14:22:15 RRSAgent has joined #dxwg 14:22:15 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-irc 14:23:42 q+ 14:23:51 Caroline_: should we vote on requirements in groups? 14:24:06 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:24:28 Jaroslav_Pullmann: still unclear what are meaningful groupings for requirements 14:24:36 ... should we extend the tagset? 14:25:16 Jaroslav_Pullmann vanished from voice :-( 14:25:29 ack roba 14:25:56 Sorry, I have to reload Webex, no audio at all 14:26:05 roba: proposed to do initial tryout on first groupings 14:26:55 present+ achille_zappa 14:27:06 can you hear us Jaroslav_Pullmann ? 14:27:11 Describe title/group "Versioning" ? 14:27:15 yes, I am back 14:27:25 Are the set of requirements complete? 14:27:27 rrsagent, set logs public 14:27:37 q+ 14:27:44 rrsagent make minutes v2 14:27:45 present+ 14:27:49 Are the descriptions simple yet meaningful (in the context of the group) 14:27:55 rrsagent, make minutes v2 14:27:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html dsr 14:28:08 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:28:36 Are there other requirements that need to be in this group 14:29:15 +1 for tags 14:29:26 Jaroslav_Pullmann: Are there multiple dimensions of classification? 14:29:36 Thanks @dsr 14:29:40 How are these requirements applicable to multiple deliverables - e.g. version semantics in DCAT, extended version models in guidance, negotiation by profile (also version?) 14:30:33 1. Describe title/group "Versioning" ? 2. Are the set of requirements complete? 3. Are the descriptions simple yet meaningful (in the context of the group) 4. How are these requirements applicable to multiple deliverables - e.g. version semantics in DCAT, extended version models in guidance, negotiation by profile (also version?) 14:31:31 ack q? 14:31:31 (Roba suggestions to focus treatment) 14:31:39 Caroline_: makes sense to me 14:31:41 q+ 14:31:45 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:32:31 Jaroslav_Pullmann: Is there a single hierarchy/classification dimension? 14:33:01 ... is a requirement part of versioning, QA, distribution 14:33:23 q? 14:33:24 ... multiple tags required to detect that a requirement applies to several groupings 14:33:35 q+ 14:33:40 ack SimonCox 14:34:13 SimonCox: it feels like we had a group as part of the use cases and the we are teasing them apart to get the requirements 14:34:13 q+ 14:34:47 q+ 14:35:09 ... I like roba suggestion that we run through an exercise to see how it goes but I am concerned how long we will take 14:35:24 roba: grouping in UCs was not so formal 14:35:54 ... tags in UC document not so formal or useful. Allowed us to test the JS ;-) 14:36:19 ... is it reasonable to say "here are all the versioning requirements" 14:36:30 ... we will know that when we've given it a try 14:36:36 q+ 14:36:39 ack roba 14:37:02 ... all very complicated, trying to mitigate risk of multiple incompatible solutions 14:37:08 ack alejandra 14:37:23 ... to requirments that weren't quite grouped right 14:37:37 q+ 14:38:24 +1 to alejandra 14:38:26 alejandra: lets analyse the requirements and not burn time grouping 14:38:50 Caroline_: maybe we can give actions to some group members who are willing to work on specific res 14:39:04 ... e.g. who is willing to work on Versioning group? 14:39:35 q+ 14:39:36 Caroline, waht would be the "set"? 14:39:47 s/waht/what/ 14:39:50 Q+ 14:39:53 ack Caroline_ 14:39:56 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:40:16 Jaroslav_Pullmann: good proposal - use groupings to govern work programme 14:40:42 ack SimonCox 14:40:55 annette_g: 14:41:03 ... lets look at groups now and get volunteers 14:41:08 s/annette_g: 14:41:13 ack annette_g 14:41:19 annette_g: grouping shoudl be 'by deliverable' 14:41:19 q+ 14:41:30 s/shoudl/should 14:41:46 annette_g++ 14:41:49 ... worried about smaller groupings, applying to small pieces of deliverable 14:42:11 ... requirements should inform the deliverables systematically 14:42:19 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:42:21 ... editors need list per deliverable 14:42:42 Jaroslav_Pullmann: tags for deliverables already in place 14:43:06 ... when can we shring them down to more practical lots of work 14:43:20 annette_g: lets see requirements sorted by deliverable 14:43:43 Jaroslav_Pullmann: will change JS prototype to achieve this 14:43:52 ... filtering 14:44:15 q+ 14:44:22 Action: Jaroslav_Pullmann to provide different views on filtered content in UCR document 14:44:25 Created ACTION-37 - Provide different views on filtered content in ucr document [on Jaroslav Pullmann - due 2017-09-18]. 