IRC log of rqtf on 2016-12-14
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:55:09 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rqtf
- 13:55:09 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/12/14-rqtf-irc
- 13:55:11 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 13:55:11 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rqtf
- 13:55:13 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 13:55:14 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
- 13:55:14 [trackbot]
- Date: 14 December 2016
- 13:55:15 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 13:57:10 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Security and Authentication
- 13:57:44 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Collaboration with Silver Task Force
- 13:58:12 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Web of Things - Accessibility Implications and W3C involvement
- 13:58:24 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Outreach and recruitment
- 13:58:34 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Teleconference Schedule
- 13:58:48 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Other Topics
- 14:00:49 [MichaelC]
- MichaelC has joined #rqtf
- 14:01:15 [Judy]
- Judy has joined #rqtf
- 14:01:40 [shadi]
- present+
- 14:01:53 [janina]
- agenda?
- 14:02:02 [janina]
- present+ Janina
- 14:02:13 [janina]
- present+ Scott
- 14:02:29 [janina]
- scribe: Janina
- 14:02:32 [janina]
- Chair: Jason
- 14:02:36 [jasonjgw]
- present+ jasonjgw
- 14:02:49 [janina]
- Chair: jasonjgw
- 14:03:36 [sloandr]
- sloandr has joined #rqtf
- 14:04:12 [Judy]
- present+ Judy
- 14:05:51 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 14:05:51 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Security and Authentication" taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 14:06:27 [janina]
- jgw: Noting two aspects, what's required for making newer approaches accessible;
- 14:08:15 [janina]
- jgw: And then the need within APA Captcha update
- 14:10:31 [Judy]
- ds: coming at this from the perspective of trying to help the TF tackle research questions -- none of us are specialists on authentication
- 14:11:01 [Judy]
- ...I did a quick lit rvw using ACM library, got a sample of papers that have been published in the last ~years
- 14:11:20 [janina_]
- janina_ has joined #rqtf
- 14:11:21 [Judy]
- ...haven't read them yet -- but gives an overview of the kind of topics that researchers are approaching
- 14:11:23 [Judy]
- q+
- 14:11:37 [Judy]
- ...or we can approach the authors and get an idea of the state of the art
- 14:11:53 [Judy]
- ...especially the topics that are on the intersection of accessibility and security
- 14:12:06 [Judy]
- ...and then bring in others
- 14:12:07 [Judy]
- q?
- 14:12:24 [Judy]
- ...I can continue to build out this list -- other repositories...
- 14:12:44 [janina_]
- scribe: janina
- 14:12:58 [MichaelC]
- ack j
- 14:13:07 [MichaelC]
- s/scribe: janina/scribe: janina_/
- 14:13:21 [janina_]
- jb: Thinks the approach may help, but wants to suggest we keep closer to what's going on in the field
- 14:13:53 [janina_]
- jb: We may not always be helping ourselves by going too far into academic research
- 14:14:14 [janina_]
- jb: Important to include implementers
- 14:14:50 [sloandr]
- +1 to including implementers
- 14:14:50 [janina_]
- jb: That may keep some of the newer approaches out for the time being, but could be more useful in W3C
- 14:15:21 [janina_]
- jb: Also important to keep a structured approach
- 14:15:43 [janina_]
- jgw: Is the concern the time delay from research to implementation?
- 14:16:28 [janina_]
- jb: No, sometimes literature lags implementation, but also some implementation work is never actually published
- 14:16:56 [janina_]
- q?
- 14:17:18 [janina_]
- jgw: Useful aspect of pubs is that it names participants we can follow up with
- 14:17:41 [Judy]
- q+
- 14:18:07 [janina_]
- jb: Suggest inviting Wendy Selser and Sam Weiler
- 14:18:16 [janina_]
- jb: into the conversation
- 14:18:23 [Judy]
- s/Selser/Seltzer/
- 14:18:28 [janina_]
- jgw: I'll follow up
- 14:18:41 [janina_]
- jb: And, I can reach out to Wendy and Sam
- 14:18:55 [Judy]
- [JB: I'll be happy to talk with Wendy and Sam]
- 14:19:02 [janina_]
- jgw: Encouraging people to look at the cited work
- 14:19:27 [janina_]
- jgw: Sam will continue updating the wiki
- 14:19:57 [sloandr]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/wiki/Relevant_Researchers
- 14:20:03 [janina_]
- jgw: Goal is to build up user requirements and to gain an understanding of how the various pwd communities are supported with newer authentication approaches
- 14:20:30 [janina_]
- zakim, next item
- 14:20:30 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, janina_
- 14:20:30 [sloandr]
- The wiki page title doesn't really reflect the content of the page, so we'll probably need to edit that at some point
- 14:20:36 [janina_]
- q?
