20:53:17 RRSAgent has joined #dxwg 20:53:17 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/11/06-dxwg-irc 20:53:28 rrsagent, make logs public 20:53:43 meeting: DXWG Plenary 20:54:12 regrets+ ncar, Ixchel Faniel, Simon Cox 20:54:19 present+ 20:55:07 kcoyle has joined #dxwg 20:55:32 regrets+ ncar, Ixchel Faniel, Simon Cox, Makx 20:55:45 rrsagent, create minutes v2 20:55:45 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/06-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 20:57:44 chair: kcoyle 21:03:21 roba has joined #dxwg 21:03:46 present+ 21:04:54 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwg 21:05:28 Jaroslav_Pullmann has joined #dxwg 21:05:45 antoine has joined #dxwg 21:05:46 present+ 21:05:54 present+ antoine 21:06:06 annette_g has joined #dxwg 21:06:12 regrets+ ncar, Ixchel Faniel, Simon Cox, Makx, LarsG 21:06:20 present+ 21:06:29 present+ 21:06:40 riccardoAlbertoni has joined #dxwg 21:06:42 rrsagent, create minutes v2 21:06:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/06-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 21:06:45 present+ 21:07:15 present+ 21:07:17 scribenick: roba 21:07:50 https://www.w3.org/2018/10/30-dxwg-minutes 21:08:22 proposed: accept Oct 30 minutes 21:08:40 +1 21:08:42 +1 21:08:43 0 (not present) 21:08:43 +1 21:08:48 +1 21:08:49 0 21:09:11 0 21:09:13 -1 21:09:53 0 21:10:12 antoine: missing regrets.. we can acknowledge here 21:10:51 regrets from Oct 30 = Karen Coyle, Riccardo Albertoni, Dave Browning 21:11:23 resolved: approve minutes of Oct 30 with addition of regrets for Karen Coyle, Riccardo Albertoni, Dave Browning 21:11:58 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open 21:12:14 TOPIC: open actions 21:13:22 alejandra has joined #dxwg 21:14:11 antoine: still ongoing 21:14:25 kcoyle: suggest turn into a github issue 21:14:51 present+ 21:14:59 PWinstanley: reclassify #246,7 as DCAT 21:15:24 TOPIC: DCAT revision 21:16:23 alejandra: few minor PR merged - discussed priorities last week 21:16:46 ...address main topics by mid-Jan 21:17:12 ...need to discuss more, start assigning to people 21:18:49 ...suggestion that releasing more PWDs brought more feedback 21:19:15 q+ to ask about publishing moratoria 21:19:57 kcoyle: seems to help editors review progress and motivates reviews as they see responses 21:21:26 ...need to solicit more feedback - what might help? 21:21:42 q? 21:22:24 ncar: about to go into meeting - agencies usually use ISO19115 - but are exploring DCAT as a 'future state' 21:22:45 ack DaveBrowning 21:22:45 DaveBrowning, you wanted to ask about publishing moratoria 21:23:10 DaveBrowning: where are the 'blackout periods' 21:23:55 * Calendar infrastructure from W3C would be nice :-) 21:24:34 kcoyle: progress on abstracts in other languages? 21:25:00 +q 21:25:01 ncar: will try to do Polish next week 21:25:09 q- 21:25:15 the good thing is that the vocabulary also is translated to several languages 21:25:16 q? 21:25:57 topic: profile negotiation 21:26:21 point on the translations: at TPAC - Richard Ichida - might be able to help 21:26:41 roba: we've handled issues 21:27:05 nick: yes it's good for review 21:27:12 s/Ichida/Ishida/ 21:27:18 roba: there's a proposal to change the editors. 21:27:18 +q 21:27:27 ... moving Ruben from editor to contributor 21:27:52 ack alejandra 21:27:53 roba: there's one point about QSA 21:28:03 alejandra: I've spent time looking at the doc 21:28:20 ... I did changes in the text, Lars merged them. 21:28:27 ... some clarifications. 21:28:30 regrets+ azaroth 21:28:34 ... and US English 21:29:46 kcoyle: so there's one final PR to merge? 21:29:47 I will take final minor edits merge on today 21:30:24 kcoyle: someone should ask the group to review the doc after these merges 21:30:29 kcoyle: please send out request to review when done - if today tomorrow we can ask for review by next meeting and vote on FPWD 21:31:07 ACTION: roba merge edits and announce to group for review 21:31:08 Created ACTION-255 - Merge edits and announce to group for review [on Rob Atkinson - due 2018-11-13]. 21:31:58 q? 21:32:29 TOPIC: profile guidance 21:32:48 antoine: not a lot of recent updates processed 21:33:08 ...inputs from @kcoyle to incorporate 21:33:43 ...conversation with Jaro re UCR and feeding requirement updates into guidance doc 21:34:35 ...structure discussed at F2F proving a challenge for UCR, perhaps also Guidance doc 21:34:44 TOPIC: Profiles ontology 21:34:56 q+ 21:35:19 ack roba 21:36:04 rrsagent, create minutes v2 21:36:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/06-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 21:37:48 could you please include the issue number here? 21:37:50 dsr has joined #dxwg 21:39:32 present+ 21:39:53 roba: we have a discussion on naming terms 21:40:05 ... nick has made some suggestion on the is/has convention 21:40:21 ... we can treat as an editorial change, we've got no installed base 21:41:22 kcoyle: we can wait for comments 21:41:27 roba: ok 21:41:54 kcoyle: if there's a fair amount of work, then we could go with the current one 21:42:00 roba: it's already done! 21:42:02 q+ 21:42:12 ack antoine 21:42:18 this is the PR roba is referring to: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/532 21:42:37 antoine: we should go for it and wait for feedback 21:42:49 ...homogenising now will help 21:43:13 kcoyle: ok so this sound like the thing to do 21:43:21 milestone? 21:43:24 ... but then can you freeze a draft? 21:43:46 roba: happy to do it and then do an editorial review and then freeze 21:44:13 kcoyle: question to the group: we've not done a group review 21:44:20 kcoyle: we havent done a group review 21:44:23 q+ 21:44:31 ... we've decided to move to FPWD but haven't brought it to the group 21:44:48 roba: not sure I understand 21:44:58 ... it's been brought to the group last week 21:45:07 ... a lot of comments have been made 21:45:13 ... and handled 21:45:25 ... what could we do more? 21:45:37 kcoyle: there was not a group action (formal) 21:45:57 ... people who have followed it have been engaged 21:46:10 q+ 21:46:22 ... but for others it's unclear so we may want to set a period to allow others 21:47:15 q+ 21:47:18 +q 21:47:19 q- 21:47:45 annette_g: it sounds a standard procedure to have a review period and vote after 21:47:51 ... I'm not sure we've done it 21:47:58 ... that said I'm ok with the current state 21:48:06 ack annette_g 21:48:14 Jaroslav_Pullmann: I've overlooked the request for review 21:48:16 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 21:48:29 ... if there's time given until next Tuesday I could do it 21:48:34 +q 21:48:36 q+ to agree with annette_g 21:48:40 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:48:52 riccardoAlbertoni: I was involved in the review and put some suggestions 21:49:06 ... I would prefer if in the future we've got an explicit call and period 21:49:19 ... but as far as I'm concerned I'm ok with this version 21:49:20 ack DaveBrowning 21:49:20 DaveBrowning, you wanted to agree with annette_g 21:49:28 DaveBrowning: +1 with annette_g 's summary 21:49:41 ... following the procedure adds extra clarity 21:49:54 ... so that we all agree with publishing 21:50:21 straw poll: announce a review for the WG of profilesOnt to end Oct 13 21:50:34 +1 21:50:44 +1 21:50:46 +1 21:50:46 +1 from nick 21:50:46 nick +1 21:50:47 ncar: +1 21:50:56 +1 21:51:03 +1 21:51:04 s/Oct/Nov 21:51:15 +1 21:51:16 +q 21:51:17 +1 21:51:20 +1 but noting I won't probably have the time to review so would again (benevolently) abstain when voting for FPWD 21:51:23 q+ 21:51:25 ack alejandra 21:51:26 s/noting/voting 21:52:17 alejandra: ok for some more days, but I've already looked at it myself 21:52:29 ... should we look for all 3 docs that are profile-related? 21:52:48 kcoyle: profile guidance is not ready, it's only for profile negotiation and profile ontology 21:53:04 alejandra: ok 21:53:34 kcoyle: Dave, what do you need for moving to FPWD 21:53:56 dsr: PubRuleChecker 21:54:04 ... and permission for the short name 21:54:12 ... from Philippe 21:54:24 * thanks antoine... 21:54:28 ... subsequent versions would be more straightforward 21:55:25 dsr: for namespace management we don't have a very formal policy 21:55:44 dsr please can you formally state this about document linkage - see minutes of last week's meeting for discussion on this where we need exact detail 21:56:06 kcoyle: is it true that we don't have a namespace for the ontology, or has there been a discussion? 21:56:14 dsr: there's been a discussion 21:56:25 ... maybe the group could have a top-level ns 21:56:37 kcoyle: we could discuss it before next Tuesday 21:56:45 dsr: this would streamline discussion 21:56:54 kcoyle: do we have short names? 21:57:13 nick: we've have suggestions but no decision yet 21:57:38 ... re PubRule, ReSpec checker we've run the doc through them already 21:57:56 s/ok for some more days, but I've already looked at it myself/ok for some more days, but we shouldn't delay to make it public 21:57:58 kcoyle: there could be an action on discussing short name and namespace with dsr 21:57:59 q+ 21:58:14 ack roba 21:58:33 nick: it would be alright 21:58:49 action: roba to process merge for name change; announce document for review 21:58:50 Created ACTION-256 - Process merge for name change; announce document for review [on Rob Atkinson - due 2018-11-13]. 21:58:51 roba: I want an action on me to process the merge and provide the doc for reivew 21:58:58 ack antoine 22:00:07 q+ to ask which namespaces 22:01:11 antoine: discussion on namespace and short name is between nick and dave or the WG? 22:01:32 proposals are in document already.. 22:01:37 dsr: I don't decide I'm passing it 22:01:56 ack DaveBrowning 22:01:56 DaveBrowning, you wanted to ask which namespaces 22:02:11 DaveBrowning: we're talking about namespaces for the set of profile docs? 22:02:18 kcoyle: two things: the docs and the ontology 22:02:48 dsr: yes the two things: short names for reports and namespace for the ontology 22:03:18 roba, is there 2 github issues that you can point the group to, so that we can discuss? 22:03:46 dsr: how many more of these namespaces do you think you'd need? 22:04:03 #398 22:04:40 nick: I've mailed something to dsr about the namespace and have suggestions for the short names 22:04:44 ... I will send a mail 22:04:48 kcoyle: great 22:05:10 thank you bye 22:05:14 bye 22:05:17 rrsagent, please generate minutes v2 22:05:17 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/06-dxwg-minutes.html kcoyle 22:05:26 rrsagent, create minutes v2 22:05:26 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/11/06-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 22:05:35 meeting adjourned 22:05:38 good luck! 22:06:06 present-