20:50:26 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 20:50:26 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/03/07-dxwgdcat-irc 20:50:58 Zakim has joined #dxwgdcat 20:51:10 zakim, make logs public 20:51:10 I don't understand 'make logs public', SimonCox 20:51:20 rrsagent, make logs public 20:51:38 Meeting: DXWG DCAT Team 20:51:48 Chair: SimonCox 20:51:52 present+ 20:52:01 regrets: ArminHaller 20:57:33 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.03.07 20:57:47 regrets: Riccardo 21:04:23 Stijn_Goedertier_AIV has joined #dxwgdcat 21:04:24 present+ 21:05:55 Jaroslav_Pullmann has joined #dxwgdcat 21:06:33 present+ 21:06:48 alejandra has joined #dxwgdcat 21:06:58 present+ 21:07:09 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.03.07 21:07:14 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwgdcat 21:07:35 present+ 21:08:31 scribenick DaveBrowning 21:08:40 topic: confirm agenda 21:09:03 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 21:09:08 present+ AndreaPerego 21:09:49 topic : approve minutes last meeting https://www.w3.org/2018/02/28-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:10:05 +1 21:10:08 +1 21:10:10 +1 21:10:12 +1 21:10:15 +1 21:10:39 Resolved: minutes approved 21:10:41 +1 21:10:49 topic: meeting times 21:10:59 https://doodle.com/poll/cvuzxnqan8s8utbc 21:11:41 SimonCox: doodle poll published. Majority looks to be for the same UTC time. 21:12:01 ....Most regulars have already replied. 21:12:27 ...poll will close in the next few hours 21:13:13 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 21:13:21 present+ 21:13:24 ...WebEx booking is following US time - getting it changed is being followed up with DaveR 21:13:37 topic: FPWD https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/ 21:14:36 Progress around linking document to github issues. Others encouraged to take action 21:15:06 to add to the agenda: to look at the actions we created last time (I created them manually in the Action tracker) 21:15:47 SimonCox: placeholder for DCAT Profile and negotiation in place, but not clear if the relevent subgroups will add to that or publish separately 21:15:55 q? 21:16:09 ...but marking it in the FPWD is good either way 21:17:12 +q 21:17:15 ...chairs have been asked - what the process is 21:17:33 ack alejandra 21:17:58 alejandra: do we vote in this group first or just in plenary? 21:18:29 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions 21:18:38 SimonCox: vote here that we’re happy to take something to the plenary 21:20:11 topic: action items https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions 21:20:29 SimonCox: Digression to current actions - 21:22:06 q+ 21:22:19 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 21:22:32 ...Discussion with Rob on what the next steps are, including following through with DaveR, but most of these need profiles subgroup actions 21:23:17 topic: DCAT Modules 21:23:21 Jaroslav_Pullmann: will follow through on his use case (is a github issue) 21:23:45 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/gh-pages/dcat/rdf 21:23:48 About my actions, I have yet to start working on them. 21:23:59 SimonCox: couple of DCAT modules in repository at above link 21:25:54 ...main DCAT one including a couple of changes. Two other modules - one includes prov-o and DCAT, onecovering schema.org, using schemaincludes etc 21:25:57 AndreaPerego: look at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/146 21:26:27 re https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Main_Page#Mappings_to.2Ffrom_DCAT_.28and_DCAT_application_profiles.29 21:27:33 +q to comment on the mapping 21:27:45 Thanks, SimonCox. In case we would like to complement this the corresponding SPARQL queries, we can start from: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/CITnet/stash/projects/ODCKAN/repos/dcat-ap-to-schema.org/browse/sparql 21:27:53 SimonCox: above link has links relevent to DCAT, these were copied into the modules, Andrea asked to look at these 21:28:07 s/this the corresponding/this with the corresponding/ 21:28:09 q+ 21:28:28 DCAT 1.0 profile https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/simon-dcat-v1.0-profile/dcat/rdf/dcat10.ttl 21:29:23 SimonCox: this file follows through on suggestions that a backward compatible profile should be provided 21:30:02 ...this file imports anything we delete in the new version of DCAT 21:30:04 q? 21:30:08 ... as an experiment 21:30:09 ack alejandra 21:30:09 alejandra, you wanted to comment on the mapping 21:30:24 present+ 21:30:52 Thanks, alejandra. I'll do. 21:30:56 Andrea to look at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/146 21:31:18 alejandra: pull req 146 would benefit from Andrea opinion 21:31:29 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/146/files/f378ad358c84ed4cccda8855baa7eef41531a9bd 21:31:45 ACTION: AndreaPerego to look at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/146 21:31:45 