14:44:36 ack aisaac 14:45:22 Again: this document https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Comparison_and_analysis_of_W3C_UCR_documents 14:46:40 This is the one we are working on https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/ 14:47:40 Makx has joined #dxwg 14:48:00 roba: 'profiles', 'versioning', 'functional descriptions of distributions' so far 14:48:23 ... the rest look a bit like 'lots more metadata' ... 14:48:38 ... will now try to pull out next set of groups 14:49:08 q? 14:49:25 ... are the descriptions of requirements (and groupings) OK as they are currently in https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/ 14:49:49 present+ Makx 14:50:11 Caroline_: tagging is important, but more important to have 'overview', not just tags 14:50:17 present+ 14:50:22 q+ 14:50:25 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:50:41 Action: all to provide feedback to UCR editors on requirements organization 14:50:41 Error finding 'all'. You can review and register nicknames at . 14:50:49 @caroline do you mean a summary for each group? 14:51:10 two needs going forward: the "next group" to organise and feedback on the level of detail on the groups already made (profiles, versions, fine grained description of datasets and distributions 14:52:11 Jaroslav_Pullmann: could we agree to select one of the groupings, assign responsibilities 14:52:35 ... Jaroslav_Pullmann will looka t versioning, see if grouping/wording is complete 14:52:36 ... etc 14:52:45 q? 14:53:21 Action: Jaroslav_Pullmann to review 'versioning' group 14:53:27 Created ACTION-38 - Review 'versioning' group [on Jaroslav Pullmann - due 2017-09-18]. 14:53:46 roba: will not review his own work! 14:54:09 ... someone else to find next priority group? 14:54:24 I agree with roba on his point. 14:54:41 Caroline_: Volunteers to do the requested review? 14:55:22 Sorry - not me, I'm travelling then on vacation next three weeks (yipee!) 14:55:56 Caroline_: Any hands up??? People! 14:56:09 q+ 14:56:23 Profiles ? 14:56:47 roba: maybe reuben, lars on Profiles? 14:56:57 q- 14:57:06 q+ 14:57:14 ack alejandra 14:57:26 Action: Caroline_ to ping lars and Reuben re reviewing Profiles grouping 14:57:27 Created ACTION-39 - Ping lars and reuben re reviewing profiles grouping [on Caroline Burle - due 2017-09-18]. 14:57:52 +1 to alejandra that all group should review the requirements 14:58:19 alejandra: all should try to contribute 14:58:48 Caroline_: did Jaroslav_Pullmann do Action 31? 14:59:03 Jaroslav_Pullmann: yes, but could not close 14:59:21 Caroline_: Any other actions to close today? 14:59:43 present+ AndreaPerego 14:59:57 ... meeting good in moving forward understanding, not so many closed actions. 14:59:59 thanks, bye bye 15:00:01 bye 15:00:02 Bye all! 15:00:05 rrsagent, make minutes 15:00:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html dsr 15:00:06 thanks, bye 15:00:07 thanks and bye all! 15:00:07 Bye! 15:00:07 present- 15:00:13 Bye! 15:00:30 RRSAgent: generate minutes 15:00:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html SimonCox 15:01:41 @dsr we will need your help massaging minutes - do you need my text log? 15:01:54 meeting: Data Exchange Working Group Teleconference 15:01:59 chair: Caroline 15:02:07 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 15:02:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 15:02:23 yes, I have saved the irc log and will patch up the minutes tomorrow 15:02:44 regets+ LarsG, Thomas D'haenens 15:02:46 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 15:02:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 15:02:56 regrets+ LarsG, Thomas D'haenens 15:02:59 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 15:02:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 15:03:11 s/regets+ LarsG, Thomas D'haenens// 15:03:12 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 15:03:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 15:05:25 present+ Caroline, Stijn, RobA, Jaroslav, AnnetteG 15:05:27 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 15:05:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 15:06:01 s/RRSAgent: generate minutes// 15:06:02 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 15:06:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 15:07:44 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2017.09.11 15:07:47 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 15:07:47 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/11-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego