IRC log of html on 2018-06-19
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 07:59:57 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #html
- 07:59:57 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-irc
- 08:00:11 [tink]
- Meeting: HTML F2F meeting
- 08:00:27 [tink]
- Chair: Chaals
- 08:01:13 [tink]
- present+ Chaals, Steve, Léonie, Bruce, Sanghwan, Job, Scott, Xiaoqian
- 08:01:21 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 08:01:21 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 08:01:29 [tink]
- rrsagent, set logs world visible
- 08:07:38 [tink]
- zakim, clear agenda
- 08:07:38 [Zakim]
- agenda cleared
- 08:07:40 [xiaoqian]
- xiaoqian has joined #html
- 08:07:44 [chaals]
- agenda: https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/meetings/18-06-html.md
- 08:10:01 [chaals]
- More issues: https://github.com/w3c/html/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A"HTML5.3+WD4"+is%3Aopen
- 08:10:07 [chaals]
- agenda+ TAG review
- 08:10:32 [chaals]
- agenda+ outstanding issues
- 08:11:28 [chaals]
- agenda+ wwg comparison
- 08:11:48 [chaals]
- agenda+ implementation report.
- 08:11:59 [chaals]
- agenda+ next steps / wwg collaboration (with PLH)
- 08:12:41 [tink]
- zakim, take up item 1
- 08:12:41 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "TAG review" taken up [from chaals]
- 08:13:08 [tink]
- SM: The TAG is not going to review HTML5.3
- 08:13:22 [chaals]
- q+
- 08:13:38 [bruce]
- bruce has joined #html
- 08:13:44 [tink]
- ... Custom Elements is being tracked in #244 on the TAG repo
- 08:14:15 [tink]
- ... The TAG is doing a wide review of the whole of HTML.
- 08:14:44 [tink]
- ... If WebPlat wants #244 to be escalated, you should raise it with the TAG chairs.
- 08:15:11 [tink]
- ... On HTML5.3, we're not happy with @ping.
- 08:15:23 [tink]
- CMN: It would be good to get a statement to that effect from the TAG then.
- 08:15:30 [tink]
- ... Privacy also has concerns.
- 08:15:47 [tink]
- SM: @ping is not well designed I think.
- 08:16:05 [tink]
- ... Also there is @allowusermedia is a concern.
- 08:16:51 [tink]
- ... There is something called Permission Delegation in development.
- 08:17:02 [tink]
- XW: I looked at that, and it doesn't seem that different.
- 08:17:20 [tink]
- SM: Yes, but @allowusermedia is very specific, we can't keep adding things.
- 08:17:30 [tink]
- XW: But Permission Delegation isn't ready.
- 08:17:41 [tink]
- SM: No, so this is something we'd want to do in the future.
- 08:17:53 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 08:17:53 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 08:17:58 [tink]
- scribe: Léonie
- 08:18:40 [tink]
- CMN: How many implementations does @allowusermedia have?
- 08:18:44 [tink]
- XW: One.
- 08:19:04 [tink]
- CMN: It should be marked at risk.
- 08:19:14 [tink]
- ... There are two things I'd like the TAG to look at.
- 08:19:26 [tink]
- ... #1337
- 08:20:02 [tink]
- ... Should you be able to put any custom attribute into a Custom Element?
- 08:20:25 [tink]
- ... The argument for is that it's useful for attribute short names.
- 08:20:36 [tink]
- ... The argument against is that there is no way of knowing which attributes are out there.
- 08:20:58 [tink]
- ... The question is whether we should sacrifice extensibility for author convenience?
- 08:21:08 [tink]
- ... It dould be good for the TAG to look into this.
- 08:21:37 [tink]
- SM: Please add this to the HTML5.3 wide review request issue on the TAG repo.
- 08:21:52 [tink]
- CMN: The other is #1424 on the ruby elements.
- 08:22:00 [tink]
- ... Don't think the TAG has a consensus position on this.
- 08:22:18 [tink]
- XW: #248 on the TAG repo relates to this.
- 08:22:31 [tink]
- SM: I've had conversations about this.
- 08:22:32 [chaals]
- s/... Don/SW: Don
- 08:22:41 [tink]
- ... There are different opinions on where it should be.
- 08:22:46 [tink]
- ... I'd like it to be better.
- 08:22:50 [tink]
- CMN: I'll raise this too.
- 08:24:18 [tink]
- zakim, agenda?
- 08:24:18 [Zakim]
- I see 5 items remaining on the agenda:
- 08:24:19 [Zakim]
- 1. TAG review [from chaals]
- 08:24:19 [Zakim]
- 2. outstanding issues [from chaals]
- 08:24:19 [Zakim]
- 3. wwg comparison [from chaals]
- 08:24:19 [Zakim]
- 4. implementation report. [from chaals]
- 08:24:19 [Zakim]
- 5. next steps / wwg collaboration (with PLH) [from chaals]
- 08:25:01 [tink]
- LW: So what is the proposed HTML review the TAG is doing?
- 08:25:13 [tink]
- SM: The TAG has never reviewed it, and so that's what we're doing.
- 08:25:25 [tink]
- LW: What is the prupose of the review?
- 08:25:40 [tink]
- SM: On our tracker there is a list of things we look for.
- 08:25:55 [tink]
- ... How everything connects together, what is still needed, what is obsolete, etc.
- 08:26:04 [tink]
- XW: Is there a timeline?
- 08:26:12 [tink]
- SM: No, no timeline.
- 08:26:18 [tink]
- ... We're under-staffed.
- 08:26:25 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 08:26:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 08:27:10 [tink]
- ... One point to mention is that the WHATWG spec is missing some of the media features that are in the W3C space.
- 08:27:15 [tink]
- CMN: Examples?
- 08:27:20 [tink]
- SM: Like EME.
- 08:27:28 [tink]
- CMN: That's a separate extension.
- 08:27:31 [tink]
- SM: Why?
- 08:27:43 [tink]
- CMN: There was a belief that the HTML spec should be modularised.
- 08:27:51 [tink]
- ... It didn't really work out.
- 08:28:01 [tink]
- SM: I don't think media should be among them.
- 08:28:25 [chaals]
- s/work out/work out as a complete success - there are some things that it helps and some costs
- 08:28:27 [tink]
- LW: I think EME was separated in order to enable HTML5 get to Rec.
- 08:29:03 [tink]
- SF: Ask the WHATWG to incorporate EME?
- 08:29:21 [tink]
- SM: It's not just EME, there is also Media Loading etc.
- 08:29:49 [tink]
- CMN: Suggest raising an issue.
- 08:29:51 [tink]
- zakim, close this item
- 08:29:51 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, tink
- 08:30:05 [chaals]
- q-
- 08:30:10 [tink]
- zakim, close this item
- 08:30:10 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 closed
- 08:30:11 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 08:30:11 [Zakim]
- 2. outstanding issues [from chaals]
- 08:30:14 [tink]
- zakim, take up item 4
- 08:30:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "implementation report." taken up [from chaals]
- 08:30:28 [tink]
- CMN: We have things in the report that no-one has looked at.
- 08:30:36 [tink]
- ... Bruce?
- 08:30:41 [tink]
- SM: Mine are not there.
- 08:31:21 [chaals]
- -> http://w3c.github.io/test-results/html53/implementation-report.html Implementation report
- 08:31:34 [tink]
- LW: The report itself needs updating because we've made more commits since I created the stub.
- 08:31:54 [chaals]
- -> http://w3c.github.io/test-results/html53/implementation-report.html Implementation report source
- 08:32:20 [tink]
- CMN: Please look at your changes, make sure they are in the report if they are substantive, and that the test results are provided with links to the tests.
