19:55:44 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #dxwg
19:55:44 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/05/29-dxwg-irc
19:55:54 <PWinstanley> rrsagent, make logs public
19:56:08 <PWinstanley> chair: PWinstanley
19:56:18 <PWinstanley> present+
19:56:53 <antoine> antoine has joined #dxwg
19:57:19 <PWinstanley> regrets+ Alejandra, Riccardo, Adam Sisco
19:58:32 <roba> roba has joined #dxwg
19:58:32 <LarsG> LarsG has joined #dxwg
19:58:39 <LarsG> present+
19:58:49 <roba> present+
19:59:40 <antoine> present+
20:00:27 <PWinstanley> rrsagent, create minutes v2
20:00:27 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/05/29-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley
20:00:55 <kcoyle> present+
20:01:25 <phila> phila has joined #dxwg
20:01:51 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> Jaroslav_Pullmann has joined #dxwg
20:02:01 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> present+
20:02:45 <annette_g> annette_g has joined #dxwg
20:03:11 <annette_g> present+
20:04:08 <phila> present+
20:04:34 <phila> Meeting: DXWG Fortnightly
20:04:43 <phila> scribe: phila
20:04:48 <phila> scribeNick: phila
20:04:59 <PWinstanley> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.05.29
20:05:02 <phila> PWinstanley: Check that everyone agrees to the agenda
20:05:11 <phila> agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.05.29
20:05:18 <phila> [no comment]
20:05:32 <phila> Topic: last meeting minutes
20:05:47 <PWinstanley> https://www.w3.org/2018/05/22-dxwg-minutes
20:06:12 <phila> -> https://www.w3.org/2018/05/22-dxwg-minutes previous minutes
20:06:26 <phila> PROPOSED: Accept previous minutes https://www.w3.org/2018/05/22-dxwg-minutes
20:06:29 <annette_g> +1
20:06:34 <antoine> +1
20:06:35 <PWinstanley> 0
20:06:38 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1
20:06:39 <kcoyle> +1
20:06:47 <LarsG> +1
20:06:50 <phila> RESOLVED: Accept previous minutes https://www.w3.org/2018/05/22-dxwg-minutes
20:06:54 <roba> +1
20:07:12 <phila> Topic: DCAT FPWD
20:07:23 <kcoyle> q+
20:07:24 <DaveBrowning> DaveBrowning has joined #dxwg
20:07:26 <phila> PWinstanley: Need to have a brief convo about the publicity for that
20:07:32 <phila> ... Look at the spreadsheet of contacts
20:07:43 <phila> ... Note actions already taken
20:07:46 <phila> q?
20:08:05 <phila> PWinstanley: Two ontology and KD conferences in the UL recently have highlighted it
20:08:17 <PWinstanley> ack kcoyle
20:08:20 <phila> ack kcoyle
20:08:29 <DaveBrowning> present+
20:09:05 <phila> kcoyle: We got a note through twitter. There was a brief comment. I asked them to let the person know and to speak to the commnet list. Maybe I should post that comment myself
20:09:42 <phila> PWinstanley: This highlights... we need to be sure that comments are received and processed approipriately. That means acknowledging the comment, thanking them then puttin git into an action
20:09:52 <phila> ... Needs to be taken up by the DCAT sub WG
20:10:25 <phila> ... If you get a comment directly, pass it on pubicly - we need the sound evidence base
20:10:41 <phila> ... Need to be able to show wide publicity
20:10:46 <Ixchel> Ixchel has joined #dxwg
20:10:50 <Ixchel> present+
20:10:54 <phila> ... Please fill in the spreadsheet appropriately
20:11:22 <PWinstanley> q?
20:11:25 <phila> ... It's the direct contact and conference presentations that gets the responses.
20:11:41 <phila> phila: I tweeted at https://twitter.com/philarcher1/status/999194608327380993 and got some traction
20:12:13 <phila> PWinstanley: After the Genoa F2F, we decided we'd have plenary meetings weekly again as the workload is increasing.
20:12:27 <phila> Topic: Profile Guidance Group
20:12:37 <phila> RRSAgent, draft minutes
20:12:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/05/29-dxwg-minutes.html phila
20:12:41 <kcoyle> q?
