Submitted by: Gerard Kuys --------------------------------- Bio I am a Linked Data specialist both professionally and a a volunteer (member of the DBpedia community, member of its Ontology Committee). Making linked data available to the public is commendable, but should e a conscious decision. Especially with Linked Data, most of the time one has to deal with data that are partly public and partly private. So I very much endorse any attempt to develop demarcations and vocabularies that make it easier for anyone to mark his or her data as public, conditionally public and private. --------------------------------- Your goals Demarcations and vocabularies that make it easier for anyone to mark his or her data as public, conditionally public and private. I am very much interested, but don't know yet whether or not I will be able to attend. --------------------------------- Workshop Goals Clear recommendations --------------------------------- Your interests Please select the rank-order (1 to 10) for the options you think are acceptable (i.e. you can live with it), where 1 is the most preferred, 2 the next best and so on... * Vocabularies to model privacy policies, regulations, and involved (business) processes: [ Ranked 1 ] * Identity management vocabularies: [ Don’t mind ] * Modeling personal data usage, processing, sharing, and tracking: [ Don’t mind ] * Interlinking aspects of privacy and provenance: [ Ranked 5 ] * Modeling consent and making it transportable: [ Ranked 3 ] * New ways to put the user in control benefiting from semantic interoperability of policy information: [ Ranked 6 ] * Modeling permissions, obligations, and their scope: [ Ranked 2 ] * Reasoning about formally declared privacy policies: [ Don’t mind ] * Exploring links and synergies using Linked Data vocabularies in the context of related efforts: [ Ranked 4 ] * Visualizations of data and policy information to help data self determination: [ Don’t mind ] --------------------------------- Other Thoughts