20:58:30 RRSAgent has joined #sdwcov 20:58:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/04/12-sdwcov-irc 20:58:32 RRSAgent, make logs world 20:58:32 Zakim has joined #sdwcov 20:58:34 Zakim, this will be SDW 20:58:34 ok, trackbot 20:58:35 Meeting: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference 20:58:35 Date: 12 April 2017 20:58:54 present+ billroberts 20:59:02 present+ dmitrybrizhinev 21:02:48 kerry has joined #sdwcov 21:03:07 present+ 21:03:58 hi Kerry - we'll just wait for you to come through on webex then can make a start 21:06:53 scribe: dmitrybrizhinev 21:07:01 scribenick: dmitrybrizhinev 21:07:07 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call 21:07:26 https://www.w3.org/2017/03/21-sdw-minutes 21:07:57 q+ 21:08:51 ack k 21:08:56 topic: covjson update 21:09:07 billroberts: at the meeting we agreed to make covjson as is into a FPWD 21:09:36 billroberts: one condition - add something to motivation to explain why it is of interest to the SDW group. Added a couple of sentences today 21:10:00 billroberts: covjson has been designed to work well in a web context, hence it meets many of the BPs of the SDW group 21:10:19 billroberts: once merged in, I think the document is ready to publish 21:10:38 Francois's request: "I would also need some form of recorded agreement to use a given short name (e.g. a resolution in the minutes), the name that goes after "/TR/" in "https://www.w3.org/TR/[short name]". I would not use "coverageJSON" to leave that short name available for a possible real "CoverageJSON" spec in the future. Although it is a bit long, it could simply be "CoverageJSON-overview"." 21:11:16 alternative: "covjson-overview" ? 21:11:38 kerry: +1 to shorter version 21:12:00 PROPOSED: use 'covjson-overview' as the short name for the document in the W3C URL 21:12:05 +1 21:12:07 +1 21:12:10 +1 21:12:24 RESOLVED: use 'covjson-overview' as the short name for the document in the W3C URL 21:13:16 billroberts: remaining work on covjson is a section to explain how it relates to BPs, or appropriate references throughout the document 21:14:01 billroberts: since there is a section for use cases and reqs, maybe appropriate to have a section 21:14:10 kerry: if there is too much, it gets in the way when it is all inline 21:14:28 q+ 21:14:30 billroberts: need to have a chat with jon about including spec in the document 21:14:56 billroberts: probably a few weeks away from a final version 21:14:58 ack k 21:15:42 kerry: should "cross-reference": put something in covjson about eo-qb (why you would want to use the other one) and vice-versa 21:16:14 billroberts: would be useful to agree between us to agree what the two formats' respective niches are 21:16:51 kerry: and potentially in the BP bit you are working on as well 21:17:10 Topic: EO-QB 21:17:33 billroberts: I had a look through your recent emails and the recent edits to the document 21:17:43 billroberts: I'm very happy with what you've written 21:18:32 https://www.w3.org/2017/04/12-sdwbp-minutes 21:18:32 billroberts: With respect to referring to EO-QB in the BP doc - jeremy accepted your comments 21:19:02 billroberts: jeremy suggested including your comment about balancing quality and cost in BP 10 21:19:51 kerry: I thought the most interesting part of that was the virtual triple store - some suggestion of different storage architectures 21:20:16 kerry: use your own judgement whether that's relevant 21:20:45 billroberts: it could be a nice example because EO-QB is balancing linkability with performance 21:21:30 billroberts: jeremy added a ref in the change over time BP where you suggested 21:22:17 dmitrybrizhinev: I've been out of the loop on EO-QB status 21:22:24 kerry: I made a few fixes here and there 21:22:43 kerry: TODO text document in the email 21:22:52 dmitrybrizhnev: I'll have a look at it over the next week 21:23:03 kerry: most significant bit is the URLs for the tiles 21:23:20 kerry: we talked about how it's useful that DGGS provides unique id's, but we don't actually use them that way 21:23:50 kerry: the data value is actually a URL, a fix that sam actually did, maybe that solves it? 21:24:25 dmitrybrizhinev: I will have a look to see if anything needs improvement 21:24:34 kerry: not sure if the problem still exists 21:25:06 kerry: one more thing - we did want to put in example of the client app UI - haven't be able to reach Duo 21:25:20 dmitrybrizhinev: I'll try and get in touch with him 21:25:36 kerry: there is a start but it needs a bit more 21:25:49 billroberts: working implementation would prove its usability 21:26:24 dmitrybrizhinev: we don't have a server for it though 21:26:41 kerry: probably not that important given that it's a note, so we don't *need* to get it running again 21:27:02 billroberts: better to write note as if client is not up, because even if we solve short term, it's not going to stay up 21:27:25 billroberts: sounds like a few things to get on with, then we will be ready for final review 21:27:43 q+ 21:27:50 ack k 21:28:19 kerry: sorry something else - SSN is changing enormously fast, and in fact the stuff we're using in the coverage note is changing or under consideration. This limits our ability to finalize untiul SSN is stable 21:28:34 kerry: It's not hard to fix when we do, but it's not worth fixing yet 21:30:16 Topic:QB4ST 21:30:22 regrets+ roba 21:30:38 billroberts: Agreed at f2f to publish an updated draft based on current status 21:31:26 billroberts: I agreed to make some example rdf data that uses the ontology 21:32:55 billroberts: maybe port some of the examples from covjson to qb4st 21:33:17 billroberts: will also have a look at EO-QB (which uses qb4st) 21:33:26 billroberts: There's not much more to do on this 21:33:45 Topic: Future calls 21:33:54 billroberts: what would be a good time for future calls? 21:34:27 kerry: a wednesday night (australian) like you were suggesting would be fine for me 21:35:03 billroberts: it's probably less important to accomodate the americans because only a couple of calls to do and all the participants are australian or UK 21:35:19 billroberts: could do early evening wednesday australian time 21:35:49 billroberts: 8am London, 5pm Sydney? 21:36:09 kerry: later is better 21:36:33 kerry: 11am, 8pm? 21:37:24 kerry: 9 is ideal 21:37:45 dmitrybrizhinev: I like 9 21:37:57 billroberts: let's do that then, noon London, 9pm Sydney 21:38:04 11 UTC 21:38:10 billroberts: 11 UTC 21:38:38 dmitrybrizhinev: when is final deadline? 21:39:02 kerry: end of june. because it's a note we don't need candidate rec. would be nice to finish earlier. Let's go for end of may 21:40:54 bye! 21:40:59 billroberts: another meeting in 2 weeks to keep up momentum 21:41:05 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:41:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/04/12-sdwcov-minutes.html billroberts 21:41:28 regrets+ phila