15:41:52 RRSAgent has joined #pbgsc 15:41:52 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/05/30-pbgsc-irc 15:41:59 Zakim has joined #pbgsc 15:42:06 rrsagent, set log public 15:42:20 Meeting: Publishing Steering Committee Telco 15:42:44 Chair: Rick_Johnson 15:43:02 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/958105B1-401B-4125-AE47-730EF2BF798F@ingramcontent.com 15:43:28 Regrets: Bill_Kasdorf, Jun-ichi_Yoshii 15:56:15 cmussinelli has joined #pbgsc 15:57:47 tzviya has joined #pbgsc 15:59:20 laudrain has joined #pbgsc 15:59:42 present+ Luc 15:59:55 George has joined #pbgsc 16:00:20 RickJ has joined #pbgsc 16:00:22 present+ 16:00:57 present+ RickJ 16:01:57 present+ George 16:02:54 tzviya has joined #pbgsc 16:03:04 present+ 16:03:36 present+ BillM, Karen, Kyrce, Mike_Baker, Tzviya 16:03:51 zakim, who is here? 16:03:51 Present: Luc, ivan, RickJ, George, tzviya, BillM, Karen, Kyrce, Mike_Baker 16:03:53 On IRC I see tzviya, RickJ, George, laudrain, cmussinelli, Zakim, RRSAgent, ivan 16:04:13 tzviya has joined #pbgsc 16:04:28 Mike_B has joined #pbgsc 16:05:02 BillMcCoy has joined #pbgsc 16:05:28 https://www.w3.org/2017/04/publ-wg-charter/0524-draft.html 16:06:17 GK: George scribing. 16:06:22 scribenick: George 16:06:43 IH: charter update there is an email sent out about the charter. 16:06:55 garth has joined #pbgsc 16:07:09 present+ Garth 16:07:11 IH: It is a version that answers the issues that were submitted. 16:07:33 IH: it looks like a rewrite but it is lawyer friendly version. 16:08:02 .IH: The objectors received the rewrite 16:08:47 IH: Wendy sent out an email to all that have commented; does this charter work for the commentors. They have a week to reply. 16:08:49 q+ 16:09:15 q+ 16:09:28 q+ 16:09:34 IH: It would then go through the W3C process. 16:09:36 ack tzviya 16:09:37 q? 16:10:33 TS: I had a call about the new draft and it seems they are OK with the rewrite. 16:10:44 ack RickJ 16:11:41 RJ: In the deliverables section we talked about more complete vocabulary. However, we said out of scope was metadata. 16:11:56 IH: We would not write a new ONIX etc. 16:11:59 ack BillMcCoy 16:12:27 BM:TZ's reach out was approved. 16:13:01 BM: W3M seems good, Wendy will drive this process. 16:13:49 BM: Now that it has been sent to the SC, Wendy wants comments if not OK. Let's us avoide any rewrites, unless it is really essential. 16:14:31 TZ: New language is how agreement was reached. 16:14:39 ack BillMcCoy 16:14:48 RJ: Any other questions. 16:15:26 Topic: Final f2f agenda 16:15:48 zakim, who is here? 16:15:48 Present: Luc, ivan, RickJ, George, tzviya, BillM, Karen, Kyrce, Mike_Baker, Garth 16:15:51 On IRC I see garth, BillMcCoy, Mike_B, tzviya, RickJ, George, laudrain, cmussinelli, Zakim, RRSAgent, ivan 16:15:56 RJ: Next item Garth sent out an agenda for the F2f. 16:16:17 GC: The agenda is in draft and not final. 16:16:22 q? 16:16:36 RJ: the rest of the agenda was not sent out. 16:17:05 RJ: update on ISO 16:17:15 Topic: ISO updates 16:17:42 BM We are getting information from ISO. 16:18:21 BM 3.0.1 is being prepared by Korean folks. 16:18:42 BM: This Korean submission complicates the process. 16:19:01 BM: Do we want to move forward with a TS. 16:19:16 BM: Let's let the ISO folks come back to us. 16:19:45 BM: Tzvia is back! 16:20:10 q+ 16:20:15 tzviya has joined #pbgsc 16:20:18 BM: Dr Cho was willing to do the work to update 3.0.1 16:20:41 BM: would there be valuse in a 3.0.1 16:22:53 q+ 16:23:04 tzviya has joined #pbgsc 16:23:05 AL: I thought 3.0.1 was done in support of the ISO process. 16:23:39 AL: Strange situation. I agree with George to move forward with accessibility standard and move to ISO. 16:24:04 RJ: What are our action items? 16:24:12 ack laud 16:24:15 ack billm 16:24:22 ack laudrain 16:24:22 ack BillMcCoy 16:24:37 regrets+ Liisa 16:25:01 BM: 3.0.1 has several holes, adding collections abstraction. 3.0.1 is a meaningfull update. 16:25:52 BM: What this group is the group needs to identify the priorities. and there are several options. 3.0.1 may happen. 16:26:33 BM: The accessibility spec is what should be considered. There are different paths. 16:26:38 q+ to ask for a clear explanation of a11y needs for ISO 16:26:45 RJ: What is the timing. 16:27:20 BM We could be dragged into errata based on ISO review. 16:27:50 BM: We should decide what this groups should be done. This would provide direction to SC 34. 16:28:22 TS: I am confused. Are there legal requirements tied to ISO. 16:28:37 TS: what are the legal requirements on accessibility. 16:29:12 AL: The EU accessibility would adoption and would fall under EU mandates. 16:29:47 q+ 16:29:55 ack tz 16:29:55 tzviya, you wanted to ask for a clear explanation of a11y needs for ISO 16:30:24 AL: The EU standard would publish the accessibility mandates. We hope it would be based on existing standards. It could be ISO or W3C. The EU commission would referent these standards. 