20:12:48 <kcoyle> q+
20:13:00 <phila> PWinstanley: I'd like to check the members are antoine, roba and LarsG
20:13:12 <phila> PWinstanley: Is there a schedule of meetings?
20:13:18 <phila> ack kcoyle
20:13:20 <PWinstanley> ack kcoyle
20:13:22 <roba> q+
20:13:27 <phila> kcoyle: I know that Nick has expressed an interest
20:13:33 <phila> ... we can add him of course.
20:14:04 <phila> ... I updated the draft, which has very little in it at the moment, as proposed in Genoa. But we still don't have our requirements
20:14:07 <antoine> q+
20:14:09 <phila> ... we need that before we start
20:14:12 <PWinstanley> ack roba
20:14:15 <phila> ack roba
20:14:35 <phila> roba: It's not so much the requirements, as open questions, what gets done where
20:14:39 <AndreaPerego> AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg
20:14:44 <AndreaPerego> present+ AndreaPerego
20:14:57 <phila> roba: I'm concerned that we don't have enough people with experience of DCAT profiles in the group
20:15:05 <kcoyle> q+
20:15:16 <phila> PWinstanley: So we need cross-pollination from DCAT
20:15:27 <PWinstanley> ack antoine
20:15:33 <PWinstanley> q?
20:15:38 <phila> q+ to mention Stijn
20:15:59 <phila> antoine: In a way, the editorial group has started to work out the position of the documents.
20:16:09 <phila> ... Not concrete progress but it takes a bit of time
20:16:18 <PWinstanley> ack kcoyle
20:16:21 <phila> ... perhaps Karen's point about requiremnets is a good one
20:16:36 <phila> kcoyle: Just to remind folks that the guidance doc is not just about DCAT profiles.
20:16:46 <phila> ... DCAT profile experience is only one part.
20:17:01 <phila> ... My assumption is that the guidance is about profiles in general
20:17:05 <PWinstanley> ack phila
20:17:05 <Zakim> phila, you wanted to mention Stijn
20:18:13 <phila> phila: Highlights that Stijn was importsnt in the DCAT-AP story in his earlier work
20:18:25 <phila> s/importsnt/important
20:18:32 <phila> Topic: Open Action Items
20:19:01 <phila> action-110?
20:19:01 <trackbot> action-110 -- Karen Coyle to Find better wording for 216 especially "extend" -- due 2018-05-15 -- OPEN
20:19:01 <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/110
20:19:10 <phila> kcoyle: I keep forgetting about that
20:19:25 <phila> action-119?
20:19:25 <trackbot> action-119 -- Antoine Isaac to Remove the labels he proposed for removal -- due 2018-05-29 -- OPEN
20:19:25 <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/119
20:19:29 <phila> antoine: I wanted another week on that
20:19:33 <phila> action-120?
20:19:33 <trackbot> action-120 -- Antoine Isaac to Add requirements to the europeana use case -- due 2018-05-29 -- OPEN
20:19:33 <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/120
20:19:39 <phila> antoine: Continuing
20:19:45 <phila> ... but an important one
20:19:51 <phila> action-121?
20:19:52 <trackbot> action-121 -- Antoine Isaac to Call for more clarification on candidate uc 239 -- due 2018-05-30 -- OPEN
20:19:52 <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/121
20:20:01 <LarsG> q+ to talk about ACTION-83
20:20:04 <phila> antoine: I think I've done this
20:20:28 <phila> close action-121
20:20:28 <trackbot> Closed action-121.
20:20:36 <phila> action-100?
20:20:36 <trackbot> action-100 -- Jaroslav Pullmann to And ucr editors to take this to dcat group -- due 2018-04-10 -- OPEN
20:20:36 <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/100
20:20:50 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: tbh I don't remember this...
20:20:59 <phila> ... If someone remembers...
20:21:15 <phila> Ixchel: It might be related to the comments we received?
20:21:27 <phila> ... from Oystein?
20:21:48 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: Ah yes, I think we've done this.  We responded and put his points into GitHub issues
20:21:56 <phila> close action-100
20:21:57 <trackbot> Closed action-100.
20:22:02 <phila> action-88?
