19:55:27 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgcneg 19:55:27 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/11/07-dxwgcneg-irc 19:55:29 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:55:29 Zakim has joined #dxwgcneg 19:55:31 Meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference 19:55:31 Date: 07 November 2018 19:57:46 Meeting: DXWG CNEG Subgroup Telecon 19:57:56 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:CNEG-Telecon2018.11.07 19:58:02 Chair: LarsG 19:58:13 RRSAgent, please make logs public 19:58:25 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 19:58:25 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/07-dxwgcneg-minutes.html LarsG 19:59:03 present+ 19:59:13 regrets+ Nick Car 20:00:15 roba has joined #dxwgcneg 20:02:26 * the link for webex i have says its expired :-( 20:08:10 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 20:08:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/07-dxwgcneg-minutes.html LarsG 20:17:03 * yep - but you dont seem to be on audio 20:20:23 * i cant hear you at all and it shows no mic symbol next to you 20:23:23 * it not making the join meeting button green - so i guess that means you are not on as host? 20:25:14 * go to skype? 20:28:43 Chair: roba 20:28:51 scribeNick: LarsG 20:29:01 Topic: Confirm Agenda 20:30:01 agenda confirmed 20:30:21 topic: confirm minutes 20:30:30 proposed: accept minutes https://www.w3.org/2018/10/10-dxwgcneg-minutes.html 20:30:33 +1 20:30:42 +1\ 20:30:45 +1 20:30:56 resolved: accept minutes https://www.w3.org/2018/10/10-dxwgcneg-minutes.html 20:31:09 Topic: List of open action items 20:31:15 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/products/4 20:31:31 action-231 20:31:31 action-231 -- Robert Sanderson to Submit topic for face to face meeting about test runner/ results repositories -- due 2018-10-17 -- OPEN 20:31:31 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/231 20:31:53 action is still open 20:31:55 Created ACTION-257 - Still open [on Ingo Simonis - due 2018-11-14]. 20:32:14 close action-257 20:32:14 Closed action-257. 20:32:33 the action is still open 20:32:42 action-233? 20:32:42 action-233 -- Lars G. Svensson to Extract definitions from IETF document to form basis of abstract model -- due 2018-10-17 -- OPEN 20:32:42 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/233 20:33:38 LarsG has written up something, action can be closed 20:33:49 close action-233 20:33:50 Closed action-233. 20:33:57 action-234? 20:33:57 action-234 -- Nicholas Car to Use definitions to create abstract model diagram and text -- due 2018-10-17 -- OPEN 20:33:57 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/234 20:34:41 there is no diagram for the diagram yet, so this issue is still open 20:35:09 roba: wanted to create a sequence diagram, perhaps that is not really necessary 20:35:29 ... or do we need to have more text 20:35:39 ... will revisit this 20:35:46 Keep action open 20:35:54 action-235? 20:35:54 action-235 -- Rob Atkinson to Create sequence diagram from abstract model and definitions -- due 2018-10-17 -- OPEN 20:35:54 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/235 20:36:41 roba: this depends on 233 and 234. Will revisit this one 20:37:35 ... we were discussing a formal UML one or is a easier pictogram easier 20:37:52 LarsG: a pictogram should do, we're not doing formal UML modelling here 20:38:21 action-240? 20:38:21 action-240 -- Lars G. Svensson to Make a suggestion to deal with #288 -- due 2018-11-01 -- OPEN 20:38:21 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/240 20:38:59 LarsG: Wrote up https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/288#issuecomment-434213949 20:39:53 ncar has removed the label already 20:39:58 close action-240 20:39:58 Closed action-240. 20:40:13 action-249? 20:40:13 action-249 -- Lars G. Svensson to Add note about qsa to the conneg document -- due 2018-11-02 -- OPEN 20:40:13 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/249 20:40:32 LarsG: handled in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/511 20:41:09 Note is in the document 20:41:14 close action-249 20:41:14 Closed action-249. 20:41:30 action-251? 20:41:30 action-251 -- Robert Sanderson to Write up something for others to reflect on - places in issue 261 -- due 2018-11-02 -- OPEN 20:41:30 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/251 20:41:59 handled in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/261 20:42:36 rob Sanderson's comment https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/261#issuecomment-435325246 20:43:11 close action-261 20:43:11 Closed action-261. 20:44:07 close action-251 20:44:07 Closed action-251. 20:44:19 action-261? 20:44:19 Sorry, but action-261 does not exist. 