14:00:59 RRSAgent has joined #sdwbp 14:00:59 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/09/07-sdwbp-irc 14:01:01 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:01:01 Zakim has joined #sdwbp 14:01:03 Zakim, this will be SDW 14:01:03 ok, trackbot 14:01:04 Meeting: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference 14:01:04 Date: 07 September 2016 14:01:14 present+ jtandy 14:01:30 ClemensPortele has joined #sdwbp 14:01:44 present+ eparsons 14:01:59 present+ Payam 14:03:39 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20160907 14:04:03 BartvanLeeuwen has joined #sdwbp 14:04:23 scribe: eparsons 14:04:37 ClausStadler has joined #sdwbp 14:05:19 present+ ClemensPortele 14:05:40 AndreaPerego has joined #sdwbp 14:05:49 topic: approve last meetings minutes 14:05:56 roba has joined #sdwbp 14:06:15 ByronCinNZ_ has joined #sdwbp 14:06:25 PROPOSED : Approve last week's minutes 14:06:33 present+ ByronCinNZ 14:06:35 http://www.w3.org/2016/08/31-sdw-minutes 14:06:42 present+ roba 14:06:46 +1 14:06:47 +1 14:06:50 +0 (wasn't there) 14:06:54 +1 14:06:56 +1 14:06:57 MattPerry has joined #sdwbp 14:07:08 RESOLUTION : Approve last week's minutes 14:07:11 topic: patent call 14:07:33 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call 14:07:44 present+ BartvanLeeuwen 14:07:46 present+ MattPerry 14:08:20 present+ ScottSimmons 14:08:25 topic: BP document status 14:08:27 jtandy - 1st thing... BP doc status 14:09:12 jtandy Doc not changed from last week... many threads via email over last week however 14:09:36 present+ AndreaPerego 14:09:55 jtandy time consuming so docs not up to date.. 14:10:56 jtandy Flooding scenario expanded however for particular actors results in around 12 cases studies... 14:11:32 present+ ClausStadler 14:11:56 jtandy - one of these where is your data, then what is your data, what format etc - so linear workflow 14:12:25 jtandy - Difficult to do, but will be published in next 24hrs - Good Idea ? 14:12:33 q? 14:15:40 eparsons - Seems good keeps the doc practical 14:16:27 jtandy - often not possible to suggest one solution 14:16:58 jtandy - editors are creating content rather than editing at the moment 14:17:16 jtandy - new stuff from linda will come before TPAC 14:17:40 topic: TPAC agenda for BP session 14:17:51 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:F2F4-best-practice-agenda-scratch-pad 14:18:00 jtandy - scratch page... 14:18:43 jtandy Linda & BartvanLeeuwen & jtandy have made a few points 14:19:57 jtandy - talks through list.... 14:20:09 jtandy - Sound Good ? 14:20:14 +1 14:20:26 the list sounds good to me 14:20:30 jtandy Agenda will be made from list 14:20:30 q? 14:20:37 +1 14:20:44 +1 14:20:55 +1 14:21:15 -1 14:21:15 +1 14:21:19 -1 14:21:22 jtandy - Can you +1 / -1 your attendance at TPAC 14:21:22 +0.5 14:21:25 +1 14:21:27 +1 14:21:27 +1 14:21:30 -1 14:21:34 -1 but can dial in 14:21:40 +1 14:21:46 -1 but can dial in 14:21:52 ClemensPortele 0.5 = might be there 14:22:02 -1 will dial in 14:23:20 topic: Coordinate Reference Systems 14:23:52 http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/ 14:24:00 Payam Several discussions re coordinate systems - added a note 14:24:28 Payam Note - Intro and summary of discussion 14:24:57 Payam issue should we allow multiple coordinate systems 14:25:32 Payam Note as intro and then BP with more details 14:25:47 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EO70CvPJWg_dWcmgrzElUQMe6IK5OTry5S291ALQoKo/edit 14:28:08 Payam use eparsons doc and note as starting point... something ready for TPAC 14:29:13 jtandy an extension of our default CRS discussion.. 