20:22:02 <trackbot> action-88 -- Rob Atkinson to Investigate profile meeting minutes generation issue due 2018-03-14 -- due 2018-03-13 -- OPEN
20:22:02 <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/88
20:22:17 <phila> roba: I raised that with the group. The minutes are being generated
20:22:35 <phila> ... It's pushing the minutes into the meetings page that's a problem
20:22:40 <phila> PWinstanley: We'll keep it open
20:22:44 <phila> action-85?
20:22:44 <trackbot> action-85 -- Andrea Perego to AndreaPerego to verify if changes to documentation of use of dct:license and dct:rights are needed -- due 2018-03-08 -- OPEN
20:22:44 <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/85
20:22:47 <phila> action-86?
20:22:47 <trackbot> action-86 -- Andrea Perego to AndreaPerego to consider if dct:accessRights should be inlcuded in DCAT -- due 2018-03-08 -- OPEN
20:22:47 <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/86
20:22:59 <phila> AndreaPerego: Both stuck
20:23:17 <phila> ... we have to trigger some discussion to move it forward
20:23:25 <phila> PWinstanley: We'll keep them in place then for now
20:23:52 <phila> ack LarsG
20:23:52 <Zakim> LarsG, you wanted to talk about ACTION-83
20:23:54 <PWinstanley> q?
20:23:57 <phila> action-83?
20:23:57 <trackbot> action-83 -- Dave Raggett to Set up respec template for "profile negotiation" deliverable - or do we simply clone the directory structure? -- due 2018-03-07 -- OPEN
20:23:57 <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/83
20:24:14 <phila> LarsG: I think we can close that one too as I think we have it covered.
20:24:17 <phila> close action-83
20:24:17 <trackbot> Closed action-83.
20:24:25 <phila> Topic: Use Cases and Requirements
20:24:47 <phila> PWinstanley: There were a number of things when we were dealing with the gathering of UCR that we didn't confirm and agree on
20:24:57 <phila> ... these were the ones that tended to cover conneg and profiles
20:25:09 <phila> ... Karen from Genoa has been pulling these together in a very organised way
20:25:15 <PWinstanley> https://docs.google.com/document/d/13hV2tJ6Kg2Hfe7e1BowY5QfCIweH9GxSCFQV1aWtOPg/edit#
20:25:34 <phila> PWinstanley: What we want to look at is agreement on these
20:26:06 <phila> ... Please take a look at that and in the top couple of pages... a bunch of Reqs in red. Profile reqs 12-24
20:26:25 <phila> ... We need agreement that these are the requiremnets that we need to work to.
20:26:37 <phila> ... But if we take them one at a time, we're likely to be here until the middle of the summer
20:26:45 <roba> q+
20:26:49 <phila> ... So first proposal is to ask ...
20:27:14 <phila> ... You should be familiar with the territory. Are you happy with the idea that we cover all 12-24 in one vote.
20:27:49 <phila> PROPOSED: That we cover requirements 12-24 at https://docs.google.com/document/d/13hV2tJ6Kg2Hfe7e1BowY5QfCIweH9GxSCFQV1aWtOPg/edit#heading=h.5l26dadqk5v7 in one vote
20:27:55 <AndreaPerego> Probably it is too much.
20:28:03 <phila> PWinstanley:  The alternative, is to do it in blocks, or do it one by one
20:28:04 <kcoyle> q+
20:28:06 <annette_g> -1 to doing it all in one block
20:28:09 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1 for grouping
20:28:10 <PWinstanley> ack roba
20:28:15 <phila> ack roba
20:28:17 <roba> Use Case: Profiles of DCAT-AP and various implementation resources #238
20:28:19 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> +q
20:28:42 <phila> roba: The first thing is that there is another UC not reflected here. There's a lot of implicit assumptions that weren't captured enough
20:28:48 <roba> Use Case: Profiles of DCAT-AP and various implementation resources #238
20:28:52 <phila> ... So I teased out a new use case
20:29:03 <phila> roba: We renamed it to be explicit about what it is
20:29:04 <PWinstanley> q?
