17:59:35 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #webauthn
17:59:35 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/01/11-webauthn-irc
17:59:37 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
17:59:37 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #webauthn
17:59:39 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be
17:59:39 <Zakim> I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
17:59:40 <trackbot> Meeting: Web Authentication Working Group Teleconference
17:59:40 <trackbot> Date: 11 January 2017
18:01:26 <apowers> apowers has joined #webauthn
18:01:57 <Rolf> Rolf has joined #webauthn
18:03:35 <jcj_moz> present+
18:04:32 <vgb> vgb has joined #webauthn
18:05:34 <vgb> present+
18:06:24 <rbarnes> is nadalin here?
18:06:30 <rbarnes> is he "me"?
18:10:54 <jcj_moz> scribenick: angelo
18:11:05 <angelo> I will scribe
18:11:09 <dirkbalfanz> dirkbalfanz has joined #webauthn
18:11:23 <angelo> Everyone please register for the F2F 
18:11:56 <JeffH> JeffH has joined #webauthn
18:12:15 <JeffH> present+ JeffH
18:12:33 <vgb> present+
18:12:47 <kpaulhamus> kpaulhamus has joined #webauthn
18:15:32 <angelo> We just reviewed 317. The browser vendors are mostly in support of the PR
18:15:45 <angelo> We are looking at the PR 319 now
18:16:56 <angelo> 319 is related to 314 because they both solve the same problem.
18:18:53 <jcj_moz> JeffH: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1329764#c1
18:19:27 <angelo> JC raised the point that the two algorithms referenced in 319 and 314 are in fact different
18:19:57 <angelo> In particular, what we want here is an algorithm to check if the RP ID is a legitimate domain
18:22:38 <angelo> One of the suggestions from bugzilla is we should just abandon RP ID and use post message
18:23:14 <angelo> That's a discussion that we had months ago and it is not wise to revisit the same discussion over and over again
18:24:56 <angelo> We are looking at #321 now
18:25:32 <angelo> 321 now makes all attestation formats CBOR encoded
18:26:13 <angelo> 321 contains a new section that describes what RP needs to do to decode attestation
18:29:29 <angelo> In previous spec, attestation statement was used in everywhere. This PR renames all the elements with more specific terms to distinguish different objects.
18:30:31 <angelo> Rolf raised a few suggestions about this PR. Vijay will make changes accordingly after the PR
18:31:14 <Rolf> those comments are recorded in the PR 321.
18:34:09 <JeffH> "files changed 1" pr#314: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/321/files
18:36:48 <angelo> We are going through a line-to-line walkthrough of PR 321
18:40:34 <JeffH> now down at new line 1100
18:41:39 <JeffH> sorry 1189
18:43:07 <angelo> These changes touch on many issues and Vijay noted 11 issues in the PR
18:43:39 <angelo> After this PR is made in, we may be able to close on a good number of issues
18:43:55 <angelo> We are now at 1233
18:47:13 <angelo> We are discussing credential attestation change around 1300
18:55:00 <angelo> We are now at around line 1394
19:00:25 <JeffH> line 1508
19:00:35 <angelo> We are now at around 1600s
19:00:54 <JeffH> line 1679
19:01:48 <angelo> We are now at around line 1800
19:02:01 <angelo> This is the last major change made by this PR
19:03:13 <angelo> A valuable exercise would if the U2F implementers can read through this PR
19:03:38 <angelo> Does anyone want to volunteer reviewing this PR?
19:04:11 <angelo> This PR may be a more than one week review
20:29:14 <Zakim> Zakim has left #webauthn
21:00:36 <apowers> apowers has joined #webauthn