13:33:47 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #silver
13:33:47 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/05/12-silver-irc
13:33:49 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
13:33:49 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #silver
13:33:51 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be
13:33:51 <Zakim> I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
13:33:52 <trackbot> Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference
13:33:52 <trackbot> Date: 12 May 2017
13:33:56 <Lauriat> agenda?
13:34:34 <sloandr> sloandr has joined #silver
13:35:30 <Lauriat> agenda+ Research project sheet review
13:35:35 <Lauriat> agenda+ Action item review
13:35:35 <jemma> jemma has joined #silver
13:35:40 <Lauriat> agenda+ Research question prioritization poll
13:35:42 <Lauriat> agenda+ Research survey core research questions
13:35:43 <Lauriat> agenda+ Stakeholder follow-up
13:35:51 <jemma> present+ JaEunJemmaKu
13:36:03 <sloandr> present+
13:36:23 <David_Swallow> David_Swallow has joined #silver
13:37:39 <Jan> Jan has joined #silver
13:37:56 <Jan> Having trouble calling in.  I will keep trying.
13:40:29 <jemma> zakim, take up item 1
13:40:29 <Zakim> agendum 1. "Research project sheet review" taken up [from Lauriat]
13:42:19 <jemma> david: did not have any progress yet
13:43:54 <jemma> david: Mike crabb got the funding for research
13:44:17 <jemma> david can contact mike and he will find out the schedule. research will start in summer
13:47:23 <jemma> jemma: Dr. Loiccono: have the team and are getting the IRB approval ready.
13:47:58 <jemma> jemma: sukil is happy to distribute Pete's survery into Koran IT community
13:48:21 <jemma> daivid swallow: interested in usability of wcag
13:49:34 <jemma> ldifferent aspect of WCAG - organization, language, effectiveness of terminology . how wcag is used by web developers
13:49:55 <jemma> re. method - diary studies - have 5 developers
13:50:11 <jemma> each participant will keep diaries for two weeks
13:50:35 <jemma> first diary studies to be ready by the end of this month
13:50:54 <jemma> deliverables will be written report - mainly qualitative - how and when wcag is used
13:50:59 <jemma> in web development
13:51:44 <jemma> anticipated challenges - motivate and encourage the participants to write diary for two weeks
13:51:55 <jemma> without skipping
13:52:15 <jemma> Jean and I talked about compensation for the participants.
13:53:08 <jemma> I have research questions to ask participants - do we want to talk about this now or do you send that via email
13:53:57 <jemma> shawn:curious about specifics of how the participant use wcag
13:54:24 <jemma> david: survey and open ended questions included after diarry
13:54:30 <Lauriat> Link to drafted questions: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u1WVlNry67mBlY1KDoSz_dEnulFpDm0CvGROChtpuW8/edit#heading=h.bsu3xklgu01c
13:54:50 <jemma> s/diarry/diary/
13:56:10 <Jan> diary
13:56:33 <jemma> david: why the developer choose wcag to use?
13:56:41 <jemma> rather than other resources
13:57:01 <jemma> do they want to use or have to use wcag?
13:57:15 <jemma> how long developer use the standard
13:57:58 <jemma> whether they can find what they are looking for from wcag
13:58:38 <jemma> any missing wcag info developers are looking for?
13:58:51 <jemma> what aspect of WCAG also help them?
13:59:01 <jemma> layout, design, organization?
13:59:13 <jemma> what aspect of WCAG hinder them?
13:59:51 <jemma> shawn: research questions sound great
14:00:09 <jemma> shawn: I wonder how developers are confident in using WCAG
14:01:00 <jemma> sloandr: in other words, wcag can give confidence or rather confusion when they use wcag
14:01:09 <jemma> or after using wcag
14:02:04 <jemma> shawn: how developers feel comfortable about the resul
14:02:37 <jemma> s/resul/result
14:03:42 <jemma> jan: end of diary, there can be open ended questions to hear about overall experience of participants
14:05:44 <jemma> jan: I have another researcher - david in scottland - who can do some diary studies
14:06:42 <jemma> david_swallow: I can connect to him
14:07:07 <jemma> david in scottland has cs students
14:07:44 <jemma> jan: it would be good idea to see how cs students recognize wcag with fresh eye
14:09:32 <jemma> sloandr: re Lowell Reade
14:10:31 <jemma> interested in 1)adaptation of wcag  2)how usable wcag is and 3)implementation accessibility policy
14:11:52 <jemma> sloandr: david can check duplication of the research questions and help with research questions which we dont cover yet.
