12:53:02 RRSAgent has joined #forms 12:53:02 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/07/05-forms-irc 12:53:04 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:53:04 Zakim has joined #forms 12:53:06 Zakim, this will be 12:53:06 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 12:53:07 Meeting: XForms Users Community Group Teleconference 12:53:08 Date: 05 July 2017 12:53:20 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jul/0006 12:53:28 Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jul/0006 12:53:37 Chair: Steven 12:53:42 Regrets: Philip 12:57:42 alain has joined #forms 13:01:30 ebruchez has joined #forms 13:03:54 Topic: Coming calls 13:04:32 Erik: Tentatively i can join the call on the 17th. 13:05:03 Steven: We'll cancel next week. 13:05:31 Erik: I'm also not sure of the 26th July 13:05:34 Steven: OK 13:05:43 Steven: Anyway, no calls in August 13:05:53 Topic: Tutorial on data-driven forms 13:05:53 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jul/0001 13:06:35 Steven: Please comment before I formally publish it 13:06:44 Topic: Email type 13:06:44 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jun/0038 13:06:44 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jun/0040 13:07:23 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jul/0009.html 13:07:42 Steven: Suggestion, two email types, one for regular ascii adresses 13:07:48 s/ad/add/ 13:08:06 Steven: plus international email address type 13:08:36 Steven: Implemented here: http://homepages.cwi.nl/~steven/forms/examples/email.xml 13:11:55 Erik: Liam raised the point of strict compatibility 13:12:11 Steven: We could add a third type that dealt with that 13:12:31 Erik: There may be email addresses at top-level domains 13:13:09 ... IETF discourages the use of domains that exist just of one part. 13:13:48 ... I don't have a big interest in supporting the strict IETF RFC 13:14:10 .. I'm good with the proposed change. 13:14:34 Topic: Validation and optional fields 13:14:34 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jun/0041 13:14:55 Steven: SO you support introducing the new rulem, as I unserstand it Erik 13:14:59 ... so do I 13:15:06 Erik: Yes. 13:15:18 Alain: I'm OK with adopting the new rule 13:15:36 ACTION: Steven to adopt new validation rule in text 13:15:37 Created ACTION-2131 - Adopt new validation rule in text [on Steven Pemberton - due 2017-07-12]. 13:17:29 Erik: SO you will just say "this is how required works now"? 13:17:32 Steven: Yes 13:17:41 Topic: 13:17:41 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jul/0000 13:18:18 Steven: A suggestion from me 13:19:08 Erik: If you wanted to reset from a slightly different version of the instance, it would be good to say yourself what the 'initial 13:19:13 ' state of an instance is 13:19:19 ... we work around this 13:19:29 ... by copying the instance somewhere else 13:19:53 ... we have no feature that supports it 13:20:07 Steven: Do you have a name for the action? 13:20:15 Erik: Haven't thought about it 13:20:43 Erik: This wouldn't add much complexity. The implementation has to do this anyway 13:21:09 Alain: Fine with me too. 13:21:29 ACTION: Steven to spec new and matching set action 13:21:30 Created ACTION-2132 - Spec new and matching set action [on Steven Pemberton - due 2017-07-12]. 13:21:45 Topic: Submission echo 13:21:45 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jun/0042 13:21:54 Steven: So Erik you have this already? 13:21:58 Erik: Yes. 13:22:04 ... mostly for testing 13:22:10 ... the name is not thought out. 13:23:19 Steven: My fear is having to register a scheme 13:23:32 Erik: A scheme is the easiest 13:24:40 Steven: I'm not opposed. It's just the extra work 13:24:50 Steven: Alain do you have this feature? 13:25:17 Alain: Not exactly, because of replace="all" which is hard to do via javascript 13:25:30 ... it is possible using a new tab 13:26:29 Steven: what would your advice be? 13:26:36 Alain: A means to copy instances. 13:26:59 Steven: In other words, this needs more thought 13:27:02 Alain: Yes. 13:27:16 Topic: switch/case 13:27:16 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Jun/0032 13:27:57 Steven: DO you support this? How hard would it be? 13:29:41 Erik: This raises a very old question of how you decide whether to display a control 13:30:05 ... a standard pattern is ".[condition]" 13:30:35 ... and such a condition on case could be more widely applied, for instance for group. 13:30:57 Steven: I agree 13:31:19 ... so you are saying that if we do this, it should be more general 13:31:24 Erik: Possibly. 13:32:43 Erik: Actually, with the @name version it works two-way 13:32:47 Steven: Ah! 13:33:13 ACTION: Steven to think about switch/case and heneral visibility more 13:33:13 Created ACTION-2133 - Think about switch/case and heneral visibility more [on Steven Pemberton - due 2017-07-12]. 13:34:13 Topic: AOB 13:34:28 Steven: No call in one week; possible call in two weeks depending on Erik. 13:34:33 [ADJOURN] 13:34:50 rrsagent, make minutes 13:34:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/05-forms-minutes.html Steven 13:35:32 Present: Alain, Erik, Steven 13:35:34 rrsagent, make minutes 13:35:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/05-forms-minutes.html Steven 13:36:00 s/SO/So/ 13:36:17 s/rulem/rule/ 13:36:29 s/SO/So/ 13:36:56 s/DO/Do/ 13:37:13 s/DO/Do/ 13:37:17 rrsagent, make minutes 13:37:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/05-forms-minutes.html Steven 13:37:42 s/i can/I can/