20:49:51 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #dxwg
20:49:51 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/02/27-dxwg-irc
20:50:04 <kcoyle> kcoyle has joined #dxwg
20:50:12 <PWinstanley> rrsagent, make logs public
20:50:24 <PWinstanley> present+
20:50:41 <PWinstanley> chair: PWinstanley
20:52:43 <PWinstanley> regrets+ Makx
20:52:50 <PWinstanley> regrets+ Antoine
20:56:08 <SimonCox> SimonCox has joined #dxwg
20:56:31 <SimonCox> regrets: SimonCox
20:57:11 <SimonCox> I'm attending monthly meeting of ESIP Semantic Technologies Committee - unfortunately a clash for one in four-ish of the DXWG meetings
20:57:17 <LarsG> LarsG has joined #dxwg
20:57:27 <PWinstanley> ok SimonCox
20:57:32 <LarsG> present+
20:57:38 <SimonCox> Will keep IRC open on a corner of my screen just in case
21:03:42 <roba> roba has joined #dxwg
21:04:57 <roba> present+
21:05:17 <kcoyle> present+
21:07:36 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> Jaroslav_Pullmann has joined #dxwg
21:07:43 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> present+
21:07:51 <DaveBrowning> DaveBrowning has joined #dxwg
21:07:52 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> ..sorry for the delay!
21:08:07 <DaveBrowning> Present+
21:09:35 <roba> scribenick: roba
21:10:01 <roba> topic: https://www.w3.org/2018/02/20-dxwg-minutes
21:11:23 <roba> +1
21:11:29 <kcoyle> +1
21:11:30 <LarsG> +1
21:11:31 <DaveBrowning> +1
21:11:35 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> 0 (was absent)
21:12:06 <PWinstanley> +1
21:12:10 <annette_g> annette_g has joined #dxwg
21:12:15 <annette_g> present+
21:12:26 <roba> RESOLVED: minutes agreed
21:12:57 <kcoyle> q+
21:13:15 <roba> PWinstanley: reminder to complete questionaire f2f
21:13:35 <PWinstanley> ack kcoyle
21:13:40 <roba> kcoyle: should send reminder to list
21:14:25 <roba> ... b4 we complete planning work out where we are on deliverables and any affect on timelines
21:14:29 <AndreaPerego> AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg
21:14:33 <roba> topic: open action items
21:14:38 <AndreaPerego> present+ AndreaPerego
21:14:48 <roba> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open
21:15:37 <roba> AndreaPerego: pending review - posted a revision some weeks ago
21:16:30 <roba> roba: action on me to complete #76 by responding to Ana
21:17:00 <roba> PWinstanley: no further feed back on UCR doc
21:17:12 <roba> topic: profiles
21:17:35 <LarsG> roba: wondering what the plan is for profile subgroup planning
21:17:54 <LarsG> ... also looking at how profiles relate to OGC specs
21:18:00 <LarsG> ... will report shortly
21:18:23 <LarsG> ... Asks if we should try to formally publish DCAT 1.1 as a profile of DCAT 2
21:18:37 <roba> * thanks lars !
21:19:12 <roba> kcoyle: dont have a separate group of people from DCAT, at this stage.
21:19:19 <LarsG> q+
21:19:29 <roba> i may need to join DCAT group then ..
21:19:29 <PWinstanley> ack LarsG
21:19:54 <roba> LarsG: profiles negotiation group has a stake in profiles too
21:20:28 <roba> PWinstanley: do you have any objections to roba suggestions?
21:20:33 <roba> LarsG: no
21:21:23 <roba> PWinstanley: topic: DCAT 1.1 subgroup
21:22:01 <AndreaPerego> s/PWinstanley: //
21:22:08 <roba> PWinstanley: kcoyle drafting Resolutions...
21:23:03 <roba> DaveBrowning: some edits made it through to editor's draft - i am checking all actions to update are implemented
21:23:06 <AndreaPerego> DCAT subgroup meeting minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/02/21-dxwgdcat-minutes
21:23:44 <roba> DaveBrowning: points of contention are those in next two resolutions - as addressed last lenary
21:23:52 <roba> s/lenary/plenary/
21:24:16 <roba> * kcoyle can you post it plz
21:24:18 <PWinstanley> We will continue to use the existing DCAT namespace for DCAT 1.1 (or 2, if it is called that) terms.
