15:01:21 RRSAgent has joined #blockchain 15:01:21 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/12/01-blockchain-irc 15:01:28 mountie has joined #blockchain 15:01:38 Meeting: Blockchain CG Meeting 15:01:54 hi 15:01:57 scribe: Marta 15:02:09 Chair: Marta, Mountie, Doug 15:02:26 Present: Marta, Mountie, Manu 15:03:31 marta has joined #blockchain 15:04:04 rrsagent, make logs public 15:04:07 rrsagent, make minutes 15:04:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/01-blockchain-minutes.html manu 15:04:27 Haiyang, marta, Samuel, thessy, manu are on the phone 15:04:30 present+ 15:04:41 present+ thessy 15:04:44 present+ weiler 15:05:17 present+ Haiyang 15:05:21 rrsagent, make minutes 15:05:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/01-blockchain-minutes.html manu 15:10:11 Topic: Overlap with Web Payments WG Meeting 15:10:29 mountie: I spoke with AdrianHB and MikeSmith about them sharing information wrt. local industry and blockchain 15:10:41 manu: Yes, we overlap with the Web Payments WG call 15:10:48 Topic: Agenda 15:11:03 marta: Let's start, thanks to Manu for joining the call today. 15:11:12 https://digitalbazaar.github.io/flex-ledger/ 15:11:34 mountie: Let's focus on Flex Ledger first, then hope to talk about CG's activity 15:11:49 mountie: Want to get to Flex Ledger first. 15:11:57 Topic: Flex Ledger 15:12:08 https://w3c.github.io/flex-ledger/ 15:12:20 scribe: weiler 15:12:46 manu: this is highly experimental work; we're not saying this is the right way to do it. this is just a conversation-starter. 15:14:04 ... Digital Bazaar asked by DHS (homeland security) to review existing blockchains. map out capabilities of each blockchain w.r.t security and privacy. 15:14:40 ... paper submitted to Rebooting Web of Trust. 15:15:52 ... looks at bitcoin, etherium, ipfs, blockstack, stellar. re: selective disclosure, anonymous identifiers, time to reach consensus. 15:16:33 ... then propose standard protocol and format to access of all above. e.g. add ledger entry, get history 15:16:50 ... trying to create unified data model and protocol for different blockchains. 15:17:24 ... not trying to restrict blockchains to this model, but trying to spec a unified client based on observed commonalities. 15:17:41 ... does this make sense to you? 15:18:42 marta: concerned that you'll ruffle feathers. 15:19:11 manu: we've already gotten that. "no reason to have unified interface" 15:19:54 ... talked to bigchaindb and sovereign ledger; they're open to discussing it. but you're right, there has been pushback. 15:20:11 ... communities feel like theirs in the best and they see no need to intro. 15:20:17 s/intro/interop/ 15:20:29 s/in the best/is the best/ 15:21:39 manu: ... some want to be able to switch ledgers in the future. if they see features they want to add, etc. 15:22:46 mountie: @@ JSON.ld 15:23:08 manu: json should be supported, but looking at other things e.g. yams. 15:23:13 s/yams/yaml/ 15:24:24 ... can we unify protocol and translate data in blockchain into unified format? 15:26:02 mountie: is the possible to handle ... w/ flexledger web could be gateway of transitions... 15:27:14 manu: we hope to see a standardized protocol to access blockchains. 15:30:09 zakim, who's here? 15:30:09 Present: Marta, Mountie, Manu, weiler, thessy, Haiyang 15:30:11 On IRC I see marta, mountie, RRSAgent, Zakim, weiler, newton, rrware, manu, bovesan, rhiaro, fluffypony, kat, nicolagreco, robmyers, hadleybeeman 15:31:47 mountie: how to do model achieving consensus? 15:32:34 manu: consensus mechanism is just a field; we don't otherwise model it. 15:34:05 https://w3c.github.io/flex-ledger/#http-api 15:37:05 (much digging into the details missed by the scribe) 15:41:07 manu: have the CG discussed the prospect of having thousands of ledgers? 15:41:54 marta: yes 15:42:10 manu: worth pursuing? 15:42:58 marta: yes, because @2. not sure we'll be able to come w/ solution unless industry wants to collaborate with us. 15:43:58 manu: dead in the water unless other players sign on. hoping sovereign foundation and @3 and get their thoughts on this. if we can get three blockchains implementing to something, even if not flexledger, we might get some traction 15:44:20 ... maybe the right approach is not to convince big players, but convince startups. 15:44:25 ... to show some traction 15:45:28 mountie: web can be gateway for thousands of bc's. this is the right time to start. 15:47:35 manu: at tpac, the people w/ web experience didn't really understand BC and were just there to learn. 15:47:51 ... need both bits of clue to create an API. 15:48:55 http://dhs2016ledger.digitalbazaar.com/ 15:49:01 manu: I hope that showing W3C a spec in a form they're familiar with, that will draw in more people from w3c. but making it concrete v. abstract. 15:49:11 s/but/by/ 15:49:23 newton has joined #blockchain 15:49:36 manu: feel free to play with implementation at link above. 15:50:45 scribe: manu 15:51:05 mountie: I found that there is great possibility to use Flex Ledger and study it. 15:53:27 marta: What do you need from the CG? 15:53:53 manu: 1. Do you want to adopt the Flex Ledger spec as a spec under incubation at the CG? 15:53:57 +1 15:54:05 +1 15:54:07 manu: +1 :) 15:54:32 manu: Do you want us to pull companies in to discuss Flex Ledger in the CG? Like Sovrin and BigChainDB? 15:55:32 marta: We discussed this on the call, wanted to make a decision on Flex Ledger - we already discussed before, but wanted you to come in and introduce it to us a bit. 15:56:26 mountie: I have some questions on Sovrin, but for BigChainDB - I think I have latest info on that. 15:56:56 https://www.sovrin.org/ ? 15:57:01 I said that unless people vote within next 30 sec we should decide based on the existing votes 15:58:58 manu: Sovrin is a decentralized ledger that is tuned for identity. 15:59:15 mountie: Do we need to vote for the 2nd ask? 16:00:06 how many votes did we get 16:00:37 great lest then just go with a yes for both? 16:01:21 mountie: no objection to invite BigChainDB and Sovrin to Blockchain CG. 16:01:31 manu: Rodophe was there from BigChainDB at W3C TPAC. 16:02:08 mountie: That's the call for today, will try to get some activity started at Blockchain CG... been busy. 16:02:17 marta: We'll discuss that during the next meeting. 16:02:39 2 weeks 16:02:42 Topic: Next Meeting 16:02:54 mountie: When should we have the next meeting? 16:03:13 No, lets just have it in 2 weeks 16:03:19 manu: I wont be able to make most of these meetings because of the conflict w/ Web Payments WG :( 16:03:31 We will reschedule them as well 16:03:39 mountie: Let's take this to email 16:03:44 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:03:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/01-blockchain-minutes.html manu 16:03:49 I'll send out a doodle 16:04:16 weiler: The CG web page has the old WebEx link, can we put up the current concall link? 16:04:30 mountie: Yes, I will update it 16:04:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:04:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/01-blockchain-minutes.html manu 16:05:08 but could you email them as well 16:05:14 please 16:11:30 marta, did you mean "email the minutes"? 16:12:30 yes:) 16:12:41 thank you 16:12:41 marta, I'll do that :) 17:37:22 Zakim has left #blockchain 19:54:12 shepazu has joined #blockchain 20:27:26 newton has joined #blockchain