20:53:19 RRSAgent has joined #dxwg 20:53:19 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/01/30-dxwg-irc 20:53:42 rrsagent, make logs public 20:53:50 present+ 20:56:04 rrsagent, create minutes v2 20:56:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/01/30-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 20:57:56 kcoyle has joined #dxwg 21:01:36 Jaroslav_Pullmann has joined #dxwg 21:01:45 SimonCox has joined #dxwg 21:02:17 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Jan/0094.html 21:02:26 present+ 21:02:28 present+ 21:03:04 roba has joined #dxwg 21:03:32 annette_g has joined #dxwg 21:03:45 * on road and delayed with limited connectivity - hope to join in more fully second half 21:04:13 present+ 21:04:19 antoine has joined #dxwg 21:06:25 present+ 21:06:45 present+ 21:07:45 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg 21:07:54 present+ AndreaPerego 21:08:12 scribenick: antoine 21:08:28 Ixchel has joined #dxwg 21:09:28 rob, did you call in by phone? 21:10:10 PWinstanley: you can kick them off - it is your call 21:10:25 riccardoAlbertoni__ has joined #dxwg 21:10:34 Topic: Admin 21:10:58 regrets+ Lars, Alejandra 21:11:01 present+ 21:11:15 Proposal: approve last meeting minutes 21:11:19 +1 21:11:22 https://www.w3.org/2018/01/23-dxwg-minutes 21:11:25 not present, can't say 21:11:35 0 21:11:38 +0 (absent last time) 21:11:52 0 ( i was absent) 21:11:53 +1 21:11:57 +1 21:12:53 PWinstanley: I was there but not on the list 21:13:17 +1 21:13:21 RESOLVED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2018/01/23-dxwg-minutes on the condition to add Peter's name 21:13:37 Topic: Open Actions 21:13:43 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open 21:14:03 PWinstanley: there are a number of actions that are pending review 21:14:11 ... where do they go to? 21:14:21 ... they need to move forward 21:14:32 ... but first let's tackle the open ones 21:14:50 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/74 21:14:57 kcoyle: I forgot, will do soon 21:15:04 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/76 21:15:18 Ixchel: I think Rob sent something on the public list 21:15:28 ... there's a comment that just came in 21:15:42 q+ 21:15:54 ... Rob, Jaro and I will discuss them and bring to this call when needed 21:15:56 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 21:15:57 q+ 21:16:06 Jaro: I have to look at the comments and react 21:16:21 ... there is a deadline in the request for comments 21:16:46 PWinstanley: 20th January, but we also agreed that people could comment through members of the WG 21:16:55 ack kcoyle 21:17:08 kcoyle: I though Ixchel said comments had been answered 21:17:16 ... but I don't see one for Ana Baptista 21:17:30 Ixchel: my understanding was that Rob would develop an answer to send her. 21:17:41 kcoyle: there are complications in what she brings up 21:17:47 ... we should discuss it on the list 21:18:01 PWinstanley: should I propose that there can be a range of APs? 21:18:21 ... it seems that she is hinting that there's work going beyond what we were originally speaking about 21:18:36 kcoyle: she also proposes new requirements 21:18:48 Ixchel: Rob had an action on a short profile definition 21:18:53 kcoyle: I think it's different 21:19:03 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/77 21:19:06 PWinstanley: can we close? 21:19:17 rrsagent, please draft minutes 21:19:17 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/01/30-dxwg-minutes.html antoine 21:19:17 q+ 21:19:27 ack kcoyle 21:19:45 kcoyle: I think we can close, and thank AndreaPerego 21:20:05 ... we should link to AndreaPerego's email from the front page 21:20:10 AndreaPerego: I didn't do it 21:20:15 kcoyle: I can do it 21:20:55 PWinstanley: so we close this action 21:22:31 Topic: Use Cases and Requirements 21:22:50 PWinstanley: anything beyond Ana Baptista's mail 21:23:02 Ixchel: there was another mail. I think we're alright. 21:23:18 PWinstanley: this is an item that we keep in the agenda for next meetings 21:23:32 Topic: Profiles 21:23:52 PWinstanley: any volunteer? 21:24:05 ?