15:48:09 RRSAgent has joined #apa 15:48:09 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/07/12-apa-irc 15:48:11 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:48:11 Zakim has joined #apa 15:48:13 Zakim, this will be 15:48:13 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 15:48:14 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 15:48:14 Date: 12 July 2017 15:49:14 agenda? 15:49:19 agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes 15:49:19 agenda+ TPAC 2017 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017 15:49:19 agenda+ Task Force Checkins 15:49:19 agenda+ Push API Response https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/259 15:49:20 agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8 15:49:21 agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html 15:49:24 agenda+ Other Business 15:49:26 agenda+ next and future meetings 15:49:29 agenda+ be done 15:59:01 Gottfried has joined #apa 16:00:36 prepresent+ 16:00:39 present+ 16:00:44 chair: janina 16:09:17 scribe: me 16:09:23 scribe: Gottfried 16:09:27 present+ 16:09:32 present+ 16:09:33 zakim, next item 16:09:33 agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina] 16:10:03 Janina: Start conversation today about some formal comments. 16:10:36 Michiel: Starting for a Dutch company in Aug. Not a member of W3C. 16:12:10 Michael: High time to have a f2f in Germany. 16:12:45 Gottfried: If it is just APA, i can look into hosting it at Stuttgart Media University. 16:12:53 Janina: Could be together with one of our subgroups. 16:13:23 Gottfried: We have rooms to fit about 30 persons. But should be in a time with no lectures. 16:13:29 zakim, next item 16:13:29 agendum 2. "TPAC 2017 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017" taken up [from janina] 16:13:58 Janina: I will start working on the agenda. In particular, cross-groups. 16:14:00 zakim, close this item 16:14:00 agendum 2 closed 16:14:02 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:14:02 3. Task Force Checkins [from janina] 16:14:02 zakim, next item 16:14:03 ... Please book your travel 16:14:03 agendum 3. "Task Force Checkins" taken up [from janina] 16:14:38 Michael: Rosson did not reply yet. I told Chris about it. 16:15:15 Janina: New co-facilitator for CSS tf - Ian Pouncey from Paciello Group. 16:15:24 ... Trying to get the co-chairs together. 16:15:57 Michael: No progress on coga gap analysis. 16:16:15 Janina: I saw the tf draft for personalization. 16:16:28 Michael: I have incorporated Leoni's comments. 16:16:41 ... Looks like the Wiki covers most of the issues. 16:17:03 ... Issue: Connect IRC to GitHub issues. Not sure whether to use this. 16:17:12 Janina: Somewhat of interest to us. 16:17:23 tdrake has joined #apa 16:17:30 present+ tdrake 16:18:01 Janina: Could help us to attach comments to specs. 16:19:14 Michael: Ted, you and Ian should talk without Rosson, to transfer what you are thinking. Need to get started even without Rosson. 16:19:32 Ted: Can we chat on where we like? 16:19:34 Michael: yes 16:20:01 zakim, next item 16:20:01 agendum 4. "Push API Response https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/259" taken up [from janina] 16:20:41 Janina: Our comments were quickly dismissed. We did not get any notification outside GitHub tracking. 16:20:58 ... We were told: You are asking for a feature from the wrong spec. The spec referenced is not a W3C spec. 16:21:23 ... I have a problem with being told to go outside W3C spec to deal with our issue - no process established for this 16:21:42 ... We should not just let it drop. 16:22:23 ... Originally came out of payments group to push notifications on a mobile device - could do damage when in a payments transaction. 16:22:51 ... One of the co-chairs of payments acknowledged this as a general problem, not just for a11y. 16:24:07 Michael: Mixed mind. I don't know about any process that prohibits us from filing comments on non-W3C technologies. But moving forward in this leaves a gap in W3C specs. 16:24:19 ... Worried about W3C horizontal review mission. 16:24:39 ... Not sure what to do. 16:25:13 ... If we later block advancing due to this dependency - what will happen? 16:25:27 Janina: Would this be yet another APA formal objection? - Famously disruptive. 16:25:37 Michael: Makes us look like the bad guys even more. 16:25:53 ... Not formally objecting when we see a problem is also not good. 16:26:08 Janina: At least we should push for an appendix. 