20:03:39 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgcneg 20:03:39 logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/01/16-dxwgcneg-irc 20:03:41 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:03:41 Zakim has joined #dxwgcneg 20:03:43 Meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference 20:03:43 Date: 16 January 2019 20:04:28 Meeting: DXWG CNEG Subgroup telecon 20:04:40 present+ 20:04:45 present+ 20:05:20 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:CNEG-Telecon2019.01.16 20:05:25 present+ 20:08:45 chair: LarsG 20:09:04 scribenick" roba 20:09:21 scribenick: roba 20:09:33 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:CNEG-Telecon2019.01.16 20:09:42 TOPIC: confirm agenda 20:10:03 ncar: minutes link is broken 20:12:07 agenda for the last meeting: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:CNEG-Telecon2018.12.05 20:13:54 TOPIC: approve minutes 20:14:39 larsg: minutes appear to be missing - we reviewed open actions and will address then. 20:15:21 TOPIC: open actions https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/products/4 20:16:13 close: action-231 20:16:32 close action-231 20:16:32 Closed action-231. 20:16:56 action-234? 20:16:56 action-234 -- Nicholas Car to Use definitions to create abstract model diagram and text -- due 2018-10-17 -- OPEN 20:16:56 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/234 20:17:57 roba: i think we need to finalise details of model for this and sequence diagram 20:18:42 ... so we leave 234 and 235 open 20:18:55 action-264? 20:18:55 action-264 -- Lars G. Svensson to Check moratorium dates -- due 2018-11-28 -- OPEN 20:18:55 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/264 20:19:09 action-241? 20:19:09 action-241 -- Rob Atkinson to Clarify #264 -- due 2018-11-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW 20:19:09 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/241 20:19:13 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/264 20:20:23 roba: This is important for profile negotiation 20:21:10 ... The UCR says in "5.5 Discover available content profiles" 20:21:50 ncar: ID5 covers the github issue #264 20:22:00 roba: not sure it's exactly the same 20:22:30 ... what the req doesn't say is where this metadata resides 20:22:47 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RPFMD 20:22:49 ... (req 6.1.3.1) 20:23:32 ncar: can we say that 6.1.3.1 covers issue #264? 20:23:55 ... if we're not losing anything we should be fine 20:24:54 close action-241 issue closed - requirement https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RPFMD handles this 20:25:44 roba: requirement https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RPFMD handles this so we can close the action 20:26:21 close action-241 20:26:21 Closed action-241. 20:26:39 action-243? 20:26:39 action-243 -- Rob Atkinson to Go back through the discussion, come to a conclusion, discuss with antoine and work out what requirement #267 actually meant -- due 2018-11-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW 20:26:39 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/243 20:27:40 roba: analysis has been done (cf note in action) 20:27:55 relates to https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/267 20:29:16 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RDIC 20:29:32 ... is the requirement we're talking about 20:30:05 ... seems to cover the use case 20:30:08 roba: i think this covers 20:30:23 ... If we have something like an OGC feature service wrapping 20:30:35 ... a list of items in a container 20:30:58 ... then the profile can be for the container or the list 20:31:09 ncar: it's not limited to DCAT 20:31:25 roba: If you say that a distribution conforms to a profile 20:31:48 ... then it can conform to several profiles independently specifiying the container 20:31:53 ... or the list items 20:32:12 ... a container can be e. g. GML FeatureCollection 20:32:25 ncar: and that is not in the accept-header 20:32:43 roba: The profile doesn't refer to the container but to the actual 20:33:03 ... features and that is similar for all services returning 20:33:09 ... lists of items. 20:33:23 ncar: So the solution is to say that it conforms to two profiles 20:33:33 ... one for the container and one for the items in the container 20:34:05 roba: The question is if it's a requirement, not to specify the details of it 20:34:32 ... another example is a zipped package with several items 20:35:49 ... that have their own media types 20:37:01 larsg: can do this by asking for mime type application/gzip etc or another (Accept-Encoding?) 20:37:14 ncar: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#page-41 20:37:54 roba: we have three levels here : encoding, container elements in data and content items contained 20:39:11 ... or ATOM or RSS feeds - profiles would be likely to be scope to listed items 20:41:39 roba: lets say we have a news service - we have a service profile that a feed contains the "most recent 10 and the 10 most popular items" - and each news items conforms to a specific citation profile 20:42:40 ... do we have this covered in an issue? 20:42:58 ... noting requirement is very general and we need to get down to specifics 20:44:04 ncar: we have probably gone beyond what the original writers 20:44:11 ... of the requirement intended 20:44:27 roba: we should go back to the use case 20:44:29 "Provide a means to specify the container structure of a distribution for access methods that return lists, independently of the specification of the profile the list items conform to." 20:45:14 ... we need to work out how the concern how this requirement is expressed 20:45:44 ... functions for the conneg guidance document 20:46:00 "A client wishes to know for which profiles a server is able to deliver conformant representations of a resource. " 20:46:10 ... in the "abstract model" section we talk about this in a general fashion 20:46:21 ... but we need to raise an issue to clarify what happens when 20:46:29 ... there is a profile for the meaning of the list 20:46:42 ... as opposed to a profile of what is listed 20:48:00 ... the requirement is in the use case 20:48:09 ... shall follow up with antoine 20:49:25 proposal: refer to issue #267 in abstract model 20:49:38 +1 20:49:41 +1 20:49:53 +1 20:49:56 resolved: refer to issue #267 in abstract model 20:53:26 action-262? 20:53:26 action-262 -- Rob Atkinson to Propose a copy edit (retaining original sense) and add an issue for list_profile responsibility -- due 2018-11-28 -- OPEN 20:53:26 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/262 20:55:50 close action-262 20:55:50 Closed action-262. 20:58:24 ncar: #379 doesn't have anything that isn't in #575 so we keep that one open 20:58:46 ... and we can close #379 and action-263 20:59:37 close #379 20:59:59 close action-263 20:59:59 Closed action-263. 21:00:07 action-264? 21:00:07 action-264 -- Lars G. Svensson to Check moratorium dates -- due 2018-11-28 -- OPEN 21:00:07 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/264 21:00:17 close action-264 21:00:17 Closed action-264. 21:01:03 TOPIC: comments 21:01:56 proposed: accept issues #662 and #663 21:02:44 +1 21:02:48 +1 21:03:14 +1 21:03:20 resolved: accept issues #662 and #663 21:03:47 ACTION: ncar - respond to reviewer with issue references 21:03:50 Created ACTION-277 - - respond to reviewer with issue references [on Nicholas Car - due 2019-01-23]. 21:05:11 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:05:11 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/16-dxwgcneg-minutes.html roba 21:05:15 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:05:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/16-dxwgcneg-minutes.html roba 22:31:14 Zakim has left #dxwgcneg