15:40:41 RRSAgent has joined #pwg 15:40:41 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/10/23-pwg-irc 15:40:42 rrsagent, set log public 15:40:42 Meeting: Publishing Working Group Telco 15:40:42 Chair: tzviya 15:40:42 Date: 2017-10-23 15:40:42 Regrets+ Vlad, Evan_Owens, clapierre, ReinaldoFerraz 15:40:42 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publ-wg/2017Oct/0037.html 15:40:43 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2017-20-23: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publ-wg/2017Oct/0037.html 15:50:44 regrets+ NickRuffilo 15:54:22 leonardr has joined #pwg 15:54:26 present+ Leonard 15:54:42 present+ 15:54:58 present+ wolfgang 15:55:50 Is gotomeeting already active? 15:56:17 *welcome back, leonard! 15:56:20 josh has joined #pwg 15:56:20 Thanks @dauwhe - good to see me too!! 15:56:29 Avneesh has joined #pwg 15:57:37 baldurbjarnason has joined #pwg 15:58:27 scribenick: rachel 15:58:49 present+ 15:58:54 present+ 15:58:55 cmaden2 has joined #pwg 15:59:01 laudrain has joined #pwg 15:59:04 present+ 15:59:08 present+ 15:59:12 present+ dauwhe 15:59:13 present+ Luc 15:59:43 present+ 15:59:54 JunGamo has joined #pwg 16:00:00 present+ 16:00:02 present+ 16:00:13 present+ Chris_Maden 16:00:14 lsullam has joined #pwg 16:00:35 evan has joined #pwg 16:00:42 present+ JunGamo 16:00:49 jeffp has joined #pwg 16:01:19 present+ Lillian Sullam 16:01:25 present+ Evan Yamanishi 16:01:32 present+ Jeff Printy 16:01:47 @Dave so impressve 16:02:24 *looks quite dangerous to me @dauwhe! 16:02:29 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pwg 16:02:36 present+ 16:02:52 garth has joined #pwg 16:02:59 present +Garth 16:03:00 for sure ! 16:03:03 Presnet+ George 16:03:05 present+ George 16:03:11 present+ Garth 16:03:12 rkwright has joined #pwg 16:03:37 present+ 16:03:53 HeatherF has joined #pwg 16:04:05 timCole has joined #pwg 16:04:31 pkra has joined #pwg 16:04:33 Hadrien has joined #pwg 16:04:36 https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/publ-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2017/2017-10-16-minutes.html 16:04:43 topic: last week's minutes 16:04:45 present+ 16:04:50 RESOLVED: Meeting minutes approved 16:05:04 laurentlemeur has joined #pwg 16:05:07 tzviya: new members? 16:05:17 presnet + 16:05:21 present + 16:05:22 liisamk has joined #pwg 16:05:34 Topic: Packaging 16:05:40 present+ Heather_Flanagan 16:05:43 tzviya: this is on the agenda for TPAC 16:05:58 marisa_demeglio has joined #pwg 16:06:09 ...security is not on the agenda for TPAC (confirmed by leonardr) 16:06:14 duga has joined #pwg 16:06:20 present+ 16:06:26 ... packaging and web packaging are due in a few weeks 16:06:38 ...we hould define what our requirements are 16:06:41 q? 16:06:50 ...we can have a discussion or start a google doc 16:06:55 q+ 16:07:01 q? 16:07:01 q+ 16:07:01 George has joined #pwg 16:07:06 ack lr 16:07:13 ack leonardr 16:07:28 present+ Tim_Cole 16:07:29 q+ 16:07:33 George now on IRC 16:07:35 leonardr: the trick to packaging is that we're looking at this as a "package neutral" approach 16:07:50 ...anything we write up, we want to continue that approach 16:07:50 ack li 16:07:59 q+ 16:08:03 liisamk: one requirement is that the pkg can be quite large 16:08:12 https://docs.google.com/document/d/15oig71-ybZDt7G-C0CGmf7KG9k35y0ggu7sXLRadH2k/edit?usp=sharing 16:08:16 ack da 16:08:19 ...audio is a good reason for this 16:08:28 Dave_Stroup has joined #pwg 16:08:40 q+ 16:08:46 clapierre has joined #pwg 16:08:54 q? 16:09:12 dauwhe: I hope we're not proposing making our own pkg system. I would mention that the impact of existing pkging has an impact on our spec including manifest and other elements 16:09:16 q? 16:09:17 q+ 16:09:20 ack iv 16:09:28 tzviya: we are hoping not to create something new 16:09:35 pkra has joined #pwg 16:09:41 present+ pkra 16:10:02 q+ 16:10:18 ivan: there is similar work to be done as we did for wp in terms of requirements gathering. Some notes in WP might be better suited for PWP. 16:10:43 ...one thing we discussed