18:45:46 RRSAgent has joined #aapi 18:45:46 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/03/14-aapi-irc 18:45:48 RRSAgent, make logs world 18:45:48 Zakim has joined #aapi 18:45:50 Zakim, this will be 18:45:50 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 18:45:51 Meeting: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference 18:45:51 Date: 14 March 2017 18:46:10 chair: Joseph_Scheuhammer 18:46:18 agenda: this 18:46:43 agenda+ (All) Level of detail in UIA mappings. 18:46:51 agenda+ (Bogdan) Specifying AAPI UIA interface in focus events table, and other mapping tables. 18:47:01 agenda+ ISSUE-738 (Bogdan) Verify or provide correct UIA mapping for role="heading". 18:47:14 agenda+ (Joanie) AX API mapping issues and testing. 18:47:21 agenda+ Triage actions/issues: https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/products/23 18:47:27 agenda+ Triage core-aam bugzillas: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=Core%20AAM&product=ARIA 18:47:34 agenda+ Triage accname-aam bugzillas: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=AccName%20AAM&product=ARIA 18:47:41 agenda+ Triage accname actions: https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/26 18:47:47 agenda+ be done. 19:01:09 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 19:01:23 present+ Joseph_Scheuhammer 19:03:09 present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 19:06:02 bgaraventa1979 has joined #aapi 19:06:31 present+ Bryan_Garaventa 19:06:50 scribe: joanie 19:08:23 Zakim, take up item 1 19:08:23 agendum 1. "(All) Level of detail in UIA mappings." taken up [from clown] 19:09:26 JS: Bogdan had missed our emails. He apologized profusely, and is now back on track. 19:09:40 JS: One of the issues was how to deal with this business of cached and current property names. 19:09:58 JS: He sent the proposal to me, Rich, Joanie, and Michael Cooper. 19:10:15 JS: He explains the difference between current and cached. 19:10:46 JS: While cached is faster, there's the danger that the property has not been cached yet. 19:11:10 JS: Bogdan proposes we explain the difference in some section. 19:11:36 JS: But that we do not specify that level of detail of the mapping table. 19:12:18 RS: It would be nice to know which to use. 19:12:41 JS: Both will always work, but there's a danger that you will have to make two calls. 19:13:03 RS: We should probably just get the current, and will know it's always going to be right. 19:13:49 scribenick: clown 19:14:08 JD: for my platform, I think there is some confusion around setters and getters. 19:15:38 JD: I think both the implementor and the tester need to use the getter. 19:16:20 stepping out a second 19:21:46 scribe: joanie 19:23:47 JD: (Technical discussion about why in general it is the getter and not the setter user agent implementors implement) 19:24:20 JS: I like the idea of a preamble and then just using the property name. 19:24:36 https://developer.gnome.org/atk/stable/AtkObject.html 19:25:21 atk_object_ref_state_set () 19:27:40 JD: I don't want to actually change this in the Core AAM. 19:27:47 JD: As I indicated last week. 19:28:09 JS: Bogdan has emailed us with three proposals. 19:28:18 JS: We need to get back to him on what we think. 19:28:43 JS: I have already replied that I like the preambled section, followed by specified the preable and property. 19:29:05 RS: What I'm saying is that you can say at the top that UIA has a notion of current and cached versions of the properties. 19:29:26 RS: And that in this specification, we'll refer to the property name without specifying current or cached. 19:29:44 RS: But for the purpose of automated testing, we'll use current. 19:29:52 JS: That's close to what I've already said. 19:30:04 JS: However, I would like you and Joanie to reply. 19:30:15 RS: But you replied? 19:30:17 JS: Yes. 19:30:29 RS: Has Bogdan replied back to you? 19:30:32 JS: Not yet. 19:30:55 JS: And unfortunately, Bogdan's email was not sent to the mailing list, so it is quasi-private. 19:31:12 RS: But, again, for the ATTA, we'll use the current value; not the cached. 19:31:14 JS: Ok. 19:31:24 RS: I'll reply to him saying that then. 19:41:37 Zakim, next item 19:41:37 agendum 2. "(Bogdan) Specifying AAPI UIA interface in focus events table, and other mapping tables." taken up [from clown] 19:42:08 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/533 19:42:10 JS: Rich had indicated we needed interfaces for ATTAs. 19:42:16 https://rawgit.com/boggydigital/aria/patch-2/core-aam/core-aam.html#focus_state_event_table 19:42:23 JS: Bogdan provided a pull request (see URL above) 19:42:46 JS: There is a new Microsoft UIA column (see the rawgit URL above). 19:42:53 JS: Note that he's using current here. 19:43:17 JS: Is this fine? If not, I suggest you comment on the pull request itself. 19:43:23 RS: I have no problem with that. 19:44:55 JS: By the way, Bogdan also indicated he was looking for someone from Microsoft to join us at these meetings. 19:45:08 JS: Anyway, are you ok with what he did for the focus table so I can pull it in? 19:45:11 RS: Sure. 19:46:18 Zakim, next item 19:46:18 agendum 3. "ISSUE-738 (Bogdan) Verify or provide correct UIA mapping for role="heading"." taken up [from clown] 19:46:26 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/532 19:46:35 JS: There is a pull request from Bodgan for this as well. 19:46:45 JS: He says to use localized control type of heading. 19:46:47 https://rawgit.com/boggydigital/aria/patch-1/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-heading 19:47:01 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2017Mar/0010.html 19:47:02 JS: See urls above. 19:47:39 JS: In an email he sent to the public list (URL above), he stated that he's requested control types for heading and header and the like. 19:52:14 JS: So you're ok with that pull request for the heading change? 19:52:54 JD: Question, is it accurate that the pull request is for a mapping to UIA API which Bogdan has requested, but which does not yet exist for his platform? 19:52:58 JS: Yes. 19:53:29 JD: Can we update the Core AAM based on that? 19:53:34 JS: We've done it before.... 19:53:47 JS: How much longer will we be writing testable statements? 19:54:04 RS: I'm making progress, but there are still quite a few remaining. 19:54:16 Zakim, next item 19:54:16 agendum 4. "(Joanie) AX API mapping issues and testing." taken up [from clown] 19:54:28 JS: How is Joanie doing on the mappings? 19:54:39 RS: She said she'd be done in a week? 19:54:45 JD: That's for the ATTA. 19:54:53 JS: If there's no progress that's alright. 19:55:04 RS: I think she's focusing on the bridge first. 19:55:12 JS: Do you mind me brining it up every week? 19:55:20 JD: It doesn't matter either way. 19:55:57 17:01:50 ASSERTION: property AXRoleDescription is alert dialog 19:55:57 17:01:50 STATUS: FAIL 19:55:57 17:01:52 ACTUAL VALUE: web alert dialog 19:56:14 JD: The above came from the ARIA channel. 19:56:34 https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-alertdialog 19:58:01 JD: Should I do a pull request? 19:58:07 JD: Should I file something first? 19:58:19 JS: I'd like something filed first. 19:58:21 JD: OK 20:03:01 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-test/2016Sep/0007.html 20:04:08 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-test/2016Sep/0010.html 20:04:21 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-test/2016Sep/0011.html 20:04:39 you win 20:06:42 Zakim, part 20:06:42 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Joanmarie_Diggs, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Bryan_Garaventa 20:06:42 Zakim has left #aapi 20:06:55 scribeOptions: -final 20:07:00 RRSAgent, stop