13:47:13 RRSAgent has joined #forms 13:47:13 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/11/09-forms-irc 13:47:15 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:47:15 Zakim has joined #forms 13:47:17 Zakim, this will be 13:47:17 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 13:47:18 Meeting: XForms Users Community Group Teleconference 13:47:18 Date: 09 November 2016 13:47:43 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0038 13:47:50 Steven has changed the topic to: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0038 13:47:55 Chair: Steven 13:47:58 Regrets: none 13:59:36 pfennell has joined #forms 14:01:27 Present: Alain, Steven, Philip 14:02:30 Present+Erik 14:02:39 Topic: StackOverflow answer 14:02:39 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Oct/0077 14:02:50 Steven: I added an answer as well. 14:02:58 Topic: Model Item Properties 14:02:58 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0023.html 14:03:31 Steven: OK that I delete "in document order"? 14:03:34 Erik: I think so. 14:03:39 Steven: will do 14:03:53 Topic: switch case selection 14:03:53 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0026.html 14:04:29 Steven: I'm assuming we're OK with using the same rules for initialisation and subsequent redisplay 14:04:31 Erik: Yes. 14:04:43 Topic: toggle 14:04:43 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0029.html 14:04:57 Steven: I guess we're agreed here. 14:05:16 ... I will update the spec to make it clearer 14:05:28 Topic: The copy Element (for itemset) 14:05:28 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0022.html 14:07:28 Steven: I think that we should send it to the selection control, since that is where the error actually is. Do we agree? 14:08:15 Erik: I agree. 14:08:27 Steven: Any objections? 14:08:36 Philip: Fine. 14:08:55 ACTION: Steven to make error event go to selection element 14:08:56 Created ACTION-2088 - Make error event go to selection element [on Steven Pemberton - due 2016-11-16]. 14:09:53 Steven: Point 2. I think this is wrong 14:09:56 Erik: I agree 14:10:39 ACTION: Steven to delete xforms-binding-error Event for different models from 14:10:40 Created ACTION-2089 - Delete xforms-binding-error event for different models from [on Steven Pemberton - due 2016-11-16]. 14:11:05 Topic: Extension functions 14:11:05 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0024.html 14:11:56 Steven: Just wanted to check we were OK with the example I added 14:12:14 Erik: Seems fine 14:12:28 Topic: The group module 14:12:28 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0025.html 14:14:06 Steven: I personally feel that it's not worth having group and repeat modules 14:14:30 ... furthermore I think they should both be in "full" 14:15:34 Erik: There is more of an argument for repeat, but I don't see any good argument for leaving it from "full" 14:16:29 https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#Conformance_Levels 14:17:12 Steven: I think they ought to be "musts" except for "except that support of the repeat-* attributes is optional." 14:17:36 Erik: Sure 14:17:49 Steven: OK? 14:17:55 Philip: Yep. 14:18:01 Alain: Yes. 14:18:44 ACTION: Steven to update XForms Full definition 14:18:44 Created ACTION-2090 - Update xforms full definition [on Steven Pemberton - due 2016-11-16]. 14:18:57 topic: switch@caseref 14:18:57 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Nov/0027.html 14:20:03 Steven: As you point out Erik, there is no backwards compatibility issue 14:20:12 Erik: Because we changed from @id to @name 14:20:48 Steven: So is everyone OK with using @ref instead of @caseref 14:20:57 Alain: no problem. 14:21:04 Philip: I'm OK 14:21:12 Erik: I'm OK 14:21:27 RESOLUTION: remove @caseref and use @ref instead 14:21:36 ACTION: Steven to remove @caseref 14:21:37 Created ACTION-2091 - Remove @caseref [on Steven Pemberton - due 2016-11-16]. 14:21:53 Topic: Select element 14:21:53 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2016Oct/0068.html 14:23:14 Steven: So what do you think about the idea of allowing different separators for