14:54:08 RRSAgent has joined #pbgsc 14:54:08 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/07/27-pbgsc-irc 14:54:09 rrsagent, set log public 14:54:09 Meeting: Publishing Steering Committee Telco 14:54:09 Chair: laudrain 14:54:09 Date: 2018-07-27 14:54:09 Regrets+ 14:58:17 laudrain has joined #pbgsc 14:58:38 dauwhe has joined #pbgsc 14:58:49 Zakim, who is here? 14:58:49 Present: (no one) 14:58:50 On IRC I see dauwhe, laudrain, RRSAgent, Zakim, ivan, Rachel, Karen, tzviya 14:58:55 present+ dauwhe 14:59:04 Meeting: Publishing Business Group Steering Committee 14:59:11 Date: 2018-07-27 14:59:27 Chair: laudrain 14:59:44 present+ 14:59:49 scribenick: dauwhe 14:59:54 present+ 15:00:34 present+ 15:00:37 present+ George 15:02:35 garth has joined #pbgsc 15:02:51 present+ Garth 15:04:12 laudrain: let's start 15:04:30 Topic: EPUB 3.2 15:04:34 liisamk has joined #pbgsc 15:05:03 Dave: CG 3.2 last meeting, start wide review 15:05:16 present+ 15:05:23 … sections to to review assigned to dfiferent people 15:05:45 … widespread to the entire eco-system 15:05:55 … 2 months process 15:06:17 … PBG to approve the final doc 15:07:14 all: resonable 15:07:38 Dave: get commitments from people 15:07:50 … where will the report will be? 15:07:51 q+ 15:08:06 … liking to other doc like a11y specs 15:08:14 ack ivan 15:08:33 Ivan: CG not published on /TR 15:08:55 … will publish it in the rigth place 15:09:10 … in W3C space 15:09:22 q+ 15:09:50 Dave: /Publishing/EPUB… 15:10:33 Luc: Will you have a consensus call in the CG? 15:11:04 Dave: ask for a vote in CG meeting 15:11:18 George: where to put comments ? 15:11:24 ack laudrain 15:12:40 Dave: in CG, try to track issues and get consensus 15:13:38 laudrain: there was a question on the mailing list about epub tests 15:13:41 Topic: EPUB Test Suite 15:13:45 present+ liisamk 15:13:58 liisamk: I think billk answered the query 15:14:04 q+ 15:14:10 ack tzviya 15:14:20 tzviya: I'm not sure I agree with billk's answer 15:14:37 ... there are two test suites right now, epubtest.org and epubcheck (?) 15:14:46 ... we haven't made an official decision 15:14:54 ... has DAISY taken over epubtest.org? 15:15:04 q? 15:15:06 ... it's certainly not part of PWG 15:15:29 George: as we know, epubtest.org was a joint effort with BISG, DAISY, and IDPF 15:15:39 ... DAISY is moving forward briskly with a11y testing 15:15:48 ... but the mainstream testing is not updated or maintained 15:16:01 ... we don't own the domain, and we're not paying for hosting, although we could take that over 15:16:06 ... we're still trying to sort it out 15:16:13 ... BISG doesn't know what their approach would be 15:16:26 ... IEEE is interested in these kinds of testing activities 15:16:29 q+ 15:16:30 ivan: IEEE? 15:16:42 George: they're using EPUB for education and interactivity and need to do testing 15:16:50 ... nothing formal, but we're leaving the door open 15:17:10 ... DAISY has been told to move forward briskly with a11y, and don't let other things stop that 15:17:11 ack tzviya 15:17:23 tzviya: We're all familiar with the problems of epubtest 15:17:31 ... has anyone looked into automated testing? 15:17:34 q+ 15:17:39 q+ 15:17:47 ack Dave 15:18:25 Dave: conversation 2 years with Jeff?? about tests for CSS 15:18:32 q+ 15:18:40 ack dauwhe 15:18:49 … need to continue for REC track 15:18:53 s/Jeff??