IRC log of webrtc on 2017-09-13

Timestamps are in UTC.

15:00:52 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #webrtc
15:00:52 [RRSAgent]
logging to
15:01:00 [dom]
Meeting: WebRTC Virtual Interim
15:01:05 [dom]
Chair: stefanh, aboba
15:01:12 [dom]
15:02:45 [dom]
Present+ Dominique_Hazael-Massieux, Stefan_Hakansson, Bernard_Aboba, Taylor_Brandsetter, Shijun_Sun, Patrick_Rockhill, Jianjun_Zhu, Lennart_Grahl, VIvien_Lacourba
15:02:58 [dom]
Present+ Eric_Rescorla
15:03:42 [adambe]
adambe has joined #webrtc
15:04:09 [vivien]
vivien has changed the topic to: WebRTC Virtual Interim join us on WebEx
15:04:20 [dom]
Present+ Cullen_Jennings, Randell_Jesup
15:04:24 [jib]
jib has joined #webrtc
15:04:32 [fluffy]
fluffy has joined #webrtc
15:04:39 [dom]
Present+ Adam_Bergkvist
15:04:54 [jesup]
jesup has joined #webrtc
15:04:58 [vivien]
[recording now in progress]
15:05:16 [dom]
Present+ Jan-Ivar_Bruaroey
15:05:23 [dom]
ScribeNick: adambe
15:05:58 [vivien]
Topic: Issue 1128: Does msid still work?
15:06:35 [dom]
-> Issue 1128
15:08:38 [dom]
-> PR 1567 Adding `remoteTrackId` attribute to represent SDP-signaled track ID
15:09:17 [adambe]
fluffy: Why doesn't the track id change?
15:09:36 [adambe]
taylor: Other stuff rely on track id's being constant
15:10:12 [burn]
Present+ Dan_Burnett
15:11:17 [adambe]
taylor: Before, you got a new track (with a new id)
15:16:43 [adambe]
jib: An other option would be to allow changing the track id in mediacap spec
15:17:18 [fluffy]
Present+ Cullen_Jennings
15:22:44 [adambe]
fluffy: I don't like adding something that you can't use in this case, and this case and this other case
15:28:34 [adambe]
jib: There's also no guarantee that remote track ids are unique anyhow
15:29:50 [dom]
Present+ Justin_Uberti, SHIM
15:32:50 [adambe]
fluffy: Suggests to fix the issue on both sides. This solution only addresses the problem on one side
15:35:30 [adambe]
Resolution: We revert the PR (1567)
15:35:58 [stefanh]
Also, we close 1128 with a comment.
15:37:39 [adambe]
taylor: Should we always generate track id so it doesn't work in some situations, but not in others
15:40:05 [vivien]
Topic: Issue 1161/Issue 1181: What happens remotely when a track is “removed”?
15:40:05 [vivien]
-> Issue 1161
15:40:05 [vivien]
-> Issue 1181
15:40:06 [adambe]
Topic: Issue 1161/Issue 1181: What happens remotely when a track is “removed”?
15:41:08 [adambe]
jib: I think this is fine
15:42:02 [adambe]
Resolution is to accept the current state after PR 1402
15:42:16 [adambe]
and we close 1161 and 1181
15:42:18 [vivien]
Topic: Issue 1207/PR 1592: Setting a remote description may cause discontinuity
15:42:19 [vivien]
-> Issue 1207
15:42:19 [vivien]
-> PR 1592
15:50:44 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate vivien
15:51:21 [adambe]
Resolution is to accept the changes proposed by PR 1592
15:51:48 [vivien]
Topic: Issue 1178: Need to describe when ICE and DTLS transport objects are created/changed
15:51:48 [vivien]
-> Issue 1178
15:52:18 [vivien]
present+ Peter_Thatcher
15:54:53 [adambe]
Resolution is to go for the "one object" approach proposed by Taylor
15:55:07 [vivien]
Topic: Issue 1406: When ICE restart results in connection to a new endpoint
15:55:07 [vivien]
-> Issue 1406
15:57:48 [adambe]
Resolution is to reuse the same RTCDtlsTransport object when a new DTLS association is started as proposed by Taylor
15:58:07 [vivien]
Topic: Issue 1563: Ambiguities with BUNDLE and ICE
15:58:07 [vivien]
-> Issue 1563
16:09:13 [adambe]
Resolution is that we are waiting for the mmuisc feedback
16:09:35 [stefanh]
Issue 1520/1560
16:09:35 [vivien]
Topic: Issue 1520/PR 1560: setParameters input validation
16:09:35 [vivien]
-> Issue 1520
16:09:35 [vivien]
-> PR 1560
16:13:15 [adambe]
Resolution is that there are no objections to the model proposed in PR 1520
16:13:31 [dom]
s/PR 1520/PR 1560/
16:13:43 [stefanh]
my audio has dropped
16:13:47 [vivien]
Topic: Issue 1564/PR 1577: Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy (Pehrsons)
16:13:47 [vivien]
-> Issue 1564
16:13:47 [vivien]
-> PR 1577
16:13:47 [stefanh]
will re-dial
16:19:56 [adambe]
Resolution is to floor instead ceil and document what happens if the result is zero (PR 1577 is not accepted)
16:21:11 [adambe]
Topic: Issue 1564/PR 1577: Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy
16:26:25 [adambe]
Resolution is that we allows aspect ratios to change due to integer width and height rounding
16:27:09 [vivien]
s/Topic: Issue 1564/PR 1577: Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy//
16:27:23 [vivien]
Topic: Issue 1259/PR 1553: What keygenAlgorithm values are supported?
16:27:23 [vivien]
-> Issue 1259
16:27:23 [vivien]
-> PR 1553
16:30:22 [dom]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:30:22 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate dom
16:30:59 [adambe]
Resolution is that no one objects to the proposed PR but it needs review
16:31:15 [dom]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:31:15 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate dom
16:37:25 [vivien]
RRSAgent, bye
16:37:25 [RRSAgent]
I see no action items