12:08:55 RRSAgent has joined #poe 12:08:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/10/16-poe-irc 12:08:57 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:08:57 Zakim has joined #poe 12:08:59 Meeting: Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Teleconference 12:08:59 Date: 16 October 2017 12:09:11 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20171016 12:09:22 ivan has changed the topic to: Agenda 2017-10-16: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20171016 12:09:44 Chair: Renato 12:10:45 renato has joined #poe 12:23:44 present+ 12:26:51 michaelS has joined #poe 12:27:10 present+ 12:29:15 present+ 12:30:22 victor has joined #poe 12:33:20 hi! much like Caroline, I am also connected from my phone tethering, with narrowband and prone to be disconnected. I decline to scribe. 12:34:16 benws has joined #poe 12:35:17 scribe: michaelS 12:35:25 scribenick: michaelS 12:35:48 topic: approval of last weeks minutes 12:35:49 regrets+ Caroline 12:35:51 https://www.w3.org/2017/10/09-poe-minutes 12:35:51 present+ 12:35:59 present+ 12:36:14 renato: no objection, taken as agreed 12:36:17 LindaB has joined #poe 12:36:19 present+ Linda 12:36:25 https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/actions/48 12:36:30 topic: Actions arising 12:37:16 victor: a json-ld document has been created for each Turtle document 12:37:27 ... they are accessibly by the Valdation page 12:37:32 Example 12:37:32 http://odrlapi.appspot.com/samples/sample005.json 12:37:40 https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Validation 12:38:21 simonstey has joined #poe 12:38:32 https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/actions/49 12:38:47 michaelS: is the Turtle and json-ld numbering in sync 12:38:51 victor: will check 12:39:55 This test regime has two objectives: 12:39:55 1. To ensure that each of the features listed in the Exit Criteria are properly supported by implementations. 12:39:55 2. To ensure interoperability between implementations. 12:39:57 The validation tests help ensure that implementations agree on which policies are valid (and which are not) based on the normative part of the specification. The tests should generate a boolean output (valid/invalid) that matches the values provided in the tests. 12:39:59 The validation tests do not presuppose the use of SHACL Shapes to test for validity. But shapes covering the tests are provided for those who want to use them. 12:40:01 The evaluation tests also promote interoperability. Given that two implementations agree as to the state-of-the-world such that they agree on what duties and constraints have been fulfilled and satisfied, then they should agree on what permissions, prohibitions, and obligations an assignee can exercise or be bound by. 12:40:34 benws: has a short outline - and the changes of the Evalution page do note make sense to him any longer. 12:41:20 https://github.com/w3c/poe/blob/gh-pages/test/test-regime.md 12:41:27 renato: could we agree on Action 49 12:43:58 Discussion about how to use the Implementation Reports 12:44:31 renato: a link to the input sheet should be added to the Test Regime page 12:45:26 benws: don't we presuppose to use SHACL shapes for validation 12:45:35 victor: agreed to that 12:46:32 https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Evaluator 12:46:36 benws: raised issues regarding the updated Evaluator page 12:47:10 ... pointed at example 19 12:47:31 https://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#prohibition 12:48:17 ... the truth table does not tell if the Prohibition is infringed or not 12:48:21 ... example 20 12:49:05 q+ 12:49:19 ... the evalutor does not know that 12:49:28 present+ 12:51:06 knowing whether a rule is active or not depends on a blackbox evaluation of optionally attached constraints 12:51:32 the same holds for knowing whether a prohib. is infringed or not 12:52:03 an obligation to not do something is a prohib 12:52:25 michaelS: what should be the result of an evaluator: to check if the results aligns with the rules in the IM definition? 12:52:53 benws: e.g. an obligation not to take an action cannot be fulfilled 12:53:54 a consequence is only active if it was triggered 12:54:08 *might be active 12:55:54 how do you know if a remedy is active? 12:57:14 renato: the Rule column aligns with what we have in the IM 12:59:36 benws: the Information Model is the backgroud for the Evaluator 13:00:06 I can take a closer look to the Evaluator in the next 10 days 13:00:32 renato: asked benws the bad part of the truth tables are the Rule columns? 13:01:44 renato: active is a requirement for setting the state of a Rule 13:02:32 renato: the evaluator is something we as a group had never a common view on 13:03:12 ... it would be the best to integrate the Rule (state) in some way into the evaluator page 13:03:30 Topic: Test Regime 13:03:40 s/Test/Testing 13:04:13 https://w3c.github.io/poe/test/test-regime 13:05:09 https://w3c.github.io/poe/test/implementors 13:05:53 Agreed: to use the github.io URLs 13:07:22 LindaB: it should be defined soon how to evaluate ODRL 13:07:59 renato: hopes to find an agreement soon - LindaB should tell the group what is currently confusing 13:09:04 what do you mean more precisely by "Test Dummy"? 13:09:25 sample input data and output? 13:09:28 this would be great 13:09:37 renato: remove the testdummy from the implementation page 13:09:49 https://github.com/w3c/poe/projects/2 13:09:56 michaelS: in the output page, in the input sheet it helps 13:10:02 renato: agreed. 13:10:21 q+ 13:10:28 q- 13:10:49 topic: Project issues 13:11:14 https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/278 13:11:42 ivan: the Github issue 278 is still open - how to proceed? 13:12:04 renato: considers it as Editorial - somebody disagrees? 13:12:20 ... nobody raised an objection 13:13:08 ivan: the other issues in the Backlog column are Editorial - and can be fixed later 13:13:33 ivan: changed #278 to Editorial 13:13:43 q+ 13:13:57 Topic: Any other business 13:14:30 ivan: the group has planned to publish some Notes - what are the plans for that? 13:15:01 I agree with Ben 13:15:20 benws: has plans for a Best Practice and will call in help from Victor and others 13:15:38 q- 13:16:08 victor: for the Formal Semantics Notes he will check with Simon and Sabrina how to proceed 13:16:20 ivan: re IPTC Profile 13:17:44 michaelS: IPTC starts to work on the RightsML Profile, may be published in April 2018 13:19:11 Ivan: when will we have implementations for the implementaiton results 13:19:33 benws: we have implementations but no results for the Evaluator 13:20:16 renato: nothing else to discuss - the meeting is closed. 13:20:35 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 13:20:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/10/16-poe-minutes.html michaelS 13:20:55 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:20:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/10/16-poe-minutes.html ivan 13:20:55 trackbot, end telcon 13:20:55 Zakim, list attendees 13:20:55 As of this point the attendees have been renato, michaelS, ivan, benws, victor, Linda, simonstey 13:21:03 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:21:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/10/16-poe-minutes.html trackbot 13:21:04 RRSAgent, bye 13:21:04 I see no action items