/Geoffrey Sneddon/ 15:18:57 ack dauwhe 15:19:02 ack liisamk 15:19:03 ack liisamk 15:19:10 liisamk: part of my perspective on why we didn't get farther is that it's hard to maintain and hard to automate 15:19:18 ... it's very subjective and visual 15:19:27 ... particularly when you're talking about reading systems 15:19:41 ... and when there are differences between sideloading and ingestion 15:19:47 ack ivan 15:20:02 ivan: from w3c process point of view, there is no obligation for automated testing 15:20:56 ... testing is an obligation, as is a report, but it doesn't have to go through automated test harnesses 15:21:41 laudrain: is that clear for you, tzviya 15:21:57 tzviya: it's clear that there's not a home for non-a11y tests 15:22:16 liisamk: we should ask what Ric is looking for 15:22:29 ... we're not clear on why he's frustrated 15:23:01 liisamk: I can contact Ric 15:23:16 Topic: RFP on epubcheck 15:23:41 tzviya: we have responses to the RFP. review commitee is looking at them 15:23:51 ... the reviewers are Liza, Tobias, Brady, and Romain 15:23:59 ... we will meet with them on August 9 15:24:16 present+ 15:24:36 ... we want them to make a recommendation to the steering committee 15:24:39 q+ 15:24:44 ... by the following week 15:24:56 q- 15:24:56 ... we will decide by the end of August 15:25:15 ... we get a rec from them by aug 15 15:25:20 ... decide on the 24th 15:25:25 ... announce on 27th 15:25:56 laudrain: are we still getting proposals? 15:26:04 tzviya: no, it closed on the 15th of July. 15:26:07 q+ 15:26:09 ... we received three proposals 15:26:17 ... the schedules are really different 15:26:23 ack liisamk 15:26:23 tzviya: they are three very different proposals 15:26:39 liisamk: are you anticipating a fourth offer that hasn't been submitted? 15:27:04 laudrain: no, we were expecting something from EDRLab, but they decided not to 15:27:27 ... we are on schedule. 15:27:40 q+ 15:27:44 George: is there any thought about negotiating, or is it just accept/reject? 15:28:01 laudrain: I think it should be possible to negotiate 15:28:39 ... we do want epubcheck to work with epub 3.2 as soon as possible 15:29:17 ... we want 3.2 and epubcheck and epub2 sunset to be released at the same time, by the end of the year 15:29:41 ... epub2 sunset doc is stable, we should propose to the PBG 15:30:04 q? 15:30:13 ack liisamk 15:30:14 ack liisamk 15:30:16 ack liisamk 15:30:25 q+ 15:30:36 ack tzviya 15:30:38 liisamk: do we have any thoughts about guidance for the committee about how to evaluate the proposals 15:30:39 ack tzviya 15:30:42 q+ 15:30:55 tzviya: I would prefer not to give guidance; that's why we have a review committee 15:31:08 ... We chose them because of their knowledge 15:31:17 q+ 15:31:22 liisamk: my only worry is about them choosing something that we can't maintain long-term 15:31:23 ack garth 15:32:04 garth: the proposals do talk about this 15:32:17 ... and the committee does have the resources to evaluate that 15:32:41 q+ 15:32:45 garth: re: negotiations; we shouldn't argue about price; we could negotiate on milestones etc 15:32:52 ack Rachel 15:32:58 Rachel: I agree with garth and tzviya 15:33:05 ... what I see from this group is a recommendation 15:33:15 ... so we can take their feedback and decide as a committee 15:33:53 ... it's ok if we have different priorities than the committee, but we shouldn't try to influence things before then 15:34:13 laudrain: I have confidence in the committee 15:34:13 q? 15:34:26 ack laudrain 15:34:35 Topic: epubcheck fundraising 15:34:57 laudrain: we have a document with language. any comments? We need to comment before tonight. 