20:54:14 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 20:54:14 logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-irc 20:54:27 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:54:42 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:54:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 20:55:14 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:55:42 meeting: DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 9 January 2019 21:00 UTC 20:56:00 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.01.09 20:56:13 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:56:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 20:56:35 chair: DaveBrowning 20:57:04 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:57:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 20:57:26 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 20:58:34 SimonCox has joined #dxwgdcat 21:00:37 present+ 21:01:32 regrets+ Alasdair Gray, Erik Mannens, Thomas D'Haenens, Lars Svensson, Andrea Perego, Makx, RiccardoAlbertoni (Likely regrets) 21:01:38 alejandra has joined #dxwgdcat 21:01:43 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:01:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 21:04:06 present+ 21:05:26 present+ 21:05:48 present+ 21:06:26 Draft agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.01.09 21:06:48 scribenick: SimonCox 21:06:53 scribe: SimonCox 21:07:12 Topic: draft agenda 21:08:21 q+ 21:08:33 DaveBrowning: anything from yesterday's plenary? 21:08:42 ack alejandra 21:09:07 alejandra: 1. we need to decide today if we will do another PWD 21:09:19 q+ 21:09:29 2. need to send link to ED to group, and public list, to solicit feedback 21:09:48 ... esp. dcat:hadRole and qualified relations 21:09:53 +1 21:09:56 +1 21:09:58 +1 21:10:37 Action: alejandra to draft note to the list drawing attention to significatn changes in ED 21:10:38 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:10:51 s/significatn/significant/ 21:10:52 s/significatn/significant 21:11:06 Topic: minutes of last meeting 21:11:13 q? 21:11:25 ack PWinstanley 21:11:35 https://www.w3.org/2018/12/19-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:12:47 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 21:12:57 present+ 21:13:10 PWinstanley: will be briefing statistics group on DCAT next week - Stat-DCAT-AP relevance 21:13:13 regrets- AndreaPerego 21:13:20 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:13:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 21:13:20 Peter - is there a link to the meeting? 21:13:26 ... requests inputs if available 21:13:48 q? 21:14:12 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/content/workshop-london-14-15-january-2019-linked-open-statistical-data-european-union-register-20-december_en 21:14:26 https://www.w3.org/2018/12/19-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:14:29 +1 21:14:32 +1 21:14:37 +1 21:14:40 (I chaired but seems that I forgot to put present+) 21:14:41 0 - was not there 21:14:42 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/content/linked-open-statistical-data-european-union_en 21:14:46 resolved: approve minutes of last meeting 21:15:09 topic: Outstanding actions 21:15:10 open actions: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open 21:16:48 q+ 21:16:48 Mine are yet to be done - with maybe the exception of https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/270 21:16:50 yes, good to keep track what we have left 21:17:12 DaveBrowning: everyone look at actions agasint name to check if still relevant 21:17:23 ... close actions that are no longer live 21:17:29 +q 21:17:37 s/agasint/against/ 21:17:44 ack PWinstanley 21:17:50 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:17:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:18:00 PWinstanley: my actions need to stay on list 21:18:48 ... continuous and rate 21:19:07 I have to review mine but they are likely to stay on the list as well. 21:19:15 ... action with danbri is nice-to-have, but not important 21:19:30 ack alejandra 21:20:35 alejandra: must prioritize responses to comments on public list 21:20:51 topic: responses to comments 21:20:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:20:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:21:59 +1 from me to SimonCox mail 21:22:06 draft response here https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/267 21:22:30 I created the action raised before: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/275 21:24:03 Action: SimonCox to send response to Clemens and the public list (pending any last minute comments from alejandra ) 21:24:03 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:24:41 DaveBrowning: is there any further followup on Luca's mail 21:25:02 AndreaPerego: had action to follow up. Sent mail in December 21:25:38 I've read Simon's response to Clemens and I'm also in agreement that should be sent - thanks SimonCox 21:26:16 https://www.w3.org/2018/12/19-dxwgdcat-minutes#x06 21:26:35 AndreaPerego: was partially discussed in previous meeting 21:26:54 ... trying to find mail ... Luca responded on 2018-12-10 21:27:59 q? 21:28:10 ... in some cases no action needed 21:28:31 ... for others, need to figure out which are the relevant use-cases 21:28:56 ... Luca mentioned they are using Hydra vocab for service-descriptions 21:29:11 ... should add a futher example showing use of hydra 21:29:28 archives: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Dec/author.html 21:29:56 this is Andrea's comments: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Dec/0185.html 21:30:46 s/this is/these are 21:30:53 q+ 21:31:38 ... Luca indicates scope of their catalogues includes additional resource types 21:32:14 ... do our ucs cover their requirements, or do they need to complement? 