IRC log of rqtf on 2017-10-11
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:45:01 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rqtf
- 12:45:01 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/10/11-rqtf-irc
- 12:45:03 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 12:45:03 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rqtf
- 12:45:05 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
- 12:45:05 [trackbot]
- Date: 11 October 2017
- 12:45:22 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Accessibility of virtual reality - preparation of findings.
- 12:45:46 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Update: questions posed to Web Authentication Working Group and meeting arrangements at TPAC 2017.
- 12:46:37 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Update: revision of W3C Working Group Note, "Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA".
- 12:46:47 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Other topics of interest.
- 12:46:57 [jasonjgw]
- present+
- 12:57:06 [scott_h]
- scott_h has joined #rqtf
- 12:59:29 [janina]
- present+
- 13:00:14 [MichaelC]
- MichaelC has joined #rqtf
- 13:00:31 [MichaelC]
- present+
- 13:01:46 [janina]
- scribe: janina
- 13:01:57 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:01:57 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Accessibility of virtual reality - preparation of findings." taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:02:34 [janina]
- jgw: Believe the draft is complete
- 13:03:19 [janina]
- sh: Found lots of discussion on concepts, but little actual research
- 13:04:06 [Judy]
- Judy has joined #rqtf
- 13:04:58 [janina]
- jgw: Recalling observations from APA discussion this past spring, noted VR could impose similar obstacles to those experienced in physical environment
- 13:05:19 [janina]
- sh: Came across nothing like that, but it's a good point
- 13:05:44 [Judy]
- present+ Judy
- 13:05:53 [janina]
- sh: Came across a VR game that allows some adaptation
- 13:06:10 [janina]
- sh: Able Gamers
- 13:08:22 [janina]
- sh: Can do some digging to see whether anything exists
- 13:08:40 [janina]
- js: We should feel free to include open questions we believe are meritorious
- 13:09:48 [janina]
- jgw: S[pecific example was physically moving around well beyond movements to control a mouse, more like daily life movements
- 13:13:08 [janina]
- jgw: Notes larger context is now the VR Workshop in December in Brussels:
- 13:13:30 [janina]
- https://www.w3.org/2017/09/webvr-authoring-workshop/
- 13:14:16 [jasonjgw]
- Janina suggests we have material that we wish to add, but this is timely as we expect Shadi may be in a position to represent our work at the WebVR workshop.
- 13:17:31 [janina]
- Wikipedia about Able Gamers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_AbleGamers_Foundation
- 13:18:15 [scott_h]
- AbleGamers Includification: https://www.includification.com/
- 13:19:08 [scott_h]
- Includification likely to have overlap with VR accessibility, especially with multiple interface,
- 13:19:46 [janina]
- jgw: Wonders whether we're exposing requirements on VR toolkits
- 13:22:56 [janina]
- jb: Suggest inviting Shadi and Dom to refine our focus specifically for the Workshop?
- 13:23:44 [jasonjgw]
- Janina: it's useful to find the right fit for the workshop of what we've developed, given the workshop's role in shaping ongoing VR activity at W3C.
- 13:25:31 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:25:31 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Update: questions posed to Web Authentication Working Group and meeting arrangements at TPAC 2017." taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:26:36 [janina]
- jgw: Notes specific APA review has been requested
- 13:26:57 [janina]
- jgw: Janina requested joint meeting at TPAC based on our 4 questions
- 13:27:34 [jasonjgw]
- Janina will continue discussions with Web Authentication WG with a view to a joint meeting at TPAC.
- 13:29:04 [janina]
- jgw: Notes we're invited to review the spec
- 13:31:01 [jasonjgw]
- Janina notes that she and I read the draft of this Web Authentication specification previously and suggests we should review it again. It's also relevant to work of the COGA Task Force, who will be invited to participate in the review.
- 13:33:02 [janina]
- jgw: Notes that authentication is an increasing issue in multiple environments currently
- 13:33:13 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:33:13 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Update: revision of W3C Working Group Note, "Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA"." taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:35:21 [jasonjgw]
- Janina is working on the draft. The material gathered by this Task Force provides additional information beyond what was already in the draft. It isn't clear waht to retain from the existing document (e.g., the discussion of federated identities as offering potentially valuable solutions).
- 13:39:51 [janina]
- sh: 1: Not that secure, especially any longer
- 13:40:12 [janina]
- sh: 2: Dev direction may make more inaccessible, image comparison
- 13:40:23 [janina]
- sh: 3: I am not a robot checkbox seems most accessible
- 13:40:53 [janina]
- sh: 4: Different authentication methods have emerged that could replace
- 13:41:53 [janina]
- jgw: Notes there are captcha service providers that can be used as third parties
- 13:42:16 [janina]
- jgw: Role needs to be to identify the human i.e. interaction proof but not identify much about the human
- 13:43:40 [jasonjgw]
- Janina suggests that a secondary sharing of data - attestation that the user with a given identity - is human, may be a useful feature of a federated identity service.
- 13:45:32 [janina]
- sh: Back around 2011 social media required captcha, but no longer
- 13:46:07 [Judy]
- q+
- 13:46:51 [janina]
- jgw: Noting federated identity works to promote the service provider, in addition to the individual's advantage
- 13:48:08 [janina]
- RQTF Report at: http://w3c.github.io/rqtf/captcha-notes.html
- 13:49:06 [jasonjgw]
- Janina inquires whether we found background rationale for Google's current appraoch to captcha.
- 13:57:04 [janina]
- jb: How we use examples should be considered. Should at minimum start from general approach
- 13:57:34 [janina]
- sh: Notes gamining example, esp people unaccustomed to Latin charsets
- 13:58:32 [janina]
- jgw: Notes that any lit discussion of examples would call out pros and cons
- 14:01:27 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 14:01:27 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, jasonjgw
- 14:01:33 [janina]
- q?
- 14:01:41 [janina]
- ack j
- 14:01:44 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 14:01:44 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Other topics of interest." taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 14:02:07 [janina]
- sh: WoT results delayed. Not sure when, now.
- 14:03:48 [janina]
- sh: Can talk about lit review, but not interviews and subject research
- 14:06:17 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, bye
- 14:06:17 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been jasonjgw, janina, MichaelC, Judy
- 14:06:17 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rqtf
- 14:06:29 [jasonjgw]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:06:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/10/11-rqtf-minutes.html jasonjgw
- 14:06:46 [jasonjgw]
- rrsagent, bye
- 14:06:46 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items