is essential vs nonessential resources which is relevant for offlining and packaging 16:11:02 q? 16:11:07 Notes we have formal requirements! http://w3c.github.io/dpub-pwp-ucr/index.html#pwp 16:11:08 ...some of the security and integrity issues may be different when we talk about packaging and web packaging 16:11:34 ...we must make it clear in the draft that it is not the goal of the group to create a new packaging format 16:11:40 q? 16:11:44 ack bald 16:12:00 For some reason Gotomeeting isn’t unmuting 16:12:00 baldurbjarnason: [on mute] 16:12:07 ack ga 16:13:02 garth: at one time there was rough agreement (I thought it was a good idea) that we would have default reading order and then secondary stuff, that you could take offline 16:13:26 ...back to leonardr comment about package neutral, this makes pwp a thin specification 16:13:54 q+ to ask what package neutral means 16:13:55 mateus has joined #pwg 16:13:55 they are 2 Baldur ! I don’t which one to help 16:13:59 present+ 16:14:01 ...if pwp is going tobe package neutral we need to also look at the epub4 profile to examine what an actual package will be 16:14:07 q+ 16:14:12 q+ 16:15:30 baldurbjarnason: in terms of what ivan said in terms of security, we need to support some sort of signing based on the domains. 16:15:38 +1 to Baldur 16:15:49 ...if we want symmetry btwn packaged and unpackaged 16:16:40 q? 16:16:52 ack la 16:16:58 ...it needs to be something that can be easily implemented in a single work station. Some dialog with people that manage whatever format we go with to make sure they allow local host resources in packages because otherwise we are looking at a complex deployment with access control which is unmanageable 16:17:13 q- 16:17:26 q- 16:17:46 laudrain - I'm having trouble hearing you; can you add your notes here? 16:17:56 ack wo 16:18:20 ???: what do you mean by package neutral in packaging 16:18:29 s/???/Wolfgang/ 16:18:36 present+ 16:18:43 Unpackaging the Google format is exciting because you have to reverse the HPACK header compression 16:18:56 q+ 16:18:57 pckaging and unpackaging : issues on server side to package (neutrality), and on device side to unpackage (low prerformance devices) 16:19:19 s/pckaging/packaging/ 16:19:22 ack ha 16:19:45 Indeed, seems odd! 16:19:54 Hadrien: are we trying to have a single solution or are we considering multiple formats 16:20:59 q? 16:21:01 q+ 16:21:06 q+ 16:21:08 ack da 16:21:15 ...I don't think we'd be able to do epub and a packaging format for the web at the same time. They are mutually exclusive 16:21:38 dauwhe: can you explain why the google packaging format would not work for epub? 16:21:59 Hadrien: some of ??? answers made it clear that these would not work, including signing 16:22:11 s/???/Jeffrey Yasskin 16:22:33 q? 16:22:45 tzviya: we're listing requirements not making decisions 16:23:18 ... please add this as a requirement 16:23:19 ack le 16:24:12 leonardr: we should consider as a part of the process, on the PWP document - building a profile in real life will clearly help us see what's generic vs profile specific 16:24:13 +1 Hadrien’s — the EPUB profile needs to support building publication that were never on the Web 16:24:23 ...I can show the work we've done on pdf 16:25:01 https://docs.google.com/document/d/15oig71-ybZDt7G-C0CGmf7KG9k35y0ggu7sXLRadH2k/edit?usp=sharing 16:25:03 q? 16:25:05 tzviya: we haven't agreed on generic packaging, this is a suggested requirements - let's get these all down 16:25:24 Topic: Archiving 16:25:24 Topic: archiving 16:25:27 Dave: no doubt, not disagreeing. 