IRC log of apa on 2017-06-28
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:49:39 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #apa
- 15:49:39 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/06/28-apa-irc
- 15:49:41 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 15:49:41 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #apa
- 15:49:43 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 15:49:43 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 15:49:44 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
- 15:49:44 [trackbot]
- Date: 28 June 2017
- 15:52:01 [MichielBijl]
- present+
- 15:53:15 [janina]
- agenda?
- 15:53:19 [janina]
- agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes
- 15:53:19 [janina]
- agenda+ TPAC 2017 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017
- 15:53:19 [janina]
- agenda+ Task Force Checkins
- 15:53:19 [janina]
- agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
- 15:53:20 [janina]
- agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
- 15:53:22 [janina]
- agenda+ Other Business
- 15:53:24 [janina]
- agenda+ next and future meetings
- 15:53:27 [janina]
- agenda+ be done
- 15:53:38 [tink]
- tink has joined #apa
- 15:54:09 [janina]
- resent+
- 15:54:22 [janina]
- agenda?
- 15:57:00 [janina]
- 15:57:02 [janina]
- 15:57:03 [janina]
- 15:57:28 [janina]
- agenda?
- 16:00:05 [tink]
- present+ Léonie
- 16:00:44 [janina]
- janina has joined #apa
- 16:00:52 [joanie]
- present+ Joanmarie_Diggs
- 16:01:06 [janina]
- agenda?
- 16:01:19 [janina]
- present+
- 16:01:24 [janina]
- chair: janina
- 16:01:55 [IanPouncey]
- IanPouncey has joined #apa
- 16:02:01 [IanPouncey]
- present+
- 16:02:06 [MichaelC]
- present+
- 16:02:59 [MichielBijl]
- scribe: MichielBijl
- 16:03:30 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:03:30 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina]
- 16:03:46 [MichielBijl]
- JS: We have the usual agenda
- 16:03:59 [MichielBijl]
- TPAC and various actions
- 16:04:25 [MichielBijl]
- Any other items we should look at or take up?
- 16:04:37 [MichielBijl]
- We’ll surely take up CSS.
- 16:05:04 [Gottfried]
- Gottfried has joined #apa
- 16:05:07 [MichielBijl]
- Any other news for the good of the order?
- 16:05:10 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:05:10 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "TPAC 2017 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017" taken up [from janina]
- 16:05:17 [MichielBijl]
- MB: I’m about to change jobs, but that’s about it
- 16:05:23 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Good luck with that!
- 16:05:30 [Gottfried]
- Gottfried has joined #apa
- 16:05:34 [MichielBijl]
- Be sure to plan ahead for TPAC
- 16:05:58 [MichielBijl]
- Even if you think you might be coming it’s good to book a hotel room, you can always cancel, but can’t always add.
- 16:06:11 [MichielBijl]
- Have already planned a couple of meetings between APA and ARIA
- 16:06:42 [MichielBijl]
- present+ Gottfried
- 16:06:54 [MichielBijl]
- Any questions TPAC related?
- 16:07:42 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:07:42 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Task Force Checkins" taken up [from janina]
- 16:07:48 [MichielBijl]
- Hearing none, let’s move forward
- 16:07:56 [MichielBijl]
- *drum rolls*
- 16:08:11 [MichielBijl]
- We have a new facilitator: Ian Pouncey
- 16:08:13 [MichielBijl]
- Welcome!
- 16:08:25 [MichielBijl]
- Ted Drake are you on the call?
- 16:08:35 [MichielBijl]
- GZ: He’s not
- 16:08:48 [MichielBijl]
- JS: We need to some active communication with the CSS WG.
- 16:08:57 [MichielBijl]
- We’ve had various issues with the specs
- 16:09:06 [MichielBijl]
- As a result of that we have a CSS TF
- 16:09:30 [MichielBijl]
- We’ve had trouble finding someone with time to function as a facilitator
- 16:09:46 [MichielBijl]
- So thank you Ian! And thank you Léonie for you help.
- 16:11:33 [MichielBijl]
- Ian, let me turn it over to you and let you introduce yourself
- 16:12:00 [MichielBijl]
- IP: I’m very excited to be here and fulfil this role
- 16:12:06 [MichielBijl]
- I’ve been a long time CSS author
- 16:12:23 [MichielBijl]
- Haven’t had an orientation yet, but hope to get that soon
- 16:12:30 [MichielBijl]
- MC: We should a private chat for that
- 16:12:48 [MichielBijl]
- Another question is whether Ted Drake will co-facilitate or whether Ian will replace him.
- 16:12:57 [MichielBijl]
- JS: I think he wants to play second fiddle
- 16:14:40 [MichielBijl]
- I think we have a few people interested in joining
- 16:15:33 [MichielBijl]
- There’s also an open question about a best practices document
- 16:16:06 [MichielBijl]
- We got a positive response on our proposal to do more with customisation via CSS media queries.
