15:35:41 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #pbgsc
15:35:41 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/06/27-pbgsc-irc
15:35:50 <ivan> rrsagent, set log public
15:36:10 <ivan> Meeting: Publishing Steering Committee Call
15:37:24 <ivan> Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishing-sc/2017Jun/0045.html
15:37:29 <ivan> Chair: Rick
15:47:16 <ivan> regrets: tzviya
15:55:12 <RickJ> RickJ has joined #pbgsc
15:55:28 <RickJ> present+
15:57:26 <RickJ> ivan a heads up... I will probably have to board a flight towards the end of this call, and will lose irc, so I may need you to mind the queue
15:57:36 <laudrain> laudrain has joined #pbgsc
15:57:45 <laudrain> present+
15:57:54 <ivan> present+
16:01:17 <pbelfanti> pbelfanti has joined #pbgsc
16:01:28 <pbelfanti> present+
16:02:42 <Bill_Kasdorf> Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pbgsc
16:02:53 <ivan> present+ dauwhe
16:02:59 <Bill_Kasdorf> present+
16:03:35 <garth> garth has joined #pbgsc
16:03:48 <garth> present+ Garth
16:04:00 <dauwhe> dauwhe has joined #pbgsc
16:04:07 <dauwhe> present+ dauwhe
16:04:54 <dauwhe> scribenick: dauwhe
16:05:11 <dauwhe> Topic: ISO
16:05:21 <dauwhe> RickJ: lots of conversation about ISO
16:05:38 <dauwhe> ... the Korean team managing the update would like assurances that we are supportive
16:05:50 <dauwhe> ... there's been a document written
16:06:08 <dauwhe> ... there was some concern about approval required by w3m
16:06:22 <dauwhe> ivan: I saw email from ISO trying to establish a formal liason
16:06:27 <dauwhe> ... we already have one
16:06:36 <dauwhe> ... and any liason must be formally approved by w3m
16:06:54 <dauwhe> ... beyond that, this whole story is independent of what we do with ISO usually, as it is not a REC
16:07:06 <dauwhe> ... w3M should know about it, but they won't likely be too concerned
16:07:11 <dauwhe> ... but it will carry w3c's name
16:07:41 <dauwhe> RickJ: we can tell Cristina that the BG is aware of what S. Korea is doing, and we support it, and w3m is  aware
16:07:48 <dauwhe> ivan: I don't know if w3m is aware
16:07:55 <dauwhe> RickJ: we need to have billm make them aware
16:08:02 <dauwhe> ... I'll follow up with that
16:08:12 <dauwhe> Topic: follow-ups from F2F
16:08:18 <RickJ> Deal with http://idpf.org/ongoing
16:08:30 <dauwhe> ... I only have one, which was to deal with the IDPF ongoing page
16:08:36 <dauwhe> ... how do we communicate where things are
16:08:43 <dauwhe> q+
16:08:53 <ivan> q+
16:09:42 <dauwhe> dauwhe: I've moved Matt's spec link page to the EPUB3 CG page
16:10:09 <dauwhe> ivan: the BG has to take a leading role in communication issues
16:10:15 <dauwhe> ... the WG is not equipped to do that
16:10:27 <dauwhe> ... the relationship to the larger community, publicity, etc
16:10:37 <dauwhe> ... and if the BG could take an active role, that would be good
16:10:48 <dauwhe> ... I know that BillM has this on his mind, but I don't know what he plans to do
16:11:04 <dauwhe> RickJ: two things I want in minutes
16:11:20 <leslie> leslie has joined #pbgsc
16:11:25 <dauwhe> ... BillM has agreed that we will meet every other week, the friday before the SC meets, to coordinate
16:11:44 <dauwhe> ... 2ndly, I had lots of conversations with SC members doing the F2F, who all said the same thing
16:12:00 <ivan> present+ leslie
16:12:09 <dauwhe> ... with the WG going, with the ISO thing almost on its own, we have an opportunity to find our voice as a BG
16:12:14 <ivan> zakim, who is here?
16:12:14 <Zakim> Present: RickJ, laudrain, ivan, pbelfanti, dauwhe, Bill_Kasdorf, Garth, leslie
16:12:17 <Zakim> On IRC I see leslie, dauwhe, garth, Bill_Kasdorf, pbelfanti, laudrain, RickJ, RRSAgent, Zakim, Karen, ivan
16:12:21 <dauwhe> ... so I would ask everyone what they think our voice and role should be
16:12:27 <RickJ> q?