- 14:20:44 [janina_]
- ack judy
- 14:20:53 [janina_]
- zakim, next item
- 14:20:53 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Collaboration with Silver Task Force" taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 14:21:26 [Judy]
- [JB: these look like great resources, from David, to review -- thanks for finding these]
- 14:21:26 [janina_]
- jgw: Just a brief review of what's going on
- 14:21:59 [janina_]
- jgw: WCAG has a TF looking at how next substantial guidelines might be developed
- 14:22:13 [janina_]
- jgw: This work is in parallel with work extending existing WCAT 2.X
- 14:22:52 [janina_]
- jgw: The Silver TF has sought our input on methodological questions relating to their research
- 14:23:41 [janina_]
- jgw: Includes ways of collecting data from stakeholders
- 14:24:06 [janina_]
- jgw: Also about how to publish their findings
- 14:24:44 [janina_]
- david: Notes the TF just held a F2F--but I wasn't present so only looked at minutes briefly
- 14:25:28 [janina_]
- David: I have been publicizing the invitation to participate to the wider research community
- 14:26:43 [janina_]
- mc: Notes TF is designing a survey, a focus in January plus lit review
- 14:27:21 [janina_]
- mc: TF wants most research delivered by end of summer to have good impact on Silver
- 14:27:35 [janina_]
- q?
- 14:28:20 [janina_]
- jgw: Recalling his meeting that RQTF wasn't being asked to do research, but to help in designing theirs
- 14:28:43 [janina_]
- jgw: e.g. is the proposed survey instrument methodologically sound?
- 14:29:17 [janina_]
- jgw: But it seems there's not anything to review just yet. When might we be asked?
- 14:30:29 [janina_]
- mc: Hopes they'll approach RQTF first week of January at some level, with short turnaround
- 14:30:43 [janina_]
- jgw: OK
- 14:31:28 [janina_]
- jgw: So, maybe we need to name the people that can give best feedback. No one immediately in mind, but this is one way to go at it
- 14:31:59 [janina_]
- mc: Noting again they'll be looking for research that can provide results within a year
- 14:32:17 [janina_]
- mc: Also wants to know what the priorities in research should be
- 14:32:27 [janina_]
- mc: This could be a good RQTF topic
- 14:33:03 [janina_]
- q?
- 14:33:36 [janina_]
- jgw: Believe we can't usefully do much more until contact from them
- 14:34:03 [janina_]
- jgw: Certainly can provide feedback on survey instruments and lit review
- 14:34:34 [janina_]
- david: I'll continue to monitor and do what I can
- 14:34:50 [janina_]
- zakim, next item
- 14:34:50 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Web of Things - Accessibility Implications and W3C involvement" taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 14:36:15 [janina_]
- Minutes from APA with WoT-IG at TPAC:
- 14:36:16 [janina_]
- http://www.w3.org/2016/09/19-apa-minutes.html#item06
- 14:36:32 [Judy]
- scribe: Judy
- 14:37:12 [Judy]
- js: I just pasted a pointer to discussion with WoT IG. Good discussion. Minutes give a good overview of some of the current thinking, and some of the current concerns.
- 14:37:27 [Judy]
- ...IG wants to get out of the product line silos and provide interop support.
- 14:37:41 [Judy]
- ...APIs are one of the ways that people tend to achieve that.
- 14:37:57 [Judy]
- ...one of my concerns is how do we review an API.
- 14:38:33 [sloandr]
- I can take over
- 14:38:39 [Judy]
- ...one example that people think this is important is autonomouse vehciles
- 14:38:47 [sloandr]
- scribe: sloandr
- 14:39:59 [sloandr]
- …API could support identifying autonomous vehicles through innovative means, for example a custom audio file that enables non-visual identification
- 14:40:27 [sloandr]
- …a lot of APIs are emerging, but do we know if they cover all our needs?
- 14:41:01 [sloandr]
- …in robotics, we want tech to adapt to humans, and APIs need to be able to accommodate that
- 14:41:34 [sloandr]
- janina_ encourages RQTF to read the APA minutes referenced previously
- 14:42:06 [sloandr]
- jgw: thanks to janina_ for the summary of the state of play
- 14:42:08 [Judy]
- q+
- 14:43:21 [sloandr]
- jb: this is helpful background. To be able to envision the space, it's helpful to have a few use cases. Customized audio for autonomous vehicles is helpful. Would be nice to have more.
