19:50:21 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 19:50:21 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-irc 19:50:35 Zakim has joined #dxwgdcat 19:50:47 rrsagent make logs public 19:51:00 rrsagent: make logs public 19:51:22 meeting: DCAT team 2014-04-04 19:52:02 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.04.04 19:52:10 present+ 19:52:17 chair: SimonCox 19:52:31 regrets: ArminHaller 19:52:48 present? 19:53:04 zakim: who is present? 19:53:12 rrsagent: who is present? 19:53:12 I'm logging. Sorry, nothing found for 'who is present' 19:53:21 rrsagent: present? 19:53:21 I'm logging. Sorry, nothing found for 'present' 19:53:40 zakim, who is present? 19:53:40 I don't understand your question, SimonCox. 19:53:49 zakim, present? 19:53:49 I don't understand your question, SimonCox. 19:57:14 roba has joined #dxwgdcat 20:01:08 Jaroslav_Pullmann has joined #dxwgdcat 20:01:30 NicholasCar has joined #dxwgdcat 20:01:33 present+ 20:01:34 present+ 20:01:38 present+ 20:02:28 alejandra has joined #dxwgdcat 20:02:34 present+ 20:02:49 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwgdcat 20:05:20 scribenick: NicholasCar 20:05:29 scribe NicholasCar 20:05:51 TOPIC: confirm agenda 20:06:01 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.04.04 20:06:14 present+ 20:06:58 could we maybe discuss the pending pull request: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/183 ? 20:08:38 ok, thanks 20:08:55 SimonCox: we can slot that topic in after we heard from Rob 20:09:05 TOPIC: confirm minutes for last week 20:09:08 topic: confirm minutes 20:09:08 https://www.w3.org/2018/03/28-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:09:24 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 20:09:30 0 (wasn't present) 20:09:33 +1 20:09:34 +1 20:09:37 +1 20:09:38 present+ AndreaPerego 20:09:39 +1 20:09:51 +1 20:09:54 +0 20:10:11 RESOLVED: confirm munutes for last week 20:10:20 TOPIC: new chair required next week 20:10:49 I'm on leave and not sure if I will be able to join (depending on wifi availability) 20:11:07 I have nothing particular on 20:11:13 maybe skip next week? 20:11:17 no! 20:11:23 no! 20:11:38 ACTION: Simon to contact Peter to chair next week 20:11:38 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 20:12:01 TOPIC: reminder about working spaces 20:12:34 SimonCox: please draft material in wiki spaces 20:12:54 SimonCox: collaboration process will be explained better soon (today) 20:13:04 TOPIC: RobA will report on profiles work 20:13:06 q? 20:13:12 q+ 20:13:42 Please use https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/DCAT-Profiles-Topics 20:13:58 RobA: only a mall group, Reuben, Lars and him, mostly about HTTP headers 20:14:11 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/roba-profile/dcat/rdf 20:14:40 RobA: has introduced a profile.ttl and profile_examples.ttl ontology and examples of profiling 20:15:25 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:15:25 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:15:48 SimonCox: suggests use of wiki to introduce profiles work not in RDF (accessible) 20:15:57 RRSAgent, make logs world 20:16:00 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:16:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:16:57 q? 20:17:05 Makx has joined #dxwgdcat 20:17:06 ack NicholasCar 20:17:33 preent+ Makx 20:17:36 NicholasCar: first to say that the profiling work is important for W3C in general to address it 20:17:52 ... I propose to separate out from the DCAT work in its own module 20:18:05 present+ Makx 20:18:07 ... I've written out a summary 20:18:27 ... I've sent it to kcoyle and she has sent me comments 20:18:52 ... I haven't read it in detail but she suggests that separating out could be done in the F2F 20:19:19 ... we've proposed a few profiles (e.g. DCAT 2014 as a profile of the revised DCAT) 20:19:38 ... three different implementations happening anyway 20:19:39 q+ 20:19:52 ... RobA's ontology 20:20:08 q? 20:20:11 ... I started to write up what is a profile and how to use it 20:20:14 ack roba 20:20:38 (thanks for scribing Alejandra!) 20:20:56 RobA: profiling is metadata about profiling, not a methodology 20:21:10 is there a link to that ontology? 20:21:21 RobA: doesn't intend to replace a constraints language 20:21:24 is it in the branch you pointed out? 20:21:30 q? 20:21:33 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/roba-profile/dcat/rdf 20:21:44 link to obt above 20:21:50 s/obt/ont/ 20:22:06 q+ 20:22:11 i will put up a wiki page too 20:22:22 q- 20:22:36 I was going to suggest work on a wiki page as next step regardless 20:23:10 ACTION: RobA to extablish a profiles wiki page 20:23:10 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 20:24:22 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:24:22 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:24:30 TOPIC: address outstanding pull request for ED 20:24:46 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/183 20:25:32 SimonCox: the pull adds in red boxes to the draft 20:25:35 https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-catalog-scope-simon/dcat/index.html 20:26:43 +q 20:26:52 ack alejandra 20:26:54 +q 20:27:28 SimonCox: inclusions in document after issue, are these ok? 20:27:39 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 20:27:49 alejandra: changes to text only and they are useful so should be ok 20:28:18 I think that, formally, we need a resolution from the DCAT group, and after ask a vote (via mail) from the WG 20:28:23 Jaroslav_Pullmann: scope extension is significat, should be included 20:28:29 Proposed: accept PR 183 for FPWD 20:28:40 +1 20:28:44 +1 20:28:46 0 20:28:49 0 20:28:50 0 20:28:54 +1 20:29:03 +1 20:29:06 Makx has joined #dxwgdcat 20:29:23 * nick pass scribe baton to me when you wish... 20:29:31 RESOLUTION: accept PR 183 for FPWD 20:29:41 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:29:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:29:47 (fine rob, unless you really want to do this!) 20:29:54 TOPIC: license and rights 20:30:03 * not really :-) thanks 20:30:07 domain https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/104 - MakxDekkers 20:30:11 +q 20:30:47 q- 20:31:27 ACTION: SimonCox to report pull req decision to Karen 20:31:27 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 20:31:38 Makx not on audio? 