IRC log of apa on 2017-01-18
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:56:49 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #apa
- 16:56:49 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/01/18-apa-irc
- 16:56:51 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 16:56:51 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #apa
- 16:56:53 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 16:56:53 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 16:56:54 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
- 16:56:54 [trackbot]
- Date: 18 January 2017
- 16:56:59 [janina]
- agenda?
- 16:57:03 [janina]
- agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes
- 16:57:03 [janina]
- agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
- 16:57:03 [janina]
- agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
- 16:57:03 [janina]
- agenda+ Media Accessibility in W3C Specs [See MAUR Redux below]
- 16:57:04 [janina]
- agenda+ Action-2104 ARIA in HTML -- Michiel Bijl http://www.w3.org/tr/html-aria/
- 16:57:05 [janina]
- agenda+ APA's Accessibility Checklist [See Below]
- 16:57:08 [janina]
- agenda+ Input Events http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005.html
- 16:57:11 [janina]
- agenda+ Updating DOM--Any RFEs? https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2017JanMar/0000.html
- 16:57:14 [janina]
- agenda+ Other Business
- 16:57:16 [janina]
- agenda+ next and future meetings
- 16:57:19 [janina]
- agenda+ be done
- 16:58:48 [MichielBijl]
- present+
- 17:00:29 [janina]
- regrets: Gottfried, John_Northrup, Leonie
- 17:01:35 [JF]
- JF has joined #apa
- 17:02:04 [joanie]
- present+ Joanmarie_Diggs
- 17:03:25 [janina]
- present+ Janina
- 17:03:47 [MichaelC]
- present+
- 17:04:05 [JF]
- Present+ JF
- 17:04:16 [MichielBijl]
- scribe: MichielBijl
- 17:05:26 [MichielBijl]
- zakim, next item
- 17:05:26 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina]
- 17:05:47 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Any additions to agenda?
- 17:05:58 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Any news for the good of the order?
- 17:06:05 [MichielBijl]
- zakim, next item
- 17:06:05 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 was just opened, MichielBijl
- 17:06:17 [tdrake]
- tdrake has joined #apa
- 17:06:18 [MichielBijl]
- zakim, close this item
- 17:06:18 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 closed
- 17:06:19 [Zakim]
- I see 10 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 17:06:19 [Zakim]
- 2. Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8 [from janina]
- 17:06:22 [MichielBijl]
- zakim, next item
- 17:06:22 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8" taken up [from janina]
- 17:06:25 [tdrake]
- present + tdrake
- 17:07:15 [MichielBijl]
- action-2017
- 17:07:15 [trackbot]
- action-2017 -- Fred Esch to Review activitypub https://www.w3.org/tr/activitypub/ -- due 2016-03-16 -- CLOSED
- 17:07:15 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2017
- 17:07:27 [ShaneM]
- present+ ShaneM
- 17:07:43 [MichielBijl]
- MC: remember we reviewed something a while back
- 17:07:56 [MichaelC]
- action-2107 due 1 week
- 17:07:56 [trackbot]
- Set action-2107 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/webcryptoapi/ web cryptography api due date to 2017-01-25.
- 17:07:58 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Nothing like web cryptography in APA
- 17:08:10 [MichielBijl]
- action-2104
- 17:08:10 [trackbot]
- action-2104 -- Michiel Bijl to Review aria in html http://www.w3.org/tr/html-aria/ -- due 2017-01-11 -- OPEN
- 17:08:10 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2104
- 17:08:56 [JF]
- MB: no apparent conflicts with the ARIA spec, but noted some issues with HTML spec
- 17:09:18 [MichaelC]
- close action-2104
- 17:09:18 [trackbot]
- Closed action-2104.
- 17:09:26 [JF]
- Consulted with Steve Faulkner, recommends to file issues agaisnt HTML spec
- 17:09:42 [JF]
- WAs mis-matches between roles defined
- 17:10:20 [MichielBijl]
- action-2095
- 17:10:20 [trackbot]
- action-2095 -- Jason White to Review web authentication https://www.w3.org/tr/webauthn/ -- due 2017-01-18 -- OPEN
- 17:10:20 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2095
- 17:10:32 [MichielBijl]
- MC: will mark wiki as complete
- 17:10:41 [MichielBijl]
- JS: taken up by RTQF
- 17:11:07 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Don’t have a category for nor-abandoned nor-complete
- 17:11:10 [MichielBijl]
- JS: We could
- 17:11:21 [MichaelC]
- action-2095 due 1 year
- 17:11:21 [trackbot]
- Set action-2095 Review web authentication https://www.w3.org/tr/webauthn/ due date to 2018-01-18.
