13:56:42 RRSAgent has joined #lvtf 13:56:42 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/05/11-lvtf-irc 13:56:44 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:56:44 Zakim has joined #lvtf 13:56:46 Zakim, this will be 13:56:46 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 13:56:47 Meeting: Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 13:56:47 Date: 11 May 2017 13:56:52 chair: jim 13:57:15 regrets? 13:57:32 regrets: Marla, Wayne, JohnR 14:26:16 Agenda+ SC management (surveys, issue status) 14:26:18 Agenda+ Review SC Status 14:54:12 ScottM has joined #lvtf 14:58:49 present: Jim, Shawn, ScottM 15:00:23 Here is the e-mail with open issues on the User Needs/Req doc that we need TF input on: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-tf/2017Apr/0076.html 15:01:35 (but that is secondary to working on the SCs) 15:04:00 Glenda has joined #lvtf 15:04:54 laura has joined #lvtf 15:05:58 agenda+ no call next week 19 May 15:06:33 present+ Glenda 15:09:54 present+ Laura 15:10:06 present+ Laura 15:10:46 scribe: jim 15:10:55 zakim, open item 3 15:10:55 agendum 3. "no call next week 19 May" taken up [from allanj] 15:11:36 4 lvtf folks out for AccessU 15:12:08 zakim, close item 3 15:12:08 agendum 3, no call next week 19 May, closed 15:12:09 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:12:09 1. SC management (surveys, issue status) [from allanj] 15:12:16 open item 1 15:13:50 Chairs set up status page 15:13:51 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_SC_status#Issue_78_-_Adapting_Text 15:15:08 resolution of issues to be decided by AG. and posted to status page 15:15:49 New section "open issues and Surveys" on each SC 15:15:50 https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/78 15:20:29 jim added section to all SC. 15:20:39 close item 1 15:21:03 open item 2 15:21:38 commenting on issues https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-tf/2017Apr/0076.html 15:22:06 present+ Erich, Steve 15:22:25 erich has joined #lvtf 15:22:52 steverep has joined #lvtf 15:23:02 present+steverep 15:23:18 present+ 15:27:39 topic: Contrast controls status 15:27:51 gs: a bit stuck. 15:28:56 Alastair - has graphics. GS is managing user-agent generated controls. May default to silver. 15:29:21 zakim, who is on the call? 15:29:21 Present: Jim, Shawn, ScottM, Glenda, Laura, Erich, Steve, steverep 15:29:46 Present: Jim, Shawn, ScottM, Glenda, Laura, Erich, steverep 15:30:26 Icon fonts that are anchors? 15:31:31 SM: they are fonts and covered by WCAG SC. 15:32:49 gs: should do the research of the form elements etc. 15:32:57 Topic: adapting text 15:33:43 Flash Issue - should we test 15:34:31 q+ 15:34:38 wayne nearing completion on font width 15:34:45 ack s 15:35:25 sr: awaiting the font research. should add to the character spacing. 15:36:05 ... concerned about the change of fonts. choosing fonts that are too similar. 15:36:43 Adapting text user to content requirements table: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Adapting_text_user_to_content_requirements_table 15:36:43 explain in understanding document about why character spacing is important, and how it relates to font changes 15:39:05 topic: Sprites, backgrounds, icon fonts. 15:39:46 Inline Semantics - https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/New_SC%3F_In-line_Semantics 15:40:19 icon fonts - https://css-tricks.com/examples/IconFont/ 15:41:08 color is covered by F24 15:41:50 it is the font change that is the issue. 15:43:18 jim: tested by changing fonts and the font icon always remained 15:45:47 sr: should fit in 1.3.1 - relationship is this font is really a graphic. should be semantically marked as a graphic. 15:46:30 should be a technique, update the understanding document, and create failures if needed. 15:47:30 does the changing fonts cover sprites, background images, etc. 15:48:09 sr: thinks they should fit in 1.3.1. 15:50:22 lc: file a bug on wcag 2.0 15:51:41 sr: 1.3.1 is programattically determined or available in text. need to update 15:52:08 gs: add a new SC. 15:52:35 1.3.1 Info and Relationships: Information, structure, and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined or are available in text. (Level A) 15:53:04 sc: if we need to file a bug in html then it will be delayed. 15:54:47 html semantics https://www.w3.org/TR/html/single-page.html#elements-semantics 15:55:46 perhaps this is a question for html editor 15:56:57 Jim will write html editor about where to file a bug 15:59:04 topic: transparancy issue 16:00:21 icons with transparency, background color is determinant of visibility of icon 16:00:52 alpha value is very complicated. CSS3 getting more complicated. 16:01:55 is it a user css issue? 16:03:22 is there a css thing to turn transparency off? what will that break? 16:04:31 sr: need to change the blending mode. Generally 16:06:27 ... making argument for smarter user style sheet. would need a bit more testing 16:07:53 For example: *.not(img, [role="img"]) {background-color: black; color: white; } 16:09:24 topic: html 16:10:04 specifying the semantic of sprites or icon-fonts so they can be programmatically determined 16:12:07 https://www.w3.org/TR/css-content-3/#accessibility 16:12:53 https://www.w3.org/TR/css-content-3/#alt 16:13:45 rssagent, make minutes 16:14:25 rrsagent, make minutes 16:14:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/11-lvtf-minutes.html allanj 16:39:23 laura has left #lvtf 16:47:34 Glenda has joined #lvtf