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:31:53 ack AndreaPerego 21:32:23 q+ 21:32:39 AndreaPerego: if we intend to complement the links - there is some work on sprawl available too 21:32:56 ...question - are we including a change log? 21:33:11 s/sprawl/sparql/ 21:33:14 NicholasCar has joined #dxwgdcat 21:33:18 present+ 21:33:34 SimonCox: yes - we’ll add at the bottom of the doc 21:33:46 ACTION: AndreaPerego to add changelog section in DCAT+ draft 21:33:46 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:34:05 q? 21:34:07 I can add the actions to the tracker 21:34:12 ack roba 21:35:12 roba: apologies - joined after the start. Profile group don’t intend to add to the DCAT standard 21:35:27 action created: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/92 21:35:27 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:36:11 q? 21:36:22 SimonCox: we’ll cover that shortly 21:36:27 topic: license and right 21:36:34 s/right/rights/ 21:36:43 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/114 21:37:33 SimonCox: much conversation on the github issue, but not all participants are in this meeting. 21:38:29 NicholasCar: initial suggestion started a discussion on which type was more appropriate, but the suggestion is now to use the dort 21:38:47 S/dort/ODRL/ 21:39:18 ...approach since it is more general 21:39:48 ... but augmented by clear discussion or rationale in specification 21:40:24 q+ 21:41:03 a contact to the ODRL group is pending (see action https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/84) 21:41:17 ... not quite ready to make a decision - needs more discussion, though not quite nailed yet. Needs specific proposal 21:41:44 q/ 21:41:45 q? 21:41:50 ack roba 21:43:07 RobA: does the decision to adopt ODRL imply we adopt other ODRL approaches. 21:43:52 NicholasCar: likely to be the case - will make that clear in the proposal 21:45:12 q+ 21:45:30 RobA: suggest that if we adopt a vocab in one place then we should check whether it is useful on other issues 21:45:50 ack AndreaPerego 21:46:32 SimonCox: ODRL is pretty narrow in its application, but in general this might be a good approach 21:47:13 s/application/scope/ 21:47:56 q+ 21:48:35 AndreaPerego: ODRL has value if not using a standard licence, and perhaps we should encourage use of the standard ones 21:49:44 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 21:50:11 NicholasCar: will cover this in proposal to make it clear when it’s appropriate to use the simpler approach via dc:rights and standard licences 21:50:15 q+ 21:50:27 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/ 21:50:29 Jaroslav_Pullmann: similar example in uc25 21:51:05 ... for the metadata of the catalog itself may have restrictions 21:51:43 NicholasCar: does it sound like our approach would apply there too? 21:52:21 Jaroslav_Pullmann: Most likely. These have different communities participating 21:52:57 ... is there any ontologies on expressing licence info in a standard way? 21:53:16 +q to mention CC work 21:53:16 ack AndreaPerego 21:53:21 q+ 21:54:42 AndreaPerego: re licence for metadata. When this has been discussed it had a different angle, to my mind 21:55:56 Jaroslav_Pullmann: there are examples of companies providing high quality metadata and wanting to protect it in some way. 21:56:20 ack alejandra 21:56:20 alejandra, you wanted to mention CC work 21:56:34 ...so want to make sure that the proposal is written to apply in that case 21:56:42 https://creativecommons.org/ns 21:57:08 There's also ODRS which might be worth looking at: http://schema.theodi.org/odrs/ 21:57:15 alejandra: re vocab for licences - examples in Creative Commons 21:57:53 ack NicholasCar 21:58:01 Jaroslav_Pullmann, I think ODRL is more flexible for this purpose. 21:58:51 NicholasCar: Im actually doing this now.... should have something comparatively shortly for the top few licences 21:59:11 +1 I look forward to seeing that NicholasCar 21:59:40 ok - link to strawe man is here: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/roba-profile/dcat/rdf 21:59:44 thanks for your references Alejandra, Andrea & Nick 22:00:23 SimonCox: re: profiles aspects in DCAT 22:00:25 Topic: profiles 22:00:41 andrea to send links re SPARQL profiles to roba 22:00:46 https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/CITnet/stash/projects/ODCKAN/repos/dcat-ap-to-schema.org/browse/sparql 22:00:59 preferably by committing change to examples :-) 22:01:13 Thanks, and bye! 22:01:15 thanks all 22:01:17 thanks all, bye! 22:01:19 thanks, and bye! 22:01:25 rrsagent generate minutes 22:01:30 present- 22:01:31 RRSAgent, generate minutes 22:01:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/03/07-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 22:01:56 RRSAgent, make logs world 22:02:04 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:02:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/03/07-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego