IRC log of sdwbp on 2016-10-12
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:05:04 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #sdwbp
- 14:05:04 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/10/12-sdwbp-irc
- 14:05:06 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 14:05:06 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #sdwbp
- 14:05:08 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be SDW
- 14:05:08 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot
- 14:05:09 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference
- 14:05:09 [trackbot]
- Date: 12 October 2016
- 14:05:30 [MattPerry]
- MattPerry has joined #sdwbp
- 14:05:31 [ScottSimmons]
- we will need to do the "present+" thing again
- 14:05:40 [ScottSimmons]
- present+ ScottSimmons
- 14:05:50 [MattPerry]
- present+ MattPerry
- 14:06:00 [Linda]
- present+ Linda
- 14:06:03 [ByronCinNZ]
- present+ ByronCinNZ
- 14:06:22 [AndreaPerego]
- AndreaPerego has joined #sdwbp
- 14:06:26 [jtandy]
- present+ jtandy
- 14:07:45 [Linda]
- regrets+ eparsons, josh, bill
- 14:07:51 [phila]
- regrets+ phila
- 14:07:57 [AndreaPerego]
- present+ AndreaPerego
- 14:08:48 [Linda]
- scribe: Linda
- 14:09:04 [Linda]
- topic: minutes
- 14:09:24 [jtandy]
- https://www.w3.org/2016/09/07-sdwbp-minutes
- 14:09:41 [jtandy]
- PROPOSED: approve minutes on 7-Sep-2016
- 14:09:43 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 14:09:44 [jtandy]
- +1
- 14:09:45 [MattPerry]
- +1
- 14:09:46 [ScottSimmons]
- +1
- 14:09:51 [Linda]
- +0 not there
- 14:09:54 [ByronCinNZ]
- +1
- 14:09:56 [Linda]
- resolved
- 14:10:08 [jtandy]
- RESOLVED: approve minutes on 7-Sep-2016
- 14:10:18 [Linda]
- topic: patent call
- 14:10:51 [Linda]
- topic: agenda
- 14:11:03 [AndreaPerego]
- Patent call: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
- 14:11:09 [Linda]
- jtandy: issues about current draft,
- 14:11:34 [Linda]
- ... next topics,
- 14:11:42 [Linda]
- ... time switch
- 14:12:03 [Linda]
- topic: time switch
- 14:12:23 [Linda]
- jtandy: would going to a later time help?
- 14:12:25 [Linda]
- ByronCinNZ: yes
- 14:12:41 [AndreaPerego]
- How much late?
- 14:14:04 [Linda]
- jtandy: the proposal would be 1 hour later, so CET 5 to 6
- 14:14:13 [AndreaPerego]
- No problem for me
- 14:14:16 [Linda]
- ScottSimmons: really good for me
- 14:14:21 [Linda]
- MattPerry: for me too
- 14:14:39 [jtandy]
- PROPOSED: next & subsequent BP sub-group calls will be at 16:00utc
- 14:14:50 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 14:14:50 [Linda]
- +1
- 14:15:02 [MattPerry]
- +1
- 14:15:40 [ChrisLittle_]
- ChrisLittle_ has joined #Sdwbp
- 14:15:46 [jtandy]
- ACTION: check with Australians ...
- 14:15:47 [trackbot]
- Error finding 'check'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/users>.
- 14:15:50 [Linda]
- ByronCinNZ: might be early for the australians
- 14:15:53 [ChrisLittle_]
- Present+ ChrisLittle
- 14:16:06 [jtandy]
- ACTION: jtandy to check new BP subgroup time with Australians ...
- 14:16:06 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-207 - Check new bp subgroup time with australians ... [on Jeremy Tandy - due 2016-10-19].
- 14:16:14 [ChrisLittle_]
- * Sorry about being late
- 14:16:23 [Linda]
- jtandy: let's go for 1600UTC unless there's a real problem
- 14:16:38 [Linda]
- topic: issues arising from pending WD review
- 14:17:02 [Linda]
- jtandy: has everybody read it, are there questions?
- 14:17:24 [Linda]
- ScottSimmons: yes and no - have read it but not formulated questions yet.
- 14:17:46 [ChrisLittle_]
- Q+
- 14:17:50 [Linda]
- jtandy: AndreaPerego, you sent an email, potentially some editorial suggestions?
- 14:18:27 [Linda]
- AndreaPerego: yes, I have something to add, an explanatory note about URIs not resolving yet
- 14:19:03 [Linda]
- ... and some minor editorial changes, could we still fix some typos etc? I could do this friday if it's still in time.
- 14:19:44 [Linda]
- jtandy: please do this in a pull request and send an email to the mailing list listing the changes.
- 14:20:18 [AndreaPerego]
- q+
- 14:20:22 [Linda]
- ... others as well: if you want to fix small things you can do it in this way.
- 14:20:29 [jtandy]
- ack ChrisLittle_
- 14:21:10 [Linda]
- ChrisLittle_: if I ask for reordering the UCR draft, does that have impact on the BP?
- 14:21:28 [Linda]
- ... now alphabetically ordered, but might be better grouped thematically.
- 14:21:51 [Linda]
- jtandy: we reference requirements by name
- 14:21:53 [AndreaPerego]
- q+ to mention the issue with Turtle syntax highlighting in the examples.
- 14:22:06 [Linda]
- ChrisLittle_: so we could renumber them without impacting the BP.
- 14:22:21 [Linda]
- jtandy: and the crossref of BPs and requirements is automatically generated.
- 14:22:31 [jtandy]
- q?
- 14:22:35 [jtandy]
- ack AndreaPerego
- 14:22:35 [Zakim]
- AndreaPerego, you wanted to mention the issue with Turtle syntax highlighting in the examples.
- 14:22:36 [Linda]
- ChrisLittle_: so there's no reason not to ask this.
- 14:23:04 [Linda]
- AndreaPerego: there is a problem with syntax highlighting turtle. This is a bit annoying.
- 14:23:23 [Linda]
- ... we could raise this issue with Phil, probably there is a solution.
- 14:23:52 [Linda]
- jtandy: [looks for an example in the BP]
- 14:23:55 [jtandy]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/csv2rdf/#example-countries
- 14:24:09 [jtandy]
- EXAMPLE 4: http://example.org/countries-minimal.ttl
- 14:24:35 [Linda]
- jtandy: this example from CSV on the web has syntax highlighted turtle. I can find out how we did that.
- 14:25:15 [AndreaPerego]
- :)
- 14:25:44 [jtandy]
- q?
- 14:25:45 [Linda]
- ACTION: jtandy to find out how to syntax highlight turtle and send it to the group
- 14:25:45 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-208 - Find out how to syntax highlight turtle and send it to the group [on Jeremy Tandy - due 2016-10-19].
- 14:26:28 [Linda]
- jtandy: so you're all happy with the pending WD
- 14:26:31 [AndreaPerego]
- q+
- 14:26:37 [ByronCinNZ]
- q+
- 14:26:38 [Linda]
- topic: work for next WD
- 14:26:42 [jtandy]
- ack AndreaPerego
- 14:26:57 [Linda]
- jtandy: any thoughts for further work after the pending WD?
- 14:27:15 [Linda]
- AndreaPerego: I have some ideas from the inspire workshop, Clemens can give some details on that.
- 14:27:36 [Linda]
- ... Clemens and Ed could highlight ideas.
- 14:27:55 [Linda]
- ... for example, focussing (too much?) on the publishers instead of the users.
- 14:28:04 [Linda]
- ... but who are the users, web developers, or spatial experts?
- 14:28:33 [Linda]
- jtandy: in our Audience section we say we need to address both, but there's limited time to do this.
- 14:29:29 [Linda]
- ... [reads from doc]
- 14:29:51 [jtandy]
- q?
- 14:29:55 [Linda]
- ... it's tricky because we have limited time. If we manage to help the publishers, it shouldn't be hard for users to use the data anymore.
- 14:30:31 [Linda]
- AndreaPerego: I agree. but it should be clearer what our focus is.
- 14:31:00 [Linda]
- ... we could get ideas from the workshop on where it is not clear enough.
- 14:31:47 [jtandy]
- q?
- 14:31:58 [Linda]
- jtandy: the minutes from the workshop are terse, but it gives an idea of what the participants considered important. e.g. persistent identifiers.
- 14:32:15 [Linda]
- ...but we need to wait for Clemens and Ed's report.
- 14:32:27 [Linda]
- AndreaPerego: next meeting they should be talking about it.
- 14:32:34 [jtandy]
- ack ByronCinNZ
- 14:33:14 [Linda]
- ByronCinNZ: on the audience: was explicitly discussed in a previous meeting. In a may or june meeting I think.
- 14:33:35 [Linda]
- ... we should look at why we wanted to restrict the focus.
- 14:34:08 [Linda]
- ... Am working on crowdsourcing with students from university of Canberry.
- 14:34:26 [Linda]
- ... if we want to flesh the crowdsourcing BP out in the next WD we could do it with them.
- 14:34:54 [Linda]
- jtandy: we were wondering if the crowdsource BP was inherently spatial and if we should be including it or not.
- 14:35:24 [Linda]
- ... josh was talking earlier about a OGC IE about humans crowdsourcing.
- 14:35:42 [Linda]
- ByronCinNZ: the trust element is important, and there are a few spatial aspects.
- 14:36:04 [Linda]
- ... and the community aspect.
- 14:36:42 [Linda]
- jtandy: are the students looking for answers or able to supply some thoughts?
- 14:36:59 [Linda]
- ByronCinNZ: yes, not on all aspects, but on the trust side they are.
- 14:37:25 [Linda]
- jtandy: sounds like worth sharing with the broader group. Could you talk about this in a plenary group meeting?
- 14:37:51 [Linda]
- ByronCinNZ: probably, not the next one but the one after that, in 3 weeks time.
- 14:38:09 [ScottSimmons]
- we lost you, Jeremy
- 14:38:37 [Linda]
- broken up
- 14:39:29 [ChrisLittle]
- ChrisLittle has joined #Sdwbp
- 14:40:09 [Linda]
- ByronCinNZ: yes
- 14:40:19 [Linda]
- q?
- 14:41:08 [jtandy]
- q?
- 14:41:47 [Linda]
- jtandy: so we have the inspire workshop stuff and the crowdsourcing stuff.
- 14:42:09 [Linda]
- ... Linda and I talked about having a 4 week or 6 week work cycle.
- 14:42:17 [Linda]
- ... do people think that's workable?
- 14:42:20 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 14:42:28 [Linda]
- ChrisLittle: good tactic
- 14:42:32 [Linda]
- ScottSimmons: agree
- 14:42:33 [ScottSimmons]
- +1
- 14:42:36 [Linda]
- +1
- 14:42:38 [ByronCinNZ]
- +1
- 14:42:43 [MattPerry]
- +1
- 14:42:52 [Linda]
- jtandy: we should use slack
- 14:43:07 [AndreaPerego]
- +1 :)
- 14:43:11 [Linda]
- ... the inspire workshop stuff could go in the first release
- 14:43:20 [jtandy]
- q?
- 14:43:20 [Linda]
- ... the crowdsource stuff in the second release
- 14:43:42 [Linda]
- ... at tpac we had discussion on a few of the best practices.
- 14:43:45 [jtandy]
- https://www.w3.org/2016/09/19-sdw-minutes.html
- 14:44:13 [Linda]
- ... we discussed BP7, globally unique id's and indirect id's.
- 14:44:23 [Linda]
- ... and about making your data indexable
- 14:44:46 [Linda]
- ... those could be part of the first release along the inspire stuff.
- 14:45:02 [jtandy]
- section ยง10: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#how-to-use
- 14:45:05 [Linda]
- ... and there's section 10, how to use these best practices?
- 14:45:32 [AndreaPerego]
- q+ to say that it may be worth having more examples in the BPs
- 14:45:34 [Linda]
- ... I'd like to make some progress on that as well.
- 14:45:39 [ByronCinNZ]
- q+
- 14:45:44 [Linda]
- q+
- 14:45:56 [jtandy]
- ack AndreaPerego
- 14:45:56 [Zakim]
- AndreaPerego, you wanted to say that it may be worth having more examples in the BPs
- 14:46:26 [Linda]
- AndreaPerego: we should have more examples, and a running example. Don't know if it's feasible.
- 14:46:50 [Linda]
- ... I can provide other examples on metadata, but we need contributions from others as well.
- 14:47:07 [Linda]
- jtandy: we don't need complete examples but we need more in the next release, yes.
- 14:47:23 [Linda]
- ... a call for examples is a good idea.
- 14:47:25 [jtandy]
- q?
- 14:47:30 [jtandy]
- ack ByronCinNZ
- 14:48:02 [Linda]
- ByronCinNZ: another thing discussed at TPAC is that it's about spatial, not just geospatial, and we haven't reached out yet to other spatial communities.
- 14:48:21 [ChrisLittle]
- Present+ ChrisLittle
- 14:49:00 [Linda]
- ... an approach to this could be to relabel it a geospatial thing.
- 14:50:38 [Linda]
- ... 'spatial data on the web - geospatial'
- 14:50:46 [Linda]
- ... and we could add other types of spatial later.
- 14:53:28 [Linda]
- Linda: I agree, we need to consider how to deal with this. There's non-geospatial use cases, but no-one from those use cases actively helping us.
- 14:53:52 [Linda]
- jtandy: a way to deal with this is to reach out and ask for help, and make clear that if no-one does, it will not end up in the BP.
- 14:54:07 [Linda]
- ... we can ask the chairs to do this outreach.
- 14:54:12 [Linda]
- +1
- 14:54:28 [ByronCinNZ]
- +1
- 14:54:37 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 14:54:50 [MattPerry]
- +1
- 14:55:20 [Linda]
- ACTION: ByronCinNZ to ask Ed and Kerry as chairs to reach out to spatial, but not geospatial people to help us with the BP.
- 14:55:20 [trackbot]
- Error finding 'ByronCinNZ'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/users>.
- 14:56:21 [Linda]
- ACTION: Byron Cochrane to ask Ed and Kerry as chairs to reach out to spatial, but not geospatial people to help us with the BP.
- 14:56:21 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-209 - Cochrane to ask ed and kerry as chairs to reach out to spatial, but not geospatial people to help us with the bp. [on Byron Cochrane - due 2016-10-19].
- 14:57:15 [jtandy]
- q?
- 14:57:24 [jtandy]
- q?
- 14:57:26 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 14:57:26 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/10/12-sdwbp-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 14:57:28 [jtandy]
- ack Linda
- 14:57:34 [Linda]
- jtandy: will communicate to the group about this plan.
- 14:57:54 [AndreaPerego]
- Thanks and bye
- 14:58:27 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 14:58:27 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/10/12-sdwbp-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 15:07:09 [jtandy]
- jtandy has joined #sdwbp
- 15:07:34 [jtandy]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 15:07:44 [jtandy]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 15:07:44 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/10/12-sdwbp-minutes.html jtandy
- 16:04:24 [jtandy]
- jtandy has joined #sdwbp
- 17:18:15 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #sdwbp
- 19:03:31 [jtandy]
- jtandy has joined #sdwbp
- 20:00:10 [billroberts]
- billroberts has joined #sdwbp
- 21:14:21 [billroberts]
- billroberts has joined #sdwbp