16:25:44 q? 16:25:47 q+ 16:25:51 ack ha 16:25:53 q+ 16:25:54 tzviya: we talked about including archiving as a part of one of these specs. Which spec does this belong to? 16:26:15 q+ 16:26:24 Hadrien: this sounds related to pwp but I'm not sure it is. There will be requirements around versioning - which goes beyond pwp. 16:26:27 ack li 16:26:37 liisamk: I wonder if you can clarify what you mean by archiving 16:27:00 q+ 16:27:04 tzviya: I have clarification from the digital publishing interest group 16:27:32 leonardr: example - the national archives announced that as of 2022 they will not longer accept physical material for archiving, digital only 16:27:42 +1 to leonardr 16:27:42 ack ge 16:27:53 +1 to Leonard 16:28:09 q+ 16:28:16 DPUB IG archiving https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Task_Forces/archival 16:28:16 George: on a a call with Bill, we were told there was an ISO group working on archiving of epub3 16:28:26 ...we should make sure we're in synch 16:28:27 q- 16:28:34 dkaplan3 has joined #pwg 16:28:38 ack la 16:28:50 q+ 16:29:07 q+ 16:29:12 q+ 16:29:14 ack bill 16:29:15 laudrain: I'm not aware of this ISO work. I wanted to say that for legal reasons there is a project in france to archive ebooks in the national library. 16:29:17 I have not heard anything about archival EPUB3 and I chair the relevant ISO SC (TC171SC2) where this would be expected to happen. 16:30:04 Bill_Kasdorf: A NISO proposal was sent out to members 16:30:46 q? 16:31:11 q- 16:31:35 zakim, who is here? 16:31:35 Present: Leonard, tzviya, wolfgang, Avneesh, rachel, baldurbjarnason, josh, dauwhe, Luc, mattg, ivan, rdeltour, Chris_Maden, JunGamo, Lillian, Sullam, Evan, Yamanishi, Jeff, 16:31:38 ... Printy, Bill_Kasdorf, George, Garth, rkwright, Hadrien, Heather_Flanagan, duga, Tim_Cole, pkra, mateus, clapierre 16:31:38 On IRC I see dkaplan3, mateus, pkra, clapierre, Dave_Stroup, George, duga, marisa_demeglio, liisamk, laurentlemeur, Hadrien, timCole, HeatherF, rkwright, garth, Bill_Kasdorf, 16:31:38 ... jeffp, evan, lsullam, JunGamo, laudrain, cmaden2, baldurbjarnason, Avneesh, josh, leonardr, RRSAgent, Zakim, wolfgang, mattg, ivan, rdeltour, plinss, rachel, tzviya, dauwhe, 16:31:40 you also need to know when a pub has changed requiring archiving change of whole or part 16:31:41 tzviya: archiving - how to construct a file so it is deconstructable 16:31:42 ... github-bot, dbaron, jyasskin, astearns, bigbluehat, ShaneM, wseltzer 16:31:48 present+ dkaplan3 16:31:55 evan has left #pwg 16:32:02 dkaplan3: archiving - how do we create a file that is preservable 16:32:05 ack ha 16:32:15 q+ 16:32:19 evan has joined #pwg 16:32:36 Hadrien: even though it's tempting to look at each countries project, archiving here goes beyond that 16:33:06 q+ 16:33:09 Here's some explanatory text that was included in the ballot from NISO: 16:33:11 ...there are a number of groups at each national library that we can talk to. We need to keep both archiving ebooks and archiving the web in mind 16:33:12 New versions of EPUB will be developed in W3C, since International Digital Publishing Forum merged to W3C in January 2017. In ISO, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 (Document description and processing languanges) co-ordinates EPUB standardization, but TC 46/SC 4 will for the time being be able to participate in the process due to our involvement in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/JWG 7 with JTC 1/SC 34 and IEC TA 100. JWG 7 is developing long term preservation -related spe[CUT] 16:33:13 ack le 16:33:45 leonardr: back to the original question - are these wp or pwp? I think there are points that need to be on both 16:33:55 ack iv 16:34:11 tzviya: sounds as though we need archiving requirements for WP and PWP 16:34:50 The balance of the quote I pasted in from the NISO ballot is important: "This specification will not be part of EPUB family of standards, but if an archivable version of the format ("EPUB/A") is developed in the future, the results from JWG 7 can support the process." 