IRC log of silver on 2016-07-21
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:13:06 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #silver
- 13:13:06 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/07/21-silver-irc
- 13:13:41 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #silver
- 13:19:42 [jeanne_]
- jeanne_ has joined #silver
- 13:20:27 [Lauriat]
- Lauriat has joined #silver
- 13:20:35 [jeanne]
- agenda+ coordinating communication
- 13:20:49 [SarahHorton]
- SarahHorton has joined #silver
- 13:21:25 [jeanne]
- group reviews how we communicate and how we will document publicly the activities of the group.
- 13:21:42 [jeanne]
- ... brainstorming and creative work will be done in google docs
- 13:21:57 [jeanne]
- ... agenda and minutes will be published to the WCAG WG
- 13:24:27 [jeanne]
- ... this is the last call in Skype. Next week we will be meeting on WebEx.
- 13:32:30 [jeanne]
- agenda+ Timelines
- 13:33:02 [jeanne]
- Jeanne: I haven't spoken with Andrew yet
- 13:33:54 [jeanne]
- ... what I expect is that we should send the proposals to the WCAG WG before TPAC to allow discussion on the mailing list
- 13:35:34 [jeanne]
- ... Joshue previously said that Silver would be on the agenda at TPAC, so we should plan on presenting and discussing there.
- 13:35:55 [jeanne]
- agenda+ Project goals
- 13:36:01 [jeanne]
- zakim, take up item 2
- 13:36:01 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Timelines" taken up [from jeanne]
- 13:36:14 [jeanne]
- [prior discussion above]
- 13:36:19 [jeanne]
- zakim, take up item 3
- 13:36:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Project goals" taken up [from jeanne]
- 13:37:09 [jeanne]
- Shawn: Reviews email from AWK
- 13:37:42 [jeanne]
- Silver sub group should consider possible update models for sIlver (3.0, 3.1, etc)
- 13:37:42 [jeanne]
- Silver sub group should collect and consider possible models for combining WCAG/UAAG/ATAG under one banner
- 13:37:42 [jeanne]
- Silver sub group should develop plan to gather feedback on needs for Silver from users/authors/user agent vendors/industry
- 13:38:18 [jeanne]
- Shawn: Feedback channels should be timely, continuous, checked afterwards, and be diverse
- 13:38:52 [jeanne]
- ... the content of Silver itself should include feedback from the feedback channels
- 13:39:21 [jeanne]
- ... Silver should look at the structure and process of other applicable standards
- 13:40:05 [jeanne]
- ... in my experience, the W3C process may be public, but it is such a wall of information, it is prohibitively expensive to learn what is really going on.
- 13:40:39 [jeanne]
- ... for example, app creaters need to know the information, but they typically have no idea what is going on.
- 13:40:50 [jeanne]
- ... we need a predictable and sensible update model
- 13:41:43 [jeanne]
- ... which is why I want to include standards that have been around for a while and have predictable models. This is where I want to include input from legal and policy professionals.
- 13:42:38 [jeanne]
- ... but has to be understandable by the people who use it.
- 13:43:35 [jeanne]
- Jeanne: This is an important point for me -- I realize that we have to serve the legal and policy audience, but they should not be primary audience that we serve.
- 13:44:35 [jeanne]
- Sarah: We should consult with experts who have experience with developing other accessibility standards, especially people with UX experience designing standards.
- 13:45:11 [jeanne]
- ... thinking about the nature of standards and what makes them useful.
- 13:45:29 [jeanne]
- Shawn: We should make a list of people that we want to interview and include
- 13:45:50 [jeanne]
- ... include standards that do not necessarily include digital or electronic media
- 13:46:29 [jeanne]
- ... for example, the NYC standard for retrofitting older buildings to meet accessibility standards
- 13:47:03 [jeanne]
- ... look at standards that are easily communicatable across all our audiences.
- 13:50:25 [jeanne]
- Shawn: We could have a continuous feedback group, and reach out to people who could be in the group.
- 13:52:33 [jeanne]
- action: Sarah will ask another person to join the group
- 13:54:40 [jeanne]
- action: Sarah will ask a UK UX person to be interviewed.
- 13:56:49 [jeanne]
- Shawn: I want to see us developing a pool of people that we want to get feedback and comments from.
- 13:57:38 [jeanne]
- s/Shawn: Feedback channels should be timely, continuous, checked afterwards, and be diverse/Shawn: Goal: Feedback channels should be timely, continuous, checked afterwards, and be diverse
- 13:58:31 [jeanne]
- Goal: Informed decision-making drives the Silver process and content
- 13:58:46 [jeanne]
- ... include feedback from other channgels
- 13:59:32 [jeanne]
- ... look at other standards - comparative analysis technique and do an analysis and use them for moving forward.
- 14:00:38 [jeanne]
- ... we want to talk to people: focus groups, 1-1 interviews, surveys to collect insights, observe people using the tools (because there is a gap between what people say they want and how they actually do it).
- 14:01:37 [jeanne]
- Goal: Perspectives of people who use WCAG are considered
- 14:05:34 [jeanne]
- ... user centered design, participatory design, design thinking. We want to include all of them, but want to focus on design thinking.
- 14:06:53 [jeanne]
- Goal: Think about WCAG over the long term
- 14:07:25 [jeanne]
- ... establishing a viable update channel is part of that .
- 14:07:46 [jeanne]
- Goal: User community and stakeholders are committed to success
- 14:08:03 [jeanne]
- ... keeping the community informed as to the process
- 14:09:48 [jeanne]
- Sarah: I thinking we should do a project charter -- not a WCAG charter, we may need to call it something else. It includes goals, stakeholders, audience, and measurements of success.
- 14:10:09 [jeanne]
- action: Sarah to draft a Project Charter
- 14:11:49 [jeanne]
- agenda+ Brainstorming documet review
- 14:11:54 [jeanne]
- zakim, take up next
- 14:11:54 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "coordinating communication" taken up [from jeanne]
- 14:12:03 [jeanne]
- zakim, take up next
- 14:12:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 was just opened, jeanne
- 14:12:20 [jeanne]
- Topic: Brainstorming review
- 14:23:47 [jeanne]
- action: Jeanne, with Shawn and Sarah to create a questions list and each add questions to the list.
- 14:29:30 [jeanne]
- Jeanne will draft some charter language to talk about next week.
- 14:29:46 [jeanne]
- action: Jeanne will draft some charter language to talk about next week.
- 14:30:16 [jeanne]
- review of some of the questions on a brainstorming list.
- 14:31:26 [jeanne]
- regrets for next week from Sarah for Tuesday.
- 14:31:33 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 14:31:48 [jeanne]
- present+ Jeanne, Sarah, Shawn
- 14:31:59 [jeanne]
- meeting: Silver subgroup
- 14:32:32 [jeanne]
- chair: working meeting, not chaired
- 14:32:51 [jeanne]
- chair: working_meeting_no_chair
- 14:33:07 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:33:07 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/07/21-silver-minutes.html jeanne
- 14:35:32 [jeanne]
- s/chair: working_meeting_no_chair//
- 14:35:41 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:35:41 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/07/21-silver-minutes.html jeanne