IRC log of aria-apg on 2017-02-06

Timestamps are in UTC.

17:59:45 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #aria-apg
17:59:45 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/02/06-aria-apg-irc
17:59:56 [jamesn]
agenda?
18:00:03 [jamesn]
zakim, clear agenda
18:00:03 [Zakim]
agenda cleared
18:00:22 [jamesn]
Agenda+ Around the table - quick updates on current milestone work:
18:00:23 [annabbott]
annabbott has joined #aria-apg
18:00:32 [jamesn]
Agenda+ Issue 248: Template pages use a div where they should use `pre` https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/248
18:00:42 [jamesn]
Agenda+ Issue 268: Editorial consistency question:
18:00:48 [jamesn]
Agenda+ Final review of issue 144: Review editor menubar example (menubar-2.html)
18:00:54 [jamesn]
Agenda+ Issue 210: Review accordion example https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/210
18:00:59 [jamesn]
Agenda+ Issue 264: Review long description disclosure example
18:01:07 [jamesn]
Agenda+ Issue 265: Review FAQ disclosure example
18:03:35 [annabbott]
present+ AnnAbbott
18:03:54 [jamesn]
present+ JamesNurthen
18:03:59 [jamesn]
agenda?
18:04:04 [jamesn]
Meeting: ARIA APG TF
18:04:18 [annabbott]
present+ MattKing
18:04:26 [sirib]
present+ Shirisha Balusani
18:04:45 [jemma]
jemma has joined #aria-apg
18:05:08 [jamesn]
rrsagent, make log world
18:05:35 [jemma]
present+ JaeunJemmaKu
18:05:49 [jemma]
scribe:JaEunJemmaKu
18:06:09 [jemma]
agenda?
18:06:52 [annabbott]
present+ Bryan Garaventa
18:07:19 [jemma]
next item
18:07:38 [MichielBijl]
present+
18:08:10 [mck]
https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/228
18:08:48 [jemma]
jon worked on this.
18:09:15 [jemma]
mck: one comment about context menu
18:10:11 [jemma]
mck: I would like to solicite context menu from the group
18:11:19 [jemma]
mb: I think context menu only works on ff
18:12:06 [jemma]
s/context menu/ context menu feedback
18:12:44 [jemma]
Ann: we need to make that, context menu, optional.
18:13:43 [jemma]
brian: context menu through javascript window?
18:14:16 [jemma]
mck: we may want to open a separate issue for this.
18:14:44 [jemma]
mck: I will take care of this after the meeting.
18:16:57 [jemma]
mck: issue 183 is done?
18:17:07 [jongund]
jongund has joined #aria-apg
18:17:23 [jemma]
mb: I am done
18:18:02 [jemma]
ann: can we assign the reviewer?
18:18:09 [jemma]
mck: I will do that after the meeting
18:19:21 [MichielBijl]
https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/187
18:19:28 [MichielBijl]
https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/pull/266
18:19:51 [jongund]
present+ jongund
18:20:52 [MichielBijl]
I have updated issue 187 to have a checkbox for the separators.
18:21:32 [jemma]
mck: do we need further discussion on content info?
18:21:38 [annabbott]
https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/249
18:22:05 [jemma]
mck: anything decorative should be silent
18:22:56 [jemma]
jongund: developers may not think about aria property like we do.
18:24:18 [jemma]
brian: developers use bg image or css content but it is not a deal breaker.
18:25:30 [jemma]
jongund: I would like to suggest that we may want to add info for these different techniques to show different states.
18:26:14 [jemma]
jongund: there is separate issue for bg image - color contrast issue.
18:27:24 [jamesn]
does this work - https://www.w3.org/TR/css-content-3/#alt
18:27:31 [jemma]
mck: the best practices are 1) content css property and 2) inline style image
18:28:01 [jemma]
james: text alternative for content image is working?
18:28:18 [jemma]
michiel: it is not implemented any where yet
18:29:29 [jemma]
brian: one way it can be done is using span tag with aria- hidden true and add css style
18:29:37 [jemma]
mck: we dont
18:29:50 [MichielBijl]
https://rawgit.com/MichielBijl/font-awesome/master/tests/index.html
18:30:07 [jemma]
mck: we don't know yet about that technique.
18:30:20 [jemma]
jongund: then what should be done to finish the example?
18:31:38 [jemma]
bijl: here is aria-hidden example with font awesome
18:32:18 [jemma]
https://rawgit.com/MichielBijl/font-awesome/master/tests/index.html
18:33:02 [jemma]
mck: our discussion regarding this landed on 1) content css property 2) aria -hidden
18:36:52 [jemma]
mck: I will create the issue for this.
18:37:40 [mck]
https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/274
18:39:08 [jemma]
jongundL it seems all the example with bg image to indicate state should be changed with css content property
18:39:15 [jemma]
james: yes
18:39:21 [jemma]
mck: yes
18:43:34 [jemma]
jongund: I would like to put all different techniques into a table with advantage vs disadvantages
18:44:07 [jemma]
+1 for Jon's suggestion
18:45:27 [jemma]
brian: there is another technique using pseudo Classes to update states.
18:45:50 [jemma]
next item
18:47:17 [jemma]
mck: michiel suggested use <pre> in html source code for APG example page
18:47:51 [jemma]
michiel: browser issues
18:48:22 [jemma]
mck: can you fix example.js, Michiel?
18:48:28 [jemma]
mb: yes
18:49:06 [jemma]
next item
18:50:16 [jemma]
mck: in the menu pattern, see the potential confusion 'pop up' vs 'submenu'
18:50:49 [jongund]
JG: I think we should be consistent
18:51:02 [jemma]
brian: we should use the word 'submenu' if it is used for menu
18:51:33 [jemma]
mck: good point, brian - I did not think about pop up widget.
18:51:57 [jemma]
mck: so I will make it consistent to use "submenu"
18:51:59 [jemma]
next item
18:52:21 [mck]
http://w3c.github.io/aria-practices/examples/menubar/menubar-2/menubar-2.html
18:54:03 [jongund]
https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/144
18:54:23 [jemma]
agenda 4
18:54:25 [mck]
https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/144
18:54:47 [jemma]
zakim, take up agenda 4
18:54:47 [Zakim]
agendum 4. "Final review of issue 144: Review editor menubar example (menubar-2.html)" taken up [from jamesn]
18:54:56 [mck]
https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/144
19:00:34 [sirib]
http://w3c.github.io/aria-practices/#menu
19:01:15 [jemma]
next item
19:02:13 [jemma]
rrsagent, make minutes
19:02:13 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/06-aria-apg-minutes.html jemma
19:02:32 [jemma]
make log public
19:02:41 [mck]
https://github.com/orgs/w3c/teams/aria-contributors
19:20:32 [mck]
Ann, webex cutt me off
19:20:39 [annabbott]
me too
19:21:12 [annabbott]
I didn't have much else to say - just wanted to share that with you...