21:32:16 ack SimonCox 21:32:44 SimonCox: there is overlap with the draft I wrote to Clemens where I wrote (last para) 21:33:04 ... that the new DCAT vocab is unlikely to add new classes, but profiles can add new ones 21:33:54 +q 21:33:58 ... Do we need to add some text around clarifying this point - by having the abstract class dcat:Resource people can use this as an extension point 21:34:12 ... but in DCAT we limit to datasets and data services 21:34:28 ... We provide the extension point, but will not be doing the extensions 21:34:28 q+ 21:34:34 ack alejandra 21:34:37 ... So, do we need to be explicit 21:34:46 +1 from me to having comments + possibly caveat about broadening too much the scope of DCAT 21:35:14 q+ to comment on proposed comment ;) 21:35:19 ack DaveBrowning 21:35:32 Do we need to clarify the scope of DCAT - datasets and data-services, but dcat:Resource provides an extension point for other types 21:35:42 ... but these will not be part of the DCAT vocabulary 21:36:11 alejandra: yes - we should say this in more than one place: in the overview and also in the description of dcat:Resource 21:36:37 DaveBrowning: we shoudl not steal the profiling methdology's thunder 21:36:45 ack AndreaPerego 21:36:45 AndreaPerego, you wanted to comment on proposed comment ;) 21:36:51 s/shoudl/should/ 21:37:12 AndreaPerego: try to raise caveats about extending the scope of DCAT too much 21:37:20 let's create a github issue about this clarification 21:38:11 ... 1. extension point is provided 21:38:28 ... 2. other type systems already available - e.g. DataCite 21:38:36 q+ 21:38:43 ack SimonCox 21:39:06 q+ to comment about dctype 21:40:07 ack AndreaPerego 21:40:07 AndreaPerego, you wanted to comment about dctype 21:40:14 also overlap with pointers from dct:type usage 21:40:42 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/64 21:41:32 +q 21:41:43 ack alejandra 21:42:28 action: SimonCox to create GH issue to add text for scope of DCAT and dcat:Resource as extension point 21:42:28 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:42:46 alejandra: should this be in Milestone #4 21:43:08 s/methdology's/methodology's/ 21:43:18 s/4/16/ 21:43:22 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/14 21:43:29 s/16/14/ 21:43:40 s/shoudl/should/ 21:43:59 yes 21:44:30 topic: Milestone 14 21:44:35 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:44:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:44:37 (i.e. 3PWD) 21:45:34 regrets- Andrea Perego 21:45:36 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:45:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:46:14 q+ 21:46:25 ack PWinstanley 21:46:46 DaveBrowning: do we put a time target on 3PWD and move unfinished issues to next milestone 21:46:50 +q 21:47:03 ... or do we try to complete all issues in milestone before 3PWD? 21:47:16 +1 to option #1 21:47:17 PWinstanley: data quality could be wrapped up? 21:47:45 DaveBrowning: AndreaPerego suggested moving some of Riccardo's material up 21:47:58 ... though DaveBrowning moved material around a bit already 21:48:42 PWinstanley: also brings in FAIR - DCAT should mention FAIR to reassure the scholarly audience that we are not behind the curve 21:48:47 ack ale 21:49:01 s/brings/need to bring/ 21:49:21 alejandra: DQ stayed open because of comments on FAIR metrics 21:49:25 q+ to comment on FAIR and data quality 21:49:56 ... links to FAIR - many of the issue are already (implicitly) addressed by DCAT-as-a-standard 21:50:38 ack AndreaPerego 21:50:38 AndreaPerego, you wanted to comment on FAIR and data quality 21:50:49 ... we should mention FAIR but there is no substantive work required as DCAT conformant solutions are implicitly FAIR 21:51:39 I suggest to add some clairification on how the vocabulary covers the FAIRness elements (e.g. conformance to standards that is required for interoperability) 21:51:43 AndreaPerego: Riccardo's examples - one example claims conformance wrt INSPIRE 21:52:14 ... this is probably best avoided - '50% conformant' is non-verifiable claim 21:53:09 ... INSPIRE sensitivities - concerns will be raised about any quantitative claims in documents that are not normative in EC 21:53:26 ... propose that examples refer to FAIR in place of INSPIRE 21:53:57 ... will provide guidance to people whose focus is FAIR 21:54:22 +1 21:54:24 +1 21:54:25 +1 21:54:27 Action: AndreaPerego to replace INSPIRE DQ examples with FAIR 21:54:27 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:55:23 +q 21:55:30 ack alejandra 21:56:18 alejandra: re closing #114 we are missing dct:accessRights and dct:rights for dcat:Resource 21:56:30 ... and also dcat:Distribution 21:56:43 s/114/248/ 21:57:29 ... need to add these properties as 'recommended for use' in the context of these classes. 21:58:09 ... also odrl:hasPolicy 21:58:50 DaveBrowning: is this part of the editorial cleanup? 21:58:56 +q 21:59:03 ackale 21:59:07 ack alejandra 21:59:36 +1 to alejandra , but we need to prioritise the issues 21:59:40 alejandra: we have short time to completion - lets focus on closing issues rather than the tax related to issuing new PWDs! 21:59:44 q+ 21:59:50 ack PWinstanley 21:59:54 q+ to propose to go through the milestones issue next call 22:00:31 PWinstanley: in profile guidance meeting timing was discussed. Likely that an extension will be requested. 22:01:02 ... so there will likely be more time 22:01:16 ... but agree that issues take priority over PWDs 22:01:26 ack AndreaPerego 22:01:26 AndreaPerego, you wanted to propose to go through the milestones issue next call 22:01:29 it'd be great to have an extension 22:01:42 +1 to a little more time... 22:01:47 AndreaPerego: support proposal from alejandra (don't get much value from PWDs) 22:02:30 ... also we should close easy issues (even if not priority) 22:03:07 ... too many open issues too much fog! 22:03:49 PWinstanley: need kanban view 22:04:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:04:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:04:06 rrsagent, generate minutes v2 22:04:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/09-dxwgdcat-minutes.html SimonCox