16:35:11 ivan: we might want to consider having some kind of workshop where we bring together national library representatives to discuss archiving on both levels (WP and PWP) 16:35:23 Avneesh_ has joined #pwg 16:35:23 q+ 16:35:29 +1 ivan 16:35:29 ack dk 16:35:31 ... most of the people in this group do not have an archiving background 16:35:57 +1 to archiving workshop 16:36:23 dkaplan3: there are a number of people with the expertise from the archivist side in this group 16:36:42 ... the same as any niche area within this group such as locators and accessibility 16:36:51 q? 16:37:26 PDF Conference being hosted by NARA & LOC - https://www.pdfa.org/new/pdf-day-washington-dc-registration-is-now-open/ 16:37:34 may be worth coordinating with them... 16:37:40 tzviya: volunteers to work on archiving requirements 16:37:57 q+ 16:38:08 ...dkaplan3 volunteers 16:38:18 ack bil 16:38:22 ...I think we can say that archiving requirements are to come 16:38:24 We should involve people from National Libraries 16:38:25 link to paperless NARA article: https://fcw.com/articles/2017/08/24/nara-paperless-future-mazmanian.aspx 16:38:29 q+ 16:38:32 ivan: if we can do more that's welcome 16:38:44 q+ 16:38:50 ack ge 16:38:58 Bill_Kasdorf: the NISO and ISO project is specifically regarding long term preservation which is one type of archiving 16:39:35 George: I can ping Todd Carpenter from NISO and the deputy director of Library services if there's something we would like to ask of them 16:39:41 q+ 16:39:46 I’ll contact people form the French National Library who cares about this point 16:40:07 s/form/from/ 16:40:12 ack dk 16:40:36 dkaplan3: we don't need to get into the weeds right now 16:41:18 ack bill 16:41:23 ...there are "tiers" of archiving much like accessibility. There is a lot of research we can pull from to document 16:41:42 Bill_Kasdorf: Frances K is excellent to work with 16:41:53 s/K/Cave 16:41:57 s/Frances K/Francis Cave/ 16:42:01 s/Frances/Francis 16:42:14 Tzviya says “quirky” when she might mean something else. :-) 16:42:40 Topic: Spring Face to Face 16:42:46 https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/publ-wg/Meetings/F2F/2018.05.Toronto 16:42:48 16:42:54 tzviya: Kobo is hosting us in Toronto in May 16:43:07 ...hopefully many of you cn come 16:43:12 s/cn/can 16:43:25 ... thanks Kobo! 16:43:31 Topic: TPAC 16:43:34 https://docs.google.com/document/d/12J3Y3bb5fdPh1r2XH9YloINkNSxBJArocKY108sYCZ0/edit?usp=sharing 16:43:56 q+ 16:44:00 tzviya: we've pretty much finalized the agenda. This is your chance for last minute changes. 16:44:00 q+ 16:44:03 ack av 16:44:51 Avneesh_: regarding the accessibility tf meeting has been scheduled with Silver and ???. We will talk about incorporating publishing in Silver or WCAG roadmap 16:45:00 s/???/APA/ 16:45:12 ... if main group people are interested they are welcome to join 16:45:20 ...it's monday at 3:30 or 4:30 16:45:33 ivan: send the exact info and I will add to the google doc 16:45:54 q? 16:46:00 ack iv 16:46:12 ivan: I've seen 2 pending questions/issues 16:46:32 ...marcos cannot be at our web manifest meeting. Do we want to switch it to a better time for him? 16:47:13 ...we do have a session for transitions, can we invite ??? 16:47:32 q+ 16:47:37 ...I've said yes but I do not know if it will fit timewise 16:47:49 s/???/Samuel Petit/ 16:47:50 ...we can finalize this wednesday 16:47:57 ack ha 16:48:10 Hadrien: this is a discussion we're having within EDR as well 16:48:26 ...we could target something more pragmatic 16:49:03 q? 16:49:21 cmaden21 has joined #pwg 16:49:25 ivan: this wednesday tzviya garth and I will finalize possibly with some minor changes 16:49:56 ...garth is on the hook for selecting a restaurant 16:50:10 +1 for dinner sounds good... 16:50:19 +1 16:50:22 https://github.com/w3c/publ-loc 16:50:26 Topic: Open Pull Requests 16:50:42 https://github.com/w3c/wpub/pull/87 16:51:06 tzviya: #87 is a point of clarification from mattg 16:51:12 ivan: just merge 16:51:37 thanks. 16:51:41 clapierre has left #pwg 16:51:51 cmaden21 has left #pwg 16:51:54 evan has left #pwg 16:52:01 Have a nice afternoon :) 16:52:07 dkaplan3 has left #pwg 16:52:27 RESOLVED: Merge #87 16:52:27 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:52:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/10/23-pwg-minutes.html ivan 16:52:36 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:52:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/10/23-pwg-minutes.html ivan