- 16:16:30 [MichielBijl]
- In addition there is the whole realm of APA for horizontal review
- 16:16:57 [MichielBijl]
- When a CSS module comes up for review, we need people to do so within this group
- 16:18:27 [MichielBijl]
- MB: Would CSS modules be reviewed by people from within APA or specifically from the CSS TF?
- 16:19:16 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Good question, I imagine most people with accessibility knowledge will be in APA. But Ian will be able to assign the correct people.
- 16:19:39 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Ultimately it’s the APA’s responsibility to review specs.
- 16:20:29 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Not sure if there’s any other news from our other TFs, but they’re both active
- 16:22:03 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Knocked one front burner off today, hope to knock another off tomorrow
- 16:22:15 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:22:15 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8" taken up [from janina]
- 16:22:20 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Not all of the APA work happens here is part of the message
- 16:22:42 [MichielBijl]
- MC: W3C is having major service problems and I can’t load the tracker
- 16:22:48 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Cé la vie
- 16:23:05 [MichielBijl]
- Léonie were you able to look at the one I emailed you about
- 16:23:17 [MichielBijl]
- LW: Yes, but not to the extend that I understood what you were going on about
- 16:23:36 [MichielBijl]
- JS: *missing part* we never responded to them
- 16:23:49 [MichielBijl]
- LW: Not sure if I qualify to do so
- 16:23:56 [MichielBijl]
- Where do I find the relevant pointers?
- 16:24:08 [MichielBijl]
- MC: That depends on how responsible people have been while logging issues
- 16:27:07 [janina]
- zakim, pick a victim
- 16:27:07 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose IanPouncey
- 16:28:00 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:28:00 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html" taken up [from janina]
- 16:28:23 [IanPouncey]
- MC: No interesting new specs. A couple from last week that didn't get cleared.
- 16:29:23 [IanPouncey]
- JS: Clear on SHACL and XSL.
- 16:29:52 [IanPouncey]
- Tink: would be good to get feedback soon on microdata. Trying to prove that we can get through the process in a short time
- 16:30:19 [IanPouncey]
- MC: We determined in May that we didn't need to review microdata.
- 16:30:32 [IanPouncey]
- Ting: There is probably nothing a11y related.
- 16:30:44 [IanPouncey]
- s/TIng/Tink/
- 16:31:28 [IanPouncey]
- Tink: Nothing in microdata that is presented directly to the user
- 16:31:36 [IanPouncey]
- JS: I'm happy to take a read on it.
- 16:31:48 [IanPouncey]
- Tink: Other person who might be able to help is Shane
- 16:31:53 [IanPouncey]
- JS: He's not been present recently.
- 16:32:28 [IanPouncey]
- MC: The technical characteristics of RDFA vs Microdata aren't relevant, so Shane might not have an advantage there.
- 16:32:47 [IanPouncey]
- MC: It microdata doesn't kill accessibility the way microformats did.
- 16:32:58 [IanPouncey]
- Tink: There is potential for AT.
- 16:33:16 [IanPouncey]
- JS: Happy to take a read because we're looking at direction for personalisation
- 16:33:40 [IanPouncey]
- Tink: COGA have been looking at determining types of data
- 16:33:50 [IanPouncey]
- JS: Assign an action to me, is 3 weeks quick enough.
- 16:33:51 [MichaelC]
- action: janina to review HTML Microdata https://www.w3.org/TR/microdata/
- 16:33:51 [trackbot]
- Error creating an ACTION: could not connect to Tracker. Please mail <sysreq@w3.org> with details about what happened.
- 16:33:57 [IanPouncey]
- TInk: Quicker would be better.
- 16:34:05 [IanPouncey]
- JS: I'll take it to COGA to see if they want to help
- 16:35:02 [IanPouncey]
- MC: I think we should look at explicit request category which has media queries level 4 and 23 active specs that are languishing.
- 16:35:28 [IanPouncey]
- MC: Input events again, Microdata, Payment specs
- 16:35:48 [IanPouncey]
- JS: I'm aware and have an action. Expecting Katie back soon to kick that community group in to gear.
- 16:35:52 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:35:52 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "Other Business" taken up [from janina]
- 16:37:07 [janina]
- zakim, bye
- 16:37:07 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been MichielBijl, Léonie, Joanmarie_Diggs, janina, IanPouncey, MichaelC, Gottfried
- 16:37:07 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #apa
- 16:37:14 [janina]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:37:14 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/06/28-apa-minutes.html janina
- 16:37:48 [janina]
- Argh. Service Unavailable!
- 16:37:57 [janina]
- I'll be back!
- 17:41:33 [IanPouncey1]
- IanPouncey1 has joined #apa
- 19:01:54 [janina]
- rrsagent, bye
- 19:01:54 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2017/06/28-apa-actions.rdf :
- 19:01:54 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: janina to review HTML Microdata https://www.w3.org/TR/microdata/ [1]
- 19:01:54 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/06/28-apa-irc#T16-33-51