15:40:46 RRSAgent has joined #apa 15:40:46 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/09/07-apa-irc 15:40:48 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:40:50 Zakim, this will be 15:40:50 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 15:40:51 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 15:40:51 Date: 07 September 2016 15:41:01 agenda? 15:41:10 zakim, clear agenda 15:41:10 agenda cleared 15:41:15 agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes 15:41:15 agenda+ TPAC Planning https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2016 15:41:15 agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8 15:41:15 agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html 15:41:16 agenda+ EME Update http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Aug/0079.html 15:41:18 agenda+ Horizontal Review Discussion Planning https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2016/SessionIdeas#Horizontal_review_summit 15:41:21 agenda+ Other Business 15:41:23 agenda+ next and future meetings 15:41:26 agenda+ be done 15:53:30 present+ Janina 15:53:34 Chair: Janina 15:56:40 TedDRake has joined #apa 15:56:54 Hi, Ted. Let's hope this approach is more stable! 15:57:08 have you been watching me connect and drop off? 15:57:19 Actually, not seeing you until now 15:57:43 I couldn't maintain a connection via limechat, so I'm on the web version. 15:58:09 Don't know that client. I use irssi in linux console 15:58:35 Probably 15:58:59 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 16:00:26 LJWatson has joined #apa 16:00:41 present+ LJWatson 16:02:42 fesch has joined #apa 16:02:56 present+ fesch 16:03:37 s/Probably// 16:04:06 s/Don't know that client. I use irssi in linux console// 16:04:23 s/I couldn't maintain a connection via limechat, so I'm on the web version.// 16:05:36 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #apa 16:06:16 present+ MichaelC 16:07:05 present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 16:07:16 zakim, pick a victim 16:07:16 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Joanmarie_Diggs 16:07:40 zakim, pick a victim 16:07:40 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose MichaelC 16:07:47 zakim, pick a victim 16:07:47 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Rich_Schwerdtfeger 16:08:10 scribe: Rich 16:08:18 zakim, next item 16:08:18 agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina] 16:08:27 q+ 16:08:40 janina: EME refuses to die. 16:08:52 janina: there is some additional discussion around TPAC 16:09:06 janina: any modifications to the agenda? 16:09:14 michael: I have some 2 minute stuff 16:09:27 -> http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-wg-2016.html WoT draft charter 16:09:41 michael: the web of things working group is wanting to add a liaison statement to apa 16:09:58 michael: is there an accessibility api for the web of things? 16:10:18 Ryladog has joined #apa 16:10:40 rich: are WoT and IoT the same? 16:10:46 Present+ Katie_Haritos-Shea 16:10:51 michael: no WoT is a layer above 16:10:59 JF has joined #apa 16:11:01 q= 16:11:08 present+ JF 16:11:27 katie: the web of things has their own kind of browser and authoring tools 16:11:42 katie: we need to discuss the components we have concerns about 16:11:48 -> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Web_of_Things APA wiki on WoT 16:12:32 rich: let’s wait for the meeting at TPAC 16:12:53 michael: we can wait to the tpac meeting before responding to their charter 16:13:01 Ryladog_ has joined #apa 16:13:03 Q+ 16:13:34 ack JF 16:13:51 janina: we need a section in their charter to discuss accessibility - we should get to standard templates. this would include security as well 16:14:17 katie: We know we need a mode of operation that includes accessible templates 16:14:29 Q+ 16:14:36 q+ 16:14:46 ack me 16:14:48 janina: we don’t have to do a deep dive now 16:15:00 q? 16:15:06 ack JF 16:15:06 ack jf 16:15:25 jf: I have been very interested int WoT - in particular home automation 16:15:55 jf: often the common denominator is the browser 16:16:06 ack ri 16:17:10 rich: we should discuss address the charter prior to tpac. 16:17:40 michael: we need to address the charter prior to tpac 16:18:21 rich: will the platform include ATs? 16:19:23 michael: should I request the accessibility impact paragraph? 