11:52:22 RRSAgent has joined #poe 11:52:22 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/09/04-poe-irc 11:52:24 RRSAgent, make logs public 11:52:24 Zakim has joined #poe 11:52:26 Meeting: Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Teleconference 11:52:26 Date: 04 September 2017 11:52:47 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20170904 11:53:03 ivan has changed the topic to: agenda 2017-09-04: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20170904 11:53:11 Chair: Renato 12:18:58 renato has joined #poe 12:21:20 simonstey has joined #poe 12:23:23 lindab has joined #poe 12:23:42 present+ 12:26:47 present+ 12:27:03 present+ 12:28:03 present+ 12:29:03 michaelS has joined #poe 12:30:45 benws_ has joined #poe 12:30:56 present+ 12:31:18 present+ 12:31:38 victor has joined #poe 12:33:33 Chair: Ben 12:33:43 scribe: michaelS 12:33:50 scribenick: michaelS 12:33:59 Topic: last week's minutes 12:34:10 regrets+ Sabrina 12:34:12 resolved: minutes are fine 12:34:23 benws_: no objection, took them as passed 12:34:23 topic: github project issues 12:34:37 Topic: Github Project Issues 12:34:53 https://github.com/w3c/poe/projects/1 12:34:54 renato: got some in the past days 12:34:57 CarolineB has joined #poe 12:35:07 present+ CarolineB 12:35:09 ... got some issues by email 12:35:49 ... main one is the Rule Processing 2.6.8 in the IM 12:36:03 https://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#rule-process 12:36:52 renato: Has changed the text of this section - and michaelS has suggested to add a note about the processing implementation 12:37:11 ... should be closed. Is the current phrasing ok? 12:37:27 Serena has joined #poe 12:37:29 benws_: came across 2 issues 12:37:58 benws_: ... one is the use of the term Not-/Violated 12:38:18 ... the second one: refinements have not role in the Rule Processing 12:38:32 renato: go over the refinement rule 12:39:14 +q 12:39:44 present+ Serena 12:41:47 all: discussion can a refinement be checked prior to taking the action of a Permission 12:42:12 q- 12:43:33 benws_: a refinement applies to a Rule 12:50:22 q? 12:50:38 all: discussion about the terminology of rule outcomes 12:52:49 +q 12:54:05 ... should the outcome be Not-/Active or Rule-specific (Not-/Exercisable) 12:55:25 q- 12:58:41 Agreed: If an action is taken as "exercised" its optional refinements must be satisfied. 13:00:34 benws_: only Not/Active is required 13:01:04 +q 13:01:57 michaelS: what is covered by setting the Active state: only the satisfaction of constraints? 13:02:49 benws_: we should not define why a rule is Not-/Active 13:04:02 simonstey: we currently do not consider in the 2.6.8 is if the Rule applies e.g. to a target or an assignee 13:04:45 q? 13:04:47 michaelS: q+ 13:04:55 ack s 13:05:33 q? 13:07:30 all: discussion about now a Prohibition gets Not/Active 13:13:17 :-( 13:14:13 ok 13:14:20 The group went over the examples and the Truth Tables 13:19:49 q+ 13:20:24 benws_: Root nodes have different processing rules than nested Duties 13:24:55 q+ 13:25:13 benws_: IM example 24 - JSON does not comply with the free text description 13:26:55 https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/242 13:27:03 q? 13:27:09 ack 13:32:36 All: discussion about the SHACL for ODRL: shoudl be provided on a page/by a resource which can be edited by all. 13:32:41 http://odrlapi.appspot.com/ 13:33:08 benws_: victor should get in touch with Simon 13:33:17 yes, victor, the validator works. Thanks, great work. 13:35:09 benws_: any open issues? 13:35:20 ivan: could be make a strict planning 13:36:06 benws_: next Monday the SHACL should be ready and the Processing Rules should be updated 13:36:25 benws_: I have no more issues in my pocket 13:37:28 ivan: when to issue a request for the Candidate Recommendation? 13:38:37 ... when will this group take a vote on the two documents IM and Vocab 13:40:53 benws_: the Evaluator is still an open issue - much of it has been covered at this call 13:41:06 michaelS: covered by what? 13:41:35 benws_: The examples in the IM cover what is defined in the IM 13:42:37 ivan: will the documents be finalized on the 11 September? 13:42:48 ... and a vote should be taken. 13:43:26 s/again/about 13:43:32 ivan: Ben and Renato should look into his draft for the request to be sent to the W3C director 13:44:11 q+ 13:44:18 ivan: as a result the request should be submitted on 12 or 13 September - then it will take 2 weeks of internal reviews 13:44:27 ... and the final CR will be published by the end of September 13:44:44 Free Beer ;-) 13:45:37 ivan: this Wg has to define how long the CR period will be. 13:46:09 http://odrlapi.appspot.com/ 13:46:11 ... it could be e.g. for 1 month - THEN the implementations have to be presented 13:47:30 ivan: minimum time for a CR is 1 month, then the results of tests need to be considered and integrated 13:48:24 Serena has left #poe 13:48:56 rrsagent, draft minutes v2 13:48:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/04-poe-minutes.html michaelS 13:49:33 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:49:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/04-poe-minutes.html ivan 13:50:00 trackbot, end telcon 13:50:00 Zakim, list attendees 13:50:00 As of this point the attendees have been lindab, simonstey, ivan, renato, benws_, michaelS, CarolineB, Serena 13:50:08 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:50:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/04-poe-minutes.html trackbot 13:50:09 RRSAgent, bye 13:50:09 I see no action items