IRC log of apa on 2017-05-17
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:40:52 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #apa
- 15:40:52 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/05/17-apa-irc
- 15:40:54 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 15:40:54 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #apa
- 15:40:56 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 15:40:56 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 15:40:57 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
- 15:40:57 [trackbot]
- Date: 17 May 2017
- 15:40:58 [janina]
- agenda?
- 15:41:03 [janina]
- agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes
- 15:41:03 [janina]
- agenda+ TPAC 2017 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017
- 15:41:03 [janina]
- agenda+ Push API CfC
- 15:41:03 [janina]
- agenda+ Task Force Checkins
- 15:41:04 [janina]
- agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
- 15:41:06 [janina]
- agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
- 15:41:08 [janina]
- agenda+ Other Business
- 15:41:11 [janina]
- agenda+ next and future meetings
- 15:41:13 [janina]
- agenda+ be done
- 15:50:49 [janina]
- 15:50:57 [janina]
- present+
- 15:51:01 [janina]
- Chair: Janina
- 15:51:10 [janina]
- regrets: Michiel, Leonie
- 15:57:52 [tzviya]
- tzviya has joined #apa
- 16:00:59 [joanie]
- present+ Joanmarie_Diggs
- 16:02:07 [tzviya]
- present+ tzviya
- 16:05:25 [MichaelC]
- present+
- 16:05:50 [Gottfried]
- Gottfried has joined #apa
- 16:06:10 [Gottfried]
- scribe: Gottfried
- 16:06:13 [Gottfried]
- zakim, next item
- 16:06:13 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina]
- 16:07:00 [Gottfried]
- Janina: any news?
- 16:07:03 [Gottfried]
- (nobody)
- 16:07:07 [Gottfried]
- zakim, close this item
- 16:07:07 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 closed
- 16:07:08 [Zakim]
- I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 16:07:08 [Zakim]
- 2. TPAC 2017 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017 [from janina]
- 16:07:14 [Gottfried]
- zakim, open next item
- 16:07:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "TPAC 2017 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017" taken up [from janina]
- 16:07:40 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Draft agenda may be available in June. But make a hotel reservation now.
- 16:08:42 [Gottfried]
- Janina: We don't know how to get the W3C rate for the hotel.
- 16:09:11 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Will keep checking.
- 16:09:16 [Gottfried]
- zakim, next item
- 16:09:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Push API CfC" taken up [from janina]
- 16:09:54 [Gottfried]
- Janina: I have drafted comments. Case: you don't want to be interrupted. I got no comments.
- 16:10:41 [Gottfried]
- ... I would like to reference Ted's Github issue. More generic use case. We need ways to tell to not push.
- 16:10:54 [Gottfried]
- ... I will put out a CfC for a formal decision of the group.
- 16:11:11 [Gottfried]
- zakim, next item
- 16:11:11 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Task Force Checkins" taken up [from janina]
- 16:12:02 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Cleaning up Coga publications. Talked with ARIA chairs on Monday.
- 16:12:41 [Gottfried]
- ... Trying to publish 3 COGA docs together. Focus on the REC-doc, i.e. ARIA doc.
- 16:12:59 [Gottfried]
- ... My highest prio is on the cog support for WCAG.
- 16:13:40 [Gottfried]
- Janina: No general problem with prioritization. But COGA needs to deliver its docs as in the charter. Should not stall them.
- 16:14:39 [Gottfried]
- ... We need to have these docs published and reviewed
- 16:14:54 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Docs are very long - can we expect them to be thoroughly reviewed?
- 16:15:21 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Maybe publish gap analysis - without issues paper?
- 16:15:34 [Gottfried]
- ... There might be other organizations interested in this.
- 16:15:55 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Gap analysis is the most useful one. References the issue paper.
- 16:16:23 [Gottfried]
- ... We could publish as group note.
- 16:16:49 [tzviya]
- q+
- 16:17:20 [Gottfried]
- s/group note/working draft
- 16:17:41 [Gottfried]
- ... Danger of publishing a working draft as a note.
- 16:17:52 [Gottfried]
- ... But publishing a working draft without a note is a bad idea.
- 16:18:01 [janina]
- ack t
- 16:19:06 [Gottfried]
- Tzviya: Only a few people know about this work. You might get interested from DC and other accessibility organization that are focused on publishing.
- 16:19:36 [Gottfried]
- ... What about the CSS task force? - Issue with personalization semantics.
- 16:20:00 [Gottfried]
- ... Overwriting the layout with CSS semantics could cause problems.
- 16:20:48 [Gottfried]
- Janina: I have prepared a set of invitations to this call next week. On the topic of mechanisms for personalization on the Web.
- 16:21:02 [Gottfried]
- ... CSS, Media query, etc.
- 16:21:37 [Gottfried]
- ... I am going to send out some emails.
- 16:21:56 [Gottfried]
- Tzviya: I can join. Can pass it on to others.
- 16:22:04 [Gottfried]
- Gottfried: Possible for me to join.
- 16:22:49 [Gottfried]
- Janina: What can we do with our 12-year old CAPTCHA paper? - Not ready yet.
- 16:23:23 [Gottfried]
- ... CSS task force had problems getting off the ground. May need some support to get started.
- 16:23:32 [Gottfried]
- s/support/nudge
- 16:23:35 [Gottfried]
- zakim, next item
- 16:23:35 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8" taken up [from janina]
- 16:23:45 [Gottfried]
- action-2131
- 16:23:45 [trackbot]
- action-2131 -- Michael Cooper to Ask webappsec if csp is meant to block bookmarklets, and raise issue of a11y scripts that users explicitly request (not xss) -- due 2017-05-17 -- OPEN
- 16:23:45 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2131
- 16:24:06 [Gottfried]
- action-2129?