+ 21:24:13 q+ 21:24:17 ack kcoyle 21:24:37 kcoyle: I have a feeling that 3 deliverables may be a bit much 21:24:59 ... people are working on DCAT they might not have the time to work on something else 21:25:07 ... maybe we can defer the profile work 21:25:33 ack antoine 21:25:47 antoine: Maybe we can do a short deliverable 21:26:00 ... or something that can be moved into the conneg one 21:26:01 roba has joined #dxwg 21:26:11 q+ 21:26:16 ... Also, what is the timing for the Profile def? 21:26:33 kcoyle: timing was left off the charter 21:26:44 ... this was an error. We gave it the same timing as the others 21:26:52 ... FPWD in 1st quarter 2018 21:26:54 ack SimonCox 21:27:01 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg 21:27:18 SimonCox: both the profile and the conneg have wider scope than DCAT 21:27:35 ... we may find ourselves in the position to discussion webarch issues 21:28:02 q+ 21:28:03 ... I'm not sure the rest of the group will be able to follow 21:28:09 ack roba 21:28:34 roba: I was prompted by Phil Archer 21:28:50 ... profile was a hole in the architecture 21:29:05 ... Phil wanted to have the discussion in this group 21:29:33 PWinstanley: is there anything in Ana Baptista's comment that helps us move forward 21:29:38 ... or would discourage us? 21:29:47 roba: I still have to look at 21:29:58 ... she mentions 3 different issues 21:30:10 ... I didn't see any fundamental requirement for a change of direction 21:30:20 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2018Jan/0001.html 21:30:38 PWinstanley: there's nobody to lead us 21:30:45 ... to progress on this 21:30:51 roba: what is needed 21:30:59 PWinstanley: a description of a profile 21:31:14 roba: I thought I had done it. We discussed it with the profile negotiation sub-group 21:31:24 PWinstanley: so I guess you're the leader 21:31:28 q+ 21:31:58 roba: all I've done is teasing out a definition from ISO, try to adapt it. 21:32:08 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:32:08 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/01/30-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:32:08 ... fairly simple process. 21:32:18 ack antoine 21:32:40 kcoyle: I think rob has worked on defining profiles 21:32:50 (is that ISO 10000?) 21:32:52 ... so that the conneg group can move forward 21:33:03 q+ 21:33:05 ... that's different from doing a description 21:33:26 where is the strawman? 21:33:57 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/ProfileContext 21:34:05 q+ 21:34:14 ack SimonCox 21:34:19 Is it the under Rob's name? 21:34:30 s/the/the one/ 21:34:44 antoine: about to volunteer, but not much time. 21:34:51 no - the one pulled out to the top of the document, discussion below saved for context. 21:34:57 ... maybe kcoyle's suggestion to postpone is better 21:35:10 q+ 21:35:12 ... and rely on roba's definition 21:35:21 ack kcoyle 21:35:21 q+ 21:35:28 SimonCox: kcoyle and antoine have been involved in Dublin Core and Europeana 21:35:40 ... is it a cautionary tale? usable? 21:35:52 kcoyle: it is very difficult to come with a technology 21:36:06 ... what DC has done is to come with guidelines 21:36:12 ... maybe they could be generalized 21:36:28 ... I could come with a draft (drafty!) 21:36:42 ... and we could see whether this is what we mean by guidelines. 21:36:45 q+ 21:36:50 q+ 21:36:51 ack AndreaPerego 21:37:32 AndreaPerego: basically what we have done is to identify the core classes and properties 21:37:37 ... but this was informal 21:37:57 ... classes and controlled vocabularies 21:38:05 ... madatory and optional 21:38:14 ... later on we worked with SHACL 21:38:15 q- 21:38:31 s/madatory/mandatory/ 21:38:48 ... the work I've done was to complement DCAT with a spec of what one should use 21:39:32 ... from informal to formal (SHACL) 21:39:55 ... the AP was developed as a data interchange format 21:40:12 ... it can be used internally or externally 21:40:21 ... distributed harvesting of data 21:40:25 ack roba 21:40:49 roba: there are profiles out there and tools to formalize them 21:41:04 ... there's no canonical means to represent the relation 21:41:35 ... we need a lightweight ontology that describes at a high-level how profiles are attached 21:41:54 ... and how documentation and formal specs are attached to profile 21:42:12 ... it doesn't have to be prescriptive 21:42:21 ack antoine 21:42:50 ... I believe we can do sthg 21:42:53 Antoine: +1 21:43:18 PWinstanley: proposal that we accept as a draft the definition that Rob has prepared 21:43:33 ... so that we can progress on the basis of this definition 21:43:43 q+ 21:44:00 ack antoine 21:44:29 q+ 21:44:32 PWinstanley: it needs a bit of editing but it's not a big project. 