19:40:20 RRSAgent has joined #dxwg 19:40:20 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/09/25-dxwg-irc 19:40:26 Zakim has joined #dxwg 19:40:34 rrsagent, make logs public 19:51:47 PWinstanley has joined #dxwg 19:53:37 meeting: DXWG Plenary 19:56:44 chair: Peter Winstanley 19:56:47 present+ 19:59:02 roba has joined #dxwg 19:59:20 ncar has joined #dxwg 19:59:55 dsr has joined #dxwg 20:00:23 SimonCox has joined #dxwg 20:00:33 present+ ncar 20:02:04 antoine has joined #dxwg 20:03:32 PWinstanley has joined #dxwg 20:03:50 present+ 20:03:54 rrsagent, create minutes v2 20:03:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/09/25-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 20:04:06 present+ 20:04:22 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwg 20:05:48 present+ 20:05:54 present+ 20:06:51 annette_g has joined #dxwg 20:06:54 scribenick: roba 20:07:02 present+ 20:07:06 alejandra has joined #dxwg 20:07:21 * have my cup of tea - but still on european time so more awake :-) 20:07:39 present+ Dave_Raggett 20:08:05 present+ 20:08:10 Jaroslav_Pullmann has joined #dxwg 20:08:15 topic: admin 20:08:39 dxwg2017 20:08:41 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.09.25 20:09:23 s/dxwg2017// 20:09:29 present+ 20:10:15 Makx has joined #dxwg 20:10:17 propose: approve minutes https://www.w3.org/2018/09/18-dxwg-minutes 20:10:37 regrets- Makx 20:11:20 0 - wasn't there 20:11:22 +1 20:11:23 +1 20:11:27 +1 20:11:28 0 - wasn't present 20:11:36 0 - missed the meeting 20:11:36 +1 20:11:40 +1 20:11:56 present+ antoine 20:12:00 +1 20:12:00 +1 20:12:12 resolved: approve minutes https://www.w3.org/2018/09/18-dxwg-minutes 20:12:30 open actions https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open 20:12:33 topic: open actions 20:13:15 present+ Makx 20:13:40 topic: F2F4 20:14:02 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/F2f4 20:14:46 me so will try to follow irc 20:15:03 PWinstanley: thanks Karen for starting this. Need to use first day to review position and see what needs to be done in the final "home run" form here 20:15:33 ... can everyone dump into wiki ideas about what we need to consider 20:15:53 q? 20:16:23 ... reminder to pay W3C before prices go up 20:16:43 topic: DCAT subgroup report 20:16:56 https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-2pwd-internal-review/dcat/index.html 20:17:31 DaveBrowning: new 2PWD best accessed via this link 20:17:53 and the actual ED is here https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/ 20:19:21 ... what we need - fresh pair of eyes - look at it as if you havent seen it before please 20:19:55 Section 11.1 is particularly interesting in current context 20:20:09 people can also change the change history section https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#changes and analyse mainly those changes 20:20:18 and relevant sections of the document 20:20:42 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#dcat-sdo 20:21:23 q? 20:21:57 topic: Profile guidance group report 20:22:15 q? 20:22:38 q+ 20:22:45 ack ncar 20:22:57 https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/profile-guidance-doc/profiles/index.html 20:23:20 ncar: quite a few changes made in as per descision in last plenary and sub group meeting 20:23:31 ...PR review approved but not merged 20:24:27 s/descision/decision/ 20:24:38 PWinstanley: @ncar and @antoine have merged structures? 20:24:58 ncar: yes - we are now ready for inserting substantive content 20:25:49 ... we have some comments from @annette_g to merge in, need more, but ready for some sort of realease now we have issues recorded 20:26:12 s/realease/release/ 20:26:14 ... effort available to edit to keep up with discussions 20:26:40 q+ 20:26:51 topic: Profile description note 20:26:54 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profiledesc/ 20:26:58 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/ 20:27:07 ack ncar 20:27:15 ncar: updated to align structurally and visually with dcat 20:27:48 ... name tweaked to remove "desc" which has been problematic 20:27:51 I like the "Participate" section - we should copy that into the DCAT 2ndPWD 20:28:26 PWinstanley: what are milestones and timeframe? 20:29:09 +1 to alejandra 20:29:15 +1 to the participate idea 20:29:25 ncar: issues identified (and latest cut of requirements) do not seem to indicate significant changes to existing version 20:29:25 q+ 20:29:27 q+ 20:29:32 ack kcoyle 20:30:04 q+ 20:30:29 ack roba 20:30:38 kcoyle: we should discuss the change of name from 'description' to 'ontology' 20:31:25 q+ 20:31:57 roba: it is an implementation of the conceptual model . I think that 'desc' is redundant, and I'm not sure that there is another conceptual model so using ontology is less ugly 20:32:02 ack ncar 20:32:04 kcoyle: concerned about name change - are we describing profiles 20:32:48 q? 20:32:52 roba: name change is consistent with the fact profiles is an ontology that implements the conceptual model implied in the agreed definition 20:32:53 ack antoine 20:33:28 ncar: note profiles not profile - because it describes how profiles relate to each each other 20:34:13 antoine: profiles feels more authoritative - profiledesc is ugly but matches the one implementation 20:34:24 q+ 20:34:28 IMHO its not a deal-breaker either way 20:34:31 ack antoine 20:34:49 ... quite like it as profiledesc 20:35:01 PWinstanley: should we vote on this 20:35:31 antoine: would like to vote - but later we after other potentially related information 20:35:52 q+ 20:35:53 it could also be 'vocabulary' 20:35:57 as in DCAT 20:35:58 ack kcoyle 20:36:23 Q+ 20:36:30 q+ 20:36:53 kcoyle: should be brought to the profile group then plenary. names are important 20:37:07 ack ncar 20:37:23 +1 to discuss in subgroup 20:37:29 q+ 20:37:47 ncar: notes issue has been in document to consider renaming 20:38:05 ... guidance around use of "vocabulary" vs "ontology" please 20:38:05 ack SimonCox 20:38:36 SimonCox: precedents in W3C both ways 20:39:01 Ontology seems to imply OWL expression 20:39:02 ... vocabularies may have OWL 20:39:06 ontology = vocabulary + relationships 20:39:11 q+ 20:39:17 ack ncar 20:39:49 profile(s/desc) is OWL - specifically to link to dct:sStandard 20:40:09 ncar: happy to take action 20:40:34 ACTION: ncar to check and bring back to the group 20:40:35 Created ACTION-223 - Check and bring back to the group [on Nicholas Car - due 2018-10-02]. 20:40:57 s/check/check on vocabulary vs ontology usage/ 20:41:05 q+ 20:41:12 ack ncar 20:41:16 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/ 20:41:17 topic: profile negotiation sub group 20:41:31 ncar: met 2 weeks ago, again tomorrow 20:41:57 ... agreed and implemented changes to doc 20:42:33 ... demonstration/example of how requirements will be met, particularly w.r.t. to the IETF document 20:43:08 PWinstanley: is there any requests for input 20:43:48 ncar: IETF draft is an issue - formally expired but reliant on input from Ruben and Lars in timeframe 20:44:00 PWinstanley: does it present a risk? 20:44:14 ncar: need comment from Lars 20:44:41 PWinstanley: does IETF have a schedule 20:44:54 ncar: not sure 20:45:25 ACTION: ncar to bring back to the group a risk assessment on IETF draft 20:45:26 Created ACTION-224 - Bring back to the group a risk assessment on ietf draft [on Nicholas Car - due 2018-10-02]. 20:45:46 q? 20:46:24 topic: UCR update 20:46:43 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/238 20:47:07 This use case was APPROVED at the plenary meeting of August 28, 2018. 20:47:10 q+ 20:47:41 q- 20:47:43 ack ncar 20:47:50 roba: editorial task now to include it 20:48:02 ncar: agrees 20:48:03 q+ 20:48:33 ack kcoyle 20:48:37 kcoyle: action on Jaro to update 20:48:40 q+ 20:48:48 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 20:48:55 Jaroslav_Pullmann: no action so far 20:49:19 ... expect to get it done by F2F 20:50:08 q+ 20:50:51 ... additional UC on 'real world' documents - need to look at discussions and update working 20:50:58 s/working/wording/ 20:51:04 ack roba 20:52:34 roba: getting in UC should be easy - cleaning up and deduplicating requirements will be heavier - happy to review that 20:52:46 bye! 20:52:52 rrsagent, create minutes v2 20:52:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/09/25-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 20:52:53 present- 20:54:01 bye now 20:54:19 bye Makx/ Thanks 20:54:43 bye 20:56:35 annette_g has joined #dxwg 22:01:50 annette_g1 has joined #dxwg