16:30:51 ack tzviya 16:31:00 scribenick: laudrain 16:31:35 Cristina : for Europe, standards have to be done by EU organization 16:31:55 The corean one as not receivable by EU 16:31:56 q+ 16:32:22 ack cmussinelli 16:32:26 present+ cmussinelli 16:32:36 … we have to check again, but EU has to wait for the end of the ISO level 16:33:23 … we would like to avoid that the EU standard is different from the exising one at international level 16:33:25 ack tzviya 16:33:58 Tzviya : why would it be a ISO standard and not a W3C one 16:34:17 … W3C should be sufficient, should be checked 16:34:55 BM: W3C will not have an EPUB standard before years, and EPUB3 isn’t a W3C rec 16:35:52 BM: Makoto want to push accessibilty 1.0 and Dr Cho push EPUB 3.0.1 16:36:13 Tzivya : this question is time consuming 16:36:38 BM: iso for 3.0.1 brings a bias 16:37:24 Luc: we should clarify for Europe 16:37:52 q+ 16:38:09 Cristiana : we need to do some research and bring back on what will happen 16:38:23 s/Cristiana/Cristina/ 16:38:29 no problem... 16:38:47 BM: just do nothing for W3C pov 16:39:12 +1 to F2F in NYC (not just for ISO though...) 16:39:14 RJ: meeting in New York, a SC F2F? 16:39:20 I will be there Tues 21 as well as 22/23 16:39:34 Cristina: I may be there 16:39:40 Would work for me. 16:39:42 Wed 21 I meant... 16:39:49 RJ: I’ll do a poll 16:39:51 so Wed dinner is an option for me 16:39:53 do you have an idea on when the f22 will start? 16:40:15 George: moving the a11y in ISO to get more weight 16:40:56 … cofusing is WCAG2.1 in dev on short schedule, anr WCAG3 on a longer term 16:41:08 s/cofusing/confusing/ 16:41:36 RJ: George can you do a reseach on a11y side 16:41:43 George: ok 16:42:25 q? 16:42:31 ack George 16:42:33 q+ 16:43:24 RJ : 2 items : Publishing summit in November and support on EPUB3. Which one ? 16:43:33 suggest since we have PC for Pub Summit and we are short on time today we could just take the EPUB 3 topic... even though I suggested the other one... 16:44:22 topic: epub3 is alive! 16:44:41 RJ: point in the thread about the subject on EPUB3 16:45:22 RJ: summary of the mail thread 16:45:38 q? 16:45:50 q+ 16:46:10 q+ 16:46:19 ack cmuss 16:46:22 ack cmussinelli 16:46:24 ack tzviya 16:47:06 Tzviya: Kindle did recently things like KFX, blackbox and awfull 16:47:29 … People forgot what epub can do 16:47:30 ack George 16:47:32 q? 16:48:25 George: sounds like mktg. We should market EPUB3 to the World and november summit is a good palce to do it 16:48:41 … we should have a marketing group fot that 16:48:47 zakim, who is here? 16:48:47 Present: Luc, ivan, RickJ, George, tzviya, BillM, Karen, Kyrce, Mike_Baker, Garth, cmussinelli 16:48:49 On IRC I see tzviya, garth, BillMcCoy, Mike_B, RickJ, George, laudrain, cmussinelli, Zakim, RRSAgent, ivan 16:48:53 RJ;: do we have marketing resources? 16:48:57 q+ 16:49:02 … in W3C? 16:49:17 BM: our biggest platform is the summit 16:50:05 … classic marketing, like EDRlab EPUB Summit in Europe 16:51:03 … it is in our mental model EPUB3 is supported by W3C 16:51:31 Mike: EPUB3 as an ongoing viable solution 16:51:49 q? 16:51:54 ack Mike_B 16:52:07 q+ 16:52:22 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:52:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/30-pbgsc-minutes.html ivan 16:52:37 … the tranisaiton with a migration path, and EPUB3 solves a lot for publishers, so marketing all the different things it solves for publishers 16:52:39 q+ 16:52:50 ack garth 16:52:53 … How to make it happen 16:53:05 Garth : a differnt format? 16:53:15 Like :our own format 16:53:40 "just use HTML5" - is the main alternative to EPUB3 IMO (but that really means creating something one-off and not necessarily interoperable across systems) 16:53:50 ... and not necessarily accessible... 16:54:26 … we are commited to EPUB3, but it’s not obvious to the executive teams what the existing EPUB brings 16:54:31 Kyrce has joined #pbgsc 16:54:39 +q 16:54:56 ack Kyrce 16:55:11 Kyrce: we didn’t address the benefit of the end user 16:55:43 … there may be some use we can show 16:56:08 … for certain user group, DRM free is high desirabilty 16:57:18 George: we need to agressively promote EPUB in the summit 16:57:56 RJ: communicating the vibrancy of the CG 16:58:28 RJ: consider moving the SC to a weekly meeting, after NY F2F? 16:58:35 laudrain has left #pbgsc 16:58:38 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:58:38 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/30-pbgsc-minutes.html ivan 16:58:43 zakim, bye 16:58:44 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Luc, ivan, RickJ, George, tzviya, BillM, Karen, Kyrce, Mike_Baker, Garth, cmussinelli 16:58:44 Zakim has left #pbgsc 17:01:53 garth has joined #pbgsc 17:06:44 https://www.w3.org/Team/wiki/DigPub/IDPF 17:12:22 tzviya has joined #pbgsc 17:20:29 tzviya has joined #pbgsc 17:41:17 tzviya has joined #pbgsc