IRC log of dnt on 2017-07-17
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:53:06 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dnt
- 15:53:06 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/07/17-dnt-irc
- 15:53:08 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 15:53:08 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #dnt
- 15:53:10 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be TRACK
- 15:53:10 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot
- 15:53:11 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Tracking Protection Working Group Teleconference
- 15:53:11 [trackbot]
- Date: 17 July 2017
- 15:54:07 [Bert]
- Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2017Jul/0013.html
- 15:54:33 [Bert]
- Previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2017/07/10-dnt-minutes.html
- 15:54:39 [Bert]
- Chair: Bert
- 15:55:17 [Bert]
- Regrets+ Matthias, David
- 15:55:33 [Bert]
- RRSAgent, make minutes v2
- 15:55:33 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/17-dnt-minutes.html Bert
- 15:58:06 [fielding]
- fielding has joined #dnt
- 16:01:09 [rvaneijk]
- rvaneijk has joined #dnt
- 16:01:38 [mikeoneill]
- mikeoneill has joined #dnt
- 16:01:55 [mikeoneill]
- webex link says its cancelled
- 16:02:04 [vincent_]
- vincent_ has joined #dnt
- 16:02:08 [Bert]
- see new link in topic and in agenda
- 16:02:20 [Bert]
- I don't know why the old one doesn't work anymore.
- 16:02:40 [Bert]
- -> https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=mc92f16330cf3b8542490cb8443a06fcf Webex link
- 16:03:02 [rvaneijk]
- new one works fin.
- 16:03:05 [walter]
- ah
- 16:03:51 [mikeoneill]
- present+
- 16:04:09 [Bert]
- present+
- 16:04:20 [walter]
- present+
- 16:05:05 [fielding]
- present+
- 16:05:28 [rvaneijk]
- present+
- 16:06:31 [vincent_]
- present+
- 16:06:33 [walter]
- Hm, Shane isn't on IRC either
- 16:09:22 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: I reduced the API calls from 6 to 3 and all return the same response type.
- 16:09:49 [Bert]
- ... Now has a new property in the Bag to distinguish webWide from site-specific.
- 16:09:50 [fielding]
- Mike is talking about the pull request at https://github.com/w3c/dnt/pull/45
- 16:10:23 [fielding]
- Right, ednotes are not published by CR
- 16:10:51 [at]
- at has joined #dnt
- 16:10:54 [Bert]
- ... Roy put in a note about not understanding a sentence.
- 16:11:20 [wileys]
- wileys has joined #dnt
- 16:11:22 [Bert]
- fielding: Maybe just remove that sentence. It doesn't seem to matter.
- 16:12:18 [Bert]
- shane: Like David, I'd need more time to review the changes.
- 16:12:33 [Bert]
- fielding: It's not in the document yet, it's mike's propoasl.
- 16:13:14 [Bert]
- bert: is an API chnage possible at all at this point?
- 16:14:37 [wileys]
- In the promise structure it appears the UGEs have been collapsed with a boolean for web-wide or not, correct?
- 16:15:03 [Bert]
- bert: roy, your opinion on mike's API?
- 16:15:32 [Bert]
- fielding: my goal is to get implementation commitments.
- 16:16:37 [fielding]
- I haven't had a chance to go through it in detail, but my preference remains to get an indication by browsers first and then go to CR. But I will defer to the WG.
- 16:18:13 [Bert]
- bert: what does the ed. note in 7.3 mean?
- 16:18:23 [Bert]
- fielding: Not really explained in the spec.
- 16:18:41 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: Thereis something in the wiki. Could maybe opy that.
- 16:18:56 [Bert]
- fielding: Anything, from wiki or mail.
- 16:19:30 [Bert]
- ... need more detail than the current one sentence at the start.
- 16:19:49 [fielding]
- earlier, Mike pointed out the comment on https://w3c.github.io/dnt/drafts/tracking-dnt.html#exception-checking
- 16:20:01 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: I can find text.
- 16:20:17 [fielding]
- ... about none of us knowing what the last sentence means in that section.
- 16:23:04 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: Section 7.6, doNotTrack property is not redundant. Just keep it.
- 16:23:22 [Bert]
- fielding: I remember now why the remark is there.
- 16:23:49 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: I have implemented it, it is not hard.
- 16:24:10 [Bert]
- fielding: property is generated dynamically for each navigator window.
- 16:24:26 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: Every context has its own property.
- 16:24:58 [Bert]
- ... E.g., an iframe. Have to be able to find the value without bouncing a request to a server.
- 16:25:23 [Bert]
- fielding: I think the need is reasonable, but the spec doesn't reflect that.
- 16:25:35 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: I coul dmake some text.
- 16:25:55 [Bert]
- fielding: If you can describe it.
