14:39:04 RRSAgent has joined #annotation 14:39:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/10/07-annotation-irc 14:39:06 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:39:06 Zakim has joined #annotation 14:39:08 Zakim, this will be 2666 14:39:08 ok, trackbot 14:39:09 Meeting: Web Annotation Working Group Teleconference 14:39:09 Date: 07 October 2016 14:39:26 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/03fe01d2201a$af1ba9f0$0d52fdd0$@illinois.edu 14:39:43 ivan has changed the topic to: Agenda 2016-10-07: http://www.w3.org/mid/03fe01d2201a$af1ba9f0$0d52fdd0$@illinois.edu 14:45:11 azaroth has joined #annotation 14:58:18 TimCole has joined #annotation 14:59:08 tbdinesh has joined #annotation 14:59:38 Jacob has joined #annotation 15:00:39 Present+ Rob_Sanderson 15:00:48 Present+ Jacob_Jett 15:01:19 Present+ TB_Dinesh 15:01:20 Present+ Tim_Cole 15:04:43 takeshi has joined #annotation 15:05:11 scribenick: Jacob 15:05:23 Present+ Ivan 15:05:44 Present+ Takeshi_Kanai 15:05:59 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Minutes of the previous call are approved: https://www.w3.org/2016/09/30-annotation-minutes.html 15:06:06 present+ ShaneM 15:06:27 RESOLUTION: Minutes of the previous call are approved: https://www.w3.org/2016/09/30-annotation-minutes.html 15:06:43 Topic: Announcements, Agenda items? 15:07:22 TimCole: (crickets) 15:07:40 Topic: Issue updates, if any? 15:08:03 ... a lot of editorial items have been cleaned up, was also the rights issue 15:08:31 azaroth: completed all of the non-internationalization issues after last week's call 15:08:44 ... getting to the last outstanding issue this afternoon 15:08:46 q+ 15:09:00 ... rights issue, doesn't need any changes or clarification 15:09:12 Regrets+ Ben_De_Meester 15:09:22 ... question revolving around "what is an annotation? how can rights be added to it?" 15:09:41 q? 15:09:44 TimCole: an example has been given, not sure what else we can add to it 15:09:44 ack ivan 15:10:09 ivan: also updated the content of the vocab and context documents 15:10:18 ... should be up to date wrt the editorial changes 15:10:43 ... were some problems with the initial internaitonalization report 15:10:58 ... think that those have been addressed, not certain if a new report has been generated 15:11:14 TimCole: regarding rights question, leave open for another week? 15:11:30 ivan: leave open for now, wait for Benjamin to answer 15:11:53 ... (internationalization) -- at the same level, when ready to move on 15:12:17 ... to final editorial rounds, then can send a note saying that we intend to close the issue 15:12:51 ... worth looking at one or two editorial issues from Richard 15:13:06 azaroth: #348 started with a simple change, then expanded 15:13:10 https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/348 15:13:46 ... suggestion is to use a unicode concept, but we're trying not to use unicode as a basis 15:14:02 TimCole: we had talked about inviting him to a call 15:14:53 ivan: invitation to Richard should come from one of the chairs 15:15:14 azaroth: traveling next week 15:15:18 I will not be on the call on the 28th - meetings in CA 15:15:38 TimCole: invite Richard for the meeting on the 28th (of October) 15:16:16 ... resolve internaitonalization issue 15:16:33 ... should connect via email to work through issue as much as possible beforehand 15:16:38 qq? 15:16:40 q? 15:16:59 Topic: Implementations 15:17:31 ... before the call started, was talking to Dinesh about his implementation 15:17:40 ... anyone else want to talk about implementations? 