16:26:39 Michael: They closed the issue after Leonie said it's good. But she was not talking on behalf of APA. 16:26:55 ... None of us had seen Leonie's comment before they closed it. 16:27:26 ... She was probably not meaning to talk on behalf of APA. 16:27:36 Janina: She might be our liaison - not sure however 16:28:05 Michael: Don't remeber if Web APIs was another group - and another liaison. 16:28:35 Ted: We are asking for the ability to set a user setting for behaviour in case of a push mechanism. Is this dependent on a personalization service? 16:28:57 Michael: Push API says how you can make things get pushed. If we talk about controlling this, they say this is notification. 16:29:13 ... Arguably, you should not have something insular like this. 16:29:36 Ted: Yes, it is a matter of notification, not push. Push is a basic function. Customization should be decided at another level. 16:30:35 Janina: I am okay with the substance. We can file a comment in this direction. But W3C should have a marker in here. We need to be able to rely on this. 16:31:09 ... Personalization by the app. We might even want phone calls to be paused for the payment transaction. 16:31:58 Michael: In a11y consideration section we could mention that we should be aware of the personalization aspect of notification. 16:32:25 ... Or do we want to go further? 16:33:08 Janina: We should not request that W3C take over notification. But we should expect that we can express the dependency, and document our concern. 16:33:20 Janina: I am eager to take this up with the payments people. 16:34:00 Michael: They could be intending to go to CR any day. 16:34:25 rrsagent, make minutes 16:34:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/12-apa-minutes.html MichaelC 16:34:25 Janina: I will see if i can draft something for payments. 16:34:28 zakim, next item 16:34:28 agendum 5. "Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8" taken up [from janina] 16:35:47 zakim, close this item 16:35:47 agendum 5 closed 16:35:48 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:35:48 6. new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html [from janina] 16:35:48 zakim, next item 16:35:49 agendum 6. "new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html" taken up [from janina] 16:35:51 Michael: No open actions on people who are here - aside from Janina and me. 16:36:22 Michael: Wide review request on TCML. We had no comments on it. 16:36:31 Janina: i can do it 16:36:50 -> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/CSS_Fonts_Module_Level_4 CSS Fonts Module Level 4 16:37:26 This specification defines modifications to the existing CSS Fonts 3 specification along with additional experimental features. 16:37:42 Michael: Not sure if we are interested in this. 16:37:53 Janina: Could be useful for low-vision. 16:38:09 Ted: Yes, there are some interesting things in here. What does "optical resolution" mean? 16:38:37 Michael: Optical sizing. There is color fonts as well. Could create some a11y challenges. That would be covered by WCAG. 16:39:38 Janina: Should we defer this review to some other people in CSS? 16:40:00 Ted: It should definitely be reviewed. Everything looks great until someone misuses it. 16:40:11 ... We should look for hidden things like fading or flashing. 16:40:35 Janina: Assign it to Ian, and have him talk to Ted. And ask a CSS expert on low vision. 16:40:55 Michael: We can just assign the issue on CSS Github. 16:42:55 ... Done 16:43:15 -> https://www.w3.org/TR/motion-1/ Motion Path Module Level 1 16:43:41 Motion path allows authors to animate any graphical object along an author specified path. 16:44:02 Michael: You can define a path and have something move on the path. It can also rotate along the movement. 16:44:30 ... It is an animation thing, with all of its issues. 16:45:16 Michael: I am inclined to not reviewing this. 16:45:22 Janina: Okay 16:45:27 zakim, next item 16:45:27 agendum 7. "Other Business" taken up [from janina] 16:45:54 zakim, next item 16:45:54 agendum 7 was just opened, janina 16:46:05 zakim, close this item 16:46:05 agendum 7 closed 16:46:06 zakim, close this item 16:46:07 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:46:07 8. next and future meetings [from janina] 16:46:07 I do not know what agendum had been taken up, janina 16:47:06 zakim, by 16:47:06 I don't understand 'by', Gottfried 16:47:08 zakim, bye 16:47:08 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been janina, MichielBijl, Gottfried, tdrake 16:47:08 Zakim has left #apa 16:47:14 rrsagent, make log public 16:47:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:47:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/12-apa-minutes.html Gottfried