- 17:11:24 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Will say “defer action”
- 17:11:35 [MichielBijl]
- action-2094
- 17:11:35 [trackbot]
- action-2094 -- Janina Sajka to Review tv control api specification https://www.w3.org/tr/tvcontrol-api/ -- due 2017-01-11 -- OPEN
- 17:11:35 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2094
- 17:11:43 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Still working on it
- 17:11:50 [MichielBijl]
- JS: leave over due
- 17:11:55 [MichielBijl]
- action-2052
- 17:11:55 [trackbot]
- action-2052 -- Shane McCarron to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/shadow-dom/ shadow dom -- due 2016-09-28 -- OPEN
- 17:11:55 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2052
- 17:12:16 [MichielBijl]
- SM: didn’t do it
- 17:12:27 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Was published again on TR this week
- 17:12:37 [MichielBijl]
- JS: All DOM specs are open for updating
- 17:13:28 [MichielBijl]
- SM: Please leave it open, will contact Rich
- 17:13:35 [MichaelC]
- action-2052 due 2 weeks
- 17:13:35 [trackbot]
- Set action-2052 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/shadow-dom/ shadow dom due date to 2017-02-01.
- 17:13:45 [MichielBijl]
- SM: Set for two weeks from now, will have update by then
- 17:14:22 [MichielBijl]
- action-2086
- 17:14:22 [trackbot]
- action-2086 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/input-events/ input events -- due 2016-09-28 -- PENDINGREVIEW
- 17:14:22 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2086
- 17:14:39 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Wanted to talk to Léonie about that
- 17:14:48 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Might want to bring them to WP
- 17:15:00 [MichielBijl]
- s/WP/Web Platforms/
- 17:15:09 [MichielBijl]
- action-2062
- 17:15:09 [trackbot]
- action-2062 -- Lisa Seeman to Re-review custom counter styles https://www.w3.org/tr/predefined-counter-styles/ -- due 2016-07-06 -- PENDINGREVIEW
- 17:15:09 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2062
- 17:15:28 [MichielBijl]
- MC: We didn’t reassign the action
- 17:15:35 [MichielBijl]
- TD: ??
- 17:15:45 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Re-assign and give a couple of weeks
- 17:16:01 [MichielBijl]
- MC: In July we said no further review needed, but never closed.
- 17:16:40 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Will re-assign to ted with two weeks to go
- 17:16:46 [MichielBijl]
- s/ted/Ted/
- 17:17:09 [MichielBijl]
- MC: That’s it for action
- 17:17:13 [MichielBijl]
- zakim, next item
- 17:17:13 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html" taken up [from janina]
- 17:17:39 [MichielBijl]
- MC: There seem to be no new publications of interest
- 17:17:56 [MichielBijl]
- MC: There’re four specs with explicit review requests
- 17:18:11 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Bunch of webpayments right?
- 17:18:14 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Yeah, three
- 17:18:24 [MichielBijl]
- SM: I’ve looked at it, nothing to do for us there
- 17:18:28 [MichaelC]
- action-2100?
- 17:18:28 [trackbot]
- action-2100 -- Shane McCarron to Review pubsub https://www.w3.org/tr/pubsub/ -- due 2017-01-26 -- OPEN
- 17:18:28 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2100
- 17:19:25 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Also have a category for specs that are assigned but haven’t returned anything
- 17:20:48 [MichielBijl]
- JS: At some point we need to look at community groups
- 17:20:59 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Done with TR
- 17:21:02 [MichielBijl]
- zakim, next item
- 17:21:02 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Media Accessibility in W3C Specs" taken up [from See MAUR Redux below]
- 17:21:33 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Ralph Swick?? will join us next week
- 17:21:53 [MichielBijl]
- JS: We have a MAUR document to help us
- 17:22:16 [MichielBijl]
- JS: We’ve been able to specify a whole lot of things via user requirements
- 17:22:35 [MichielBijl]
- JS: We need to find a way that it gets appropriately address
- 17:22:44 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Which comments need to go to who
- 17:23:01 [JF]
- Q+ to note there are also some author requirements that have nothing to do with APIs
- 17:23:37 [MichielBijl]
- JS: MAUR is a long read, would be nice to have a one and half page summary.
- 17:23:47 [MichielBijl]
- JS: John is working on ??
