13:58:06 RRSAgent has joined #lvtf 13:58:06 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/04/27-lvtf-irc 13:58:08 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:58:11 Zakim, this will be 13:58:11 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 13:58:11 Meeting: Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 13:58:11 Date: 27 April 2017 13:58:13 chair: Jim 14:00:24 Regrets: Glenda, Erich 14:14:29 Agenda+ Adapting Text - color & font 14:14:38 zakim, clear agenda 14:14:38 agenda cleared 14:14:45 present: 14:14:53 present+ 14:14:58 Agenda+ Adapting Text - color & font 14:15:33 Agenda+ Resize Content 14:15:45 Agenda+ Graphic & control contrast (UA generated affordance) 14:53:40 laura has joined #lvtf 15:02:05 steverep has joined #lvtf 15:02:12 present+steverep 15:02:42 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:02:42 Present: allanj, steverep 15:02:46 present+ Shawn 15:03:15 present+ Marla 15:03:33 Marla has joined #lvtf 15:04:26 present+ Laura 15:04:38 Wayne has joined #lvtf 15:04:47 Present+ 15:05:57 Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2017AprJun/0341.html 15:07:20 zakim, open item 2 15:07:20 agendum 2. "Resize Content" taken up [from allanj] 15:07:32 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Resize_content_issues_review 15:08:06 Alaistair addressed some issues 15:09:26 laura: can we move 1.4.4 to A? 15:09:43 s/Alaistair/Alastair 15:09:57 jim : would like to remove H-scrolling 15:10:54 q+ 15:11:47 ack me 15:12:02 shawn: this is our suggestion. depends on what AG decides about replacing SC 2.0 vs 2.1 15:14:24 spatial layout, need a better definition 15:14:54 are video, tables, IDE exempt 15:15:04 alastairc has joined #lvtf 15:15:09 wayne: IDEs should be included 15:15:39 wayne: exempt tables and images, but not IDEs 15:16:02 ... need semantic navigation 15:18:35 scribe: allanj 15:18:43 topic: IDE 15:20:01 ac: powerpoint online, slide and thumbnails - need all onscreen at same time. Ok at 200%. but beyond things break. there are times when you need many things on the screen at the same time 15:21:11 ... maintain 200% for these . Google presentations works up to 200%. having difficulty thinking how to make it work above 200 15:21:40 Resize Content Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewSC_April25_2017/results#xq10 15:22:28 wd: computer aided design tools. useful to have tools available. but if you need the entire screen for the work area. would be better to switch views work area to tools, etc. 15:23:46 ac: toolbar on top and side, when you expand the work area diminishes. 15:25:23 q+ zooming isn't usually the right answer on those interfaces 15:25:44 ac: semantic navigation, and keyboard shortcuts are a different SC. complex interfaces need other affordances that may allow linearization or greater size of content. 15:27:22 wd: ms word, ribbon. always eliminate it and use the keyboard. want a different kind of interface. hit alt expand ribbon to fill the screen, then click on part of ribbon then that part expands 15:29:08 sr: zoom isn't the answer. you can pop the editor in wordpress to full screen, and reduce it to see more tools. 15:30:10 ac: don't see how to word this in this SC. perhaps a Flexible interface SC 15:31:40 wd: drop disclaimer, just 400% without hz scrolling. 15:32:44 ac: would have to scope to text only. 15:33:53 topic: mobile devices and text resize 15:34:35 screen width only in testing and understanding 15:38:34 action: jim to create definition of spatial layout for Text Resize 15:38:34 Created ACTION-98 - Create definition of spatial layout for text resize [on Jim Allan - due 2017-05-04]. 15:38:42 Definition of spacial layout: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Resize_content_issues_review#Definition_of_spacial_layout 15:39:22 q+ make sure math is considered in spatial layout 15:40:34 sr: make sure math is considered in spatial layout 15:40:47 ja: or understanding document 15:42:50 ac: math and svg work with media queries. presentation creation is difficult on desktop. 15:43:32 ac: perhaps a note - putting IDEs in spatial layout category for now, pending solutions 15:43:39 wd: +1 15:46:34 ja: issue of OK if not work on mobile ... 15:47:05 wd: that is a technology bias. 15:47:49 ac: trace comment was about feasibility. there are no example of things that are not feasible ... yet 15:52:46 discussion of contrast issue 15:55:25 q+ worried about doing research like that but not opposed (e.g. peer-review, ranges of vision, what display is being used, etc.) 15:55:55 q+ 15:56:01 sr: worried about doing research like that but not opposed (e.g. peer-review, ranges of vision, what display is being used, etc.) 15:57:11 ... worried about getting results we can't explain, would need vision problems, display type, etc. 15:57:30 ... would be better to have outside research, with a formal statement. 15:59:11 ac: understand. if there is other research we can use it. if we use qualitative research - rather than quantitative with ranges and formal stats 16:00:03 wd: may be able to use text break points for reading. contrast may be similar to acuity level - can perceive text but not read it. 16:00:58 ac: perhaps a honeypot question to really test if person could actually see the content 16:01:32 jeanne has joined #lvtf 16:02:53 wd: perhaps contrast limit. Legge - but he used a different scale would need to convert. 16:03:25 ac: graphics contrast. need lots of examples in the understanding. 16:03:45 ... main feedback on contrast levels. may impact criteria text 16:04:15 ... other feed back on graphics objects. can cover in understanding with pictures. 16:05:40 ac: please review https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Resize_content_issues_review message the list or Alastair directly with updates 16:06:01 zakim, close item 1 16:06:01 agendum 1, Adapting Text - color & font, closed 16:06:02 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:06:02 3. Graphic & control contrast (UA generated affordance) [from allanj] 16:06:35 zakim, close item 2 16:06:35 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, allanj 16:06:45 zakim, open item 1 16:06:45 agendum 1. "Adapting Text - color & font" taken up [from allanj] 16:06:48 q? 16:07:02 ack 2 16:07:06 ack w 16:07:11 close item 2 16:07:19 open item 1 16:08:28 wd: can calculate width of font. we can create an algorithm 16:09:34 ... font family - need to be able to fit 10 to 15 character in fovea. have a tight distribution of fonts. 16:09:41 Can the font metrics be incorporated into our spacing metrics? 16:09:53 q+ 16:10:48 Gets to my point - what actually breaks by changing font that doesn't break by changing spacing? 16:10:50 ac: so do we need to deal with fonts. if it is just spacing. can we change the spacing, it should cover the font width issue. 16:11:17 steverep font-icons, but we could deal with that elsewhere. 16:12:34 Well, technology independecne is still a big issue for Laura to check her blood pressure on :) 16:12:39 wd: serif vs san-serif 16:13:43 sh: yes there is need to change the font. the point is if people change font then things don't break. but this is covered by spacing. so we don't mention fonts. 16:14:39 wd: concerned with fonts. 16:14:55 ack l 16:15:06 q+ font icons are not really an issue in my opinion 16:15:19 ac: can change most everything with css 16:15:47 wd: need inline semantics. should be covered in 1.3.1 16:18:13 wd: can live with not using fonts and using spacing for adapting text. 16:19:36 ac: 1.3.1 need to be a standardized way in some spec. to provide semantics in ARIA or HTML 16:20:05 ja: icon fonts? 16:20:38 sh: need to file issue in specs HTML, ARIA 16:21:12 q+ 16:21:16 wd: need identify what things are. 16:21:36 ack l 16:23:31 lc: do we need to change the spacing to cover font width and letter spacing. 16:24:45 wd: the number are fine. there is spacing already added by font. 16:27:53 removing font family from Adapting Text SC text, because font width h is very similar to letter spacing. we will address spacing and font family in the understanding document. 16:28:39 RESOLUTION: removing font family from Adapting Text SC text, because font width is very similar to letter spacing. we will address spacing and font family in the understanding document. 16:30:37 topic: Semantics. 16:31:07 sh: need to file an issue with HTML. need to have semantics for sprites, and icon fonts 16:31:21 ... should be marked as 16:32:42 ac: things which are programmatically available but not visible (popups, icon fonts, background images, sprites). May need an SC 16:33:41 ... if you have a span with icon font, and a span with text. but change font then object vanishes 16:34:12 sr: icon font, role=img, then aria label. 16:35:27 Issue: need to think about things which are programmatically available but not visible (popups, icon fonts, background images, sprites). May need an SC. 16:35:28 Created ISSUE-2 - Need to think about things which are programmatically available but not visible (popups, icon fonts, background images, sprites). may need an sc.. Please complete additional details at . 16:36:06 Thanks everyone! 16:36:12 bye. 16:36:37 wd: sprites and other things break High Contrast mode. 16:39:55 wd: background image, sprites, and other things need inline semantics.. 16:41:25 sr: need to get html or aria to require semantics. 16:42:42 we: they fit in 1.3.1, you are not using the appropriate role (semantics) when include background images as sprites, 16:43:09 we need examples, pictures code. 16:44:57 trackbot, end meeting 16:44:57 Zakim, list attendees 16:44:57 As of this point the attendees have been allanj, steverep, Shawn, Marla, Laura, Wayne 16:45:05 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:45:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/04/27-lvtf-minutes.html trackbot 16:45:06 RRSAgent, bye 16:45:06 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2017/04/27-lvtf-actions.rdf : 16:45:06 ACTION: jim to create definition of spatial layout for Text Resize [1] 16:45:06 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/04/27-lvtf-irc#T15-38-34