20:29:19 <phila> roba: Tio make sure that the DCAT-AP use cases was being captured
20:29:39 <phila> ack kcoyle
20:29:55 <PWinstanley> ack kcoyle
20:29:57 <phila> kcoyle: First in response to Rob we'd have to vote on the UC and then see about the reqs/
20:30:14 <phila> ... Not sure what new features it adds
20:30:15 <roba> excatly - the UC  may help resolve the issue - it does not add any new requirements however
20:30:34 <phila> kcoyle: The other thing we could ask if there are any requirements in that group that people objected to.
20:30:36 <phila> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
20:30:48 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: This is a huge bunch og reqs that might be unrelated.
20:30:50 <PWinstanley> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
20:31:05 <kcoyle> q+
20:31:06 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: Groupings of similar reqs would make sense
20:31:31 <phila> PWinstanley: There are links with IDs
20:31:59 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: This was fantastic work by Karen, I;m trying to support the grouping. These back refs ... would such a statement of a use case motivate such a req and it's not always the case.
20:32:12 <phila> ... I think an update of the UC statement might be helpful.
20:32:19 <phila> ... But I'm in favour of grouping
20:32:28 <AndreaPerego> q+
20:32:32 <phila> ack k
20:32:35 <PWinstanley> ack kcoyle
20:32:47 <PWinstanley> q?
20:32:55 <phila> kcoyle: One of the things about having this in a Google Doc... there are things that GH doesn't do very well.
20:33:07 <phila> kcoyle: WE've got some comments, Lars provided alternate wording etc.
20:33:11 <PWinstanley> ack AndreaPerego
20:33:16 <phila> ... People should do that soon.
20:33:18 <phila> ack AndreaPerego
20:33:42 <phila> AndreaPerego: Another option for grouping is to identify reqs that will be a SHOULD and those that would be a MAY
20:33:53 <phila> ... we may not have an agreement yet, but it might be useful exercise.
20:34:04 <phila> ... leads to idea of core requirements, nice to haves etc.
20:34:25 <phila> RRSAgent, make logs public
20:34:30 <phila> RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
20:34:30 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/05/29-dxwg-minutes.html phila
20:34:44 <phila> AndreaPerego: not all reqs might need to be fully supported
20:35:06 <phila> PWinstanley: There is a waterfall process We need to do things in sequence. The UCR needs to support the Rec on profiles
20:35:15 <roba> so lets look at the UC first
20:35:29 <phila> ... I was trying to see what scope there is for moving as quickly as possible without losing hte opportunity for appropriate consideration
20:35:46 <phila> ... we didn't get them all agreed when we were sorting out the ones that are the basis for DCAT
20:36:09 <phila> ... The challenge is that if we're looking for groupings, then it may take us less time than doing it one by one, but we'll still need a proposal for how to block them
20:36:18 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> q+
20:36:24 <PWinstanley> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
20:36:25 <phila> ... It has to be done at the plenary meeting
20:36:44 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: I was asked to support Karen which I will do on Thursday this week.
20:37:06 <roba> q+
20:37:09 <phila> action: Jaroslav to propose initial grouping of the requirements 12-24
20:37:17 <trackbot> Error creating an ACTION: could not connect to Tracker.  Please mail <sysreq@w3.org> with details about what happened.
20:37:30 <phila> PWinstanley: You're saying that sounds possible, AndreaPerego, but annette_g maybe not
20:38:02 <phila> AndreaPerego: You can think of a matrix, split into reqs that are SHOULD, those that are MUSTS etc.
20:38:19 <phila> ... The Gh mailing list isn't clear what are the core requirements
20:38:42 <PWinstanley> q?
20:39:11 <PWinstanley> ack roba
20:39:14 <phila> annette_g: I think it's too big a chunk is too much, but a logical grouping makes sense
20:39:19 <phila> ack roba
20:39:57 <phila> roba: I agree with the comment about the UCs not motivating all the reqs clearly, hence to proposed new UC
20:40:25 <phila> roba: I've attempted to capture what's missing which might be useful
20:40:45 <phila> PWinstanley: We also have some additional chunks of UC work {missed a bit]
20:40:56 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> q+
20:41:04 <PWinstanley> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
20:41:16 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: These aren't related to profiles
20:41:26 <phila> ... at least mine isn't
20:41:47 <kcoyle> q+
20:41:47 <phila> ... I need to put it back on the screen but it's not relevant in the discussion we had
20:41:56 <AndreaPerego> q+
20:42:03 <phila> PWinstanley: And what about the Flanders one and the one below that (modelling permissions)
20:42:46 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: The UC from Stijn - I commented that there is already a related UC. We share an understanding of where DCAT is used. Is it a base or an interop/exchange standard
20:43:01 <phila> ... One of the important parts of the description...
20:43:08 <AndreaPerego> q-
20:43:12 <phila> PWinstanley: Is this already dealt with?
20:43:43 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: Yes, descriptions already handled elsewhere, but we could alter the UC to talk about DCAT as an exchange standard at interop level.
20:43:56 <phila> ... To enable interop by interchange of DCAT artifacts
20:44:01 <PWinstanley> q?
20:44:15 <PWinstanley> ack kcoyle
20:44:15 <phila> ... A slight rewording of the use case then it will make sense. Internal use, no, but as an interchange standard
20:44:39 <phila> kcoyle: I'm looking at that the DCAT-AP. GH issue 238
20:45:02 <roba> q+
20:45:03 <phila> ... It refers specifically to DCAT-AP and profiles, that's really not in our charter. Is here a general profile issue?
20:45:09 <phila> PWinstanley: Yep
20:45:11 <PWinstanley> ack roba
20:45:25 <phila> kcoyle: I'm a bit reluctant fr us to add profile management at this point
20:46:02 <phila> ... I can see it as a topic within the profile guideline And from Makx's presentation, we cojuld come up with some issues in profile management, but I don't think it's related to programming languages and interop
20:46:14 <phila> PWinstanley: The charter is clear that we're generalists
20:46:26 <phila> roba: The use case doesn;t talk about management, it talks about the experience of DCAt-Ap
20:46:41 <phila> ... It's an example for the need for descriptions
20:46:54 <AndreaPerego> q+ to restate roba's point about examples, and to make a suggestion
20:46:58 <phila> ... Most of hte UCs talk about ... in this specific case... this is no different in that regard
20:47:31 <phila> ... It doesn't provide any new reqs but it does provide a clearer traceability for some of the reqs we already have, eg the Europeana one
20:47:44 <LarsG> s/hte/the/
20:48:04 <antoine> q+
20:48:05 <PWinstanley> ack AndreaPerego
20:48:05 <Zakim> AndreaPerego, you wanted to restate roba's point about examples, and to make a suggestion
20:48:13 <phila> roba: I don't think a mischaracterisation of its scope makes it irrelevant The issue... people aren't disagreeing about the use cases, more that we can't always trace back to the UC
20:48:25 <phila> q+ to tall about Rob's UC
20:48:53 <phila> AndreaPerego: Examples in the doc... I think it wold be important ... we give a sense of how things are done in different UCs.
20:48:54 <PWinstanley> q?
20:49:06 <phila> ... WE should probably include profiles that are not just about metadata
20:49:16 <phila> ... GML is an example, designed for use with profiles
20:49:25 <phila> s/WE/We/
20:49:43 <phila> ack antoine
20:49:52 <roba> happy not toi include this - but not if we then revert to arguing about the lack of UC!
20:49:56 <PWinstanley> ack antoine
20:50:02 <antoine> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018May/0391.html
20:50:20 <phila> antoine: I wanted to talk briefly about Rob's use case. I see it's trying to capture some of the issues that I posted. It ewas a report of the varuous profiles of DCAT around Eu
20:50:29 <phila> ... I think Rob's use case was trying to go towards
20:50:47 <phila> ... I think it could help us
20:50:54 <phila> PWinstanley: Does it need a bit of editing?
20:51:11 <phila> antoine: Rob was welcoming the input of people involved in this effort to flesh out his UC, so yeas
20:51:14 <PWinstanley> ack phila
20:51:14 <Zakim> phila, you wanted to tall about Rob's UC
20:51:16 <phila> ack me
20:52:30 <PWinstanley> q?