15:35:01 no, this is not the first draft, luc 15:35:07 q+ 15:35:20 ack liisamk 15:35:26 liisamk: i want to follow up on the email about maintenence 15:35:41 ... the way I read it, it doesn't look like we're asking for a year over year committment 15:35:44 q+ 15:35:52 ack tzviya 15:36:04 tzviya: we should look to the future for a maintenence fund 15:36:14 ... the proposals we have are not long-term 15:36:19 q+ 15:36:25 ... I would love long-term committments for funding 15:36:32 q+ 15:36:48 ... maybe we want to change this for a long-term committment? 15:37:26 laudrain: I just wanted to say that I didn't feel like the long-term or short term was clear 15:37:53 ack laudrain 15:38:02 q+ 15:38:19 George: looking forward to WP and EPUB4, I think we're going to need the equivalent of epubcheck in that space 15:38:29 ack dave 15:38:36 ack dauwhe 15:38:59 Dave: not ask for long term money before we can prove it’s done 15:39:04 ack liisamk 15:39:35 liisamk: I agree with Dave, maybe we should put someething in doc that we want to fund the next X amount of time--2 years? 15:39:45 ... we will look for ongoing support in the future 15:39:59 laudrain: that's what I wanted to say 15:40:20 liisamk: do we agree we want two years? 15:40:38 laudrain: I agree 15:40:55 ... we should say that the fundraising is for an effort that lasts for two years. 15:41:22 tzviya: can someone propose language in the doc? 15:41:51 laudrain: I can 15:42:13 tzviya: I need to give this to W3C comms team so they can prepare website 15:42:27 s/laudrain: I can/liisamk: I'll do it/ 15:42:37 George: there's no mention of $1k 15:42:57 liisamk: maybe a mention of $1k and say that no amount is too small 15:43:54 laudrain: should we change or leave as-is? 15:44:01 george: i don't feel strongly 15:44:29 George: are we going to post a thanks on a web site? Should that be in the doc? 15:44:34 liisamk: that's a good suggestion 15:45:08 ... "contributors will be acknowledged on the epubcheck home page" 15:45:13 laudrain: it should be added 15:46:02 ... I had another topic but we already talked about epub2 sunset doc. I'll look at beginning of next week and propose to BG 15:46:23 ... do you have any objection to look at this once more? 15:46:38 liisamk: it's ok to look again 15:46:54 laudrain: one more round, and we'll speak to PBG in two-ish weeks 15:47:06 ... a report from the road map task force 15:47:21 ivan: there are two things 15:47:41 https://www.w3.org/TR/wpub/ 15:47:52 ... PWG has posted a new update of wpub, including manifest with schema.org 15:47:58 ... we should announce in BG 15:48:21 garth has joined #pbgsc 15:48:33 ivan: then we can put this on the agenda for tuesday 15:48:53 liisamk: there should be an introduction 15:50:16 q+ 15:50:18 q+ 15:50:42 ack garth 15:51:22 garth: as we talked about the draft fundraising doc, we have 45k already raised 15:51:42 ... we should ask people on this call if we can get some more committments 15:51:47 q+ 15:51:58 ack tzviya 15:52:29 tzviya: (redacted) 15:52:53 q- 15:57:45 laudrain: I'll send an agenda for PBG on Monday morning French time 15:57:51 ... thanks everyone 15:57:56 RRSAgent: draft minutes 15:57:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/07/27-pbgsc-minutes.html dauwhe 15:58:01 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:58:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/07/27-pbgsc-minutes.html ivan 15:58:01 zakim, bye 15:58:01 rrsagent, bye 15:58:01 I see no action items 15:58:01 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been dauwhe, tzviya, ivan, laudrain, George, Garth, liisamk, Rachel 15:58:01 Zakim has left #pbgsc 15:58:02 RRSAgent: make logs public