- 08:32:26 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 08:32:26 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 08:33:43 [xiaoqian]
- https://wpt.fyi/results/
- 08:34:52 [tink]
- zakim, close this item
- 08:34:52 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 closed
- 08:34:53 [Zakim]
- I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 08:34:53 [Zakim]
- 2. outstanding issues [from chaals]
- 08:37:26 [tink]
- zakim, take up item 2
- 08:37:26 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "outstanding issues" taken up [from chaals]
- 08:39:22 [tink]
- CMN: Programmer3000 deleted their account after it was blocked, so we've lost their issues.
- 08:39:26 [tink]
- SM: Is that a bad thing?
- 08:39:35 [tink]
- CMN: I think so.
- 08:39:47 [tink]
- ... They were often abusive, but their issues were sometimes useful.
- 08:40:10 [tink]
- BL: I have lots in my emails.
- 08:40:47 [tink]
- LW: That's a very time consuming thing to do, is it really worth it?
- 08:40:54 [tink]
- CMN: Yes, I think so.
- 08:41:00 [tink]
- BL: I can do this.
- 08:41:51 [tink]
- LW: As we go through issues do we plan to add them to milestones?
- 08:41:59 [tink]
- CMN: Good question.
- 08:42:09 [tink]
- ... We should get a WD update out next week.
- 08:42:17 [tink]
- ... Then set another WD milestone.
- 08:43:06 [tink]
- LW: If we move the current milestone deadline to Friday, the WD next week will include al we do here this week.
- 08:43:23 [tink]
- CMN: I'll do that, and create a new WD milestone for the end of July.
- 08:43:35 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 08:43:35 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 08:43:59 [Scott_O]
- Scott_O has joined #html
- 08:44:56 [chaals]
- -> https://github.com/w3c/html/milestone/21 current milestone (due Friday)
- 08:45:32 [tink]
- CMN: If you have an assigned issue and can get it done this week, that would be good.
- 08:45:44 [tink]
- ... There are also issues that are unassigned, all from Programmer3000
- 08:46:11 [tink]
- ... #1338, #1344, and #1363
- 08:46:26 [tink]
- ... Will bump the to the next milestone.
- 08:46:35 [tink]
- BL: WFM
- 08:47:33 [tink]
- ... Any others we should bump?
- 08:48:45 [Scott_O_]
- Scott_O_ has joined #html
- 08:59:06 [bruce]
- bruce has joined #html
- 09:00:26 [bruce]
- (WiFi fun ensues after scribe was kicking off)
- 09:00:49 [tink]
- tink has joined #html
- 09:01:02 [chaals2]
- chaals2 has joined #html
- 09:02:25 [tink]
- ... Of those that are assigned, how confident is everyone that they'll be done?
- 09:02:37 [tink]
- SOH: 4 of mine have PRs.
- 09:02:44 [tink]
- ... I'll work more on the Custom Elements examples this week.
- 09:03:02 [tink]
- ... Will start on #1405
- 09:03:14 [tink]
- ... Also #1392
- 09:03:31 [tink]
- ... So I think I can make progress this week.
- 09:03:48 [tink]
- ... I've also been looking at #300, which has been bumped to the When It's ready milestone.
- 09:04:03 [tink]
- XW: #1299 we can take the changes from the WHATWG.
- 09:04:18 [tink]
- ... #1384 and #1382 I can do this week.
- 09:04:32 [tink]
- CMN: #1424 to be discussed on Thursday with the I18n people.
- 09:04:47 [tink]
- ... #1423 needs implementations.
- 09:05:32 [tink]
- ... Think it can be closed because there are no implementations.
- 09:05:45 [tink]
- ... thead should allow you to keep the header in place whilst you scroll around.
- 09:05:59 [tink]
- ... Actually, I'll assign it to When It's Ready.
- 09:06:10 [tink]
- LW: We should open a corresponding issue on the WHATWG.
- 09:06:19 [tink]
- ... #1229 is to go through the IDL and compare it to the WHATWG spec.
- 09:06:40 [tink]
- ... Bruce, could you take this one?
- 09:06:53 [tink]
- BL: Ok...
