15:44:39 RRSAgent has joined #pbg 15:44:39 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/03/13-pbg-irc 15:44:40 rrsagent, set log public 15:44:40 Meeting: Publishing Business Group Telco 15:44:40 Chair: Luc 15:44:40 Date: 2018-03-13 15:44:40 Regrets+ 15:44:40 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishing-sc/2018Mar/0010.html 15:44:40 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2018-03-13: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishing-sc/2018Mar/0010.html 15:49:57 BillM has joined #pbg 15:57:07 Makoto has joined #pbg 15:57:54 Avneesh has joined #pbg 15:59:43 laudrain has joined #pbg 15:59:53 present+ 16:00:27 liisamk has joined #pbg 16:00:53 present+ 16:01:03 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pbg 16:01:08 present+ 16:01:18 present+ 16:01:27 present+ 16:01:35 present+ dauwhe 16:01:42 jkamata has joined #pbg 16:01:44 Brian has joined #pbg 16:01:46 present+ wolfgang 16:01:51 present+ 16:01:55 present+ 16:02:12 present+ Junko Kamata 16:02:16 present+ 16:02:37 garth has joined #pbg 16:02:56 rkwright has joined #pbg 16:03:22 present+ Garth 16:03:23 present + rkwright 16:03:50 Scribe expectations set appropriately low. 16:03:55 George has joined #pbg 16:04:02 scribenick: garth 16:04:10 Zakim, set scribe_expectation to low 16:04:11 I don't understand 'set scribe_expectation to low', dauwhe 16:04:14 present+ rkwright 16:04:14 present+ George 16:05:21 Luc: first item for EPUB 3.2 resolution 16:05:24 Julian_Calderazi has joined #pbg 16:05:25 Topic: Principles for EPUB 3.2 proposal 16:05:36 … Version 3.2; lots of work to do. 16:06:10 present+ Dan_Fauxsmith 16:06:14 … Agree with princples? Or have comments? 16:06:24 link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r2RbLipc5VY3vUp_iuPak3oaNxI5BF9gJ5s-98qsmEY/edit?ts=5a578c4c#heading=h.izdc9lnn3tf 16:06:28 http://w3c.github.io/publ-epub-revision/epub32/spec/epub-spec.html 16:06:38 … otherwise we’ll move to ask CG to proceed with work on EPUB 3.2 (with all due haste). 16:06:39 present+ Julian_Calderazi 16:06:44 zakim, who is here? 16:06:44 Present: laudrain, tzviya, Bill_Kasdorf, liisamk, BillM, dauwhe, wolfgang, ivan, Brian, Junko, Kamata, jyoshii, Garth, rkwright, George, Dan_Fauxsmith, Julian_Calderazi 16:06:48 On IRC I see Julian_Calderazi, George, rkwright, garth, Brian, jkamata, Bill_Kasdorf, liisamk, laudrain, Avneesh, Makoto, BillM, RRSAgent, Zakim, wolfgang, ivan, jyoshii, Rachel, 16:06:48 ... tzviya, dauwhe, bigbluehat 16:06:50 … Good concensus so far 16:06:53 q? 16:06:59 … No Objections, it seems! 16:07:04 q+ 16:07:34 … Concensus on call; 72 hour notice to go out. 16:07:48 resolved: CG can go ahead, provided there is an objection within 72 hours 16:07:52 ack garth 16:08:10 s/an/no/ 16:08:13 Who is going to lead the taskforce for this work in the CG? 16:08:18 s/there is an objection/there is no objection 16:08:58 Garth: can we get Matt to help with draft? 16:09:07 … how Matt is allocated? 16:09:07 q+ 16:09:39 George: Matt is 100% with Daisy. 16:09:57 Garth: Garth will reach out to Matt, for time availability. 16:09:59 q? 16:10:13 ack Avneesh 16:10:24 Geroge: Matt would likely want to work on this but A11Y? 16:10:41 s/Geroge/George/ 16:10:46 s/Geroge:/George:/ 16:10:59 q+ 16:11:08 ack dave 16:11:31 Dave: did first pass as draft, that’s what we’ll work from. Need issues to move forward. 