IRC log of apa on 2017-07-12
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:48:09 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #apa
- 15:48:09 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/07/12-apa-irc
- 15:48:11 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 15:48:11 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #apa
- 15:48:13 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 15:48:13 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 15:48:14 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
- 15:48:14 [trackbot]
- Date: 12 July 2017
- 15:49:14 [janina]
- agenda?
- 15:49:19 [janina]
- agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes
- 15:49:19 [janina]
- agenda+ TPAC 2017 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017
- 15:49:19 [janina]
- agenda+ Task Force Checkins
- 15:49:19 [janina]
- agenda+ Push API Response https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/259
- 15:49:20 [janina]
- agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
- 15:49:21 [janina]
- agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
- 15:49:24 [janina]
- agenda+ Other Business
- 15:49:26 [janina]
- agenda+ next and future meetings
- 15:49:29 [janina]
- agenda+ be done
- 15:59:01 [Gottfried]
- Gottfried has joined #apa
- 16:00:36 [janina]
- prepresent+
- 16:00:39 [janina]
- present+
- 16:00:44 [janina]
- chair: janina
- 16:09:17 [Gottfried]
- scribe: me
- 16:09:23 [Gottfried]
- scribe: Gottfried
- 16:09:27 [MichielBijl]
- present+
- 16:09:32 [Gottfried]
- present+
- 16:09:33 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:09:33 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina]
- 16:10:03 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Start conversation today about some formal comments.
- 16:10:36 [Gottfried]
- Michiel: Starting for a Dutch company in Aug. Not a member of W3C.
- 16:12:10 [Gottfried]
- Michael: High time to have a f2f in Germany.
- 16:12:45 [Gottfried]
- Gottfried: If it is just APA, i can look into hosting it at Stuttgart Media University.
- 16:12:53 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Could be together with one of our subgroups.
- 16:13:23 [Gottfried]
- Gottfried: We have rooms to fit about 30 persons. But should be in a time with no lectures.
- 16:13:29 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:13:29 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "TPAC 2017 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017" taken up [from janina]
- 16:13:58 [Gottfried]
- Janina: I will start working on the agenda. In particular, cross-groups.
- 16:14:00 [janina]
- zakim, close this item
- 16:14:00 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 closed
- 16:14:02 [Zakim]
- I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:14:02 [Zakim]
- 3. Task Force Checkins [from janina]
- 16:14:02 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:14:03 [Gottfried]
- ... Please book your travel
- 16:14:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Task Force Checkins" taken up [from janina]
- 16:14:38 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Rosson did not reply yet. I told Chris about it.
- 16:15:15 [Gottfried]
- Janina: New co-facilitator for CSS tf - Ian Pouncey from Paciello Group.
- 16:15:24 [Gottfried]
- ... Trying to get the co-chairs together.
- 16:15:57 [Gottfried]
- Michael: No progress on coga gap analysis.
- 16:16:15 [Gottfried]
- Janina: I saw the tf draft for personalization.
- 16:16:28 [Gottfried]
- Michael: I have incorporated Leoni's comments.
- 16:16:41 [Gottfried]
- ... Looks like the Wiki covers most of the issues.
- 16:17:03 [Gottfried]
- ... Issue: Connect IRC to GitHub issues. Not sure whether to use this.
- 16:17:12 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Somewhat of interest to us.
- 16:17:23 [tdrake]
- tdrake has joined #apa
- 16:17:30 [tdrake]
- present+ tdrake
- 16:18:01 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Could help us to attach comments to specs.
- 16:19:14 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Ted, you and Ian should talk without Rosson, to transfer what you are thinking. Need to get started even without Rosson.
- 16:19:32 [Gottfried]
- Ted: Can we chat on where we like?
- 16:19:34 [Gottfried]
- Michael: yes
- 16:20:01 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:20:01 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Push API Response https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/259" taken up [from janina]
- 16:20:41 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Our comments were quickly dismissed. We did not get any notification outside GitHub tracking.
- 16:20:58 [Gottfried]
- ... We were told: You are asking for a feature from the wrong spec. The spec referenced is not a W3C spec.
- 16:21:23 [Gottfried]
- ... I have a problem with being told to go outside W3C spec to deal with our issue - no process established for this
- 16:21:42 [Gottfried]
- ... We should not just let it drop.
- 16:22:23 [Gottfried]
- ... Originally came out of payments group to push notifications on a mobile device - could do damage when in a payments transaction.
- 16:22:51 [Gottfried]
- ... One of the co-chairs of payments acknowledged this as a general problem, not just for a11y.
- 16:24:07 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Mixed mind. I don't know about any process that prohibits us from filing comments on non-W3C technologies. But moving forward in this leaves a gap in W3C specs.
- 16:24:19 [Gottfried]
- ... Worried about W3C horizontal review mission.
- 16:24:39 [Gottfried]
- ... Not sure what to do.
- 16:25:13 [Gottfried]
- ... If we later block advancing due to this dependency - what will happen?
- 16:25:27 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Would this be yet another APA formal objection? - Famously disruptive.
- 16:25:37 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Makes us look like the bad guys even more.
- 16:25:53 [Gottfried]
- ... Not formally objecting when we see a problem is also not good.
- 16:26:08 [Gottfried]
- Janina: At least we should push for an appendix.
- 16:26:39 [Gottfried]
- Michael: They closed the issue after Leonie said it's good. But she was not talking on behalf of APA.
- 16:26:55 [Gottfried]
- ... None of us had seen Leonie's comment before they closed it.
- 16:27:26 [Gottfried]
- ... She was probably not meaning to talk on behalf of APA.
- 16:27:36 [Gottfried]
- Janina: She might be our liaison - not sure however
- 16:28:05 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Don't remeber if Web APIs was another group - and another liaison.
- 16:28:35 [Gottfried]
- Ted: We are asking for the ability to set a user setting for behaviour in case of a push mechanism. Is this dependent on a personalization service?
- 16:28:57 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Push API says how you can make things get pushed. If we talk about controlling this, they say this is notification.
- 16:29:13 [Gottfried]
- ... Arguably, you should not have something insular like this.
- 16:29:36 [Gottfried]
- Ted: Yes, it is a matter of notification, not push. Push is a basic function. Customization should be decided at another level.
- 16:30:35 [Gottfried]
- Janina: I am okay with the substance. We can file a comment in this direction. But W3C should have a marker in here. We need to be able to rely on this.
- 16:31:09 [Gottfried]
- ... Personalization by the app. We might even want phone calls to be paused for the payment transaction.
- 16:31:58 [Gottfried]
- Michael: In a11y consideration section we could mention that we should be aware of the personalization aspect of notification.
- 16:32:25 [Gottfried]
- ... Or do we want to go further?
- 16:33:08 [Gottfried]
- Janina: We should not request that W3C take over notification. But we should expect that we can express the dependency, and document our concern.
- 16:33:20 [Gottfried]
- Janina: I am eager to take this up with the payments people.
- 16:34:00 [Gottfried]
- Michael: They could be intending to go to CR any day.
- 16:34:25 [MichaelC]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:34:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/12-apa-minutes.html MichaelC
- 16:34:25 [Gottfried]
- Janina: I will see if i can draft something for payments.
- 16:34:28 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:34:28 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8" taken up [from janina]
- 16:35:47 [janina]
- zakim, close this item
- 16:35:47 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 closed
- 16:35:48 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:35:48 [Zakim]
- 6. new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html [from janina]
- 16:35:48 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:35:49 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html" taken up [from janina]
- 16:35:51 [Gottfried]
- Michael: No open actions on people who are here - aside from Janina and me.
- 16:36:22 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Wide review request on TCML. We had no comments on it.
- 16:36:31 [Gottfried]
- Janina: i can do it
- 16:36:50 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/CSS_Fonts_Module_Level_4 CSS Fonts Module Level 4
- 16:37:26 [Gottfried]
- This specification defines modifications to the existing CSS Fonts 3 specification along with additional experimental features.
- 16:37:42 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Not sure if we are interested in this.
- 16:37:53 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Could be useful for low-vision.
- 16:38:09 [Gottfried]
- Ted: Yes, there are some interesting things in here. What does "optical resolution" mean?
- 16:38:37 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Optical sizing. There is color fonts as well. Could create some a11y challenges. That would be covered by WCAG.
- 16:39:38 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Should we defer this review to some other people in CSS?
- 16:40:00 [Gottfried]
- Ted: It should definitely be reviewed. Everything looks great until someone misuses it.
- 16:40:11 [Gottfried]
- ... We should look for hidden things like fading or flashing.
- 16:40:35 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Assign it to Ian, and have him talk to Ted. And ask a CSS expert on low vision.
- 16:40:55 [Gottfried]
- Michael: We can just assign the issue on CSS Github.
- 16:42:55 [Gottfried]
- ... Done
- 16:43:15 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/TR/motion-1/ Motion Path Module Level 1
- 16:43:41 [Gottfried]
- Motion path allows authors to animate any graphical object along an author specified path.
- 16:44:02 [Gottfried]
- Michael: You can define a path and have something move on the path. It can also rotate along the movement.
- 16:44:30 [Gottfried]
- ... It is an animation thing, with all of its issues.
- 16:45:16 [Gottfried]
- Michael: I am inclined to not reviewing this.
- 16:45:22 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Okay
- 16:45:27 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:45:27 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "Other Business" taken up [from janina]
- 16:45:54 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:45:54 [Zakim]
- agendum 7 was just opened, janina
- 16:46:05 [janina]
- zakim, close this item
- 16:46:05 [Zakim]
- agendum 7 closed
- 16:46:06 [janina]
- zakim, close this item
- 16:46:07 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:46:07 [Zakim]
- 8. next and future meetings [from janina]
- 16:46:07 [Zakim]
- I do not know what agendum had been taken up, janina
- 16:47:06 [Gottfried]
- zakim, by
- 16:47:06 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'by', Gottfried
- 16:47:08 [Gottfried]
- zakim, bye
- 16:47:08 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been janina, MichielBijl, Gottfried, tdrake
- 16:47:08 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #apa
- 16:47:14 [Gottfried]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 16:47:19 [Gottfried]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 16:47:19 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/12-apa-minutes.html Gottfried