- 16:24:06 [trackbot]
- action-2129 -- Michael Cooper to Find publications that went straight to note without review opportunity -- due 2017-05-10 -- OPEN
- 16:24:06 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2129
- 16:24:32 [Gottfried]
- Michael: 54% of notes last year were published without a review draft.
- 16:24:41 [Gottfried]
- ... Will send this in an email to the wg.
- 16:25:40 [Gottfried]
- ... There are some process changes needed.
- 16:26:29 [Gottfried]
- action-2124?
- 16:26:29 [trackbot]
- action-2124 -- Janina Sajka to Follow up with johannes wilm on input events 1 and 2 wrt our comments on input events non-leveled -- due 2017-05-17 -- OPEN
- 16:26:29 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2124
- 16:26:46 [Gottfried]
- Janina: I am still waiting for Leonie
- 16:26:48 [Gottfried]
- action-2119?
- 16:26:48 [trackbot]
- action-2119 -- Janina Sajka to Review html 5.2 https://www.w3.org/tr/html52/ -- due 2017-05-17 -- OPEN
- 16:26:48 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2119
- 16:27:23 [MichaelC]
- close action-2119
- 16:27:23 [trackbot]
- Closed action-2119.
- 16:27:24 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Found no problem. Let's close it.
- 16:28:25 [Gottfried]
- Tzviya: Issue on ARIA details tag was closed by Charles. Should be fine now.
- 16:29:05 [Gottfried]
- zakim, next item
- 16:29:05 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html" taken up [from janina]
- 16:29:28 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/TR/motion-sensors/ Motion Sensors Explainer
- 16:30:13 [Gottfried]
- Michael: We sometimes have a11y input on use cases. Do we want to deal with this?
- 16:30:34 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Probably not - unless somebody has a particular use case.
- 16:30:56 [Gottfried]
- Michael: (reading from the use case section)
- 16:31:33 [Gottfried]
- Janina: No need to review
- 16:32:01 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/TR/orientation-sensor/ Orientation Sensor
- 16:33:02 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Guessing this is low-level, but nothing on the API level.
- 16:33:12 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Yes, there could be a11y use cases.
- 16:34:15 [Gottfried]
- Gottfried: This doc refers to the motion sensors explainer doc.
- 16:34:42 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Cannot tell how comprehensive this API is. But guessing we probably care more about API uses than the API itself.
- 16:35:10 [Gottfried]
- ... We need to come up with a white paper about web of things, device API, sensors etc.
- 16:35:23 [Gottfried]
- Janina: We need to complain about API specs not explaining themselves.
- 16:35:38 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Haven't made a formal complaint, only discussed this
- 16:35:40 [MichaelC]
- action: cooper to make a fuss about algorithmic specs
- 16:35:41 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2132 - Make a fuss about algorithmic specs [on Michael Cooper - due 2017-05-24].
- 16:35:44 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Need to come back to this.
- 16:36:11 [Gottfried]
- ... Need to pick up conversation with Ralf. Other groups are impacted too.
- 16:36:47 [Gottfried]
- ... For us it is not only the problem of not being able to do an a11y review, but also resulting in badly written specs.
- 16:37:30 [Gottfried]
- Michael: We have 23 specs that are marked "in active review".
- 16:37:42 [Gottfried]
- ... 19 have a review assigned.
- 16:37:52 [Gottfried]
- Janina: We should get back to this in early June.
- 16:38:16 [Gottfried]
- zakim, next item
- 16:38:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "Other Business" taken up [from janina]
- 16:39:05 [Gottfried]
- Michael: I was reading on content security policy - looking for a11y issues - could not find out in the spec. Talked with Ralf.
- 16:39:27 [Gottfried]
- ... Ralf said that we have to live with the preferred language style of the editor. No resources to train editors or add additional editors.
- 16:39:57 [Gottfried]
- ... I believe we can still address this by drafting best practices to make editors aware of common problems.
- 16:40:17 [Gottfried]
- ... This will be an ongoing conversation with Ralf and the architecture team.
- 16:40:29 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Involve others? Internationalization?
- 16:41:03 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Presentation of i18n on how to review specs. They have similar processes, but different tools.
- 16:41:15 [Gottfried]
- ... I will discuss with them.
- 16:41:39 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Best practices policy manual should address this.
- 16:41:51 [Gottfried]
- Michael: Not a simple path.
- 16:42:24 [Gottfried]
- Janina: There is a wider community that wants to look at an API and understand before diving into.
- 16:42:49 [Gottfried]
- ... Should be a topic at the next TPAC on Wed.
- 16:43:07 [Gottfried]
- Michael: We should gather other interested parties before TPAC.
- 16:43:56 [Gottfried]
- Janina: Next call on architectural directions on achieving meaningful personalization. Folks from the wider APA community are invited.
- 16:44:13 [Gottfried]
- ... I will send out the invitation.
- 16:44:48 [Gottfried]
- zakim, bye
- 16:44:48 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been janina, Joanmarie_Diggs, tzviya, MichaelC
- 16:44:48 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #apa
- 16:44:54 [Gottfried]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 16:44:59 [Gottfried]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 16:44:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/17-apa-minutes.html Gottfried
- 16:55:55 [tzviya]
- tzviya has joined #apa