- 14:43:34 [janina_]
- jb: Notes that developing use cases will be important to understand what the research questions might be
- 14:44:45 [janina_]
- jb: Asking if there are other use case notions we could consider
- 14:45:04 [janina_]
- jgw: Having conversations that may get some
- 14:45:25 [Judy]
- s/autonomouse vehciles/autonomous vehicles/
- 14:45:30 [janina_]
- jgw: Asking whther anyone is aware of ongoing work in this area?
- 14:46:16 [shadi]
- q+
- 14:46:19 [janina_]
- Scott: Asking whether home bot apis would fall into the category
- 14:46:21 [Judy]
- q-
- 14:46:23 [janina_]
- janina: I think so
- 14:46:48 [janina_]
- scott: Often the apps aren't that accessible, but the apis can help
- 14:48:43 [janina_]
- q?
- 14:48:49 [janina_]
- ack sh
- 14:49:34 [janina_]
- shadi: Expecting that different components, e.g. headset, won't be fully accessible--e.g. to deaf people ...
- 14:50:03 [janina_]
- shadi: but whatever sensor in particular, overall system needs to support all kinds of pwd users
- 14:50:22 [janina_]
- shadi: therefore, distributed components would be useful
- 14:51:09 [janina_]
- shadi: Maybe also a point for Silver to consider who's responsible for components integrating well
- 14:51:35 [janina_]
- shadi: this would need protocol level support
- 14:52:27 [jasonjgw]
- q?
- 14:53:12 [janina_]
- shadi: So we can perhaps help figure out what aspect needs to be taken up by Silver vs WoT vs APA, etc
- 14:53:19 [janina_]
- Scott: Also interested in this
- 14:55:23 [janina_]
- janina: Notes that an eventual output like HTML's MAUR doc would be helpful
- 14:55:25 [janina_]
- agenda?
- 14:57:38 [janina_]
- jgw: Notes the ongoing WBS survey for RQTF telecon time.
- 14:57:43 [MichaelC]
- zakim, take up item 5
- 14:57:43 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Teleconference Schedule" taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 14:57:47 [MichaelC]
- zakim, close item 3
- 14:57:47 [Zakim]
- agendum 3, Web of Things - Accessibility Implications and W3C involvement, closed
- 14:57:49 [Zakim]
- I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 14:57:49 [Zakim]
- 4. Outreach and recruitment [from jasonjgw]
- 14:58:02 [janina_]
- jgw: The suggestion for 8AM U.S. Eastern is that our Facilitator is commuting in that hour--don't know about working around that yet
- 14:58:45 [janina_]
- jgw: Also we'll have challenges because we have so many tz's
- 14:58:56 [janina_]
- jgw: Please do the WBS and provide your preferences
- 14:59:09 [sloandr]
- q+
- 14:59:11 [janina_]
- jgw: We also need to continue to find a few more participants for our work.
- 15:00:10 [janina_]
- jgw: Next meeting?
- 15:00:15 [janina_]
- janina: Suggest 4 Jan
- 15:00:20 [janina_]
- jgw: Any objections?
- 15:00:22 [janina_]
- [crickets]
- 15:00:40 [janina_]
- q?
- 15:00:49 [janina_]
- ack d
- 15:01:18 [janina_]
- david: Thinking of a blog post encouraging participation, TPG blog, could provide draft
- 15:02:18 [janina_]
- jb: Notes there's usually an approach in calls for participation, suggest followup with Shadi and maybe Michael
- 15:02:35 [MichaelC]
- q+
- 15:03:13 [janina_]
- jb: Suggests a pointer to W3C Blog post and maybe saying more would be the way to go
- 15:03:26 [MichaelC]
- ack me
- 15:03:29 [sloandr]
- q-
- 15:03:31 [janina_]
- ack d
- 15:03:43 [janina_]
- jgw: Will move on this
- 15:03:52 [janina_]
- q?
- 15:04:22 [janina_]
- scott: Volunteering for lit review on captcha work
- 15:05:13 [janina_]
- jgw: Agree
- 15:05:23 [janina_]
- janina: And APA wants Dual Factor included, if possible
- 15:05:45 [janina_]
- jgw: Happy Hollidays
- 15:06:27 [MichaelC]
- present+ Faezeh
- 15:06:31 [janina_]
- present+ Scott
- 15:06:33 [MichaelC]
- present+ MichaelC
- 15:09:15 [janina_]
- present+ Faezeh
- 15:09:21 [janina_]
- zakim, bye
- 15:09:21 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been shadi, Janina, Scott, jasonjgw, Judy, Faezeh, MichaelC
- 15:09:21 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rqtf
- 15:09:29 [janina_]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:09:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/14-rqtf-minutes.html janina_
- 17:21:12 [shadi]
- shadi has joined #rqtf