12:58:10 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #dwbp
12:58:10 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/09/09-dwbp-irc
12:58:12 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs 351
12:58:12 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #dwbp
12:58:14 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be DWBP
12:58:14 <Zakim> ok, trackbot
12:58:15 <trackbot> Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference
12:58:15 <trackbot> Date: 09 September 2016
12:58:19 <BernadetteLoscio> BernadetteLoscio has joined #dwbp
12:58:31 <hadleybeeman> Present+ hadleybeeman
13:01:14 <BernadetteLoscio> Present+ BernadetteLoscio
13:01:20 <hadleybeeman> Zakim, code?
13:01:20 <Zakim> I have been told this is DWBP
13:03:02 <eric_kauz> eric_kauz has joined #dwbp
13:03:12 <SumitPurohit> SumitPurohit has joined #DWBP
13:04:08 <BernadetteLoscio> I can hear you!
13:04:09 <Caroline_> Caroline_ has joined #DWBP
13:04:31 <Caroline_> Present+ Caroline_
13:05:10 <Caroline_> scribe: Caroline_
13:05:52 <hadleybeeman> https://www.w3.org/2016/08/26-dwbp-minutes
13:05:58 <hadleybeeman> Chair: Hadley
13:06:08 <Caroline_> Approve: Last week minutes https://www.w3.org/2016/08/26-dwbp-minutes
13:06:25 <Caroline_> s/Approve/PROPOSED
13:06:32 <hadleybeeman> +1
13:06:34 <BernadetteLoscio> +1
13:06:37 <newton> +0
13:06:43 <Caroline_> +1
13:06:53 <riccardoAlbertoni> riccardoAlbertoni has joined #DWBP
13:07:11 <hadleybeeman> hadleybeeman has changed the topic to: agenda https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160909
13:07:26 <Caroline_> Newton: about the evidences
13:07:35 <Caroline_> ... we don't have a lot of implementations yet
13:07:59 <Caroline_> ... we need to fill in the form as well, not let just the "testers" to do it
13:08:09 <riccardoAlbertoni> present+ riccardoAlbertoni
13:08:14 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: when is the deadline
13:08:20 <Caroline_> newton: September 26
13:08:21 <Caroline_> q+
13:08:40 <hadleybeeman> Present: eric_kauz
13:08:47 <newton> present+ newton
13:09:00 <hadleybeeman> Present+ eric_kauz
13:09:21 <Caroline_> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Dwbp-LC-implementationreport
13:09:41 <Caroline_> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n6tOphCLXLrzHrdyRUHVgrgx1YARdauBQBy9jSJXgDQ/edit#gid=0
13:10:24 <BernadetteLoscio> The group expects to satisfy its implementation criteria by 31 October 2016... from xueyuan@w3.org
13:10:46 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
13:11:27 <hadleybeeman> Ack berna
13:12:24 <Caroline_> BernadetteLoscio: I fully agree with Caroline that it is really important the members of the DWBP WG test the BPs as well
13:13:11 <Caroline_> ... during the meeting with the W3C Director - Philip - was mentioned to test the DB pedia
13:13:29 <hadleybeeman> S/Philip/Philippe
13:13:29 <newton> dbpedia, imbd..
13:13:43 <newton> maybe we could try Geonames as well
13:13:49 <Caroline_> s/DE pedia/dbpedia
13:14:07 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: we can try someone that I know from Wikipedia and also send a message to the group
13:14:36 <Caroline_> ... it would be good to contact someone in dbpedia and if they are not interested we can fill in the form
13:14:57 <Caroline_> BernadetteLoscio: we will contact them and if they don't want or don't respond we will do it
13:16:14 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: BernadetteLoscio and Caroline_ were talking about members of the working group testing as well
13:16:37 <Caroline_> ... it might be useful to send a reminder individually to some people in the WG
13:17:09 <riccardoAlbertoni> q+
13:17:15 <Caroline_> BernadetteLoscio: we caould also ask specific tasks. For example, Annette could test many of the BPs related to APIs
13:17:30 <hadleybeeman> Ack carol
13:17:35 <hadleybeeman> Acc riccardoAlbertoni
13:17:50 <Caroline_> riccardoAlbertoni: part of the people of the WG are also data provider
13:17:53 <hadleybeeman> Present+ riccardoAlbertoni
13:18:07 <Caroline_> ... I am going to check some of the BPs in our datasets and probably implement the BPs in our datasets
13:18:29 <Caroline_> ... it is important to send emails to the WG member asking to let us know if they are implementing
13:18:30 <Caroline_> q+
13:18:39 <Caroline_> ack riccardoAlbertoni
13:18:41 <hadleybeeman> Acc r
13:18:52 <Caroline_> ... also it is important to check if there are critical BPs
13:19:18 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: we may well find some that wre difficult to find implementation for
13:19:32 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
13:19:33 <Caroline_> ... if no one is doing we have to decide what to do with later
13:19:45 <hadleybeeman> Acc c
13:20:18 <riccardoAlbertoni> to Caroline wonderful!
13:20:23 <newton> Caroline_: is dealing with this action. she will send message to the group
13:20:28 <hadleybeeman> Ack b
13:20:36 <hadleybeeman> Ack C
13:20:37 <newton> ... and ask them to implement and test some specific best practices
13:21:15 <Caroline_> BernadetteLoscio: in the begginig we understood that we only had to check evidences
13:21:26 <Caroline_> ... now we have this task to check if there is a BP
13:21:28 <hadleybeeman> S/begining/beginning
13:21:34 <riccardoAlbertoni> q+
13:21:46 <Caroline_> ... if nobody implements a specify BP maybe it is not a BP
13:22:00 <Caroline_> ... the fact of implementing a BP is enough?
13:22:02 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: I think so
13:22:18 <Caroline_> ... when we were talking wheather or not a BP could be tested
13:22:41 <Caroline_> ... we were trying to see if the BPs are "testable"
13:23:11 <Caroline_> ... so we tried to write the BPs very specific about testing and showing the implementors / publishers how to use that BP
13:23:27 <Caroline_> ... now we also have to gather evidences to check if the BP is really a BP
13:23:34 <Caroline_> BernadetteLoscio: it does make sense
13:24:02 <Caroline_> ... what is going to happen if we find BP that is possible to implement, but no one is actually doing that
13:24:05 <Caroline_> ... /.
13:24:11 <Caroline_> ... ?
13:24:14 <riccardoAlbertoni> q-
13:24:20 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: the WG will have to decide what to do
13:24:32 <Caroline_> BernadetteLoscio: I was wondering if it would be a problem to move on
13:24:40 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: it is a problem if no one implements it
13:24:55 <hadleybeeman> Q?
13:24:57 <newton> q+
13:24:59 <Caroline_> ... it would be legal if we can implement it but if no one is actually using the group has to decide what to do
13:25:10 <newton> schema.org
13:25:33 <Caroline_> newton: just wondering if schema.org could be tested?
13:25:41 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: yes! by all mean you can look at them
13:25:54 <Caroline_> newton: thank you! we will test them as well
13:26:03 <BernadetteLoscio> ;)
13:27:54 <riccardoAlbertoni> sorry
13:28:12 <newton> sorry, hadleybeeman :(
13:29:05 <riccardoAlbertoni> bye!
13:29:13 <newton> bye!
13:29:14 <BernadetteLoscio> bye!
13:29:24 <hadleybeeman> RRSAgent, make logs public