21:44:37 ack kcoyle 21:44:43 happy to take on editorial responsibility to update as group provides and agrees on evidence and change proposals to def. 21:44:51 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/ProfileContext#Draft_common_definition_and_explanation_of_.22profile.22 21:45:01 kcoyle: Ruben has a couple of objections 21:45:12 ... I would not feel confident about voting 21:45:24 q+ 21:45:42 ack antoine 21:46:25 antoine: I've tried to answer Ruben's comments 21:46:43 PWinstanley: we could handle this in the next meeting depending on Ruben's availability 21:46:43 q+ 21:46:48 ack roba 21:47:10 roba: I think we need to agree on what is an objection 21:47:37 ... I think some claims are too general 21:48:11 PWinstanley: we need to carry this one over 21:48:17 ... please continue discussion on mailing list 21:48:30 Topic: DCAT 21:48:48 Unfortunately I was also not in that meeting 21:48:50 will need evidence for any assertion that definitions are incompatible with other ideas and more importantly requirements in UCR 21:49:01 PWinstanley: we pushed ahead 21:49:09 ... we discussed two items 21:49:13 DCT meeting minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/01/24-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:49:17 ... 1. we agreed to using Github 21:49:29 s/DCT/DCAT subgroup/ 21:49:49 ... there were concerns though 21:50:12 2. we agreed to have a piece of work for reviewing how the comments are tagged 21:50:34 Topic: Profile negotiation 21:51:09 roba: we talked through the definition and the issue of tagging accuracy for use cases and requirements 21:51:18 ... there was an action to make sure tags are correct 21:51:38 ... we reviewed the direction and resourcing and goald 21:51:44 s/goald/goals 21:52:07 PWinstanley: in the table we don't have a link to the minutes of this meeting 21:52:14 ... can someone check with Dave? 21:52:27 kcoyle: I think if I change it in the agenda it will appear 21:52:41 roba: Lars undertook the process to be on top of the commands 21:53:06 ... we should attach it to the minutes 21:53:20 kcoyle: were minutes taken? 21:53:33 PWinstanley: did you use IRC/Zakim? 21:53:36 roba: no 21:53:55 ... we decided to record the actions 21:54:08 PWinstanley: will you be able to use IRC/Zakim for the next meeting? 21:54:11 roba: yes 21:54:28 Topic: ODI survey results 21:54:45 PWinstanley: Dave was going to bring them to the meeting but he's on the road 21:54:57 AOB? 21:55:13 Topic: AOB 21:55:21 q+ 21:55:46 kcoyle: I wanted to send an email that mails with links to the minutes should mention what was done 21:55:56 ... short abstract 21:55:57 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 21:56:17 Jaroslav_Pullmann: we plan to visit a workshop on ?? Linked Data in Vienna 21:56:26 ... April 17-18 21:56:40 PWinstanley: I've mentioned it to my colleagues. Very interesting 21:56:53 Jaroslav_Pullmann: one area is application of ODRL 21:57:05 ... one missing thing is guidance on applying ODRL 21:57:14 q+ 21:57:31 PWinstanley: related to the work of Ben, Dave's colleagye 21:57:34 ack antoine 21:57:49 s/colleagye/colleague/ 21:57:56 https://www.w3.org/2018/vocabws/ 21:58:02 s/??/Privacy and/ 21:58:12 thanks all! 21:58:13 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 21:58:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/01/30-dxwg-minutes.html antoine 21:58:16 Bye! 21:58:18 thanks, bye 21:58:27 Data Privacy Controls and Vocabularies 21:58:29 rrsagent, please draft minutes v2 21:58:29 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/01/30-dxwg-minutes.html kcoyle 21:58:37 present- 21:59:18 meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference 21:59:18 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.01.30 21:59:28 chair: PWinstanley 21:59:31 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:59:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/01/30-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:00:42 thanks for your help Andrea 22:01:05 Thanks for your help too kcoyle 22:01:25 have a good week kcoyle 22:01:27 bye 22:01:33 bye AndreaPerego 22:02:46 Andrea, you are by Lago Maggiore, right? We need to think about the next face-to-face, and I was hoping for Italy 22:03:00 it looks like your place isn't easy to get to 22:07:55 Got it. 22:24:10 arminhaller has joined #dxwg 22:35:25 s/Got it/ 22:52:52 arminhaller has joined #dxwg 22:59:58 arminhal_ has joined #dxwg 23:07:20 arminhaller has joined #dxwg 23:20:49 arminhaller has joined #dxwg