00:22:27 betehess has joined #wpwg 01:36:39 Max has joined #wpwg 01:41:51 Max has joined #wpwg 02:06:24 betehess_ has joined #wpwg 16:52:11 RRSAgent has joined #wpwg 16:52:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/01/20-wpwg-irc 16:53:08 Meeting: Merchant Adoption Strategy 16:53:25 Agenda: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Adoption2017 16:53:35 Chair: Ian 16:54:05 rrsagent, pointer? 16:54:05 See http://www.w3.org/2017/01/20-wpwg-irc#T16-54-05 16:54:28 koalie has joined #wpwg 16:59:39 present+ Ian 16:59:52 present+ Alan 17:00:02 present+ AndrewPelehach 17:00:34 present+ 17:01:36 present+ MaheshK 17:01:42 kayakalan has joined #wpwg 17:02:14 MaheshK has joined #wpwg 17:02:52 zkoch has joined #wpwg 17:02:59 present+ Evgeny 17:03:07 present+ zkoch 17:03:30 present+ Javed 17:03:41 Evgeny has joined #wpwg 17:03:43 present+ KOalie 17:03:48 present+ Coralie 17:03:54 present- KOalie 17:04:00 present +Evgeny 17:04:13 https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Adoption2017 17:04:33 -> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2016Dec/0034.html Preparing for conversations about merchant adoption of Payment Request API 17:05:14 present+ AndrewF 17:05:23 mathp has joined #wpwg 17:05:44 present+ Thao 17:05:56 sorry having trouble with webex 17:06:06 afitz has joined #wpwg 17:06:09 koalie has changed the topic to: 20-Jan agenda https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Adoption2017 17:06:45 rouslan has joined #wpwg 17:06:51 present+ 17:07:38 scribe: Koalie 17:07:39 present+ 17:07:42 scribenick: koalie 17:07:49 https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Adoption2017 17:08:17 Ian: My understanding from plementers is that there are a lot of conversations havening already about adoption for the API 17:08:25 ... good to hear challenges to adoption 17:08:31 ... getting starting in the ecosytem is one 17:08:51 ... one is merchants want users, users want lots of merchants to accept this 17:09:06 ... another is cross platform deployment 17:09:20 ... the API supports transition; communicating that is a path forward 17:09:27 ... communication strategy will be helpful 17:09:47 ... work groups focus on gory details but not the shiny details that appeal to other audiences 17:10:01 q+ 17:10:12 Zach: I'd agree with those 17:10:16 ... another one is 17:10:27 ... API probably more effective at converting users 17:10:48 zkoch: "newness of this approach" 17:10:55 ...internally we've called it a branding problem 17:11:00 ...the world right now is "pay with X" 17:11:08 ...applepay, chase pay, etc. 17:11:16 ...there is a user education problem for payment request API 17:11:25 i|... internally|scribenick: Ian| 17:11:27 thaotran has joined #wpwg 17:11:35 s/... internally/Zach: internally/ 17:11:36 scribenick: koalie 17:12:06 (sorry koalie, i speak too quickly!) 17:12:07 Ian: Google spearheaded an HTML5 logo and we made an awareness campaign 17:12:16 ... see outreach in the wiki 17:12:36 ... Understanding all the implications when you click on the pay button is a deeper question 17:12:43 ... Thanks for mentioning this explicitely 17:12:53 ... Any other challenges, problems people want to raise? 17:13:11 q+ 17:13:15 ... I'll update the wiki after the meeting 17:13:16 ack zkoch 17:13:40 AndrewP: as an org, it's not our core focus to do market outreach 17:13:51 ... any way we can structure that in a way 17:14:30 MESSAGE: (1) technical simplicity (2) consistency 17:14:36 ... technical simplicity offered to merchant; consistent acrosse browsers and payment types 17:14:44 ... outreach on the marketing side collectively 17:15:07 q+ 17:15:10 QUESTION: What merchants to target 17:15:32 Ian: tectic question, but first an audience question 17:15:48 ... I don't know that we have answers today but we need to identify those 17:15:58 q? 17:16:02 s/those/the people we want to reach/ 17:16:12 ack kay 17:16:17 s/AndrewP/Javed 17:16:23 ack mat 17:16:32 Mathieu: I agree with Javed 17:16:44 mathp: I think technical simplicity is covered by the API 17:16:44 ... the API takes care about the simplicity aspect 17:16:54 ... consistency on merchant side is something I'd