16:19:30 -> https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/audio-2016.html Draft Audio charter 16:19:32 janina: yes 16:19:42 rich: I think UIs will be multi-modal 16:20:42 Michael: We need to be able to say why we need an impact section 16:21:16 Janina: we should require an accessibility impact statement form everybody 16:21:40 zakem, next item 16:21:46 zakim, next item 16:21:46 agendum 2. "TPAC Planning https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2016" taken up [from janina] 16:22:20 janina: our agenda is forming. There are some spots left open. We will have this WoT conversation but I don’t know when 16:22:35 Janina: We will be meeting with the authentication people 16:22:43 Janina: We will be talking about COGA 16:23:17 Janina: Are there other topics we need to have at TPAC? 16:23:35 Janina: CSS is Tuesday morning first thing 16:23:58 JF: Are we meeting with the WCAG working group? 16:24:14 JF: They are working on WCAG 2.1 and Silver 16:24:37 Michael: Andrew said something about a social event outside formal meeting time. 16:25:02 Michael: I don’t see a need for joint meeting time with WCAG 16:25:11 zakim, next item 16:25:11 agendum 3. "Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8" taken up [from janina] 16:25:27 Michael: Action-2084? 16:25:38 Michael: vibration API 16:25:47 ACTION-2084? 16:25:47 ACTION-2084 -- Ted Drake to Work with janina to draft an a11y considerations section for the vibration api -- due 2016-08-31 -- OPEN 16:25:47 http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2084 16:26:25 Ted: there are preference requirements for personalization 16:26:43 Ted: pages with a specific origin. … 16:27:01 janina: can you take a stab at a draft? 16:27:05 Ted: yes 16:27:31 action-2084 due 1 week 16:27:31 Set action-2084 Work with janina to draft an a11y considerations section for the vibration api due date to 2016-09-14. 16:27:54 ACTION-2083? 16:27:54 ACTION-2083 -- Ted Drake to Review deviceorientation event specification https://www.w3.org/tr/orientation-event/ -- due 2016-08-31 -- OPEN 16:27:54 http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2083 16:28:15 Ted: I looked at this and there was nothing in the spec. that had to do with accessibility 16:28:35 Ted: Someone could detect device orientation changes to detect a tremor 16:28:55 JF: I did not see anything applicable here for accessibility 16:28:59 close action-2083 16:28:59 Closed action-2083. 16:29:01 close action-2082 16:29:01 Closed action-2082. 16:29:15 ACTION-2081? 16:29:15 ACTION-2081 -- Michael Cooper to See if web app manifest comments are dealt with https://www.w3.org/wai/apa/wiki/web_app_manifest -- due 2016-08-17 -- OPEN 16:29:15 http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2081 16:29:22 michael: still open 16:29:37 ACTION-2085? 16:29:37 ACTION-2085 -- Fred Esch to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/shacl-abstract-syntax/ shacl core abstract syntax and semantics -- due 2016-09-07 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:29:37 http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2085 16:29:48 Action-2069? 16:29:48 Action-2069 -- Michael Cooper to Follow up on http://www.w3.org/tr/media-source/ media source extensions -- due 2016-08-04 -- OPEN 16:29:48 http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2069 16:30:16 Michael: action 2069 - Fred to review 16:30:29 Fred: no UI impact. We do not need to review it 16:30:47 action-2085 16:30:47 action-2085 -- Fred Esch to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/shacl-abstract-syntax/ shacl core abstract syntax and semantics -- due 2016-09-07 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:30:47 http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2085 16:31:14 close action-2085 16:31:14 Closed action-2085. 16:31:15 RESOLUTION: no comments to file for action 2085 16:32:07 janina: matrix on why we made decisions on aria-details, etc. 16:32:37 janina: discovery of aria-details by non-AT users 16:33:52 leonie: browsers are not interested in a corresponding attribute in html as it applies to aria-details 16:34:34 leonie: it might be good to give David Singers view on the HTML text 16:34:39 Q+ 16:34:39 action: cooper to sign, seal, and deliver the extended description matrix https://www.w3.org/2015/08/extended-description-analysis 16:34:40 Created ACTION-2089 - Sign, seal, and deliver the extended description matrix https://www.w3.org/2015/08/extended-description-analysis [on Michael Cooper - due 2016-09-14]. 16:35:16 leonie: david singer was not abashed at the browsers changing the UI. 16:35:32 janina: we need to take the past history off limits 16:36:44 http://github.com/w3c/html/issues/561 16:36:59 zakim, next item 16:36:59 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, richardschwerdtfeger 16:37:18 michael: there are spec. changes that we are actively working on 16:37:47 michael: there are specifications that we were required to riview. one was ambient light. 