- 09:06:59 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 09:06:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 09:16:17 [chaals2]
- /join chaals
- 09:22:27 [tink]
- CMN: #1389 I'll get done.
- 09:22:40 [tink]
- ... That's all the open issues in the current milestone.
- 09:23:07 [tink]
- TOPIC: I18n issues
- 09:23:14 [chaals]
- -> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues?utf8=✓&q=label%3Ai18n-comment+ i18n issues
- 09:23:34 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 09:23:34 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 09:23:55 [tink]
- LW: All open issues, or just those from wide review?
- 09:23:58 [tink]
- ... All of them.
- 09:24:17 [tink]
- s/... All of them./CMN: ... All of them./
- 09:24:44 [chaals]
- s|https://github.com/w3c/html/issues?utf8=✓&q=label%3Ai18n-comment+|https://github.com/w3c/html/labels/i18n-comment
- 09:25:14 [tink]
- ... #1424 we've dealt with ^^
- 09:25:28 [tink]
- ... #1292 allow span in the title element
- 09:25:47 [tink]
- ... Would be good, but you can't change title, so it's unlikely to happen.
- 09:26:04 [tink]
- ... It's marked "When It's ready, but think we should assume that won't happen.
- 09:26:13 [tink]
- LW@ Proposal to close?
- 09:26:19 [tink]
- CMN: Not sure.
- 09:26:28 [tink]
- SF: If we keep it open it gives false hope.
- 09:26:31 [tink]
- CMN: Yes.
- 09:26:50 [tink]
- ... Think tracking real issues is a good thing to do.
- 09:27:05 [tink]
- LW: Not sure this is the way to track such things.
- 09:27:21 [tink]
- SF: Could close it and use a specific label.
- 09:27:28 [tink]
- CMN: So suggest a label?
- 09:27:38 [tink]
- LW: "good idea", "unlikely"?
- 09:27:57 [tink]
- CMN: Will add "if only".
- 09:28:08 [tink]
- JVA: What makes this one hard to solve?
- 09:28:25 [tink]
- BL: The title element is so widely implemented and supported, changing it is too much to ask.
- 09:28:33 [tink]
- SF: The way thebrowser parses it would need to change.
- 09:28:58 [tink]
- s/SF: The way thebrowser parses it would need to change./SF: The way the browser parses it would need to change./
- 09:29:47 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 09:29:47 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 09:30:10 [tink]
- CMN: Ok, labelled "if only" and closed.
- 09:30:26 [tink]
- XW: We should keep it open.
- 09:30:44 [tink]
- CMN: There is no point in keeping it open, but we just want to have a way of recalling it later.
- 09:30:52 [tink]
- XW: But if it's closed it won't happen.
- 09:30:58 [tink]
- CMN: We don't expect anything to happen.
- 09:31:20 [tink]
- SM: It doesn't have to happen inside the title element.
- 09:31:51 [tink]
- ... Quick test suggests it's just treated as text.
- 09:32:05 [tink]
- CMN: I know, I don't think we cansolve the problem, do you?
- 09:32:13 [tink]
- SM: No.
- 09:32:22 [tink]
- XW: We should keep it open.
- 09:32:25 [tink]
- LW: I disagree.
- 09:33:02 [tink]
- CMN: Open issues are the things we intend to do.
- 09:33:26 [tink]
- XW: What if someone raises the same issue again?
- 09:34:12 [tink]
- LW: We'd point them to the closed issue, like we would in any other situation.
- 09:34:21 [tink]
- SM: Open it in WICG?
- 09:34:29 [tink]
- CMN: There is no workable proposal though.
- 09:34:40 [tink]
- SM: True, but there is a use case.
- 09:35:29 [tink]
- CMN: Proposal: Close the issue?
- 09:35:33 [tink]
- +1
- 09:35:53 [tink]
- CMN: Show of hands +5 and -1.
- 09:36:18 [tink]
- SM: We might want some guidelines around this.
- 09:36:35 [tink]
- XW: Maybe I18n can track?