14:30:54 q? 14:30:58 q+ 14:31:07 +q 14:31:10 ack ByronCinNZ_ 14:31:15 jtandy - So recognise that the use of different CRS is OK 14:31:59 ByronCinNZ_ Lots on the topic 4326 is an OK default - not always useful however 14:32:26 ByronCinNZ_ Many reasons to use a different CRS however 14:32:41 q+ 14:33:24 jtandy We suggest people make a choice of data encoding, etc CRS another choice 14:34:06 ByronCinNZ_ GeoJSON use of WGS84 not popular with some standards organisations 14:34:23 q? 14:34:29 ack Payam 14:36:07 q+ 14:36:23 Payam - several mails on using multiple CRS - is this really a BP? 14:36:24 ack roba 14:37:02 roba Issue not multiple.. but identification of CRS 14:37:05 q- 14:37:13 +1 to roba 14:37:19 q+ 14:37:54 ByronCinNZ_ Identification needs BP, multiple does not ? 14:37:55 q? 14:38:12 ack ByronCinNZ_ 14:38:26 roba issue if multiple and can't tell them which is whcih 14:39:11 Sound issues 14:39:22 q? 14:39:57 ByronCinNZ_ - Need to be more precise with language.. 14:40:22 ByronCinNZ_ WGS84 is not really a CRS on it's own... 14:40:42 jtandy WGS-84 is the datum... 14:40:50 topic: Resolving open discussion threads 14:41:01 jtandy 5 in 20 mins 14:41:11 > describing properties that change over time 14:41:40 jtandy thread in agenda - but long... summary coming 14:42:46 jtandy - if thing changes we can use versions of geometry or position is dependent variable in time series coverage ? 14:42:51 q? 14:42:52 q+ 14:42:57 ack eparsons 14:46:03 jtandy - Clarifies both approaches are suggested.. 14:46:14 q+ 14:47:21 ack ByronCinNZ_ 14:47:44 roba Works when there is a authority to id features, eg. a vehicle 14:47:55 q? 14:47:59 ByronCinNZ_ GPS tracks > GPX apprach 14:48:35 topic : indirect identifiers 14:48:53 roba jtandy email is a good summary 14:49:09 roba feels over complicated to redirect 14:49:11 Jeremy's (great) summary: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Sep/0096.html 14:49:16 here's the summary of the thread: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Sep/0096.html 14:49:48 roba many different angles - stability, representations, naming ... 14:50:14 roba difficult to conflate if representation is the same as "the thing" 14:51:07 roba redirect to url creates implicit relationship so - sameas ? 14:52:32 jtandy Long thread... worth reading !! 14:56:22 jtandy - Read summary 14:57:18 jtandy architecture of web 101 talks about indirect identification - Nadia's mail box is actually talking about Nadia 14:57:49 relative positioning, describing "fuzzy" spatial things and Linear Referencing 14:58:15 jtandy topic : relative positions, fuzzy boundaries , LR 14:58:45 jtandy help needed for spatial relations - topological relations 14:59:13 jtandy topological relations - which ones ?? 14:59:39 jtandy relative location relations ? North 35m for example ? 15:00:31 jtandy add to TPAC discussion... 15:01:31 jtandy ANOB ? 15:01:38 thx jtandy eparsons 15:01:44 bye 15:02:04 Thanks, and bye! 15:02:11 thanks and bye 15:02:12 thanks - bye 15:02:12 bye all 15:02:14 Bye 15:02:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:02:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/09/07-sdwbp-minutes.html eparsons 15:02:59 AndreaPerego has joined #sdwbp 15:03:10 will do waiting for you ? 15:04:05 Enjoy CH jtandy 15:56:58 Payam has joined #sdwbp 16:48:35 Payam has joined #sdwbp 16:52:43 Payam has joined #sdwbp 16:54:36 eparsons has joined #sdwbp 17:02:24 Zakim has left #sdwbp