15:00:09 RRSAgent has joined #tt 15:00:09 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/11/17-tt-irc 15:00:11 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:00:11 Zakim has joined #tt 15:00:13 Zakim, this will be TTML 15:00:13 ok, trackbot 15:00:14 Meeting: Timed Text Working Group Teleconference 15:00:14 Date: 17 November 2016 15:01:17 Chair: Nigel 15:01:19 Present: Nigel 15:01:25 Regrets: None 15:01:49 scribe: nigel 15:02:13 Present+ Glenn, Pierre, Andreas 15:02:25 Topic: This Meeting 15:03:45 nigel: Today we have some outgoing liaison text to finalise, which I'd like to timebox. 15:04:07 ... Profiles Registry is for next week on request of Mike 15:04:09 Regrets: Mike 15:04:18 atai has joined #tt 15:04:45 nigel: So then TTML2, and I am not aware of other topics to discuss. F2F is on the agenda, 15:05:01 ... just in case there are any questions or agenda requests. 15:05:16 nigel: AOB? 15:05:20 group: No AOB 15:05:30 Topic: F2F Planning 15:05:50 -> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/F2F-jan-2017 15:07:19 Topic: IMSC 15:07:30 nigel: Can we spend max 20 minutes on the liaison text? 15:07:45 tmichel has joined #tt 15:08:11 -> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2016Nov/0020.html 15:08:16 present+ 15:08:21 Present+ Thierry 15:14:12 q+ 15:15:05 ack atai 15:15:24 group: [discussion of liaison text] 15:35:49 nigel: Just to draw this to a close, is the generic template response ok with everyone? 15:36:00 glenn: Yes, okay with me, and could be used for DVB also as is. 15:36:23 nigel: Ok we have consensus on the generic template. 15:39:20 ACTION: nigel Send generic liaison to ATSC, ARIB, MPEG (via Mike), DECE, CTA, DASH-IF, DTG, HbbTV, SMPTE. 15:39:20 Created ACTION-487 - Send generic liaison to atsc, arib, mpeg (via mike), dece, cta, dash-if, dtg, hbbtv, smpte. [on Nigel Megitt - due 2016-11-24]. 15:41:06 ACTION: nigel Send liaison to DVB replacing first sentence from generic response with acknowledgement sentence. 15:41:06 Created ACTION-488 - Send liaison to dvb replacing first sentence from generic response with acknowledgement sentence. [on Nigel Megitt - due 2016-11-24]. 15:41:50 Topic: F2F 15:42:07 Pierre: Will there be a telecon facility at the F2F? 15:42:20 nigel: I can put one in if anyone asks - nobody has so far. 15:42:34 Pierre: We should have a draft at the face to face meeting so I will check if that would help. 15:43:02 Topic: IMSC 15:43:09 close action-484 15:43:09 Closed action-484. 15:43:15 nigel: Thank you for doing that drafting Pierre. 15:43:39 hum ... I lost you guys 15:44:14 Action-478? 15:44:14 Action-478 -- Nigel Megitt to Draft a liaison to hbbtv requesting further information and proposing an option e.g. to extend imsc 1 to allow signalling of background height on span, and request timelines etc. -- due 2016-09-26 -- OPEN 15:44:14 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/478 15:44:32 nigel: The agreed liaison text in principle covers this action but maybe we should try to 15:44:48 ... add a paragraph as previously discussed asking about background height on span. I will 15:44:55 ... draft an additional paragraph and send for review. 15:45:21 Topic: TTML1 & TTML2 issues, actions, PRs, editorial actions etc 15:45:54 nigel: First thing to note is we have a new WD published with today's date on it. 15:46:04 I am back 15:46:08 -> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-ttml2-20161117/ 15:48:26 tmichel: There was a bit of confusion about the new pub rules checker which is very strict, 15:48:41 ... and does not let anything through that is not an exact match. 15:50:06 nigel: Thank you Thierry and Glenn for getting that out. 15:50:33 tmichel: Should I send this to the horizontal reviewers. 15:51:22 nigel: My view is send this now since there is no restriction asking us only to begin horizontal 15:51:30 ... review at "last call" or equivalent. 15:51:42 tmichel: OK then I will send the prepared security questionnaire and the WD link to the 15:51:47 ... other groups for horizontal review. 15:52:22 action-481? 15:52:22 action-481 -- Glenn Adams to Provide nigel with a list of new features in ttml2 to begin reviewing -- due 2016-09-26 -- OPEN 15:52:22 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/481 15:53:20 nigel: I will kick on with this action to draft a short description as a small number of 15:53:40 ... paragraphs of prose, and send to you Glenn for review. Thierry, if you CC me in on your 15:53:53 ... emails to the horizontal review groups then I can respond with this descriptive text. 15:54:16 tmichel: Sure 15:54:19 nigel: Thank you 15:55:09 nigel: We have two pull requests outstanding - is there any reason not to merge those? 15:55:23 glenn: I didn't have time to review and merge those before doing the WD, but will do so soon. 15:55:27 nigel: OK, thank you. 15:56:10 nigel: Should we raise https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/issues/220 lineHeight "computed" inheritance? 15:56:28 glenn: A couple of implementations I reviewed consider the value "normal" to be considered 15:56:46 ... a computed value for inheritance, and then calculate the actual line height further down the tree. 15:57:06 ... That is consistent with the CSS behaviour. 15:58:00 ... For percentages, they are resolved to an absolute value that is inherited. I have not checked 15:58:03 ... the implementations of these. 15:58:25 glenn has joined #tt 15:58:30 https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS22/visudet.html#propdef-line-height 15:59:13 pal: I think it's really important to note that the computed value of normal is "normal". 15:59:38 ... Also not to change the algorithm in TTML for percentages. Whether we change the 15:59:51 ... recommendation to authors about baseline jumping etc I do not have a strong opinion. 16:00:06 glenn: I agree with you on this Pierre. If we feel it is important we can add a note giving 16:00:19 ... advice to authors. I am not sure I understand the baseline jumping business so I need to 16:01:42 ... review the thread - I think that the baseline jumping issue may not be a correct interpretation of the text. 16:04:29 nigel: I've added a comment to the issue above. 16:05:53 glenn: Now that we have a new WD will we be sending out liaisons requesting review? 16:06:12 nigel: No, we should wait until we think we're at the "final" WD so that the wide review 16:06:26 ... comments that we receive clearly apply to that version of the document. 16:06:38 glenn: We did say in Lisbon that we would issue a WD for wide review in early November. 16:06:54 nigel: Yes, and that was on the basis that it would be a "last call" style WD however since 16:07:06 ... we are not ready for that but we want to initiate horizontal review we agreed last week 16:07:15 ... to publish an interim WD. 16:07:32 glenn: I would like to spend some time next week discussing how we proceed to a WD for 16:07:35 ... wide review. 16:07:40 nigel: Okay, good idea. 16:07:50 nigel: We're out of time for today, thanks everyone [adjourns meeting] 16:07:54 rrsagent, make minutes 16:07:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/11/17-tt-minutes.html nigel 16:12:06 s/to the horizontal reviewers./to the horizontal reviewers? 16:14:30 rrsagent, make minutes 16:14:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/11/17-tt-minutes.html nigel 16:14:56 scribeOptions: -final -noEmbedDiagnostics 16:14:57 rrsagent, make minutes 16:14:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/11/17-tt-minutes.html nigel 17:32:30 Zakim has left #tt