- 09:36:42 [tink]
- CMN: They'll get a notification when we close it.
- 09:37:42 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 09:37:42 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 09:37:59 [tink]
- CMN: #1039 assigned to Xiaoqian.
- 09:38:24 [tink]
- ... Terence has a PR against this.
- 09:38:31 [tink]
- CMN: We merged it.
- 09:38:36 [tink]
- XW: So why is it assigned to me?
- 09:38:46 [tink]
- CMN: It's a wide review issue.
- 09:38:51 [tink]
- ... We should look at it again.
- 09:39:31 [tink]
- LW: If Terence addressed the original issue, it makes sense to assign this to him now.
- 09:40:20 [xiaoqian]
- scribe: xiaoqian
- 09:40:32 [xiaoqian]
- scribe: tink
- 09:40:49 [tink]
- cCMN: #1011
- 09:40:59 [tink]
- XW: Can do tht for the next milestone.
- 09:41:18 [tink]
- s/XW: Can do tht for the next milestone./XW: Can do that for the next milestone.?
- 09:41:30 [tink]
- CMN: #970 will assign to myself.
- 09:42:10 [tink]
- ... To improve definition of string using content from the Charmod spec.
- 09:42:28 [tink]
- ... #820 how should RTL ables be processed.
- 09:42:41 [tink]
- ... This is "When It's Ready" bcause implementations are generally borked.
- 09:42:58 [tink]
- ... Would be good to take it up but not sure we should right now.
- 09:43:40 [tink]
- ... #269 assigned to Sanghwan.
- 09:44:27 [tink]
- s/Sanghwan/Sangwhan/
- 09:44:35 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 09:44:35 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 09:44:53 [tink]
- SM: We could potentially put it back.
- 09:45:08 [tink]
- ... If someone else wants to take it, I' ok with that.
- 09:45:26 [tink]
- s/... If someone else wants to take it, I' ok with that./... If someone else wants to take it, I'm ok with that./
- 09:45:37 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 09:45:37 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 09:46:21 [tink]
- SOH: In the issue Firefox has it in development, others mixed signals.
- 09:46:34 [tink]
- JVA: Looks like Firefox implemented it about three months ago.
- 09:47:24 [tink]
- CMN: Sangwhan can you test for the next milestone?
- 09:47:35 [tink]
- SM: I need a mobile to test with.
- 09:48:22 [tink]
- ... But yes, I think so.
- 09:49:25 [tink]
- CMN: #226 assigned to Bruce.
- 09:49:26 [Scott_O]
- Scott_O has joined #html
- 09:50:59 [tink]
- BL: Can do it for the next milestone.
- 09:51:14 [tink]
- CMN: I'll also talk to I18n about it.
- 09:51:27 [tink]
- ... That's the last of the i18n issues.
- 09:51:59 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 09:51:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 09:52:09 [tink]
- TOPIC: Privacy issues
- 09:52:36 [tink]
- CMN: #1458 more granularity for allowusermedia
- 09:52:43 [tink]
- LW: It's a feature request.
- 09:53:11 [chaals]
- scribe: chaals
- 09:53:26 [tink]
- CMN: #1457
- 09:53:42 [bruce]
- bruce has joined #html
- 09:53:46 [chaals]
- LJW: in #1457 there is privacy information in the spec referred to, we should point more clerly to it. I agree and assign it to me.
- 09:54:29 [chaals]
- CMN: #1456 ping attribute
- 09:55:01 [chaals]
- LJW: We should think about taking it out again
- 09:55:12 [chaals]
- JVA: Or disable it. That is really hard today
- 09:55:29 [chaals]
- LJW: posted an issue in whatwg about this - they were not inclined to change anything
- 09:55:42 [chaals]
- SOH: whatwg/3718 issue
- 09:56:02 [chaals]
- CMN: The TAG apparently has something to say on this and I will be aking them to say it clearly.
- 09:57:09 [tink]
- ... The ping attribute is better for privacy than other possibilities.