20:32:15 do this first then: range https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/114 - NicholasCar 20:33:05 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:33:05 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:33:11 NicholasCar: I had promised to present to the group more thoughts and the outcome of having a relaxed range would be 20:33:34 ... I've looked at ODRL v2 20:33:58 ... no mention of licenses in ODRL v2 but my understanding is that would fall into Agreement 20:34:15 ... I've looked into common licenses and started to break them down into their parts 20:34:50 ... it makes sense to express licenses in ODRL v2 way 20:35:04 q? 20:35:20 q+ 20:35:59 NicholasCar: I did a small extension of ODRL 2 to add License 20:36:13 q+ to note POE WG publish BPs which include a section on how to represent standard licences - http://w3c.github.io/poe/bp/ 20:36:26 ack AndreaPerego 20:36:26 AndreaPerego, you wanted to note POE WG publish BPs which include a section on how to represent standard licences - http://w3c.github.io/poe/bp/ 20:37:27 Jaroslav_Pullmann_ has joined #dxwgdcat 20:37:31 NicholasCar: I was thinkin on contacting ODRL people 20:37:39 q+ 20:37:40 s/thinkin/thinking 20:38:14 (Renato Iannella is in Brisbane!) 20:38:24 Andrea, do you have a link to the mentioned work of the ODRL group? 20:38:32 http://w3c.github.io/poe/bp/ 20:38:48 thanks! 20:38:49 q? 20:38:54 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann_ 20:38:59 SimonCox: this is a test of the completed ODRL2 work 20:39:31 Jaroslav_Pullmann_: what is the objective? 20:39:41 NicholasCar: allow a machine express a license 20:39:57 ... automatically surface certain message that people might need to agree to 20:40:02 ... restrict access to data 20:40:13 q+ 20:40:25 q+ 20:41:16 q? 20:41:21 q+ 20:41:54 Jaroslav_Pullmann: will be meeting ODRL@ colleagues next week in Vienna 20:42:24 ack Makx 20:42:25 https://www.w3.org/2018/vocabws/ 20:43:27 ack AndreaPerego 20:43:29 q+ 20:44:04 ack SimonCox 20:44:43 q+ 20:45:21 ack NicholasCar 20:45:39 NicholasCar: will be setting up register of common licenses 20:45:57 ... will allow us to have confidence that there will be something for DCAT predicates to point to 20:46:38 SimonCox: so we can develop the predicates (use, access, obligations) in DCAT 20:46:49 q? 20:47:27 makx: development of license details is outside scope of DCAT 20:47:32 ack AndreaPerego 20:47:33 q+ 20:48:21 AndreaPerego: we should make ODRL2 group aware of our interests since they are preparing a Dest Practice document 20:48:28 s/Dest/Best/ 20:49:14 AndreaPerego: we can delegate relevant work to us to ODRL2 group 20:49:16 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann_ 20:49:33 AndreaPerego: we have or can do a similar delegation for data quality to DQV 20:49:37 AndreaPerego: delegate like we also do for data quality 20:49:45 q? 20:50:28 q+\ 20:50:44 q-\ 20:50:47 q+ 20:50:56 Jaroslav_Pullmann: we need to better cater for different clients (automated clients) 20:50:58 ack roba 20:51:35 q+ 20:51:40 ack Makx 20:51:52 roba: the concern seems to be the attachement point of dataset -> license, not license details 20:52:52 Makx: licenses & rights out of scope for this group, agrees we need to know how to link to them, has laready stated you can use dct:LicenseDocument or odrl:Policy 20:53:12 q? 20:53:30 +1 to Makx's comment 20:53:44 q+ 20:54:00 ack NicholasCar 20:54:49 odrl:hasPolicy is the appropriate super-property, DCAT may need a taxonomy underneath that 20:55:07 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/104 20:55:22 TOPIC: license domain 20:55:58 SimonCox: we appear to have reached concensus 20:56:53 q? 20:57:00 Makx: (summarising) one SHOULD put it on Distribution, one MAY put it on Datasets but SHOULD NOT put it on Dataset and not Distribution and if there are multiple, there may be a conflict 20:57:41 SimonCox: can close the issue when resulting changes have been made in doc & RDF 20:57:48 q+ 20:58:03 ACTION: Makx will try to do these changes via Pull Request 20:58:03 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 20:58:23 SimonCox: we (editors) will provides notes for this 20:58:40 q? 20:59:50 AndreaPerego: we will need to wait until after the FPWD to accept this PR - SimonCox agrees 21:00:05 proposed: close issue 104, when makx has completed action 21:00:07 +1 21:00:09 +1 21:00:10 +1 21:00:11 +1 21:00:14 +1 21:00:21 +1 21:00:26 RESOLVED: close issue 104, when makx has completed action 21:00:28 +1 21:00:31 ack AndreaPerego 21:01:07 rrsagent, generate minutes 21:01:07 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html NicholasCar 21:01:10 bye! 21:01:13 present- 21:01:32 thanks Andrea! 21:01:35 present- 21:01:48 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:01:48 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:01:53 thanks, and bye! 21:02:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:02:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 23:03:50 Zakim has left #dxwgdcat