15:18:04 ... still worried that bodyValue isn't implemented by enough implementations 15:18:29 ... what happens if a not-at-risk property isn't used, wrt exiting CR 15:18:48 ivan: shouldn't have an effect 15:19:09 ... do we have any knowledge of anyone using it 15:19:28 ... we should ask and document that no one is using it before removing it 15:19:45 azaroth: wasn't in the CG model, so would have to be a new implementation 15:20:09 ... need to find out if anyone is using, but should be easy to validate via the list 15:20:34 TimCole: still haven't heard from Europeana 15:21:15 ... if tests are in shape then Rob can talk to them when he's there 15:21:46 ... examples of annotation collections in Rob's implementation 15:22:03 ... will be able to test them as soon as that test is ready 15:23:07 ... anyone else's implementations we're trying to work with for testing 15:23:47 ShaneM: Europeana, already in the test results folder 15:23:55 https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html 15:23:57 https://github.com/w3c/test-results/tree/gh-pages/annotation-model 15:25:11 ivan: Europeana not listed in the testing report 15:25:43 TimCole: any other implementers? 15:25:55 I neglected to push the updated report for some reason 15:26:00 azaroth: trying to get Pundit to test their's 15:26:20 it is up on the server now 15:26:24 TimCole: vocab testing, need to make sure that Greg reads the report, then we're done 15:26:31 https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html 15:26:42 azaroth: bug for the onto extraction from the vocab 15:27:08 ivan: need a report on protocol from Europeana 15:27:25 https://github.com/w3c/test-results/blob/gh-pages/annotation-model/EF-input/anno11.json is using bodyvalue 15:27:31 ShaneM: don't think they've done it yet 15:27:41 ... still need to make changes to the report generator 15:28:09 TimCole: Rob has an action to clean up an issue with the ontology 15:28:20 ... open issues on protocol testing? 15:28:55 ... Tim has an action on model testing to get the collections (and other) testing in place 15:29:14 ... after that's done, will have to go back address any fails in mandatory tests to 15:29:29 ... determine if they're fails in the test or fails in the implementation 15:29:44 ... then report rollup 15:30:00 Implementing the "rollup" is pretty simple I think. I just need a free hour. 15:30:42 Topic: CR Exit 15:30:43 ... Dinesh pointed out that one of the Europeana tests uses bodyValue, so that issue may go away afterall 15:31:33 ivan: once all testing, etc., is done, then republish the document and done 15:32:05 TimCole: should rerun tests once the schemas are fixed, but should also notify the implementers 15:32:24 I am fine with that 15:32:54 q+ 15:33:07 ack ivan 15:33:47 ivan: minor issue, good if at the director's call, if we provide details for who will manage 15:34:31 ... errata, can plug in the community group, restart a new community group to do that, need clear idea of how to handle errata 15:34:50 Topic: upcoming meetings 15:35:25 TimCole: broader issue (looking forward) -- start a new community group, tap into the old community group 15:35:38 ... who to manage / maintain the products of the CR 15:35:48 ... should be something the WG discusses 15:36:15 azaroth: shouldn't create new group, just go back to existing group 15:36:46 TimCole: can pole them to see if any objectors, should expect some change in membership over time 15:37:25 ivan: need to set up the fundamentals of who will manage errata 15:37:32 ... have a plan 15:37:45 TimCole: that will be a topic for one of the next meetings 15:37:53 I like this one: https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDFa_1.1._Errata 15:38:27 ... should try to make sure Paolo is available in capacity as co-chair (with Rob) of CG 15:39:20 ivan: question, when will html note be ready? need Rob to look at selector note 15:39:48 TimCole: another topic for future meetings, but may be able to switch to biweekly schedule 15:40:13 ... other topics? do we need to interact with other WGs? 15:40:50 ... Tim has an internationalization call and a notes call as the future calls for this WG 15:41:12 ... other business? 15:41:22 ... adjourne 15:42:03 zakim, bye 15:42:03 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Rob_Sanderson, Jacob_Jett, TB_Dinesh, Tim_Cole, Ivan, Takeshi_Kanai, ShaneM 15:42:03 Zakim has left #annotation 15:42:11 trackbot, end telcon 15:42:11 Zakim, list attendees 15:42:19 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:42:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/10/07-annotation-minutes.html trackbot 15:42:20 RRSAgent, bye 15:42:20 I see no action items