- 09:58:11 [chaals]
- JVA: I can see JS crafting a URL and sending that.
- 09:59:19 [chaals]
- CMN: Right, and that is why ping is in principle an improvement, but you can't realise the value in curent shipping browsers
- 09:59:39 [chaals]
- SM: Need to talk through this more with TAG, but think the permission model is odd.
- 10:02:11 [LJWatson]
- LJWatson has joined #html
- 10:03:38 [LJWatson]
- SM: Disabling autoplay on untrused websites is happening in Chrome.
- 10:04:20 [LJWatson]
- ... We could add a note to the spec to suggest it be disabled by default.
- 10:04:22 [LJWatson]
- CMN: Yes.
- 10:05:03 [LJWatson]
- ... #1311 is similar.
- 10:05:14 [LJWatson]
- ... Suggestion is to note the possibility of the attack.
- 10:05:49 [LJWatson]
- SM: I'm not sure about #1311
- 10:05:56 [LJWatson]
- CMN: It's been done.
- 10:06:15 [tink]
- SM: Is it a concern for the spec?
- 10:06:29 [tink]
- CMN: I think it's worth noting the mitigatins.
- 10:06:42 [tink]
- s/mitigatins./mitigations./
- 10:07:56 [tink]
- ... I'll take #1311 and #1312
- 10:08:06 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 10:08:06 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 10:08:30 [chaals]
- chaals has joined #html
- 10:09:10 [tink]
- SOH: Should we index anything with a privacy concern under 1.8?
- 10:09:14 [tink]
- CMN: Yes, I think so.
- 10:09:53 [tink]
- SOH: I'm happy to do that indexing exercise.
- 10:10:08 [tink]
- LW: Worth opening an issue.
- 10:10:11 [tink]
- SOH: On it.
- 10:10:22 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 10:10:22 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 10:11:40 [tink]
- TOPIC: Security issues
- 10:11:51 [tink]
- CMN: #952 update clickjacking guidance.
- 10:12:00 [tink]
- ... assigned to Sangwhan.
- 10:12:17 [tink]
- SM: We need Mike West's input on this one.
- 10:13:28 [tink]
- CMN: Anyone prepared to write a draft we can ask Mike to review and comment on?
- 10:14:59 [tink]
- ... Ok, I'll take it.
- 10:15:08 [tink]
- ... #543 add origin aware transferrables.
- 10:16:06 [tink]
- SM: This feature is needed, just not sure it's an HTML thing.
- 10:16:15 [tink]
- XW: Related to Feature Policy?
- 10:16:19 [tink]
- SM: Yes, could be.
- 10:16:56 [tink]
- ... Not sure which WG though.
- 10:17:34 [tink]
- SM: It's lower than HTML.
- 10:18:02 [tink]
- SM: Would be a good WHATWG collaboration issue?
- 10:18:12 [tink]
- LW: Should we open a cross-issue?
- 10:18:20 [tink]
- CMN: Check first there isn't one.
- 10:19:39 [tink]
- ... Not finding one.
- 10:20:03 [tink]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 10:20:03 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html tink
- 11:05:20 [Scott_O]
- Scott_O has joined #html
- 11:12:19 [xiaoqian]
- xiaoqian has joined #html
- 11:13:13 [tink]
- tink has joined #html
- 11:24:41 [Scott_O]
- Scott_O has joined #html
- 11:33:09 [chaals]
- chaals has joined #html
- 11:33:34 [chaals]
- chaals has joined #html
- 12:06:14 [chaals]
- Topic: issue triage...
