17:02:35 RRSAgent has joined #social 17:02:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/10/24-social-irc 17:02:37 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:02:37 Zakim has joined #social 17:02:37 good morning #social 17:02:39 Meeting: Social Web Working Group Teleconference 17:02:39 Date: 24 October 2017 17:02:58 good morning tantek 17:03:43 present+ 17:03:44 present+ 17:03:45 present+ 17:04:09 present+ 17:04:10 ajordan: ben_thatmustbeme left you a message 1 week, 1 day ago: I merged the rest of your text fixes in the the ED and and am updating a few of the more important fixes (remaining 'value' error) 17:04:10 ajordan: ben_thatmustbeme left you a message 1 week, 1 day ago: I think its good to go for an updated WD 17:04:41 zakim, who is here? 17:04:44 Present: cwebber, sandro, ben_thatmustbeme, ajordan 17:04:44 On IRC I see RRSAgent, tantek, adam, dlongley, timbl, xmpp-social, jankusanagi_, DenSchub, jungkees, jaywink, raucao, saranix, bwn, erincandescent, wilkie, jet, rhiaro, 17:04:44 ... ben_thatmustbeme, Gargron, csarven, sknebel, Loqi, melody, ajordan, mattl, bigbluehat, cwebber, surinna, dlehn, KjetilK, bitbear, aaronpk, howl, dwhly, tsyesika, 17:04:47 ... astronouth7303, sandro, nightpool, trackbot, puckipedia 17:04:53 present+ 17:05:36 i can scribe 17:05:42 scribenick: ben_thatmustbeme 17:05:47 scribe: Ben Roberts 17:05:51 Chair: Tantek 17:05:54 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2017-10-10-minutes 17:05:54 FYI I'm on audio but can't speak for ~30 minutes 17:06:08 TOPIC: approval of last meeting's minutes 17:06:19 tantek: please take a quick look 17:06:27 PROPOSED: Approve minutes from two weeks ago https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2017-10-10-minutes 17:06:37 present+ 17:06:43 +1 17:07:13 that's the second time SV_MEETING_CHAIR has happened 17:07:20 something must be borked 17:07:33 rowan has joined #social 17:07:41 its because no one set Chair: in the minutes 17:07:44 +1 17:07:57 ^^^ to the PROPOSED 17:08:03 +1 17:08:18 +1 17:09:19 present+ 17:09:23 tantek: lets go ahead and resolve them 17:09:44 TOPIC: telcon schedule 17:10:00 tantek: the next item is telcon sched, but the next meetings coming up are TPAC 17:10:02 Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2017-10-10-minutes]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=104830&oldid=104648 17:10:28 we have a slot scheduled for the CG, monday afternoon i believe 17:10:33 15:30–17:30 Social Web Incubator CG 17:10:38 Monday 17:11:09 https://www.w3.org/2017/11/TPAC/schedule.html 17:11:39 tantek: make a note of that, november 6th 3:30 17:11:51 q+ 17:12:02 ... we'll see about remote attendance, we'll certainly be using the IRC 17:12:05 eprodrom has joined #social 17:12:08 hallo 17:12:11 present+ 17:12:13 ... not sure if thats after the time change or not 17:12:13 ack cwebber 17:12:19 eprodrom: hallo! 17:13:03 cwebber: i want to point out that we said we would do it every other week but leave it open to additional weeks. I think we might want to do that for a making sure AP gets to CR 17:13:21 tantek: we had agreed to 90 minutes today and we have that possibility of adding another week 17:13:28 ... did you need more discussion or just confirmation 17:13:57 cwebber: we might need to issue a new CR next week, but i think it depends on what ends up happening today and this week 17:14:14 tantek: so you are saying you may need an additional meeting for next week either way for publishing reasons 17:14:24 sandro: isn't it conditional? 17:14:42 tantek: basically its 'if we need more time or we need it for publication' 17:15:01 ... i think its a reasonable request, are there any objections? 17:15:13 ... not hearing any obj. i'm going to approve that 17:15:45 TOPIC: activity pub 17:15:54 tantek: cwebber, what is left for CR 17:16:32 eprodrom_ has joined #social 17:16:35 cwebber: the major thing is the test suite, and i got it written. I was deploying it this morning but ran in to servers issues. the software is good in theory, its just a matter of working through the deploy issues 17:16:52 ... by the end of today, i should have it up and people on the IRC should be able to see it and test against it 17:16:57 \o/ yay for being written 17:17:04 tantek: awesome progress 17:17:11 congrats cwebber 17:17:24 sandro: other than puckipedia who do you expect to be submitting implementations in the near-term? 17:17:38 ^^^ same 17:17:49 cwebber: i'm going to submit one and ... and i'm going to try to push others to submit them, most notably mastodon 17:17:54 probably 17:18:02 sandro: ajordan are you expecting to have this implemented or not yet? 17:18:12 ajordan: (via IRC) probably 17:18:13 it's about 50-50 that it's done in time 17:18:27 sandro: cwebber are you expecting these to all be complete or a feature matrix sort of thing? 