like to see 17:17:00 ...what I would like to see is on the merchant side...they can choose to brand this experience however they want "instant checkout" or "express checkout" 17:17:09 ..there is no indication to the user that they are now using the API 17:17:17 ....there is no education for the user... 17:17:25 ...guidance here for merchants would be helpful 17:17:31 ...I hesitate to call it branding 17:17:38 ...suggested presentation of the buttons 17:17:38 q? 17:17:40 i|...what I|scribenick: Ian| 17:17:52 s/...what/Mathp: What| 17:17:54 scribenick: koalie 17:18:55 Ian: Engaging users to payment apps isn't a priority topic but part of the value proposition of this ecocystem 17:18:59 Goals 17:18:59 Raise awareness about Payment Request API and encourage merchant adoption. 17:18:59 Gauge interest in merchant payment apps 17:19:05 s/ecoc/ecos/ 17:19:14 ... Any ideas on reaching merchants differently? 17:19:26 Ian: As far as audience 17:19:28 ... two questions 17:19:49 ... are we really thinking about convincing the strategists, in companies, or the developers, or both 17:20:21 IJ: Big or small merchants or all? 17:20:25 ... has size of merchant informed your thoughts? 17:20:31 q+ 17:20:40 ... would it be more effective to do demos to developers? 17:20:46 q+ 17:20:47 ... or show people shiny experience? 17:20:51 ack zk 17:20:59 ... given limited resources, I'd like to prioritise 17:21:35 Zach: how can we go from talking to merchants to empower developers but also the BD inside companies 17:21:38 zkoch: I view this as "what can the WG do to empower developers" but also the teams inside of companies so that collectively we provide tools to aid in those conversations 17:21:47 ... second half of what you're proposing 17:21:56 ...examples 17:21:58 ... e.g. "how to deal with coupon codes?" 17:21:59 ..common ux patterns 17:22:05 ...we should put up tools 17:22:19 ...advice on branding, ux flows 17:22:21 ... advice on brandinc, on UX flows 17:22:28 ...at google we have sample code and integration guide 17:22:40 ..but it would be good to show a collaborative effort among vendors 17:22:55 ... devs need example codes, but they aren't the one who need to be convinced. 17:22:56 ...I think we don't as much need to convince devs, rather convince CMOs and product owners 17:23:04 q? 17:23:08 ack kay 17:23:19 Alan: I'd agree with Zach 17:23:39 ... perhaps we should think in terms of event 17:23:42 ... or time-frame 17:23:51 ... a goal we share: e.g. interop 17:24:17 ... good milestone 17:24:23 ...one time to raise awareness --- some interop among browsers and apps 17:24:27 ..have a marketing event around that 17:24:28 ... have a marketing event around that 17:24:36 Andrew: I'm on the BD team 17:24:42 ... a challenge we're facing 17:24:57 [Another interesting topic: success metrics] 17:25:01 ... larger education effort 17:25:01 q+ 17:25:14 ... shop top, March 19, is a big event coming up 17:25:22 ... to introduce what we're working on 17:25:28 s/shop top/shop talk/ 17:25:33 ack ian 17:25:51 Ian: When at Money 2020, I asked and heard it was too late already for Shop Talk 17:26:04 ... maybe a collective effort might encourage us for a panel, for example 17:26:20 ... Tuesday afternoon, chat with Andrew Moris, CCO about Money2020 17:26:30 ... which might be an option for our collaborative effert 17:26:38 ... I'll keep up these conversations 17:26:43 ack me 17:26:44 q? 17:26:55 ... state of implementation and interop might determine which event is better. 17:27:01 ==== 17:27:19 Ian: I'm hearing that product owners is the place we should prioritise 17:27:30 ... it may involve materials for developers 17:27:34 +1 17:27:35 ... can people +1? 17:27:43 +1 17:27:45 +1 17:27:59 Ian: What about merchant size? 17:28:15 ... big small, any size? 17:28:26 ... it's great that shopify is in the group 17:28:34 ... could help us reach merchants quickly 17:28:44 ... other names were suggested to me 17:28:53 ... any others would help us achieve scale in this effrt? 