- 12:06:14 [xiaoqian]
- scribe: xiaoqian
- 12:06:31 [chaals]
- -> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues open issues
- 12:06:45 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1463
- 12:06:46 [bruce]
- bruce has joined #html
- 12:06:49 [Scott_O]
- Scott_O has joined #html
- 12:07:39 [xiaoqian]
- Scott_O: I can take it
- 12:08:00 [xiaoqian]
- tink: happy to join the discussion
- 12:08:09 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1461
- 12:08:36 [xiaoqian]
- ... assigned it to edent
- 12:09:00 [xiaoqian]
- tink: he shall be available in the next few weeks
- 12:09:24 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1447
- 12:09:45 [xiaoqian]
- Scott_O: I can give it a try
- 12:10:08 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1445
- 12:10:13 [xiaoqian]
- ... I can do this one
- 12:10:33 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1431
- 12:11:30 [xiaoqian]
- ... close it because no one is going to implement it
- 12:12:03 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1429 & #1430
- 12:12:11 [xiaoqian]
- ... substantive
- 12:13:11 [xiaoqian]
- ... need tests
- 12:13:42 [xiaoqian]
- ... going to the WD5 milestone
- 12:15:23 [xiaoqian]
- tink: I can try #1429, not sure can do before WD5
- 12:15:25 [LJWatson]
- LJWatson has joined #html
- 12:15:46 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1425
- 12:15:59 [xiaoqian]
- Scott_O: not sure if we want this...
- 12:16:15 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: assign to tink
- 12:16:51 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1355
- 12:17:37 [xiaoqian]
- ... about which numbers are available or not
- 12:17:43 [xiaoqian]
- ... assign to edent
- 12:17:56 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1340
- 12:18:46 [xiaoqian]
- ... about the unknown dates, unknown months, ... , when the system format doesn't provide
- 12:19:13 [xiaoqian]
- ... when it's ready
- 12:19:41 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1336
- 12:20:05 [xiaoqian]
- ... about RDFA, I can take this, next milestone
- 12:20:18 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1333
- 12:20:52 [xiaoqian]
- ... should go to the WICG
- 12:21:28 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1319
- 12:21:53 [xiaoqian]
- ... next milestone
- 12:22:23 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1299 & #1298
- 12:22:43 [xiaoqian]
- sangwhan: 1299 is an example of 1298
- 12:23:16 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: we should do it, people wants this
- 12:24:14 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1289
- 12:24:46 [xiaoqian]
- ... we should do it when ready
- 12:25:33 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1247
- 12:26:39 [xiaoqian]
- ... a wish on various elements need attention
- 12:27:37 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1222
- 12:28:02 [xiaoqian]
- ... not implemented
- 12:28:51 [xiaoqian]
- sangwhan: it seems we should put it in
- 12:29:28 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1193 & #1185
- 12:29:55 [xiaoqian]
- ... both general things how the spec is built, low priority
- 12:30:41 [xiaoqian]
- sangwhan: what's the problem with the syntax?
- 12:31:04 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: it breaks things...
- 12:31:27 [xiaoqian]
- ... a noted issue in pygments
- 12:31:52 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1156
- 12:32:45 [xiaoqian]
- ... move to incubation
- 12:33:21 [xiaoqian]
- sangwhan: there is a CSS drafts working on this
- 12:33:53 [xiaoqian]
- ... already open on CSS -> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2013
- 12:34:46 [xiaoqian]
- resolution: close #1156
- 12:35:00 [tink]
- RESOLUTION: Close #1156
- 12:35:04 [tink]
- https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/1156
- 12:35:07 [chaals2]
- chaals2 has joined #html
- 12:35:22 [chaals2]
- rrsagent, pointer?