17:18:28 been pretty swamped for like a month, trying to avoid burnout :-) 17:18:45 understood 17:19:09 cwebber: its going to be a feature matrix, the test suite actually will export the implementation report and i can just plug it in to make it nice and "griddy" 17:19:28 tantek: there is also an implementation with bridgy 17:19:29 I expect to ship AS2 representations this week, hopefully the rest of AP isn't too far off but I'm not sure 17:19:37 ... idon't know if that can be run against it 17:19:38 fed.brid.gy 17:19:41 ajordan++ 17:19:42 ajordan has 21 karma in this channel (22 overall) 17:19:49 cwebber: distbin by bengo and sloph by me 17:19:59 I have an app that should be ready to test for next week 17:20:02 Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=104831&oldid=104649 17:20:10 (It's a client app, c2s) 17:20:21 cwebber: (lists a bunch of app) anyone else i should reach out to? 17:21:01 tantek: i know in the past two weeks, there have been one maybe two people using fed.brid.gy to reply to mastodon 17:21:03 I'm honestly over the moon that fed.brid.gy is a thing 17:21:13 ... its not a test per-se but at least its real world example 17:21:33 ... thats one of the things we would want to bring up with you in the transition call 17:21:56 ... you may want to consider having a section in your implementation report for real-world interop or something like that 17:22:08 ajordan: haven't pushed it 17:22:17 ... list them or give permalinks, etc 17:22:20 I'll get it up this weekend! 17:22:34 \o/ 17:22:34 cwebber: i can ask that, yeah 17:22:45 tantek: is that reasonable to you sandro? 17:22:50 sandro: yeah, thats great 17:22:56 https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues 17:23:11 cwebber: the issues that were moved to extensions have been closed, so thats moving along nicely 17:23:20 ... everything thats left on there is editorial 17:23:39 ... hopefully we'll have everything ready for a PR ready document by next tuesday 17:23:53 sandro: you want to do another editorial CR next week? 17:24:03 cwebber: i don't know the process, does it make sense? 17:24:16 sandro: no need to, you can just wrap them in to the PR? 17:24:25 ... the question there is when do we think we will go to PR? 17:24:58 .... should we say nov 14th as a target deadline for imp reports 17:25:06 cwebber: that sounds like a good goal 17:25:21 tantek: if we are going to wait that long, there is no harm doing an editorial CR is there? 17:25:37 ... i was under the impression we were going to try for like next week 17:25:45 ... i would be supportive either way 17:26:07 sandro: what is important to have the editorial changes are done in the ED at least soon 17:26:12 q+ 17:26:23 q- 17:26:31 q+ 17:26:32 tantek: i agree, cwebber is that something that you can commit to by next week? 17:26:36 q? 17:26:39 ack eprodrom 17:26:39 ... incorporated in to the ED 17:26:41 cwebber: yeah 17:26:47 eprodrom: i can help too 17:27:28 now I started, I plan to keep working on the issues aiming for them all to have text in the ED by Friday, so people can review over the weekend and if we want to vote a new CR on Tuesday 17:27:39 I did like half in the last 2 hours 17:27:39 rhiaro: great 17:27:51 cwebber: i think thats everything i had to say 17:28:16 sandro: we didn't quite resolve if we would do a new CR next week or just get it in to ED 17:28:33 cwebber: i think it seems like a good idea to issue a new CR 17:28:48 sandro: it also makes the PR transition a little cleaner 17:28:49 +1 new CR 17:29:04 sandro: can you have that ready by monday so we can review? 17:29:08 cwebber: yes 17:29:24 30 minutes? 