- 17:24:09 [ShaneM]
- I thought the checklist was updated right before the MAUR was published.... I sort of remember doing it
- 17:24:22 [MichielBijl]
- JF: There is a disconnect between the MAUR and the checklist
- 17:24:50 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Rebuilding reqs into a checklist
- 17:25:09 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Would like feedback
- 17:25:18 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Cross ref to WCAG 2.0
- 17:25:26 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Something are infered through WCAG
- 17:25:32 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Not explicitly called out
- 17:25:46 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Some of that feedback needs to be fed back to WCAG WG.
- 17:26:02 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Think we need to add note not necessarily normative
- 17:26:35 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Open to any suggestions to things we need to track
- 17:27:00 [MichielBijl]
- JF: It’s now hosted in the Wiki, is there somewhere else, more static, where we can host this?
- 17:27:06 [MichielBijl]
- MC: We can come up with a place
- 17:27:42 [MichielBijl]
- MC: If appropriate, we can take it to note track, mixed feeling about that, but we can solve it
- 17:27:52 [MichielBijl]
- JF: At some point we want to get it out of the W3 wiki
- 17:27:58 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Not overly fussy where
- 17:28:12 [MichielBijl]
- JS: MAUR has a reference to it, so would have to edit that
- 17:28:18 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Updating a link is not a problem
- 17:29:51 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Let me do the hard work and we’ll figure out the paper work later
- 17:30:27 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Should consider if there is enough new information to update the MAUR
- 17:31:59 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Think we have a couple of small comments, maybe push to 1.2
- 17:32:26 [MichielBijl]
- MC: While there is bureaucracy for updating notes, not as bad as RECs
- 17:34:04 [MichielBijl]
- JF: The other thing, some of the author requirements have nothing to do with APIs
- 17:34:14 [MichielBijl]
- JF: There are some other requirements as well
- 17:34:21 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Should be made into best practices
- 17:34:26 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Or advance to WCAG
- 17:34:42 [MichielBijl]
- JS: If that’s the case I don’t care too much about which version.
- 17:35:01 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Would be interested in POCs
- 17:35:09 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Someone from BBC showed me some stuff
- 17:35:14 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Would like to do that
- 17:35:31 [MichielBijl]
- JS: If you have time before next meeting that’d be good
- 17:35:34 [MichielBijl]
- zakim, next item
- 17:35:34 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, MichielBijl
- 17:35:38 [MichielBijl]
- q-
- 17:35:42 [JF]
- ack jf
- 17:35:42 [Zakim]
- JF, you wanted to note there are also some author requirements that have nothing to do with APIs
- 17:35:42 [MichielBijl]
- ack JF
- 17:35:53 [JF]
- zakim, next item
- 17:35:53 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Action-2104 ARIA in HTML -- Michiel Bijl http://www.w3.org/tr/html-aria/" taken up [from janina]
- 17:36:01 [JF]
- scribe: JF
- 17:36:13 [JF]
- MB: have done a review
- 17:36:28 [JF]
- no real issues except for one item - a legacy issue
- 17:36:41 [JF]
- there are a number of elements that are not currently iin alpha-order
- 17:36:54 [JF]
- there is one issue however that is the section element
- 17:37:11 [MichielBijl]
- https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues/64
- 17:37:23 [JF]
- according to ARIA in HTML, it maps to region, but according to APG it has extra properties
- 17:37:36 [MichielBijl]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/239
- 17:37:36 [JF]
- so there is a need for an update
- 17:37:54 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/01/18-apa-minutes.html MichaelC
- 17:38:01 [JF]
- there are a number of differences between what is allowed in different documents
- 17:38:11 [JF]
- Steve F. has requested that these differences be filed as bugs
- 17:38:30 [JF]
- JS: a good list of items to follow up on
- 17:39:10 [JF]
- JS: suspect that the ARIA group would be interested inthis as well, especially the discrepancies apparent
- 17:39:38 [JF]
- JS: our wiki should have, at a minimum, pointers of what happened and a paper-trail back to github issues
- 17:39:53 [JF]
- MB: hae a markdown file of issues noted, can be added to anywhere
- 17:39:59 [JF]
- JS: can send it tomailing list
- 17:40:05 [JF]
- MB: yes, can do that
- 17:40:34 [JF]
- MB: has 3 categories of issues: ARIA in HTML issues, HTML issues, and one APG issue
- 17:40:45 [JF]
- most issues are the descrepencies
- 17:41:11 [JF]
- MB: so question is, where should post the issues?