17:28:56 s/ffrt/ffort/ 17:29:00 RRSagent, make minutes 17:29:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/01/20-wpwg-minutes.html koalie 17:29:10 Adam: We could grab someone like Amazon 17:29:16 ... that would be a high profile 17:29:23 ... we have reasonable contacts 17:30:07 Ian: It would be great indeed. I'm in conversation with Best Buy 17:30:13 ... also Walmart and Target are aware of the work 17:30:16 ... closely following it 17:30:25 ... I haven't had many detailed discussion about their adoption 17:30:37 ... any help with messaging tooling would be very helpful. 17:30:44 ====== 17:30:53 Ian: A big visible merchant would help. 17:31:06 ... any other thoughts on what size merchant would be most amenable to this 17:31:19 q? 17:31:39 ... or what could we help you do that outreach? 17:31:47 ... what could we produce? 17:31:54 q+ 17:32:01 ack ka 17:32:15 Javed: we can target tier one merchants 17:32:19 ... that would get us to scale 17:32:28 ... and bring attention to the broader industry 17:33:02 ... we need to show that it's not individual but a bigger scale that merchant investment would benefit 17:33:08 MESSAGE: Once you implement this you can reuse across new payment methods 17:33:29 ... challenge today is to sell how the implementation will outbrand 17:33:36 ...marketing documentation should show brands of participants in the WG 17:33:38 ... what the merchant support enables 17:33:43 ...and that gives scale 17:34:08 ...questions about (1) when supported (2) which devices and systems (3) which payment mehtods 17:34:13 ... if we can collectively give a bigger message, beyond individual road-maps 17:34:19 ...message that there's a commitment to future suport 17:34:52 ... early day but different partners are actively driving the effort 17:34:52 "industry effort, early days but already some things supported" 17:35:05 ... "it's an investment" 17:35:11 ... "will lead to success over time" 17:35:16 Ian: great, thank you 17:35:16 q+ 17:35:21 ack ma 17:35:27 Mathieu: I agree completely 17:35:50 ... as we write, it doesn't make sense for each of us to rewrite our own versions 17:35:55 ... let's write it collectively 17:36:12 ... "here's what supported now and what is coming" 17:36:25 Ian: Thank you 17:36:34 ... what do you label that sort of resource? 17:36:43 Mathieu: maybe a website that is source don GH 17:36:50 ... that people contribute to 17:36:51 ... share code 17:37:12 ... "such and such browsers added support for payment" 17:37:24 Ian: code sample and business cases and implementations are helpful 17:39:46 https://www.webplatform.org/ 17:40:06 betehess has joined #wpwg 17:40:58 IJ: w3.org or some other domain? 17:41:12 AdamR: I think the people who will work on this will be different and from that perspective does not need to be closely associated with the WG 17:41:29 ...new domain may help 17:42:16 Ian: not a big deal from an admin perspective, but the least maintenance the better 17:42:26 ... trying to gauge what people think 17:42:42 ... how serious marketing do we need 17:43:16 Mathieu: +1 to GH 17:43:39 ... I'm not an expert in marketing but custom domain is probably preferable than github.io 17:43:51 ... in terms of collaboration, GH is great 17:45:07 q+ 17:45:26 adamR: Github pages doesn't support HTTPS certs for custom domains, but +1 to GH source control. 17:45:32 Ian: if we acquire such a resource, we need to figure out a plan for it 17:45:51 ... I'd turn to those present to find out about commitment levels 17:46:47 ... Coralie Mercier, head of marcomm is on the call today 17:47:03 ... we could start to build a plan and circulate it among the WG 17:47:15 ... develop it in e-mail or on calls 17:47:28 q+ 17:47:36 ack th 17:47:37 ack thao 17:48:08 Thao: given we are talking to early adopters at this point 17:48:29 ... a single slide, just to give a sense of where that stands in the various browsers 17:48:32 ... and links 17:48:59 ... for now 17:49:08 ... we may want to convert it to a website later 17:49:16 ... all of use can use that slide with our respective logo 17:49:22 q- 17:49:37 https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki#experimentation-and-implementation 17:49:40 Ian: I had started to put together a public common space in wiki: 17:50:10 ... a more structured approach could be more interested 17:50:17 ... people would need to give us update 17:50:21 ... lest it's outdated 17:50:25 mathp: There’s a… partial solution. It’s not awesome, but still pretty good: https://konklone.com/post/github-pages-now-sorta-supports-https-so-use-it#using-a-custom-domain-with-cloudflare 17:50:27 ... I agree it's useful 17:50:57 koalie: I wanted to say that I'll be happy to include plans in the broader web payments communications plan and strategy 17:50:58 mathp: (Requires attackers to effectively be in network core or on premise at cloudflare or github) 17:51:32 adamR: (Side discussion on github-backed domains) 17:51:33 Adam: there are ways to host domains on Github 17:51:42 adamR: Thanks 17:51:55 Ian: that would be one way to go 17:51:57 q+ 17:52:05 ack koalie 17:52:24 koalie: I would support an approach to using GitHub 17:52:32 ...instead of a new domain name 17:52:47 Ian: we could start simply 17:52:58 ... and find we may want to package it differently 17:52:59 +1 17:53:04 [Coralie: +1] 17:53:22 Ian: do people think a name would help to talk about it in a consistent way? 17:53:23 +1 17:53:28 ... and how about a visual identity? 17:53:31 q? 17:53:33 q+ 17:53:35 +1 17:53:39 ack kay 17:54:22 Alan: Who woud be interested in an event or cross-interop demo? 17:54:29 ... that's when critical mass will happen 17:54:33 ... with this initiative 17:54:36 ... re: name and logo 17:54:41 ... name is first 17:54:52 ... we call it W3C pay internally and to partners 17:54:58 ... for lack of a better name 17:55:14 s/is first/is first before visual identity/ 17:55:18 ... then get a logo if you can 17:55:20 ... start slow 17:55:23 Ian: "k 17:55:27 s/"k/'k 17:55:34 q? 17:55:37 === 17:55:46 Alan: expectation for after end of Q2 17:55:47 summarizing some shorter term tactics 17:55:55 * Web site with useful resources 17:56:00 * Name to call this thing 17:56:11 * An event 17:56:16 * Status information 17:56:50 * Highly visible adoption 17:57:24 (status = implementation + adoption) 17:57:30 ====== 17:57:38 Ian: any other things people had in mind? 17:57:51 Mathieu: great list 17:58:08 https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Adoption2017 17:58:27 Mathieu: we need to be able to contribute now 18:00:02 Ian: 'name to call this thing' isn't the domain name we may choose 18:00:14 ... what do we call it from a marketing perspective 18:00:20 ... then what do we do to support it 18:00:44 mathp: will have to think about names! Good homework :) 18:00:46 ====== 18:01:05 Topic: next call 18:01:12 Ian: same time in two weeks? 18:01:37 +1 18:01:48 ACTION: Ian to set up a w3c mailing list for discussions about this topic 18:01:48 'Ian' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., ijacobs, ijmad). 18:02:03 ...and subscribe people on this call to that list 18:02:09 ...and tell the WG about it 18:02:55 Ian: shall we find a GH repo? 18:03:00 ... or use the existing vision wiki 18:03:11 Not familiar with existing repos... 18:03:14 https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Adoption2017 18:03:22 ... or wiki on gh 18:03:23 betehess has joined #wpwg 18:03:33 ... where the WG people have write acces 18:03:38 s/cces/ccess/ 18:03:52 ... people can start collaborating, including ideas for names 18:04:03 Topic: Next meeting 18:04:14 3 Feb at noon ET for 1 hour 18:04:19 ACTION: Ian to send around meeting logistics 18:04:19 'Ian' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., ijacobs, ijmad). 18:04:29 Ian: Thanks everybody 18:04:33 ... it's been helpful 18:04:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/01/20-wpwg-minutes.html Ian 18:04:48 rrsagent, set logs public 18:04:54 RRSagent, make minutes 18:04:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/01/20-wpwg-minutes.html koalie 18:05:35 rrsagent, set logs public 18:06:07 s/ ->/ ->/G 18:06:08 RRSagent, make minutes 18:06:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/01/20-wpwg-minutes.html koalie 18:06:37 koalie has left #wpwg 18:36:13 betehess has joined #wpwg 20:49:02 betehess has joined #wpwg 22:02:18 betehess has joined #wpwg 22:48:45 betehess has joined #wpwg 23:03:00 betehess has joined #wpwg 23:47:52 betehess has joined #wpwg