17:29:37 sandro: and I guess just a quick meeting on tuesday just to do a quick vote 17:29:51 i probably won't be able to be on next week 17:29:57 tantek: any objections 17:30:01 eprodrom, I think 30 mins should be fine 17:30:04 xmpp-social has joined #social 17:30:07 tantek: i just want to record that there are no objections 17:30:22 cwebber: 30 minutes seems reasonable to me 17:30:25 tantek: me too 17:30:29 I can chair 17:30:36 ... i'm also going to volunteer evan to chair 17:30:46 https://test.activitypub.rocks/ 17:30:48 Will be coming off of transatlantic flight but I can rock that 17:31:23 cwebber: one more thing, this is the version of the test suite thats running, it doesn't support https but its up there and verify that version for now 17:31:42 ... you can do the first and last one, which are just clicking buttons to say you support things 17:31:42 How do I kill people in this mush 17:31:53 j/k 17:31:57 tantek: evan: what? 17:32:21 cwebber: this is reusing the interface i used for a MUD... 17:32:44 tantek: i think we have answered all the questions, congratulations cwebber for getting the test suite up there 17:33:04 I should probably note for the record that I don't want to kill people. That's just something that noobs say when they join a MUD/MUSH for the first time. 17:33:09 tantek: i think we have some time for last call for implementations right? 17:33:15 eprodrom: :) 17:33:44 +1 17:33:56 tantek: cwebber do you have a stub implemntation report? 17:34:12 cwebber: i can copy and paste the output if i just say no to everything 17:34:15 https://test.activitypub.rocks/download-report/zgok7bivx36lpconvk3bx7ggz34hcemesmrkas4u3hdn23txzvnq 17:34:17 tantek: i mean the summary 17:34:27 cwebber: i'm doing that today 17:34:34 https://activitypub.rocks/implementation-report/ 17:35:01 tantek: so thats where it would be at that link? 17:35:06 cwebber: yes 17:35:28 TOPIC: websub 17:35:39 tantek: any new issues on websub? 17:35:49 https://github.com/w3c/websub/issues/127 17:35:50 [mkovatsc] #127 Review for Proposed Recommendation 17:35:58 aaronpk: yes, someone submitted a review of several ... i'll just post the link 17:36:16 ... i have not yet started to address these 17:36:16 JanKusanagi has joined #social 17:36:46 ... and then tantek opened an issue to discuss the text to refer to the text 17:36:58 just the text links to it, its not a normative change 17:37:21 tantek: that one (127) looks like it needs to be broken up in to sep issues 17:37:29 aaronpk: yeah, that will be my action item 17:37:52 tantek: other than that? 17:38:03 aaronpk: other than taht, i don't htink i have any updates 17:38:33 tantek: i believe i can share that there are no negative responses to the PR yet 17:38:53 ... it sounds like if you are able to resolve these issues we may get another in 17:39:08 sandro: it would be good to remind people at TPAC to vote 17:39:38 ... right now i would need to extend the response time limit 17:39:51 tantek: can we extend it to thursday at TPAC? 17:39:54 sandro: sure 17:40:09 ajordan: oh, har 17:41:08 tantek: aaronpk how soon do you think you can get those issues created? 17:41:22 aaronpk: i can probably do that either today or tomorrow 17:41:26 tantek: sounds good 17:41:40 ... sandro anything we should do to prepare, and editors draft, etc? 17:41:57 sandro: sure, keeping the editors draft up to date is always good 17:42:23 tantek: so aaronpk you have licesnse to keep updating the ED as you resolve these issues 17:42:30 ... anything else for websub? 17:43:12 TOPIC: JF2 17:43:24 I can scribe 17:43:29 scribenick: eprodrom 17:43:54 tantek: take us through what's happening with JF2 17:44:03 tantek: there will be a new ED 17:44:11 s/ED/WD 17:44:12 ben_thatmustbeme: not a lot of normative changes, editorial changes 17:44:31 ben_thatmustbeme: also examples and references 17:44:35 http://dissolve.github.io/jf2/#changes-from-19-july-2017-wd-to-this-version 17:45:01 q? 17:45:09 q+ 17:45:15 ack eprodrom 17:45:41 does it matter in terms of process since it's a WD? 17:46:08 I just lost my audio responses 17:46:11 eprodrom: were there any editorial changes that could be normative? 