IRC log of poe on 2017-03-13

Timestamps are in UTC.

12:28:18 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #poe
12:28:18 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-poe-irc
12:28:20 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
12:28:20 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #poe
12:28:22 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be
12:28:22 [Zakim]
I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
12:28:23 [trackbot]
Meeting: Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Teleconference
12:28:23 [trackbot]
Date: 13 March 2017
12:29:12 [renato]
Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20170313
12:29:14 [michaelS]
michaelS has joined #poe
12:29:21 [renato]
Chair: Ben
12:29:34 [renato]
present+ renato
12:29:42 [renato]
Regrets: Ivan, Serena, Victor
12:29:53 [CarolineB]
CarolineB has joined #poe
12:29:55 [michaelS]
present+
12:31:51 [CarolineB]
present+ CarolineB
12:33:15 [phila]
present+
12:33:21 [benws17]
present+
12:33:36 [phila]
scribe: Phil
12:33:41 [phila]
scribeNick: phila
12:33:55 [phila]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
12:33:55 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-poe-minutes.html phila
12:34:20 [phila]
agenda: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20170313
12:34:23 [phila]
Chair: Ben
12:34:33 [phila]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
12:34:33 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-poe-minutes.html phila
12:35:22 [phila]
Topic: Preliminaries
12:35:31 [phila]
benws17: Any objection to last week's minutes?
12:35:35 [phila]
NOTUC
12:36:03 [phila]
RESOLUTION: Minutes of 6 March approved
12:36:18 [phila]
Topic: Deliverables review
12:36:23 [renato]
https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Deliverables
12:36:37 [phila]
renato: That page lists wide review recipients so far
12:36:47 [phila]
... Most are done. A couple still to do
12:36:57 [simonstey]
simonstey has joined #poe
12:37:18 [phila]
renato: Last week or so, someone said they'd contact the AC review members who said they'd support the WG
12:37:21 [simonstey]
regrets+ Sabrina
12:37:30 [phila]
benws17: Yes, I did, I'll do that in the comings days.
12:37:38 [phila]
renato: It's on track. Phil has some to do
12:37:51 [phila]
phila: Red faced. Have done one just now, will complete today
12:38:16 [phila]
renato: For horizontal review
12:38:27 [phila]
phila: Will handle a11l as promised
12:38:38 [phila]
s/a11l/a11y/
12:38:48 [phila]
renato: They'll look at a11y of the spec itself
12:39:07 [renato]
https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/114
12:39:13 [phila]
... There's a GH issue for this. There are some places where we used bold cf strong, so I have a GH job for that
12:39:18 [phila]
... And I have a URL for a checker
12:39:24 [phila]
... SO we can do that for the 2 main specs
12:39:40 [phila]
... Next on the list is i18n
12:39:52 [phila]
... Brian was tasked to do that and did send a mail to the lis
12:40:07 [phila]
... He sent a PDF attachment
12:40:10 [renato]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poe-wg/2017Mar/0009.html
12:40:27 [phila]
renato: The PDF there is where he tried to click the checkboxes relevant to our area
12:40:36 [phila]
... He got N/A for a number of them
12:40:45 [phila]
... Some aren't checked. Not sure what that means
12:41:00 [phila]
benws17: I can loop back with Brain later
12:41:12 [phila]
q+ to make a realisation
12:41:55 [phila]
q-
12:42:39 [renato]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poe-comments/2017Mar/0005.html
12:42:52 [phila]
renato: Next horizontal review was security. I sent the mail
12:43:00 [phila]
... I answered most of their questions with 'no.'
12:43:13 [phila]
... Except that we do have a p and s section
12:43:19 [simonstey_]
simonstey_ has joined #poe
12:43:20 [phila]
... No response as yet
12:43:35 [phila]
renato: Next was privacy.
12:43:41 [renato]
https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Privacy_Considerations
12:43:45 [phila]
... I have a draft wiki page answering the questions
12:43:53 [phila]
... I'll send that to the privacy IG
12:44:01 [phila]
... They have 13 questions.
