15:23:35 RRSAgent has joined #pbgsc 15:23:35 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/03/09-pbgsc-irc 15:23:36 rrsagent, set log public 15:23:36 Meeting: Publishing Steering Committee Telco 15:23:36 Chair: Liisa 15:23:36 Date: 2018-03-09 15:23:36 Regrets+ 15:23:36 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishing-sc/2018Mar/0002.html 15:23:36 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2018-03-09: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishing-sc/2018Mar/0002.html 15:44:27 jyoshii has joined #pbgsc 15:55:34 George has joined #pbgsc 16:01:05 BillM has joined #pbgsc 16:01:36 Ivan, will you start the meeting or shall I login? 16:01:49 I see "waiting for organizer" message... 16:01:51 done 16:02:07 oops, sorry 16:02:20 Bill_Kasdorf_ has joined #pbgsc 16:02:24 present+ 16:02:27 you mean gtm? 16:02:27 do it please... 16:03:04 laudrain has joined #pbgsc 16:03:11 Bill, George and Luc on the phone and we are not hearing those on GTM. 16:03:13 present+ 16:03:57 present+ 16:04:04 present+ George 16:04:11 liisamk has joined #pbgsc 16:04:28 Rachel has joined #pbgsc 16:05:27 liisamk__ has joined #pbgsc 16:05:36 present+ 16:05:47 present+ 16:06:17 present+ 16:06:52 lost audio... 16:07:12 serious audio issues 16:07:21 someone has an horrible echo 16:07:23 do we need a different lnine? 16:07:32 there are 51 people on this call 16:08:08 we are organizing another line 16:08:45 ok- everyone hung up and will call in again on that line 16:10:14 present+ BillM 16:12:26 q+ 16:12:37 q- 16:12:53 scribenick 16:13:05 scribenick: laudrain 16:14:02 laudrain: We gave the BG 2 weeks to review the EPUB 3.2 document, and we hope that we will come to consensus on tuesday 16:14:35 q+ 16:14:54 ...Should we send a 72 hour CfC? Or is sufficient to tell CG to proceed? 16:15:28 q+ 16:15:37 ivan: we should do CfC 16:15:37 q- 16:15:43 ack Billm 16:16:48 regrets+ dauwhe 16:16:58 BillM: opinion on how the CG would report to the BG after endorsment 16:17:08 … is ther any form? 16:17:31 Ivan: there is a way to do that 16:17:48 … we will ask Matt 16:18:06 … take another report as a model 16:18:16 … Like JSON 1.1 16:18:21 https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/ 16:18:42 q+ 16:18:57 BillM: put aline like « Prove by the PBG… » 16:19:05 ack Tzviya 16:19:16 s/Prove/Approved 16:20:03 Tzviya: keep in mind last tuesday proposal from Ivan 16:20:18 q? 16:21:57 q+ 16:22:12 ack george 16:22:45 George: a11y standardizaiton moving formward in parallel with EPUB 3.2 16:23:10 … wonderful France will be contributing in SC34 16:23:16 I believe Cristina said that Italy would follow France's lead 16:23:31 … any other people in US? 16:23:45 q+ 16:23:52 q+ 16:23:54 BillK: no longer in NISO 16:24:27 q- later 16:24:27 q? 16:24:46 George: should we get in touch with NISO? 16:24:57 ack lii 16:25:14 Liisa: PRH is a member of NISO 16:26:33 Ivan: finalize EPUB 3.2 and move it ti ISO? 16:26:38 Luc: Yes 16:26:54 Ivan: ISO has it’s own terminology 16:27:23 … These two should coordinate in a format in ISO « format » to reduce work 16:27:24 q+ 16:27:31 ack ivan 16:28:00 BillK: Francie Cave in PBG? 16:28:09 s/Francie/Francis/ 16:28:37 Luc: I will raise the question to him 16:29:03 ack Bill_Kasdorf_ 16:29:07 regrets+ rickj 16:29:47 George: check for any copyright problem for kb IDPF a11y guidelines 16:30:16 … 2 sites are independant, and there is know cut and paste from the former work 16:30:57 … 2 options : move IDPF site down or say « this is no longer maintain » and redirect to the new siet 16:31:15 q+ 16:31:38 BillM: we plan to update the EPUB A11Y 1.0. 16:31:52 … New one would be a W3C document as 1.1 16:32:15 The other issue was any IP concerns wrt IDPF content 16:32:31 q+ 16:32:41 … W3C is not abandoning EPUB3 a11y but is commited to EPUB3 a11y standardization 16:32:54 q+ 16:33:25 Rachel: we take advantage that this was available in IDPF, and move to W3C 16:33:25 ack Rachel 16:33:45 ack tzviya 16:34:20 Tzviya: IDPF best practice shoudl have asap a banner to go the DAISY kb 16:34:22 +1 to tzviya's suggestion 16:34:24 q+ 16:34:26 +1 16:34:29 +1 to Tzviya. Same for the A11y 1.0 document 16:34:37 ack lii 16:34:58 +1 to Liisa 16:35:16 Yes but I'm concerned about citations to the IPDF site instead of the proper W3C site 16:35:20 the a11y metadata is all completely out of date 16:35:20 Liisa: a notice is not sufficient as it is accessed through detailed pages 16:35:56 BillM: IDPF site ha legacy stuff still valid 16:36:28 … migrate the current level stuff to a W3C repository and put a banner on IDPF 16:36:29 $ 16:36:30 q+ 16:36:36 ack billM 16:37:03 … people should go a W3C or DAISY site 16:37:20 ack tzv 16:37:47 Tzviya: reason to a11y guideline is the doc people use the most 16:38:29 … starts with that so that people doesn’t do inaccurate coding becaus it ahasn’t been updated 16:38:43 q+ 16:38:49 BillM: use a11y as a laboratory for moving to W3C 16:39:00 it's eating our brains 16:39:02 … I volunteer to make so 16:39:10 q? 16:39:31 q+ 16:39:41 George: Matt can help you on this 16:40:16 … decision: put in a11y guidelines information to redirect to the kb in DAISY 16:40:41 … best practices are in dev in the CG 16:41:02 q? 16:41:25 George: has to be approved by the PBG 16:41:49 BillM: an agenda item for next PBG call 16:42:32 … 2mn topic on the DPUB summit 16:42:50 https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/03/digital-publishing-summit-in-berlin-16th-and-17th-of-may/ 16:42:51 … see blog post from Ivan 16:44:40 Liisa: epubcheck funding bar ? 16:45:00 … we have hours from Rick 16:45:13 s/Rick/RicWright 16:45:30 … 160h/month, 90$/h 16:46:23 ack liisa 16:47:00 Liisa: porposal to leave the site with every page on a11y marked. what for other pages? 16:47:02 q+ 16:47:10 … like the forum 16:47:52 q+ 16:47:56 George: it is a good other plave to direct people to the CG and other W3C group 16:48:01 ack Ivan 16:48:46 Ivan: separate dicussion on that because of instead « killing » it, keep the IDPF site as part of the W3C activity 16:49:18 … remove thing on memeber, but keep it as it is natural for people to go there 16:49:40 … it’ worth discussion with communication W3C people 16:50:04 … there are some practicalities like name of IDPF… 16:50:13 q- 16:50:34 … more straitforward, why not keeping it? 16:51:02 Tzviya: a11y stuff is pressing, the forum should be kept alive 16:51:25 … could be in W3C 16:51:52 … form should not be ignored, legacy documentation archived 16:52:00 q+ 16:52:01 q? 16:52:07 ack tzvi 16:52:11 ack Rachel 16:52:27 ack Rachel 16:52:29 Rachel: i’m willing to help 16:54:15 I wouldn't take anything down right now 16:54:19 Liisa: what about membership pages? 16:54:36 George: serving customers better 16:55:42 … we can’t close down the site for now 16:56:18 q+ 16:57:10 Ivan: warning on calling time for Asia and Europe 16:57:33 q+ 16:57:49 present+ yoshii, daihei 16:57:50 Billk: nominate Dahei and Yoshi as outstanding members 16:57:58 ack Bill 16:58:05 ack George 16:58:19 George: find proper time for people to participate 16:58:31 … like for the affordance TF 16:58:58 Tzviya: one of the chair is in Califonia 17:00:13 Luc: agenda item for specific call time for Asia 17:00:53 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:00:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/03/09-pbgsc-minutes.html ivan