- 12:35:22 [RRSAgent]
- See https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-irc#T12-35-22
- 12:36:16 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: #1125
- 12:36:54 [xiaoqian]
- ... things like this will be helpful
- 12:37:14 [xiaoqian]
- tink: you will have to redefine placeholder
- 12:37:28 [xiaoqian]
- chaals: this should be done in incubation
- 12:37:50 [xiaoqian]
- Scott_O: they misuse the term placeholder
- 12:39:37 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #1086
- 12:40:08 [xiaoqian]
- xw: it's waiting for the feature policy spec
- 12:40:18 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #1075
- 12:40:42 [xiaoqian]
- ... I dont think we should do it, DOM is a better place for Workers
- 12:41:10 [xiaoqian]
- sangwhan: not really a DOM thing
- 12:41:57 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: update the worker spec as it is
- 12:43:10 [xiaoqian]
- tink: send another CfC to the WG
- 12:43:56 [xiaoqian]
- RESPLUTION: run a new CfC to the WG about Workers
- 12:44:36 [xiaoqian]
- sangwhan: I don't think it has a strong binding to HTML
- 12:45:37 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #980
- 12:45:48 [xiaoqian]
- ... editorial
- 12:46:46 [xiaoqian]
- Scott_O: let's put it for July and I can try to do it
- 12:47:42 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #978
- 12:48:09 [xiaoqian]
- ... it seems we should do it
- 12:48:16 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #975
- 12:48:51 [xiaoqian]
- ... duplicate with #1355
- 12:49:31 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #957
- 12:52:05 [xiaoqian]
- ... currently a hard one
- 12:52:22 [xiaoqian]
- ... will fix it when it's ready
- 12:52:42 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #938
- 12:54:26 [xiaoqian]
- ... we found a bunch of issues from Bugzilla last year that hadn't been imported
- 12:54:33 [xiaoqian]
- ... this is one of them
- 12:55:15 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #935
- 12:55:41 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #933
- 12:56:10 [xiaoqian]
- ... people may want to mute the microphone without muting the video
- 12:57:05 [xiaoqian]
- sangwhan: there are some platform features that can do it
- 12:57:53 [xiaoqian]
- ... what's the use case?
- 12:58:36 [xiaoqian]
- Scott_O: there are two sessions about microphone, none about this issue
- 12:58:52 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #910
- 12:59:48 [xiaoqian]
- RESOLUTION: close #910
- 13:00:29 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #907
- 13:00:52 [xiaoqian]
- ... should the name attribute allow multiple names on meta
- 13:00:56 [xiaoqian]
- ... need tests
- 13:01:07 [xiaoqian]
- ... low priority
- 13:01:21 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #898
- 13:02:27 [xiaoqian]
- Scott_O: I can try
- 13:02:39 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #868
- 13:03:05 [xiaoqian]
- ... should be put something about focus in the rendering section
- 13:03:47 [xiaoqian]
- s/should be put/should we put
- 13:04:33 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #375
- 13:05:09 [xiaoqian]
- sangwhan: would prefer to have pull requests...
- 13:05:33 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: would be reasonable to ask for PR
- 13:06:21 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #373
- 13:06:37 [xiaoqian]
- ... most of these have been taken out
- 13:06:44 [xiaoqian]
- ... editorial
- 13:07:03 [xiaoqian]
- chaals2: #293
- 13:07:57 [xiaoqian]
- ... when you have an inactive element, you should not be able to hover it
- 13:08:58 [xiaoqian]
- ... assign to bruce
- 13:09:03 [Scott_O_]
- Scott_O_ has joined #html
- 13:09:25 [xiaoqian]
- sangwhan: #292
- 13:10:28 [xiaoqian]
- ... this can be part of the WICG special navigation TF
- 13:11:04 [xiaoqian]
- ... operate on the render tree instead of the DOM tree
- 13:12:24 [xiaoqian]
- RRSAgent, make mintues
- 13:12:24 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'make mintues', xiaoqian. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 13:12:34 [xiaoqian]
- RRSAgent, mike minutes
- 13:12:34 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'mike minutes', xiaoqian. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 13:12:42 [xiaoqian]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 13:12:42 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/06/19-html-minutes.html xiaoqian
- 13:15:18 [sangwhan]
- s/special navigation/spatial navigation/
- 13:33:35 [xiaoqian_]
- xiaoqian_ has joined #html
- 14:01:54 [xiaoqian_]
- sangwhan: https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/issues
- 14:03:04 [Scott_O]
- Scott_O has joined #html
- 14:15:03 [tink]
- tink has joined #html
- 14:42:09 [xiaoqian]
- xiaoqian has joined #html
- 15:12:27 [Scott_O]
- Scott_O has joined #html