- 17:41:17 [JF]
- JB: definately on the ARIA list
- 17:41:31 [JF]
- ACTION: Michiel to file issues, send out email to both lists
- 17:41:31 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2109 - File issues, send out email to both lists [on Michiel Bijl - due 2017-01-25].
- 17:42:10 [MichaelC]
- associate action-2109 with product-8
- 17:42:10 [trackbot]
- action-2109 (File issues, send out email to both lists) associated with product-8.
- 17:42:30 [MichaelC]
- action-2109?
- 17:42:30 [trackbot]
- action-2109 -- Michiel Bijl to File issues, send out email to both lists -- due 2017-01-25 -- OPEN
- 17:42:30 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2109
- 17:44:34 [JF]
- agenda?
- 17:45:15 [MichielBijl]
- zakim, next item
- 17:45:15 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "APA's Accessibility Checklist" taken up [from See Below]
- 17:46:19 [MichielBijl]
- MC: No news since last week
- 17:46:20 [MichaelC]
- -> http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/wtag/checklist.html Draft WTAG Checklist
- 17:46:35 [MichielBijl]
- MC: I tried to make the checklist somewhat compelte
- 17:46:43 [MichielBijl]
- s/compelte/complete/
- 17:47:10 [MichielBijl]
- MC: It references relevant guidelines
- 17:47:33 [MichielBijl]
- MC: I think the wording of these checklist items needs to be done
- 17:47:50 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Were drafted so we would understand
- 17:47:59 [MichielBijl]
- MC: A) Do we have the right sections
- 17:48:17 [MichielBijl]
- MC: B) Are the checklist items appropriate for that section
- 17:48:24 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Can send comments to the list
- 17:48:34 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Can send PRs, but might be a little early for that
- 17:48:46 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Might do restructure in coming weeks
- 17:48:52 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Ralph wants this in April
- 17:49:07 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Not sure yet when we want to publish final version
- 17:49:19 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Over next month we’ll try to answer all those questions
- 17:49:28 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Publish in APA rep or TR
- 17:49:39 [MichielBijl]
- MC: These checklist items are just CSS
- 17:49:46 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Would like to put in actual form
- 17:50:02 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Would be able to submit and get a list of things you need to look at
- 17:50:19 [JF]
- Q+
- 17:50:35 [MichielBijl]
- JF: I see there are some gaps
- 17:50:40 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Under the explanation column
- 17:50:44 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Do you need help?
- 17:50:47 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Yes!
- 17:50:56 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Would be greatly appreciated
- 17:51:05 [MichielBijl]
- MC: If people can offer content, that would be great
- 17:51:24 [MichielBijl]
- MC: In short term e-mail is fine
- 17:51:41 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Looking at media stuff here
- 17:51:53 [MichielBijl]
- JF: Working on MAUR anyway, seems trivial to feed that to checklist
- 17:52:06 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Did attempt to link to MAUR
- 17:52:25 [MichielBijl]
- MC: Will fix contrast issue soon
- 17:52:39 [JF]
- ack JF
- 17:56:12 [MichielBijl]
- JF: target audiance is other WGs?
- 17:56:19 [MichielBijl]
- MC: primary target audience yes
- 17:56:26 [MichielBijl]
- s/audiance/audience/
- 17:56:53 [MichielBijl]
- JS: Think we need to put on media hats
- 17:57:18 [MichielBijl]
- Whatever different viewpoints we have
- 17:57:36 [MichielBijl]
- Michael just noted that indeed you need to be able to send out to different devices
- 17:57:53 [MichielBijl]
- MC: That’s the sort of stuff I want people to catch in their review
- 17:58:11 [MichielBijl]
- Might be useful to look at overall web accessibility technology guidelines
- 17:58:16 [MichaelC]
- -> http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/wtag/wtag.html Draft WTAG
- 17:58:21 [MichielBijl]
- Nearly 2 year old draft at this point
- 17:58:28 [MichielBijl]
- Went through it with PFWG at some point
- 18:00:03 [MichielBijl]
- JS: plenty of work left!
- 18:00:15 [MichielBijl]
- Any other comments or questions?
- 18:00:19 [MichielBijl]
- We’re at the hour
- 18:00:41 [MichielBijl]
- We’ll discuss input events when Léonie is here, we had some comments from Rich.
- 18:01:09 [MichielBijl]
- Thanks all!
- 18:02:21 [MichielBijl]
- RRSAgent, makeminutes
- 18:02:21 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'makeminutes', MichielBijl. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 18:02:26 [MichielBijl]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 18:02:26 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/01/18-apa-minutes.html MichielBijl