- 16:26:18 [Bert]
- ACTION mikeoneill: describe doNotTrack property purpose and implementation
- 16:26:19 [trackbot]
- Error finding 'mikeoneill'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/users>.
- 16:27:24 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: "Expires" property: roy says it should be removed, but it is still in HTTP.
- 16:27:49 [Bert]
- fielding: Yes, for legacy reasons. But if we have maxAge, expires is not needed.
- 16:28:11 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: It is not much cost to implement.
- 16:28:23 [Bert]
- fielding: Date parsing is actually expensive.
- 16:28:33 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: Yes, but that code is there already.
- 16:29:40 [Bert]
- fielding: No implems yet, we can decide. But we need more than 2 people with an opinion.
- 16:29:57 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: There are implems.
- 16:31:36 [Bert]
- shane: Expires is clearly understood, but maxAge serves the same pupose.
- 16:32:02 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: Easier to remove expires than to chnage to Promises.
- 16:33:30 [Bert]
- RESOLVED: remove "expires"
- 16:33:36 [fielding]
- action on me to remove Expires property on API
- 16:33:36 [trackbot]
- Error finding 'on'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/users>.
- 16:34:07 [fielding]
- action fielding to remove Expires from API in favor of just using maxAge
- 16:34:07 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-474 - Remove expires from api in favor of just using maxage [on Roy Fielding - due 2017-07-24].
- 16:37:57 [Bert]
- bert: Do we need to mention DNT-extension as at risk (issue 48)?
- 16:38:14 [fielding]
- action fielding to rephrase "at risk" on DNT-extensions
- 16:38:14 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-475 - Rephrase "at risk" on dnt-extensions [on Roy Fielding - due 2017-07-24].
- 16:38:25 [Bert]
- fielding: We can republish the CR instead. But there seems no reason to mark it at risk at present.
- 16:38:37 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: Back to API:
- 16:39:15 [Bert]
- ... Re the duplets, I made a variable domain.
- 16:39:37 [Bert]
- fielding: Will have a look, haven't had time to read it.
- 16:40:05 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: [Something about resolving a Promise]
- 16:40:33 [Bert]
- fielding: Probably editorial. Web Platforms specs typically specify algo for promises.
- 16:40:52 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: I can make a pull request for next week.
- 16:41:57 [Bert]
- bert: how much time do we need for review & editing?
- 16:42:08 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: Most seems to be editorial.
- 16:42:19 [rvaneijk]
- Q: what is the consequence of a revision to the API for the process?
- 16:42:40 [rvaneijk]
- q+
- 16:43:21 [Bert]
- shane: browser want to know that servers will implement before they spend resources. Move to Promises is big.
- 16:43:42 [Bert]
- ... I don't have enough feedback.
- 16:44:27 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: Promises are in the spec.
- 16:44:34 [Bert]
- fielding: yes, that was already decided,
- 16:44:47 [Bert]
- shane: OK, so I'll need to talk to my team.
- 16:45:27 [Bert]
- bert: How many weeks do we want for review?
- 16:45:58 [Bert]
- shane: We first need the editorial chnages in the spec. And then about 2 weeks after that.
- 16:46:15 [Bert]
- ... And if no comments in those two weeks, that implies acceptance.
- 16:46:28 [rvaneijk]
- q-
- 16:46:44 [Bert]
- fielding: I can do work this week only.
- 16:47:39 [Bert]
- mikeoneill: I can do my text next Monday.
- 16:49:41 [rvaneijk]
- sorry, soundcard problem
- 16:50:33 [rvaneijk]
- would it require new implementations?
- 16:51:25 [fielding]
- I think further changes would be bound by existing implementations. Right now we are not bound because the Promises changes.
- 16:51:36 [wileys]
- wileys has left #dnt
- 16:51:39 [rvaneijk]
- ok, tnx
- 16:52:27 [Bert]
- RRSAgent, amke minutes v2
- 16:52:27 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'amke minutes v2', Bert. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 16:52:36 [Bert]
- RRSAgent, make minutes v2
- 16:52:36 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/17-dnt-minutes.html Bert
- 16:52:56 [fielding]
- zakim, list attendees
- 16:52:56 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been mikeoneill, Bert, walter, fielding, rvaneijk, vincent_
- 16:53:18 [fielding]
- present+ shane
- 17:08:54 [Bert]
- RRSAgent, make minutes v2
- 17:08:54 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/17-dnt-minutes.html Bert
- 17:35:07 [Bert]
- zakim, bye
- 17:35:07 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been mikeoneill, Bert, walter, fielding, rvaneijk, vincent_, shane
- 17:35:07 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #dnt
- 17:35:13 [Bert]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 17:35:13 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2017/07/17-dnt-actions.rdf :
- 17:35:13 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: mikeoneill to describe doNotTrack property purpose and implementation [1]
- 17:35:13 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/07/17-dnt-irc#T16-26-18