20:52:51 <phila> phila: Supports Rob's use case if it clarifies the relationship with a key target market
20:52:59 <phila> Topic: Weekly Meetings
20:53:06 <AndreaPerego> +1 from me
20:53:09 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1
20:53:27 <phila> PWinstanley: It seems to me, based on what we've just been talking about, we'll need weekly meetings for a while yet
20:53:43 <annette_g> +1 for weekly meetings
20:53:47 <antoine> +1
20:53:49 <DaveBrowning> +1
20:53:51 <LarsG> +1
20:53:52 <phila> PWinstanley:  Are we all happy with the idea of weekly meetings for the foreseebale future (next 3-4 meetings)
20:53:54 <roba> + uggh
20:53:54 <PWinstanley> +1
20:54:00 <roba> +1 uggh
20:54:11 <Ixchel> +1
20:54:13 <phila> PWinstanley: I think that's where we're at.
20:54:25 <phila> ... The next meeting therefore will be in a week's time
20:54:39 <phila> ... The actions we have are on Jaro to clump those UCs associated with the profiles
20:54:53 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> q+
20:54:54 <phila> ... preferably by next week, if not the week after
20:55:08 <phila> PWinstanley: We can tease out the ones we're going to work on and get rid of others.
20:55:20 <phila> ... AndreaPerego was also suggesting a prioritisation
20:55:35 <phila> PWinstanley: Would you have time to help AndreaPerego?
20:55:39 <phila> AndreaPerego: I'll do my best
20:56:12 <phila> PWinstanley: So it's incumbent on everyone to follow the Google doc. Jaro will make some suggestions
20:56:30 <phila> ... It's important that we get this done so the profiles doc work can start.
20:56:34 <PWinstanley> q?
20:56:37 <phila> ... Any other suggestions?
20:56:39 <PWinstanley> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
20:56:42 <phila> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
20:57:11 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: I'll start with a reqs grouping and see if they are motivated by the UCs, or as Karen said, put some comments on them where justification is missing
20:57:13 <roba> q+
20:57:31 <phila> ack roba
20:57:36 <PWinstanley> ack roba
20:57:51 <phila> roba: The potential role of the additional clarifying UC will be included in that review?
20:57:54 <kcoyle> q+
20:57:59 <PWinstanley> ack kcoyle
20:58:05 <phila> PWinstanley: I think there's enough support for that to be brought to the table
20:58:25 <phila> kcoyle: I would offer that we should vote on it now
20:58:40 <phila> PROPOSED: Include Rob's Clarifying Use Case on DCAT-AP
20:58:48 <phila> +1
20:58:52 <annette_g> +1
20:58:52 <antoine> +1
20:58:54 <PWinstanley> +1
20:58:55 <kcoyle> +0
20:58:56 <DaveBrowning> +1
20:58:56 <roba> +1
20:59:00 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1
20:59:00 <AndreaPerego> +1
20:59:04 <LarsG> +1
20:59:09 <Ixchel> +1
20:59:12 <phila> RESOLVED: Include Rob's Clarifying Use Case on DCAT-AP
20:59:14 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> q+
20:59:21 <PWinstanley> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
20:59:23 <antoine> This said it would be good if it was marked work in progress
20:59:25 <phila> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
20:59:41 <phila> Jaroslav_Pullmann: Last week we had a discuion on the problem statement which seemed to be missing.
20:59:44 <kcoyle> +1
20:59:54 <phila> ... Can you, Rib, please revise the problem statement and make sure it's clear
21:00:11 <phila> roba: I think the problem was the dissonance with the title which I've tried to resolve
21:00:22 <phila> PWinstanley: And there was Antoine's comment on some diting
21:00:27 <antoine> It's probably the same issue as with the Europeana one.
21:00:30 <annette_g> s/Rib/Rob/
21:00:45 <antoine> s/one/case
21:00:47 <phila> Topic: reports from DCAT sub group
21:00:52 <phila> PWinstanley: Postponed to next time
21:01:31 <phila> ... Busy meeting. Please prepare your calendars so that you're freed up for the next few meetings. I think the next few will be quite meaty.
21:01:39 <phila> PWinstanley: Thanks everyone for attending
21:01:41 <AndreaPerego> Thanks, bye bye!
21:01:43 <phila> [ADJOURNED]
21:01:45 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> bye!
21:01:47 <LarsG> Thanks, bye
21:01:51 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> present-
21:01:53 <annette_g> annette_g has left #dxwg
21:01:54 <phila> RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
21:01:54 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/05/29-dxwg-minutes.html phila
21:03:08 <phila> Cheers AndreaPerego!