16:11:49 q+ 16:11:54 ack dauwhe 16:12:04 … most development should move through gitbub 16:12:14 ack George 16:12:16 I was disconnected for a while. 16:12:19 … Maybe kick-off meeting makes sense. 16:12:30 +1 to George 16:12:44 present+ makoto 16:12:48 Geroge: we MUST say SHOULD :-) 16:13:11 s/Geroge/George/ 16:13:13 Yes, I will! 16:13:14 zakim, who is here? 16:13:14 Present: laudrain, tzviya, Bill_Kasdorf, liisamk, BillM, dauwhe, wolfgang, ivan, Brian, Junko, Kamata, jyoshii, Garth, rkwright, George, Dan_Fauxsmith, Julian_Calderazi, makoto 16:13:17 Brian_ has joined #pbg 16:13:18 On IRC I see Julian_Calderazi, George, rkwright, garth, Brian, jkamata, Bill_Kasdorf, liisamk, laudrain, Avneesh, Makoto, BillM, RRSAgent, Zakim, wolfgang, ivan, jyoshii, Rachel, 16:13:18 ... tzviya, dauwhe, bigbluehat 16:13:20 … (beware of W3C/ISO vocab differences) 16:13:48 Topic: new person on the call 16:13:55 Luc: Welcome Dan Fxxx? 16:14:11 s/Fxxx/Fauxsmith/ 16:14:26 Welcome Dan! Good to have you here. 16:14:42 scribejs, set Dan Dan Fauxsmith 16:15:11 Topic: DPUB Summit 16:15:27 Luc: Can anybody explain where we are with DPUB Summit 16:15:29 present+ laurent 16:15:32 q+ 16:15:45 … in Berlin the 17th of May 16:15:57 … Book your rooms! 16:16:04 https://www.edrlab.org/dpub-summit-2018/ 16:16:11 … 1:00p on 16th to 5:30p on the 17th 16:16:18 … Program on web site 16:16:35 I will be there. 16:16:49 +1 Makoto! 16:16:56 +1 16:17:06 … Daisy devices moving to EPUB 3 to be demoed. 16:17:12 ack BillM 16:17:24 BillM: W3C is co-sponsoring event 16:17:26 Dan has joined #PBG 16:17:37 q+ 16:17:38 Conflicts with a BISG metadata summit in NY; unable to attend 16:18:05 … Good general agenda and W3C-ish Publishing topics too 16:18:29 … Mix of (light) technical topcis and business too 16:18:30 See also https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/03/digital-publishing-summit-in-berlin-16th-and-17th-of-may/ 16:18:52 q? 16:18:57 Makoto, u muted? 16:19:28 ack Makoto 16:20:27 Windows 10 tries to block me. 16:20:37 Summit follows AC meeitng Monday/Tuesday; Readium meeting 16th AM 16:20:55 Topic: epubcheck funding 16:21:04 Liisa: epubhceck funding 16:21:13 laurentlemeur has joined #pbg 16:21:20 present+ 16:21:21 s/meeitng/meeting/ 16:21:24 … Need to raise $90-$100K to get epubcheck to where it needs to be 16:21:46 s/epubhceck/epubcheck/ 16:21:46 … Maybe get 20-30 compaires to put in $3K+ 16:21:49 q+ 16:21:54 I wanted to point out that there will be WHATWG people in the AC meeting. It would be a good chance for us to understand how we should contact WHATWG about HTML. 16:22:00 … do we need tiers of funding 16:22:07 ack Garth 16:22:14 Garth: no, for an amount that small. 16:22:28 liisamk has joined #pbg 16:22:33 q+ 16:22:35 Ric agrees with Garth 16:22:42 Luc: How will this be announced? 16:23:02 Liisa: Ric could work with a list of prospects. 