20:45:16 Topic: Progress on FPWD 20:45:26 roba: we met for editorial review 20:45:43 ... reviewed actions 20:45:49 ... and issues 20:46:26 ... the document is ready for review from the group 20:47:18 ... will send email to list as soon as we've cleaned up the can-be-closed issues 20:47:46 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 20:47:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/07-dxwgcneg-minutes.html LarsG 20:48:39 Topic: review and close issues 20:50:00 roba: #378 not marked for closing, leave it in the document 20:50:31 ... #513 seems done, we can close and remove from the document 20:51:52 ... #379 content is de-duplicated. close. 20:52:11 A client requesting the representation of a resource conforming to a profile MUST identify the resource by a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) [rfc3986] and MUST identify a profile either by a URI or a token that unambiguously identifies the profile for the server within that request/response session. 20:52:28 ... #515 seems to be addressed in the paragraph above. We can close that one, too 20:53:49 ... that one is handled in an open PR 20:55:55 ... [browsing the document] 20:58:38 ... #391 versioning of profile identifiers. We have not handled that one yet 20:58:53 ... we need to write some useful text 21:01:04 azaroth has joined #dxwgcneg 21:03:01 if we use URIs for profiles but the profile definition changes, how will clients know? Do we need to make strong statements about versions and URI uniqueness? 21:03:41 * we have been meeting for last 30 mins on skype after webex failed on us 21:04:00 * skype_id and I'll dial you in 21:04:55 +1 to roba's proposal 21:08:38 https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/conneg-doc/conneg-by-ap/index.html 21:08:55 roba: describing the process, any problems with publishing this as FPWD? 21:09:24 azaroth: no, it looks ok 21:10:04 roba: [recaps the decisions on the issues and actions] 21:10:22 ... talked to Holger Knublauch on the difference between SHACL shapes 21:10:33 ... and JSON-LD frames. Is this well-known? 21:10:55 azaroth: SHACL is geared towards validation (does it validate or crash?). 21:11:25 ... frames is for structuring the data. the problem it tries to solve is, 21:11:50 ... how do I shape a graph into a structure the user can understand 21:12:06 roba: so it's a bridge between a shape and a profile 21:12:29 azaroth: correct. 21:13:42 roba: continuing with issue #462. There is content in the abstract model 21:13:49 ... so we can close 21:14:59 ... #500 (order of negotiation). The issue is still under discussion, so we leave it open 21:15:51 azaroth: [discusses time-based negotiation.] We need to say something like 21:16:17 ... "if there are other dimensions, we need to handle them in the right order" 21:16:23 Do we need to specify the order in which negotation headers are processed? Memento specifies that time-based negotiation MUST take place before any other negotiation 21:16:48 roba: proposes that we extend for FPWD "it would appear that it will be necessary 21:16:49 +1 21:17:11 ... to negotiation for profile before media type or language" 21:17:29 It would appear that it will necessary to negotiate for profile before language or content-type. Memento specifies that time-based negotiation MUST take place before any other negotiation. 21:17:35 azaroth: the profile might specify languages or other things, so that's a super-structure 21:18:20 LarsG: which means time-based first, then profile-based negotiation 21:18:26 azaroth: correct. 21:18:32 roba: has made the change 21:18:55 ... #510 (http options) still under discussion, leave it in 21:19:43 ... #461 (security and privacy) text is good enough, we can close 21:22:01 ... #287 (indication of conformance) has been addressed in the document 21:22:38 LarsG: We leave it open since it also is labelled profile-guidance, 21:23:42 ... but remove it from the document. 21:24:35 roba: shall we freeze the document now or try to make more changes 21:24:42 ... ? 21:28:11 LarsG_ has joined #dxwgcneg 21:28:33 azaroth_ has joined #dxwgcneg 21:28:39 present+ Rob_Sanderson 21:28:42 LarsG: Ruben and I are having a writing session on November 23 21:29:02 ... so we should have something substantial towards the end of the month 21:29:32 Meeting adjourned 21:29:43 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 21:29:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/07-dxwgcneg-minutes.html LarsG_ 21:31:06 ... slightly awkward minutes at the end since IRC suddenly died... 21:31:10 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 21:31:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/07-dxwgcneg-minutes.html LarsG_ 21:33:43 regrets+ antoine 21:33:47 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 21:33:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/07-dxwgcneg-minutes.html LarsG_