14:13:14 <Jan> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nRjYeOsEyXS9WZ0Bq8tYywt1i4vkU5QVrKeCAMFe_Sw/edit#heading=h.qv64wjyega4y
14:13:36 <sloandr> s/david in scottland has cs students/Michael Heron in Scotland has CS students
14:16:59 <jemma> jan: see Klaus Miesenberger's google doc link
14:18:12 <jemma> zakim, take up next item
14:18:12 <Zakim> agendum 2. "Action item review" taken up [from Lauriat]
14:18:30 <Lauriat> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/open
14:22:37 <jemma> checking action items progress
14:22:44 <jemma> close things which are done
14:25:47 <Lauriat> Community Group link: https://www.w3.org/community/silver/
14:26:20 <jemma> jemma: community groups are composed of research partners, TF members, stakeholders, anyone interested in silver project
14:27:15 <jemma> including people who signed up for the silver community group
14:27:32 <jemma> s/stakeholders/some stakeholders
14:27:36 <jemma> s/stakeholders/some stakeholders/
14:27:54 <jemma> s/community groups are/ silver community group is/
14:30:04 <jemma> sloandr: re: ACTION-73: Work with jeanne and dave to draft the policies for using the stakeholder list. also involve researcher. - it would be a good idea writing a blog post about this.
14:30:50 <jemma> shawn: you can create wiki and point it from blog post
14:32:21 <jemma> sloandr: I can take over action item,  Follow up with jason white about helping review surveys.
14:33:03 <jemma> since I have continuous contact/work with him
14:33:41 <jemma> jan: re Follow up with dr. butler to help with research validity review
14:34:14 <jemma> jan: may be we can have some time to go over those research questions?
14:34:28 <jemma> sloandr: I would like to
14:34:59 <Lauriat> Draft agenda item: "Survey meta question prioritization & pruning"
14:35:19 <jemma> jan: Dr. butler can join Friday meeting
14:35:40 <jemma> next week
14:37:22 <jemma> re: 	Create onboard documents for researchers and for helping with surveys - David, Jan and Jeanne can work together
14:41:22 <jemma> zakim, take up next item
14:41:22 <Zakim> agendum 3. "Research question prioritization poll" taken up [from Lauriat]
14:41:48 <jemma> zakim, take up next item
14:41:48 <Zakim> agendum 3 was just opened, jemma
14:41:54 <jemma> zakim, take up next item 4
14:41:54 <Zakim> I don't understand 'take up next item 4', jemma
14:42:02 <jemma> zakim, take up item 4
14:42:02 <Zakim> agendum 4. "Research survey core research questions" taken up [from Lauriat]
14:44:50 <Lauriat> Core researcher questions doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vDzSCO-mEnPB7jaAzIhOOLf92b0pCuzzR8u_GSWTw_M/edit
14:59:35 <jemma> all the discussion and comments are added to google doc comment section.
15:00:34 <jemma> sloandr: core research questions are ones which can be included in any Silver research survey.
15:00:52 <jemma> rrsagent, make minutes
15:00:52 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/12-silver-minutes.html jemma
15:01:20 <jemma> present+ sloandr, jan, david_swallow, shwan, jemma
15:01:34 <jemma> scribe: JaEunJemmaKu
15:01:37 <jemma> rrsagent, make minutes
15:01:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/12-silver-minutes.html jemma
15:02:04 <jemma> regrets+ sarah, jeanne
15:02:18 <jemma> chair: Shawn
15:02:22 <jemma> rrsagent, make minutes
15:02:22 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/12-silver-minutes.html jemma