16:23:09 q+ 16:23:16 … Should it just be a litter from this group 16:23:20 Whatever might be needed as regards to design, count with me. 16:23:29 s/litter/letter/ 16:23:30 I believe Liisa means Rick, as in Rick Johnson 16:23:35 ack Brian_ 16:23:39 … How did we land on getting payment and storing payment 16:24:16 Brian: Tiers might be good… for a lead tier (maybe $25K) 16:24:19 +1 to Brian 16:24:32 q+ 16:24:44 ack tzviya 16:24:55 Tzviya: brian makes a good point 16:25:11 … where do the checks go? 16:25:17 ack garth 16:25:52 Garth: +1 to Brian’s single bigger tier 16:26:07 Liisa: need to settle how we’re going to deal with cash 16:26:23 q? 16:26:29 … Nominate BillM for handling that 16:26:54 +1 16:27:06 Bill: wil take that on and explore option 16:27:30 s/wil/will/ 16:28:42 Tzviya: if Readium, need to make sure it looks good, relative to W3C takign over for IDPF 16:28:52 s/takign/taking/ 16:28:52 q+ 16:29:03 ack laurentlemeur 16:29:14 q+ 16:29:22 ack ivan 16:29:27 Laurent: is there a history of W3C do this sort of stuff: fundraising and paying for development 16:29:35 Ivan: not really 16:29:43 https://www.w3.org/International/sponsorship/ 16:30:11 … general pushback against potential competition with member orgs 16:30:32 … some fundraising for general programs (e.g., mobile web initiative) 16:30:35 who funds https://validator.w3.org/? 16:30:35 q+ 16:30:54 ack laudrain 16:30:56 Luc: Readium and EDRlab may make sense. 16:31:19 Laurent: yes, well could be 16:31:19 q+ 16:31:34 ack Julian_Calderazi 16:31:34 Luc: though annoucements need to be clear 16:31:54 Julian: how long do we fundraise? 16:32:00 s/annoucements/announcements/ 16:32:14 Liissa: until to get to $100K (semi smiley) 16:32:18 s/ss/s/ 16:32:33 q? 16:33:27 Tzviya: initial release in a month-ish, then start on EPUB 3.2 16:33:49 q+ 16:33:49 … then there is also general maintenance 16:34:00 q? 16:34:09 Liisa: which is why were looking to have an annual budget 16:34:10 ack rkwright 16:34:36 Ric: Folks may be taking HappyPills(tm) with said estimates 16:35:18 … it’s involved, and muct be scoped and algile-ish 16:35:37 s/muct/must/ 16:35:52 Luc: EPUB 3.2 is making it somewhat easier, due to compatibility with EPUB 3.0.1 16:36:04 Ric: suffers for historicly too many cooks in the kitchen 16:36:23 q? 16:36:23 s/for historicly/historically from/ 16:36:26 q+ 16:36:34 ack tzviya 16:37:05 Tzviya: Six months was allotted for general cleanup of code and test suite 16:37:29 Ric: happy to help refine 16:37:37 Luc: IDPF web site 16:37:48 Topic: IDPF Web site's fate 16:38:04 … discussion about what to move where; A11Y resources move to Daisy? 16:38:50 George: problem with maintaining info in two different places; A11Y guidelines on IDPF site; ACE knowledge base 16:39:04 … should redirect to new ACE location 16:39:37 q? 16:39:46 … new ACE knowledge is newer and should no be with overlapping copyright (swith older IDPF stuff) 16:39:48 q+ 16:39:58 q+ 16:40:08 +q 16:40:13 ack ivan 16:40:22 Ivan: beyond A11Y… 16:40:29 q- 16:40:33 … what do we do with the IDPF Web site? 16:40:57 … some pages should be deprecated there 16:41:28 q+ 16:41:33 … Keep some IDPF pages alive for W3C publishing? 16:41:57 q+ 16:42:10 Yes 16:42:16 I would like to point out that 16:42:25 EPUB 3.1 depends on some 16:42:32 registries at the IDPF site. 16:42:58 URLs are hardcoded in the specs. 16:43:21 q+ 16:43:27 ack Makoto 16:43:31 ack Makoto 16:43:35 q+ 16:43:37 ack rkwright 16:43:39 ask rkwright 16:43:43 ack rkwright 16:44:25 Ric: have been working on some Readium site work, with some light cloning from IDPF 16:44:28 we've ported some IDPF documents to the CG github: https://w3c.github.io/publ-cg/ 16:44:29 ack Bill_Kasdorf 16:45:09 BillK: Some aux specs (e.g., indexes) could well move to be CG notes 16:45:20 … if still valid 16:45:38 ack liisamk 16:45:56 Liisa: Should 3.2 not point to anythinfg on IDFP site? 16:46:00 That's certainly possible. 16:46:24 s/anythinfg/anything/ 16:46:36 s/IDFP/IDPF/ 16:46:48 Garth: likely good direction for 3.2 16:47:02 Ivan: but old URLs never die 16:47:03 who's paying today for the IDPF domain name? 16:47:21 ack BillM 16:47:25 q? 16:47:49 BillM: 3.2 referencing only W3C locations is a good plan 16:48:17 … IDPF.org should be considered more a static achive 16:48:35 q+ 16:48:39 s/achive/archive/ 16:48:56 … could move into some sort of static archive 16:49:15 q? 16:49:29 We had http://idpf.org/epub/vocab/structure/ (ssv) 16:49:42 But it is redirected to https://idpf.github.io/epub-vocabs/structure/ 16:50:02 ack ivan 16:50:31 Ivan: Package namespace is IDPF URI 16:50:48 We cannot change them. 16:50:58 q+ 16:51:07 ack BillM 16:51:30 q+ 16:51:39 q+ 16:51:44 BillM: epubzone isn’t continuing, W3C will be used instead. 16:51:50 q+ 16:52:05 … it was never normative, anyhow. 16:52:48 Redirection would work. 16:53:28 ack rkwright 16:53:28 Ric: 1) URLs: redirection can help not break specs. 2) epubzone, some has migrated to Readium 16:53:46 ack liisamk 16:54:04 ack ivan 16:54:13 Liisa: Noticed that forums on epubzone are still acrive and might be in need of monitoring 16:54:29 s/acrive/active/ 16:54:58 Ivan: Should use W3C blog for publishing stuff 16:55:01 q? 16:55:26 Topic: External coordiantion TF 16:55:29 Luc: Task forces 16:55:49 s/coordiantion/coordination/ 16:55:51 s/coordiantion/coordination/ 16:56:36 BillK: email to Publishing BG late this week or early next (External Coordination task force) to call for participation 16:56:49 … stay tuned for email 16:56:53 Topic: A11y TF 16:57:08 Luc: A11Y TF call tomorrow 16:57:12 A11Y: BillM, did you speak with the W3C management about starting an EPUB accessibility project in ISO/IEC? Japan has created a draft for the required new work item proposal and is waiting. 16:57:37 Avneesh: A11Y awaiting resolution/direction 16:57:42 I think that I need "OK". 16:57:44 That's all. 16:57:55 Why no progress? 16:58:18 q+ 16:58:40 Luc: ISO — 3.0.1 now, start on 3.2 thereafter 16:58:47 Why no "OK" from the w3c m about an Iso/IEC project for EPUB A11Y? 16:59:06 ack BillM 16:59:17 No. 16:59:21 Independent. 16:59:44 BillM: 3.2 needs to be set. This should should recommend that “OK”. 16:59:48 q+ 17:00:27 … does it make sense to EPUB A11Y at ISO independantly of EPUB 3.2 17:00:48 I agree with Garth. 17:00:57 should be separated. 17:00:57 ack Avneesh 17:00:57 scribenick: dauwhe 17:01:23 Avneesh: the proposal of separating epub a11y from EPUB 3.1 was due to the independence of accessibility 17:01:39 ... now the situation has changed, and we need to rethink 17:01:44 +1 to Avneesh 17:02:13 Yes! 17:02:15 Bye 17:02:18 laudrain: we need a call about ISO and a11y 17:02:20 ... thanks all 17:02:20 laudrain has left #pbg 17:02:43 laudrain has joined #pbg 17:02:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:02:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/03/13-pbg-minutes.html ivan