12:44:22 [phila]
... We don't currently have a Privacy considerations section but I think we should have.
12:44:31 [phila]
... I've suggested how the section could be worded
12:44:53 [phila]
... This is just to make implementers aware of the issue
12:45:46 [benws17]
q?
12:45:57 [phila]
renato: I think we can make it clear that the text will be there. The other questions are mostly answered with no.
12:46:28 [phila]
... No 6 asks if data could be faked. Well, yes it can, so you have to trust the parties involved but that's out of scope for us.
12:46:38 [phila]
benws17: It's a genuine issue - for others to solve.
12:46:59 [phila]
renato: I can send that off to the privacy IG as with the security folks
12:47:10 [phila]
Topic: Notes
12:47:19 [phila]
benws17: Is simonstey here?
12:47:30 [benws17]
Simon - are you out there? Are you calling in?
12:47:34 [phila]
benws17: Formal semantics and Primer
12:47:43 [phila]
s/Primer/Best Practices/
12:48:00 [benws17]
Can you call in and talk to the formal semantics?
12:48:36 [phila]
benws17: I'll talk about the best practices. I'm going to start work on it soon.
12:48:53 [phila]
... I've been working on profiles for specific industries, esp. financial markets
12:48:56 [renato]
ODRL Best Practices: http://w3c.github.io/poe/bp/
12:48:58 [phila]
... Those licences are complex
12:49:13 [phila]
benws17: They push the expressivity of ODRL quite hard
12:49:30 [phila]
... Victor will, I hope, include some egs from standard licences and how to express those.
12:49:38 [phila]
... What we need are more examples
12:49:53 [phila]
... I'll write to the CG and ask for these.
12:50:10 [phila]
benws17: We need feedback from the community about whether these are indeed BPs
12:50:20 [simonstey_]
simonstey_: we started to go through other FS notes
12:50:24 [phila]
... I'd expect to start working on that next week
12:50:27 [phila]
q+
12:50:39 [phila]
benws17: I'll try and hook up with victor
12:50:42 [phila]
ack me
12:51:06 [phila]
phila: So the BP doc will include things like CC-BY?
12:51:17 [phila]
benws17: Yes, I hope Victor will provide that.
12:51:20 [simonstey_]
simonstey_: I raised/reopened some issues regarding the infomodel
12:51:44 [phila]
benws17: The doc isn't about those licences, it's about how you express the issues that come up in those licences
12:52:05 [phila]
renato: Paul Jessop is down as a co-editor, but we've not heard from him since Lisbon.
12:52:15 [phila]
.. I can drop him an e-mail to see if he's still interested.
12:52:19 [phila]
benws17: Please cc me
12:52:29 [phila]
... he may have examples from music and film
12:52:41 [simonstey_]
simonstey_: we'll have a first draft of the formal semantics note for our next f2f meeting
12:53:00 [phila]
renato: I think James B might also be worth asking
12:53:23 [renato]
thanks simon!
12:53:37 [phila]
CarolineB: If he's allowed to, memebrship wise
12:54:06 [phila]
phila: Yes, Catapult has lapsed (and he's left anyway) but don't that let that stop us asking James
12:54:20 [phila]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
12:54:20 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-poe-minutes.html phila
12:54:23 [CarolineB]
*me he could com ein under our membership?
12:55:26 [phila]
benws17: Contracting parties often come up in agreements
12:55:38 [phila]
renato: That's in the GH repo as an issue
12:55:52 [simonstey_]
present+
12:55:55 [phila]
benws17: I think we have versioning covered but I guess I should write some use cases to make sure
12:56:03 [phila]
... Victor did provide an eg
12:56:11 [phila]
... but it doesn't have the same semantics
12:56:11 [renato]
Party roles (action 20) https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/110
12:56:27 [phila]
benws17: We do need a kind of regulatory policy
12:56:43 [phila]
renato: I think Serena has proposed a regulation policy type
12:57:03 [simonstey_]
simonstey_: we are working on representing the gdpr in ODRL
12:57:25 [simonstey_]
... and as such derive req for regulatory policy type
12:57:34 [renato]
s/Serena/Sabrina/
12:57:37 [phila]
... 20, 23, 25, 28 and 38 can all be closed in tracker
12:57:40 [phila]
close action-20
12:57:40 [trackbot]
Closed action-20.