16:12:32 <dauwhe> q-
16:12:33 <ivan> q-
16:13:06 <dauwhe> Topic: update on publishing summit
16:13:25 <dauwhe> Bill_Kasdorf: I'm on the program committee
16:13:40 <dauwhe> RickJ: could you do a quick update on the summit?
16:13:47 <dauwhe> ... I had an IMS board meeting
16:14:09 <dauwhe> ... it will be opportunistic to report on gradebook/edupub interoperability, so we could bring Rob in
16:14:18 <dauwhe> ... worth thinking about for the speaking committee
16:14:35 <dauwhe> Bill_Kasdorf: I sent that to the program committee, and people thought it was a good idea
16:14:45 <RickJ> q?
16:14:53 <ivan> q?
16:15:19 <dauwhe> Bill_Kasdorf: we had meeting yesterday to talk about structure, not speakers
16:15:37 <dauwhe> ... we already have lots of speakers invited, and we sent out a call for proposals
16:15:47 <dauwhe> ... we'll have another meeting to talk about program
16:16:09 <dauwhe> ... but yesterday we talked about having topical sessions, with 2-3 speakers who come at a topic from different angles
16:16:24 <dauwhe> ... but we don't want the traditional panel with comfy chairs and no preparation :)
16:16:39 <dauwhe> ... we want organized, thoughtful presos around related topics
16:16:46 <dauwhe> ... we'll also have single-speaker sessions
16:17:02 <dauwhe> ... so probably a combo of 30min-ish speakers and hour sessions
16:17:40 <dauwhe> ... we also talked a bit about marketing, and want it to be substantive
16:18:02 <dauwhe> ... tzviya suggested that the ebookcraft model, where speakers do blog posts, would be a nice idea
16:18:11 <pbelfanti> q+
16:18:15 <dauwhe> ... and we talked about logistics--room setup, capacity, etc
16:18:34 <dauwhe> ... the main issue was about speakers submitting presentations in advance
16:18:58 <dauwhe> ... and we agreed we want to see preliminary presentations, but understand they will be edited up to the last second
16:19:12 <dauwhe> ... sharing presos beforehand is really important for the "panel" sessions
16:19:25 <dauwhe> pbelfanti: to fill in a few blanks
16:19:39 <RickJ> ack pbelfanti
16:19:39 <dauwhe> ... we discussed the file submission, for the panel moderator to own that topic
16:20:00 <dauwhe> ... make sure there's collaboration between panelists, and avoid duplication
16:20:15 <dauwhe> ... and some questions prepared in case audience is passive
16:20:26 <dauwhe> ... we also talked about program committee owning parts of the program
16:20:49 <dauwhe> Bill_Kasdorf: a program committee member taking responsibility for each session
16:21:19 <dauwhe> laudrain: it was a good summary
16:21:24 <dauwhe> Topic: summer schedule
16:21:42 <dauwhe> RickJ: august might be a better time to go light on the schedule, to go with the European holidays
16:21:53 <dauwhe> ... next week is july 4, a holiday in us
16:22:01 <dauwhe> ... we'd have meetings on the 11th and 18th
16:22:31 <dauwhe> .... take a break starting July 25, for two or three weeks
16:22:34 <dauwhe> Bill_Kasdorf: that sounds good
16:22:50 <dauwhe> RickJ: Ivan, can you let me know how to run the calls?
16:23:11 <laudrain> that coherent with european breaks in August
16:23:14 <dauwhe> ivan: I may have something
16:23:34 <dauwhe> RickJ: any objections to take a break from July 25, starting again on August 15
16:23:39 <dauwhe> laudrain: that works
16:24:05 <dauwhe> RickJ: I'll send an email to the BG with a summary, and update on the schedule, and a reminder about the CG meeting
16:24:10 <dauwhe> ... does that work for everyone?
16:24:17 <dauwhe> Topic: Open discussion
16:24:25 <dauwhe> RickJ: anyone want to raise any issues?
16:24:38 <dauwhe> ... sounds like we finished the call before I had to board my flight :)
16:24:41 <laudrain> q+
16:24:41 <dauwhe> garth: excellent
16:24:56 <dauwhe> laudrain: about the 15th, I thought you'd restart on August 22nd
16:24:59 <dauwhe> RickJ: that's right
16:25:36 <dauwhe> RickJ: thanks all!
16:25:37 <laudrain> laudrain has left #pbgsc
16:26:17 <ivan> rrsagent, draft minutes
16:26:17 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/06/27-pbgsc-minutes.html ivan
16:26:23 <ivan> rrsagent, bye
16:26:23 <RRSAgent> I see no action items