15:02:44 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wcag-act
15:02:44 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/12/07-wcag-act-irc
15:02:46 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
15:02:46 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #wcag-act
15:02:48 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be
15:02:48 <Zakim> I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
15:02:49 <trackbot> Meeting: Accessibility Conformance Testing Teleconference
15:02:49 <trackbot> Date: 07 December 2016
15:04:05 <Wilco>  agenda+ Approval of last week's meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/93339/ACT8Dec2016meeting/
15:04:15 <Wilco> agenda+ Issue 7 - Clarification of "negative tests"
15:04:19 <Wilco> agenda+ Action 11 - Draft of Rule Description section
15:04:22 <Wilco> agenda+ Review proposed update to the Introduction section  https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-framework.html#quality-updates
15:04:25 <Wilco> agenda+ Open Issues in github https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues
15:04:28 <Wilco> agenda+ Open Action Items https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/conformance-testing/track/actions/open
15:04:36 <shadi> regrets+ shadi
15:05:06 <Wilco> present+ wilco
15:06:19 <Wilco> zakim, take up next
15:06:19 <Zakim> agendum 1. "Approval of last week's meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/93339/ACT8Dec2016meeting/" taken up [from Wilco]
15:08:50 <maryjom> maryjom has joined #wcag-act
15:09:17 <Wilco> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/93339/ACT8Dec2016meeting/
15:09:31 <maryjom> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/93339/ACT8Dec2016meeting/
15:10:59 <jemma> jemma has joined #wcag-act
15:15:37 <Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pulls
15:15:54 <Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/18
15:16:48 <maryjom> Shadi had comments: Does the ACT Framework define "requirements" versus a "format" or "template" or such? Also, are ACT Rules "in support" or "in accordance" to this framework? Maybe:
15:17:07 <maryjom> The Accessibility Conformance Testing Framework (ACT Framework) defines a format for accessibility testing rules (ACT Rules) that produce consistent validation results. This work will lead to more transparency and common understanding on how to test conformance to accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.0.
15:18:08 <jemma> present+ jaeunjemmaku
15:18:50 <MoeKraft> yes
15:19:21 <maryjom> present+MaryJo
15:19:42 <MoeKraft> nvm, works now. Prompted to login.
15:19:56 <MoeKraft> present+ MoeKraft
15:20:29 <tripu> tripu has joined #wcag-act
15:22:51 <Wilco> @shadi, about your comment requirements vs format
15:23:16 <tripu> tripu has left #wcag-act
15:23:24 <Wilco> I think format doesn't cover it. What we have is a set requirements of qualities for rules
15:25:14 <shadi> [[not hearing the discussion, will go with group consensus. Think "set of requirements" sounds a little vague and unclear. Concerned it may get pushback. But we can revisit when the document is fuller too. I suggest something stronger and more specific. Maybe "format and instructions" oer such?]]
15:25:45 <MoeKraft> The Accessibility Conformance Testing Framework (ACT Framework) defines a set of requirements and format to produce a transparent set of accessibility test methods that produce consistent validation results.
15:26:46 <shadi> [[how about "... is a specification to help produce ..."?]]
15:27:02 <MoeKraft> The Accessibility Conformance Testing Framework (ACT Framework) defines a set of requirements, format and measurable qualities to produce a transparent set of accessibility test methods that produce consistent validation results.
15:27:40 <shadi> [[that edit could work too]]
15:28:45 <jemma> +1
15:28:49 <maryjom> +1
15:30:02 <Wilco> zakim, next item
15:30:02 <Zakim> agendum 2. "Issue 7 - Clarification of "negative tests"" taken up [from Wilco]
15:30:15 <Wilco> https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&q=https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/93339/ACT8Dec2016meeting/&source=gmail&ust=1481209255597000&usg=AFQjCNGRADeJlfhryIAgIxL9hs3nNJpEqA
15:34:38 <jemma> This would be compatible with the principle that “not applicable” is a pass, and that SC are written as affirmative statements.
15:34:55 <jemma> copied from  https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues/7
15:37:20 <Wilco> zakim, next item
15:37:20 <Zakim> agendum 3. "Action 11 - Draft of Rule Description section" taken up [from Wilco]
15:39:19 <Ryladog_> Ryladog_ has joined #wcag-act
15:39:33 <Ryladog_> Present+ Katie Haritos-Shea
15:39:51 <Wilco> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/93339/ACT8Dec2016meeting/results
15:46:28 <Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/12
15:47:42 <Wilco> zakim, next item
15:47:42 <Zakim> agendum 4. "Review proposed update to the Introduction section  https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-framework.html#quality-updates" taken up [from Wilco]
15:48:22 <Wilco> zakim, next item
15:48:22 <Zakim> agendum 4 was just opened, Wilco
15:48:33 <Wilco> zakim, take up item 5
15:48:33 <Zakim> agendum 5. "Open Issues in github https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues" taken up [from Wilco]
15:49:39 <Ryladog_> ScribeNick: Ryladog
15:50:12 <jemma> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues/17
15:50:52 <Ryladog_> WF: Issue #17 til open,
15:51:17 <Ryladog_> WF: Issue #13, Wilco created a pull request that solves the confusion on numbering
15:52:03 <Ryladog_> WF: Open issues on other folks, I will ping them to see the status
15:52:51 <Ryladog_> JEMMA: Issue #17, the instruction in APG group - we put the instructions in the Read Me document
15:53:10 <Ryladog_> WF: Good, Ill make it a comment
15:53:20 <Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/2
15:53:36 <Ryladog_> WF: Pull request by Shadi
15:54:33 <rdeltour> rdeltour has joined #wcag-act
15:54:41 <Ryladog_> WF: We can put the editorial changes on the survey for next week?
15:55:11 <Wilco> zakim, next item
15:55:11 <Zakim> agendum 4. "Review proposed update to the Introduction section  https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-framework.html#quality-updates" taken up [from Wilco]
15:55:14 <Ryladog_> MJ: We probably dont need to survey editorial content
15:55:21 <Wilco> zakim, take up item 6
15:55:21 <Zakim> agendum 6. "Open Action Items https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/conformance-testing/track/actions/open" taken up [from Wilco]
15:56:50 <Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/19
15:56:51 <Ryladog_> MJ: Action for Romain, Action 17 on Wilco which is done, Action 20 update scope
15:56:57 <Ryladog_> WF: Ive done that
15:57:17 <Ryladog_> MJ: I can close action 20?
15:58:07 <Ryladog_> WF: Last action item not done. Maryjo I think we can put that on the survey for nexy week
15:58:38 <Ryladog_> rrsagent, make minutes
15:58:38 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/07-wcag-act-minutes.html Ryladog_
15:58:50 <Ryladog_> rrsagent, make log public
16:00:11 <Wilco> rssagent end meeting
16:00:32 <Wilco> rrsagent, draft minutes
16:00:32 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/07-wcag-act-minutes.html Wilco
16:08:04 <shadi> trackbot, end meeting
16:08:04 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
16:08:04 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been wilco, jaeunjemmaku, MaryJo, MoeKraft, Katie, Haritos-Shea
16:08:12 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
16:08:12 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/07-wcag-act-minutes.html trackbot
16:08:13 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
16:08:13 <RRSAgent> I see no action items