12:57:44 [phila]
close action-23
12:57:44 [trackbot]
Closed action-23.
12:57:48 [phila]
close action-25
12:57:48 [trackbot]
Closed action-25.
12:57:53 [phila]
close action-28
12:57:53 [trackbot]
Closed action-28.
12:58:00 [phila]
close action-38
12:58:00 [trackbot]
Closed action-38.
12:58:09 [phila]
close action-41
12:58:09 [trackbot]
Closed action-41.
12:58:41 [phila]
Topic: London F2F
12:58:52 [phila]
benws17: We need to know who's coming, details, hotels etc.
12:59:11 [phila]
renato: There's the logistics etc.
12:59:38 [phila]
phila: We need wi-fi for remote participation
12:59:58 [phila]
phila: Is TR offering tea and coffee
13:00:23 [phila]
phila: There's no obligation to provide lunch but it's nice if you do.
13:00:36 [phila]
benws17: I assume we'll provide sandwiches
13:01:39 [renato]
https://iptc.org/events/spring-meeting-2017/
13:01:42 [phila]
phila: I'm doping a talk organised by Bill K on the Wednesday
13:01:45 [phila]
michaelS: IPTC?
13:01:48 [phila]
phila: Sounds right
13:01:57 [phila]
benws17: And there's a thing on Monday that I'm at
13:02:03 [phila]
... at the BBC
13:02:17 [michaelS]
https://iptc.org/events/spring-meeting-2017/
13:03:15 [phila]
benws17: Lots of interesting people in London that week, so how big will the room need to be.
13:03:24 [phila]
... 15 people?
13:03:37 [phila]
renato: I think that'll be pushing it. In Lisbon we had about 8
13:03:52 [phila]
... A room that holds 10 will be enough
13:04:12 [renato]
https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:London2017
13:05:55 [phila]
phila: It's not unreasonable to insist that people declare whether they're going to be there or not.
13:06:19 [phila]
Topic: AOB?
13:06:31 [phila]
[None]
13:06:45 [phila]
renato: So what is next week's agenda?
13:07:42 [simonstey_]
simonstey_: everyone has a look at open issues & reads through the spec?
13:08:09 [renato]
https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues
13:08:18 [phila]
phila: Asks about issues open at the moment
13:09:19 [phila]
renato: The plan is that the open issues will be closed during the F2F
13:09:37 [phila]
phila: So you're not planning to go to CR until after F2F?
13:09:41 [phila]
renato: That's the plan
13:09:57 [simonstey_]
simonstey_: I would object to this
13:10:25 [phila]
benws17: I think it will be 2 weeks before BP doc is ready for discussion
13:10:29 [simonstey_]
... that is, going to CR before f2F
13:10:32 [phila]
... Next week cold be a short 15 min call
13:10:36 [phila]
... Just to recap
13:11:12 [benws17]
CR after F2F :)
13:11:21 [phila]
benws17: Anything else?
13:11:25 [phila]
[Nope]
13:11:54 [phila]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
13:11:54 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-poe-minutes.html phila
15:45:21 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #poe
15:47:53 [benws17]
benws17 has joined #poe
17:16:09 [phila]
phila has joined #poe
17:18:51 [benws17]
benws17 has joined #poe
17:22:58 [benws18]
benws18 has joined #poe
17:36:52 [benws18]
benws18 has joined #poe
17:40:17 [benws19]
benws19 has joined #poe
18:22:44 [benws19]
benws19 has joined #poe
18:26:08 [benws110]
benws110 has joined #poe
18:28:03 [benws111]
benws111 has joined #poe
19:55:09 [benws111]
benws111 has joined #poe
20:05:28 [benws15]
benws15 has joined #poe
21:19:58 [benws15]
benws15 has joined #poe