16:38:10 Michael: that is it for spec. review for this week 16:38:14 zakim, next item 16:38:14 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, richardschwerdtfeger 16:38:18 q? 16:38:22 ack jf 16:38:30 zakim, next item 16:38:30 agendum 4. "new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html" taken up [from janina] 16:38:39 zakim, close this item 16:38:39 agendum 4 closed 16:38:40 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:38:40 6. Horizontal Review Discussion Planning https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2016/SessionIdeas#Horizontal_review_summit [from janina] 16:38:42 zakim, next item 16:38:42 agendum 6. "Horizontal Review Discussion Planning https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2016/SessionIdeas#Horizontal_review_summit" taken up [from janina] 16:39:49 janina: we have talked about certain requirements that would help them do due diligence. 16:40:03 Janina: what a perfect topic for TPAC 16:40:18 -> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2016/SessionIdeas#Horizontal_review_summit Horizontal Review Summit proposal 16:40:36 Janina; we would like to be able to plan our work vs. having to firefight 16:40:50 Janina: we will try to get other groups to join us 16:41:05 janina: we do have things we would like to bring to the table 16:41:23 janina: standard process ideas would be good to agree on 16:41:49 janina: the idea is to us to get other groups to get this part of the process to be well defined. 16:42:39 janina: the reason horizontal review is good is it puts an identifiable spot in any spec where accessibility is called out. This way people don’t have to go through the whole spec. to find the accessibility work. 16:42:54 janina: this is important for implementors as well as those creating the standards 16:42:55 Ryladog has joined #apa 16:43:07 janina: it might say “no impact’ 16:43:14 q? 16:43:22 q? 16:43:46 michael: I am hoping that we talk to other groups about practices 16:44:01 michael: horizontal groups are talking about establishing a checklist 16:44:18 michael: I am hoping to reinvigorate the work 16:44:30 michael: we need to discuss best practices 16:44:52 q? 16:45:04 michael: We want to define best practices so that groups address accessibility in horizontal review where the groups reach out for horizontal review 16:45:11 Q+ 16:45:25 ack jf 16:45:28 michael: if we can share pain points and solutions it will improve horizontal review 16:45:49 JF: what is the possibility of setting a horizontal review email to request horizontal reviews 16:46:09 JF: this would be an alias mailing list 16:46:27 JF: there is one for announcements. So we could talk with that group 16:46:32 q? 16:46:55 JF: If we had a specific email address that people could post to it might put a spotlight on it 16:46:56 TPAC Question: I have learned on the interweb that Uber functions in Lisbon, can anybody confirm this? 16:47:01 q? 16:47:11 RRSAgent, make log public 16:47:17 chair: Janina 16:47:22 zakim, close this item 16:47:22 agendum 6 closed 16:47:23 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:47:23 7. Other Business [from janina] 16:47:30 zakim, take up item 5 16:47:30 agendum 5. "EME Update http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Aug/0079.html" taken up [from janina] 16:47:35 -> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-review-announce/ Review Announce list 16:47:51 Janina: we came to conclusion that there was no issue 16:48:06 Janina: then I start hearing from management that they are not convinced we don’t have an issue 16:48:28 Janina: we need to check back with management 16:48:51 JF: can we get a clear articulation of the issue 16:49:01 Janina: I am trying to to do that 16:49:21 zakim, next item 16:49:21 agendum 7. "Other Business" taken up [from janina] 16:49:57 katie: I just wanted to know if anyone knows if Uber runs in Lisbon 16:51:35 https://www.w3.org/wiki/MeetingTaxis 16:52:05 https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g189158-i203-k9379620-Uber_questions-Lisbon_Lisbon_District_Central_Portugal.html 16:54:12 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:54:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/09/07-apa-minutes.html richardschwerdtfeger 16:55:11 fesch has left #apa 16:55:14 zakim, bye 16:55:14 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Janina, Joanmarie_Diggs, LJWatson, fesch, MichaelC, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Katie_Haritos-Shea, JF 16:55:14 Zakim has left #apa 16:55:20 rrsagent, make minutes 16:55:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/09/07-apa-minutes.html janina 16:56:42 JF has left #apa 16:59:18 richardschwerdtfeger has left #apa 17:12:18 jamesn has joined #apa 17:24:57 LJWatson has left #apa 19:45:52 chaals has joined #apa 21:48:50 jamesn has joined #apa