17:46:29 ben_thatmustbeme: reviewed changes, were not normative 17:46:48 I guess https://github.com/dissolve/jf2/commit/d766076b00d9af40521d669872fc3c4119ebf17e is technically normative but it was pretty clear so 17:47:45 trying 17:47:50 its not behaving 17:49:10 right, that red text is not in https://dissolve.github.io/jf2/ 17:49:12 ben_thatmustbeme: https://github.com/dissolve/jf2/pull/35 17:49:12 [strugee] #35 Fix changelog typo 17:49:14 ben_thatmustbeme: the change ajordan is noting was not from the previous WD; it was in a branch for development of this text 17:49:36 https://www.w3.org/TR/jf2/#documents 17:49:54 tantek: any other edits that might be normative 17:50:01 timbl has joined #social 17:50:11 and currently published version: https://www.w3.org/TR/jf2/ 17:50:12 [Benjamin Roberts] JF2 Post Serialization Format 17:50:14 ben_thatmustbeme: as ajordan said, he did most of the edits, and I reviewed and pulled them 17:50:20 q? 17:50:33 ben_thatmustbeme: if you could merge the PR I just linked to 17:50:43 that'd be neat 17:50:44 tantek: any more questions before we take this to a proposal? 17:51:05 PROPOSED: publish an updated working draft of JF@ 17:51:06 +1 17:51:11 s/JF@/JF2/ 17:51:14 overcapped 17:51:22 +1 17:51:24 PROPOSED: publish an updated working draft of JF2 17:51:24 ajordan: i will merge tha 17:51:25 t 17:51:30 +1 17:51:32 ben_thatmustbeme++ 17:51:32 ben_thatmustbeme has 86 karma in this channel (257 overall) 17:51:43 +1 17:51:44 +1 17:52:13 +1 17:52:39 scribenick: ben_thatmustbeme 17:52:54 tantek: this is an ordinary WD so you should be able to do it with echidna 17:53:00 whooo one new publish and one planned publish! 17:53:30 ben_thatmustbeme: thank YOU 17:53:49 RESOLVED: publish an updated working draft of JF2 17:53:55 Sorry I missed that part 17:54:38 tantek: anything else on JF2? 17:54:43 ben_thatmustbeme: no thats it 17:55:09 noooot yet 17:55:12 maybe one day 17:55:14 tantek: any new documents needing to be published or needing updates? 17:55:16 you'll all be the first to know 17:55:21 tantek: was hoping for SWP 17:55:33 ... thats okay, i'll keep pestering you amy 17:55:40 TOPIC: Post Type Discovery 17:55:56 https://github.com/tantek/post-type-discovery/issues/30 17:55:56 [tantek] #30 add "reacji" discovery with reply fallback, consider like fallback 17:56:26 tantek: I documented some parts with Reacji, its a response that has a fallback of reply, which pretty much every response does, but it also has a 'like' fallback possibly 17:57:12 i wanted to bring that up to the groups attention and see if anyone else has seen something like this where there is a new post type that other systems might not know how to fallback 17:57:26 ... thats all i had there, just wanted to bring people's attention to it 17:57:50 q? 17:58:11 TOPIC: any other document statuses 17:58:16 tantek: any other documents? 17:58:19 ... no? 17:58:37 TOPIC: CG update 17:58:44 had meeting 2017-10-11 17:59:19 cwebber: had a call last time that was pretty interesting, good attendance, we talked about (?) filtering 17:59:27 ... pretty much took up the whole meeting 17:59:34 Filtering is really interesting 17:59:37 ... i believe we have another call tomorrow 17:59:49 aaronpk: its on my calendar for tomorrow 17:59:52 cwebber: the Bayesian spam filter we use for OStatus is pretty good 17:59:58 TOPIC: Any Other Business? 18:00:12 cwebber: I should probably get it up and running again 18:00:24 FYI: https://www.w3.org/wiki/SocialCG/2017-10-25 18:00:46 tantek: not hearing any other business i'm going to go ahead and close the meeting 18:01:16 ... we are scheduled for 30 minutes at most next week, evan will be chairing, the purpose will be to review and hopefully approve an updated AP CR 18:01:27 ... it would be great to have you all there 18:01:37 same bat time, same IRC channel 18:01:42 will do 18:01:45 https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=Socialwg/2017-10-31&action=edit&redlink=1 18:02:07 eprodrom, cool... yeah it came up! :) 18:02:24 thanks everyone 18:02:33 ben_thatmustbeme++ for scribing! 18:02:33 ben_thatmustbeme has 87 karma in this channel (258 overall) 18:02:34 ben_thatmustbeme++ 18:02:34 ben_thatmustbeme has 88 karma in this channel (259 overall) 18:02:37 tantek++ 18:02:37 tantek has 73 karma in this channel (396 overall) 18:02:38 ben_thatmustbeme++ for scribing 18:02:42 eprodrom++ too! 18:02:42 slow down! 18:02:48 Loqi: nah 18:03:22 trackbot end meeting 18:03:22 Zakim, list attendees 18:03:22 As of this point the attendees have been cwebber, sandro, ben_thatmustbeme, ajordan, tantek, aaronpk, rhiaro, eprodrom 18:03:30 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 18:03:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/10/24-social-minutes.html trackbot 18:03:31 RRSAgent, bye 18:03:31 I see no action items