21:24:42 <PWinstanley> q?
21:24:56 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> q+
21:25:02 <PWinstanley> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
21:25:08 <roba> PROPOSED:  We will continue to use the existing DCAT namespace for DCAT 1.1 (or 2, if it is called that) terms.
21:25:47 <roba> Jaroslav_Pullmann: what is w3c process for versioning namespaces
21:25:50 <roba> q+
21:25:56 <PWinstanley> ack roba
21:26:03 <AndreaPerego> W3C does have a versioning policy.
21:27:12 <kcoyle> +1
21:27:12 <AndreaPerego> +1 to the proposal
21:27:17 <annette_g> +1
21:27:17 <PWinstanley> +1
21:27:19 <LarsG> +1
21:27:21 <DaveBrowning> +1
21:27:22 <roba> roba: summary - current advice is to not break existing implementations as long as semantically consistent
21:27:22 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1
21:27:24 <roba> +1
21:27:36 <roba> RESOLVED:  We will continue to use the existing DCAT namespace for DCAT 1.1 (or 2, if it is called that) terms.
21:27:45 <PWinstanley> We will not align ADMS (as a whole) to DCAT; subgroup will look at ADMS identifier for possible reuse
21:28:28 <roba> q+
21:28:33 <PWinstanley> ack roba
21:28:50 <kcoyle> roba: wants different wording
21:30:45 <roba> PROPOSED: ADMS update to align with DCAT is out of scope for this WG
21:31:00 <kcoyle> +1
21:31:01 <LarsG> +1
21:31:02 <DaveBrowning> +1
21:31:03 <AndreaPerego> +1
21:31:04 <roba> +1
21:31:04 <annette_g> +1
21:31:04 <PWinstanley> +1
21:31:04 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> q+
21:31:13 <roba> RESOLVED: ADMS update to align with DCAT is out of scope for this WG
21:31:27 <PWinstanley> ack Jaroslav_Pullmann
21:32:13 <AndreaPerego> q+
21:32:26 <PWinstanley> ack AndreaPerego
21:33:47 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> .. thank you for clarification, AndreaPerego
21:33:54 <PWinstanley> q+
21:34:00 <PWinstanley> ack PWinstanley
21:34:01 <roba> AndreaPerego: we don not know what changes are needed yet, and we do not have resources to guarantee this.  May revisit this is small changes only
21:34:57 <roba> PWinstanley: what about ADMS identifier
21:35:02 <kcoyle> +1 to Peter's suggestion
21:35:11 <roba> i have second proposal hot to paste in....
21:36:20 <roba> PROPOSED: DCAT subgroup will explore how ADMS identifier concept may be best incorporated
21:36:30 <AndreaPerego> +1
21:36:33 <PWinstanley> +1
21:36:33 <kcoyle> +1
21:36:35 <annette_g> +1
21:36:35 <roba> +1
21:36:37 <SimonCox> +1
21:36:38 <LarsG> +1
21:36:44 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1
21:36:49 <roba> RESOLVED: DCAT subgroup will explore how ADMS identifier concept may be best incorporated
21:37:21 <roba> topic: Profile negotiation sub group
21:38:03 <roba> LarsG: some email conversation on scope - on negotiation rather than profile definition
21:38:24 <roba> ... profile inheritance is the key common concern
21:38:49 <roba> meeting tomorrow at 9UTC - 12 hours ahread of DCAT
21:39:02 <PWinstanley> s/ahread/ahead/
21:39:23 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> bye!
21:39:24 <kcoyle> rrsagent, please generate minutes v2
21:39:24 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/02/27-dxwg-minutes.html kcoyle
21:39:28 <Jaroslav_Pullmann> present-
21:39:34 <annette_g> bye!
21:39:39 <SimonCox> roba: Should I add an item on the DCAT team agenda for you to report back?
21:39:40 <PWinstanley> rrsagent, create minutes v2
21:39:40 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/02/27-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley
21:45:36 <AndreaPerego> agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.02.27
21:46:02 <AndreaPerego> meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference
21:46:12 <AndreaPerego> RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
21:46:12 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/02/27-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
21:50:42 <AndreaPerego> regrets+ Makx, Antoine
21:50:43 <AndreaPerego> RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
21:50:43 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/02/27-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego